[00:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dcraw [source] (noble-proposed) [9.28-5ubuntu1] [00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs102 [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [102.15.1-3ubuntu2] (no packageset) [00:02] vorlon: No worries. :) [00:04] cam.c:100:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'PMTDoesNeedDecypting'; did you mean 'PMTDoesNeedDecrypting'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] [00:04] how does any of this stuff work [00:04] Bubblegum and duct tape, kinda like how my high school was held together. [00:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs102 [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [102.15.1-3ubuntu2] (no packageset) [00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs102 [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [102.15.1-3ubuntu2] (no packageset) [00:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs102 [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [102.15.1-3ubuntu2] (no packageset) [00:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dvbstreamer (noble-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-5.6build2 => 2.1.0-5.6ubuntu1] (no packageset) [00:17] mclemenceau_: THERE we go.https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/452/builds/299172/testcases [00:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dvbstreamer [source] (noble-proposed) [2.1.0-5.6ubuntu1] [00:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs102 [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [102.15.1-3ubuntu2] (no packageset) [00:47] vorlon: is https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/gSTHF4cdJQ/ still the list? [00:48] looking at dx [00:54] uh this includes bison output but not .y file? [01:08] testing a fix for dx in my ppa [01:08] looking at dynamips [01:08] it migrated [01:08] ecmwflibs [01:09] mwhudson: it is [01:09] mwhudson: yeah I looked at dx and walked away [01:09] was inclined to delete that one [01:09] ectrans [01:09] well i have a lame patch now [01:10] lol acl2 is still building on armhf [01:11] :/ [01:11] ImportError: /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libodccore.so.0d: undefined symbol: _ZNK5eckit10DataHandle23requiredMoverAttributesB5cxx11Ev [01:12] not something that inspires happy thoughts [01:12] ectrans failure implies some kind of cmake fortran breakage [01:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ectrans (noble-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1build1 => 1.3.0-2] (no packageset) (sync) [01:12] Imported target "fiat" includes non-existent path [01:12] "/usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/fortran/aarch64-linux-gnu-gfortran-13/fiat" [01:12] that's eckit::DataHandle::requiredMoverAttributes[abi:cxx11]() const [01:12] in its INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES. [01:15] i bet this build is broken on amd64 now, let's find out [01:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ectrans [sync] (noble-proposed) [1.3.0-2] [01:17] why does a firmware package even have an autopkgtest [01:17] nope. alternative theory: some build dep didn't build on arm64 and ppc64el [01:31] zing https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/odc/1.5.0-2 [01:31] right well fiat-ecmwf ships broken cmake [01:31] /usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/cmake/fiat/fiat-targets.cmake: INTERFACE_INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES "${_IMPORT_PREFIX}/include;/usr/include/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/fiat;${_IMPORT_PREFIX}/include;/usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/fortran/powerpc64le-linux-gnu-gfortran-13/fiat" [01:31] oh ffs dh_strip is failing? [01:32] oh [01:32] debian/rules:30: warning: overriding recipe for target 'override_dh_dwz' [01:32] /usr/share/debhelper/dh-fortran/fortran-support.mk:154: warning: ignoring old recipe for target 'override_dh_dwz' [01:33] hm not really sure what's going on [01:53] hm maybe this is patchelf's fault [01:54] seems like a mess [01:54] vorlon: what's the current policy on "this is all garbage" packages in this list? [01:54] epic5 next [01:55] omg we still package epic? I dunno if that's neat or scary :) [01:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mozjs102 [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [102.15.1-3ubuntu2] (no packageset) [02:12] casper passed w/ itself so skiptesting it w/ ubiquity [02:15] still waiting on tests for gnome-session though [02:24] testing fix for epic5, moving on to esniper [02:29] esniper migrated, on to fcitx-anthy [02:32] i think the fcitx{,5}-* stuff has either migrated or would without the block [02:32] onto fckit [02:46] fckit is same patchelf lossage [02:52] fdb is too (transitively) [02:53] fizmo-sdl2 [02:54] that migrated [02:57] flightgear [02:58] looks ok now [02:58] flocq is blocked on coq [02:58] not sure what the story is for that though [02:58] it's only a ncr so maybe coq can be hinted? [03:00] coq is already a candidate but it's ocaml so everything is an abi change and there were some of the revdeps that were still catching up [03:00] skipped: coq-unicoq coq-mtac2 coq coq-bignums coqprime coq-corn coq-math-classes coq-interval coquelicot ssreflect mathcomp-multinomials coqeal mathcomp-real-closed mathcomp-bigenough mathcomp-analysis mathcomp-finmap coq-elpi mathcomp-algebra-tactics mathcomp-zify coq-hierarchy-builder paramcoq coq-reglang coq-deriving coq-extructures coq-quickchick coq-ext-lib coq-simple-io coq-relation-algebra [03:00] aac-tactics flocq coq-gappa coq-dpdgraph coq-stdpp coq-iris coq-hammer ott coq-libhyps coq-record-update coq-hott coq-equations coq-reduction-effects coq-menhirlib (29, 0, 1910) [03:00] got: 1196+0: a-760:a-15:a-361:i-16:p-15:r-13:s-16 [03:01] * s390x: libcoq-unimath [03:02] favourite genre of failure: configure checks that fail because of -Werror=implicit-function-declaration [03:02] (looking at foxeye btw) [03:02] and that takes 3 days to build on riscv64 so I'm going to temporarily remove that binary there [03:03] mwhudson: "this is all garbage" just have us remove it [03:04] vorlon: there is a cluster of fail where patchelf on !amd64 causes strip to fail [03:04] are they all fortran? [03:04] vorlon: so far affecting fckit, odb, fdb, ecmwflibs [03:04] vorlon: i think so [03:04] no idea what the dependency chain of these packages is like [03:05] yeah for some reason dh-mod-fortran sets the soname for all libs with patchelf, because it can't do it right at build time? [03:08] it's done in rules files by hand it seems [03:09] mwhudson: ok, kid bedtime here, but I'll try to take a look at them afterwards. FWIW if we remove all the !amd64 binaries then the packages will promote with amd64-only... [03:09] and maybe doko wants to look at it since he's closer to the fortran stuff [03:10] vorlon: well yes [03:11] oh, and fiat-ecmwf having broken cmake is because it's depwait on !amd64 on fckit :P [03:12] oh i thought you were saying cmake is depwait, that would have been bad [03:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: foxeye (noble-proposed/universe) [0.12.1-4build2 => 0.12.1-5] (no packageset) (sync) [03:13] ^ that was me [03:13] onto fprobe [03:13] it migrated [03:14] freewnn migrated [03:14] fsniper migrated [03:15] looking at ftools-fv [03:15] builds failed without log so retrying [03:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted foxeye [sync] (noble-proposed) [0.12.1-5] [03:16] fuseiso migrated [03:17] onto gabedit (new first letter!!) [03:22] vorlon: i'm sure gabedit can be fixed but it's removed from testing so can you just remove the armhf binary? [03:23] bah rdep chain :( [03:27] vorlon: remove gamazons/armhf? [03:32] vorlon: i think gauche should be removed entirely, it build-depends on slib which got RMed a few weeks ago [03:32] eh i guess that means a bug [03:33] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gauche/+bug/2060759 [03:33] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2060759 in gauche (Ubuntu) "please remove gauche from noble" [Undecided, New] [03:34] gcc-14-cross -> i think britney just hates this package for some reason? [03:34] gcin blocked on qtbase-opensource-src [03:35] crystal_graph.c:180:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘type_dreiding_gasteiger’ you what a what now [03:36] vorlon: remove gdis and rdeps on armhf? [03:36] gfaim migrated [03:42] gfarm missing prototypes, let's see if this is easy [03:42] oh there's a patch in the bts [03:45] testing that [03:45] onto ggobi [03:45] that migrated [03:46] ghdl -> waiting on autopkgtest [03:46] ginn -> migrated [03:46] gjacktransport -> migrated [03:46] gkrellm-volume -> migrated [03:47] glhack -> migrated [03:47] glw -> migrated [03:48] gnomad2 -> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066610 [03:48] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1066610 in src:gnomad2 "gnomad2: FTBFS: jukebox.c:1979:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘set_tag_for_file’; did you mean ‘set_tag_for_mp3file’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]" [Serious, Open] [03:55] seems ez [03:56] uploading gfarm [03:57] and gnomad2 [03:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gfarm (noble-proposed/universe) [2.7.20+dfsg-1.1build2 => 2.7.20+dfsg-1.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [03:58] seems a decent place to stop [03:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnomad2 (noble-proposed/universe) [2.9.6-8build2 => 2.9.6-8ubuntu1] (no packageset) [04:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnomad2 [source] (noble-proposed) [2.9.6-8ubuntu1] [04:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gfarm [source] (noble-proposed) [2.7.20+dfsg-1.1ubuntu1] [04:04] grr i am apparently too dense to fix dx today [04:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted obconf-qt [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.16.0-1ubuntu2] [04:05] vorlon: remove dx/armhf? [04:24] morning/afternoon/evening [04:30] waiting on gnome-session s390x tests which seems silly [04:32] bdmurray: should we just skip them? since we don't support a desktop on s390x === Ukikie_ is now known as Ukikie [04:46] atlas-ecmwf, ectrans, fiat-ecmwf, fckit, eccodes-python, ecmwflibs, fdb removed on !amd64. mwhudson you mentioned odb, but that doesn't seem to be out-of-date? [04:47] mwhudson: gabedit only has reverse-recommends, removing [04:47] mwhudson: gamazons/armhf removed [04:50] mwhudson: gdis/armhf removed (reverse-recommends only) [04:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libxmlb (noble-proposed/main) [0.3.17-1 => 0.3.18-1] (core) (sync) [04:52] mwhudson: and dx/armhf removed [04:52] taking gnome-breakout [04:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloudkitty (noble-proposed/universe) [20.0.0-1 => 20.0.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [04:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloudkitty [source] (noble-proposed) [20.0.0-1ubuntu1] [04:58] gnome-paint [05:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-breakout (noble-proposed/universe) [0.5.3-7build3 => 0.5.3-7ubuntu1] (no packageset) [05:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-breakout [source] (noble-proposed) [0.5.3-7ubuntu1] [05:08] vorlon: that makes sense to me [05:08] bdmurray: I've added the hint [05:08] thanks [05:10] hmm and skiptesting linux-firmware [05:10] I repeat: why does a firmware package have an autopkgtest [05:10] okay, what we could spin now? [05:10] nothing because linux-firmware :/ [05:12] which I've now skiptested [05:12] well at least britney is faster [05:12] sorry, should've been more aggressive about that the moment I saw that it was blocking on a linux-firmware-raspi autopkgtest [05:14] gnome-paint incredibly bad about function declarations [05:15] bdmurray: heh maybe me don't want 8 separate copies of libreoffice tests in the arm64 queue (cleaning) [05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozjs102 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [102.15.1-3ubuntu2] [05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozjs102 [armhf] (noble-proposed) [102.15.1-3ubuntu2] [05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozjs102 [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [102.15.1-3ubuntu2] [05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozjs102 [arm64] (noble-proposed) [102.15.1-3ubuntu2] [05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozjs102 [s390x] (noble-proposed) [102.15.1-3ubuntu2] [05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mozjs102 [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [102.15.1-3ubuntu2] [05:22] gnome-paint rapidly approaching the point of not worth fixing [05:28] $ wc -l debian/patches/no-implicit-declarations.patch [05:28] 192 debian/patches/no-implicit-declarations.patch [05:28] $ [05:28] one more missing header and I was going to axe it :P [05:29] 0008-Included-patch-by-Logan-Rosen-and-one-other-gdk-func.patch [05:29] well that's a patch name [05:29] I had no idea that Logan Rosen was a gdk func [05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-paint (noble-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-9build2 => 0.4.0-9ubuntu1] (no packageset) [05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-paint [source] (noble-proposed) [0.4.0-9ubuntu1] [05:31] golang-1.20: removed [05:31] gperiodic: migrated [05:33] gphoto2: blocked on libcdk5, which is blocked on osmo-bsc/armhf which has unsatisfiable build-deps, removing [05:34] gphotofs, gri, gromit: migrated [05:34] gshutdown [05:37] gshutdown is Ubuntu specific hnnngh [05:37] last new upstream release in 2007 [05:38] and after all that gnome-paint ftbfs on armhf still [05:39] kicking to the curb [05:41] gsocket [05:41] gsocket migrated [05:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gshutdown (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2-0ubuntu14 => 0.2-0ubuntu15] (no packageset) [05:42] gst-omx removed [05:42] gst-plugins-espeak migrated [05:42] gtk-chtheme [05:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gshutdown [source] (noble-proposed) [0.2-0ubuntu15] [05:46] gtk-theme-switch [05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtk-chtheme (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-6.1build3 => 0.3.1-6.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [05:47] gtk-theme-switch migrated [05:47] gtkterm [05:49] 1004s linux-image-generic : Depends: linux-firmware but it is not installable [05:50] :/ [05:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gtk-chtheme [source] (noble-proposed) [0.3.1-6.1ubuntu1] [05:56] gv, gwaterfall migrated [05:56] gwc [05:56] it looks like linux-firmware is moving [05:56] and gnome-session [05:59] \o/ [05:59] hmm why did I get notification of a failed ubuntukylin build [06:00] which fortran packages? [06:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.12 (noble-proposed/main) [3.12.2-5ubuntu3 => 3.12.3-1] (i386-whitelist) [06:02] tap_reverb.c:161:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘warning’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] [06:02] what the heck [06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tsocks (noble-proposed/universe) [1.8beta5+ds1-1ubuntu1 => 1.8beta5+ds1-2] (no packageset) (sync) [06:03] doko: atlas-ecmwf, ectrans, fiat-ecmwf, fckit, eccodes-python, ecmwflibs, fdb removed on !amd64 [06:03] gwc removed [06:03] gworldclock migrated [06:03] and stopping there for the night, someone else can take h [06:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tsocks [sync] (noble-proposed) [1.8beta5+ds1-2] [06:06] vorlon: so all of these already removed? [06:06] vorlon: od*c* not od*b* ,doh [06:07] (how could i possibly get those mixed up) [06:17] doko: yes; should something be done to bring them back? [06:22] vorlon: please not at this point. just wanted to know if there would be some action required [06:22] strace is a real time_t 64bit issue on armhf [06:27] if any of the release team have cycles to look at https://code.launchpad.net/~james-page/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/463923 it would be much appreciated - the manila/i386 test break is blocking quite a bit of stuff at the moment [06:48] juliank: good morning! I have prepared a debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/2059550/comments/1 and tested it with custom PPA https://launchpad.net/~mihalicyn/+archive/ubuntu/lxc-test-ppa-noble2 [06:48] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2059550 in lxc (Ubuntu) "autopkgtest failures on 1:5.0.3-2ubuntu2 (Noble)" [Undecided, New] [07:03] refreshed list, filtered for packages that have migrated or that have been removed https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/YwNFD4DkyJ/ [07:03] (421 packages -> 161 packages) === vorlon changed the topic of #ubuntu-release to: Released: 23.10 Mantic Minotaur, 22.04.4 Jammy Jellyfish | Archive: Beta Freeze | packages with removed amd64 binaries that need resolving: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/YwNFD4DkyJ/ | Highlight ubuntu-archive for archive admin help | We accept payment in cash, cheque or scotch | melius malum quod cognoscis | infinity, you are missed [07:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted astrometry.net [source] (noble-proposed) [0.93+dfsg-1.1ubuntu1] [07:08] linux-firmware published; kicking off image builds [07:10] oops I failed to remove libcoq-unimath/riscv64 from noble-proposed too ; done now [07:11] Depends: ubiquity libdebian-installer (not considered) [07:11] :\ [07:17] patchelf is completely broken [07:18] sergiodj: is there a way to change the soname of a library non-interactively? [07:19] sergiodj: using poke ... [07:27] Eickmeyer, they "should" be in sync generally ... a resync is coming but they happened to be out of sync at the time of the issue. [08:25] working on librep [08:36] doko: i don't understand why these packages use patchelf at all. surely it's not that hard to pass flags to the linker?? [08:40] mwhudson: they are preparing a dual stack for Fortran libraries, one stack for libgfortran, and the other one for libflang, and then handling the defaults for the shared libs using alternatives. something similar to libblas and liblapack [08:40] doko: uh ok [08:49] working on bristol [08:51] taking libsys-utmp-perl [08:53] doko: hmm [08:54] doko: still, linking twice would be safer i think... [08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsys-utmp-perl (noble-proposed/universe) [1.8-2build4 => 1.8-2build5] (no packageset) [08:56] libsys-utmp-perl just needs a NCR, it was built against the old perl on riscv. [08:56] ginggs: would you mind? ^ [08:57] taking libtrue-perl [08:58] ditto for libtrue-perl. [09:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libtrue-perl (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-2build4 => 1.0.2-2build5] (no packageset) [09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsys-utmp-perl [source] (noble-proposed) [1.8-2build5] [09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtrue-perl [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.2-2build5] [09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (noble-proposed/main) [89ubuntu3 => 89ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop) [09:07] linux-* up to lowlatency (excluded) seem to already have been taken care of. [09:07] I'm assuming the kernel team is looking after the lowlatency. [09:09] schopin: were you asking to accept libsys-utmp-perl ? [09:09] I was. [09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: poke (noble-proposed/universe) [3.3+dfsg-1build2 => 4.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) (sync) [09:11] schopin: it's not seeded, so the auto-accept bot took care of it [09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted poke [sync] (noble-proposed) [4.0+dfsg-1] [09:11] Ah. Good bot. [09:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dose3 (noble-proposed/universe) [7.0.0-4build2 => 7.0.0-4build3] (no packageset) [09:15] xpat2: https://code.launchpad.net/~zhsj/ubuntu/+source/xpat2/+git/xpat2/+merge/463999 [09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dose3 [source] (noble-proposed) [7.0.0-4build3] [09:16] mwhudson: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/patchelf/+bug/2060779 [09:16] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2060779 in patchelf (Ubuntu) "patchelf --set-soname broken on non-amd64 architectures" [Undecided, New] [09:17] taking llvm-defaults, lucky me. [09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poke [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poke [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poke [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poke [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [09:22] poke [09:30] um. what is https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/noble_uninst.txt telling me? [09:32] for example [09:32] aflplusplus (4.09c-1ubuntu3): afl++ [09:32] this is $srcpkg ($version): $binpkg [09:32] but afaict afl++ is installable in noble [09:34] hi team, I 'm working on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/simplestreams/+bug/2052437 [09:34] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2052437 in simplestreams (Ubuntu) "python-boto: obsolete, replaced by python-boto3" [Undecided, In Progress] [09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poke [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [09:41] oh it's probably only installable if proposed is enabled [09:50] (ocaml migrated, and will migrate also something more next run) [09:51] mwhudson: noinst is about the release pocket only (not sure if it includes updates and security) [09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ariba (noble-proposed/universe) [2.14.7+ds-2 => 2.14.7+ds-2build1] (no packageset) [09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libelfin (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3-3.1build1 => 0.3-3.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: prody (noble-proposed/universe) [2.4.1+dfsg-2 => 2.4.1+dfsg-2build1] (no packageset) [09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cartopy (noble-proposed/universe) [0.22.0+dfsg-1build1 => 0.22.0+dfsg-1build2] (no packageset) [09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unifrac (noble-proposed/universe) [1.3-2 => 1.3-2build1] (no packageset) [09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unifrac [source] (noble-proposed) [1.3-2build1] [09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poke [amd64] (noble-proposed) [4.0+dfsg-1] [09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poke [armhf] (noble-proposed) [4.0+dfsg-1] [09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poke [s390x] (noble-proposed) [4.0+dfsg-1] [09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poke [arm64] (noble-proposed) [4.0+dfsg-1] [09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libelfin [source] (noble-proposed) [0.3-3.1ubuntu1] [09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-cartopy [source] (noble-proposed) [0.22.0+dfsg-1build2] [09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poke [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [4.0+dfsg-1] [09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted prody [source] (noble-proposed) [2.4.1+dfsg-2build1] [09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ariba [source] (noble-proposed) [2.14.7+ds-2build1] [10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poke [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poke [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [4.0+dfsg-1] [10:14] autopkgtest for dotnet8/8.0.103-8.0.3-0ubuntu3: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, s390x: Test in progress [10:14] is llvm-defaults blocked by a test on s390x that will not run? [10:15] or maybe it will run, just busy [10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (noble-proposed/universe) [1:5.0.3-2ubuntu3 => 1:5.0.3-2ubuntu4] (ubuntu-server) [10:18] old binaries left on *: libhe5-hdfeos0 [10:18] ubuntu-archive ^^ please NBS-proposed cleanup? [10:19] silo-llnl DAMN [10:20] LocutusOfBorg: ah shoot [10:20] LocutusOfBorg: Yeah so we need to fix silo-llnl too [10:21] juliank, you mean we needed to fix :) [10:21] LocutusOfBorg: Alastair did not look at the Debian archive and overrode the NMUs for this just like he did for hdf-eos5 [10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: librep (noble-proposed/universe) [0.92.5-3.1build2 => 0.92.5-3.1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: silo-llnl (noble-proposed/universe) [4.11-4build1 => 4.11-4ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:21] ^^ [10:22] nice [10:22] are you filing an RC bug in Debian too? [10:23] Maybe we need to look at all his uploads [10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hdf-eos5 (noble-proposed/universe) [2:2.0-2ubuntu1 => 2:2.0-3] (no packageset) (sync) [10:25] forwarded to debian [10:25] unarchived the bug [10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hdf-eos5 [sync] (noble-proposed) [2:2.0-3] [10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted silo-llnl [source] (noble-proposed) [4.11-4ubuntu1] [10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted librep [source] (noble-proposed) [0.92.5-3.1ubuntu1] [10:26] LocutusOfBorg: Did you just pointlessly sync hdf-eos5 causing a migration delay? [10:26] Or was that someone else? [10:27] oh... aren't we in beta freeze? [10:27] Yes but nothing is seeded [10:27] Unseeded packages are autoaccepted [10:28] well, it takes one minute to build, and for migration we still need ubuntu-archive [10:29] so... maybe the delay is not that huge, and not caused by the sync (and I'm sorry for it) [10:29] ubuntu-release Hmm lxc is not seeded anywhere but not being autoaccepted; can we get it accepted please, it fixes the test suite? [10:30] LocutusOfBorg: yeah it's probably not much trouble but it's annoying :) [10:30] and makes the delta really nicer w.r.t. debian, and MoM happier from next time [10:30] lxc ^^ [10:30] juliank, it is! and more annoying when I'm annoyed by myself [10:37] bristol MP ready for review: https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/bristol/+git/bristol/+merge/464004 [10:38] for fixing bristol FTBFS on armhf [10:41] Oh I hate it but it looks right [10:41] pre-ANSI C is annoying to look at [10:44] mirespace: General note, the PPA test runs are not really helpful for ftbfs in proposed (or packages not yet in proposed); when we're fully loaded, we can just upload and run the tests in proposed [10:45] juliank: I was thinking on that and for that reason I didn't wait for the results... thanks for telling me! More easier to do the next time :) [10:47] It has all the sense [10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bristol (noble-proposed/universe) [0.60.11-4build2 => 0.60.11-4ubuntu1] (no packageset) [10:48] mirespace: yeah it's also possible to just remove armhf binaries if they're the ones failing fwiw but I guess right now just fixing ftbfs may be easier than taking time from the release team who's busy with beta preparations :) [10:48] mirespace: Anyway you can see ^^ it's sponsored [10:49] juliank: thankyou! [10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bristol [source] (noble-proposed) [0.60.11-4ubuntu1] [10:53] mirespace, please also forward the patch to Debian bug: #1066243 I guess [10:53] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1066243 in src:bristol "bristol: FTBFS: bristolmemorymoog.c:280:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘doPitchWheel’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1066243 [10:53] juliank, maybe as sponsors we should make sure patches are forwarded too, otherwise the delta won't ever drop, and debian won't gain fixes :) [10:54] LocotusofBorg: omw to do it, thanks for the friendly reminder! [10:55] LocutusOfBorg: Well There's a FTBFS and the patch is from upstream so meh https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066243 [10:55] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1066243 in src:bristol "bristol: FTBFS: bristolmemorymoog.c:280:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘doPitchWheel’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]" [Serious, Open] [10:55] I'm only worried about divergence but a ftbfs won't diverge [10:56] thanks :) [10:56] Albeit generally speaking when sponsoring my approach is: Is this a patch that makes sense for Ubuntu to carry regardless of what Debian does [10:57] juliank, you are right, but the debian bug misses the "fixed-upstream" or "forwared" tags, so an extra ping is better to forward a link or patch anyway... === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc [11:10] LocotusOfBorg: patch fowarding done [11:21] thanks! [11:34] LocutusOfBorg: dotnet8/s390x is a brand new binary, i think the tests will run eventually [11:34] could be hinted if it's the only blocker [11:34] nah its ok [11:35] I ran ms-gsl and libelfin with migration-reference/0 [11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: provd (noble-proposed/universe) [0.1.0 => 0.1.1] (no packageset) [11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ngspice [source] (jammy-proposed) [36+ds-1ubuntu0.1] [11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted provd [source] (noble-proposed) [0.1.1] [11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (noble-proposed) [1:5.0.3-2ubuntu4] [11:36] juliank: ^ [11:39] ginggs: ta [11:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yosys-plugin-ghdl (noble-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20230419.5b64ccf-1build2 => 0.0~git20230419.5b64ccf-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yosys-plugin-ghdl [source] (noble-proposed) [0.0~git20230419.5b64ccf-1ubuntu1] [11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: asyncpg (noble-proposed/universe) [0.29.0-1 => 0.29.0-1build1] (no packageset) [11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: peewee (noble-proposed/universe) [3.17.0+dfsg-1 => 3.17.0+dfsg-1build1] (no packageset) [11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-biopython (noble-proposed/universe) [1.81+dfsg-3 => 1.81+dfsg-3build1] (no packageset) [11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: poezio (noble-proposed/universe) [0.14-3 => 0.14-3build1] (no packageset) [11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-iow (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.6-4 => 1.0.6-4build1] (no packageset) [11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-iow [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.6-4build1] [11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted asyncpg [source] (noble-proposed) [0.29.0-1build1] [11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted poezio [source] (noble-proposed) [0.14-3build1] [11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted peewee [source] (noble-proposed) [3.17.0+dfsg-1build1] [11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-biopython [source] (noble-proposed) [1.81+dfsg-3build1] [12:06] ubuntu-release: hi :) Ubuntu Kylin just raised this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2059903 [12:06] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2059903 in peony (Ubuntu) "Ubuntukylin noble install error: Failed to exclusively open path: /dev/nvme0n1p5" [Critical, In Progress] [12:07] Looks like a syncpackage peony is needed for them, will likely take care of that when I get in today unless someone is faster [12:08] (They probably have upload access to it? Just curious @ "waiting for it to sync from Debian") [12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: timeshift (jammy-proposed/universe) [21.09.1-1 => 21.09.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: rust-calloop-wayland-source (noble-proposed/primary) [0.2.0-1] [12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pdl (noble-proposed/universe) [1:2.085-1build2 => 1:2.085-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: rust-xkeysym (noble-proposed/primary) [0.2.0-1] [12:32] tsimonq2: LP hasn't picked up peony for syncpackage to work yet. fakesync could work though if we don't want to wait ~4 hours [12:34] jbicha: Oh, didn't realize it was *that* recent :) [12:34] Thanks for the reminder! [12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pdl [source] (noble-proposed) [1:2.085-1ubuntu1] [12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xpat2 (noble-proposed/universe) [1.07-20build4 => 1.07-20ubuntu1] (no packageset) [12:39] sponsored xpat2 for zhsj ^ [12:39] looking at libprelude next [12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xpat2 [source] (noble-proposed) [1.07-20ubuntu1] [12:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bpftrace (noble-proposed/main) [0.20.2-1ubuntu3 => 0.20.2-1ubuntu4] (no packageset) [12:47] ubuntu-release, we probably want this (bpftrace) for beta ^ see bug #2060766 [12:47] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2060766 in bpftrace (Ubuntu) "Can't run bpftrace , ERROR: too many arguments" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2060766 [12:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysstat (noble-proposed/main) [12.6.1-1ubuntu2 => 12.7.5-2] (ubuntu-server) (sync) [13:04] slyon: what do you mean "for beta"? [13:05] ginggs: I mean it should be accepted from unapproved. even during beta freeze [13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-qrencode [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.2-5ubuntu0.1] [13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: peony (noble-proposed/universe) [4.0.0.0-1.1build5 => 4.0.0.1-1fakesync] (ubuntukylin) [13:26] Hi, release team, please accept peony which fixed an critical installation error. Thanks! [13:29] handsome_feng, the fakesync should have a lower version number: 4.0.0.1-1~fakesync [13:34] Argh, studio build problems [13:36] Apparently we need openvdb from -proposed for the builds to be possible [13:37] ...or not [13:39] ubuntu-archive [13:39] old binaries left on *: libsiloh5-0 [13:39] and also libhe5-hdfeos0 [13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dotnet6 (mantic-proposed/universe) [6.0.128-0ubuntu1~23.10.2 => 6.0.129-0ubuntu1~23.10.1] (no packageset) [13:43] sil2100: NCR libopenimageio2.4 and blender? [13:45] @bdrung: sorry, please reject peony with the wrong version [13:50] ubuntu-release: ^^^ :) [13:50] Yes [13:50] Sadly [13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected peony [source] (noble-proposed) [4.0.0.1-1fakesync] [13:51] Well, and we need openvdb too [13:51] Because it is a dep of blender and-co but we have no amd64 in the release pocket [13:51] Eickmeyer: hi :) FYI ^^^^ [13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dotnet6 (jammy-proposed/universe) [6.0.128-0ubuntu1~22.04.2 => 6.0.129-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset) [13:52] Yup, makes sense. [13:53] Yes, I no-change rebuilt them all yesterday, no? [13:54] Ah someone else did, what did I do? [13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-boot-test (noble-proposed/universe) [1.1build1 => 2] (no packageset) [13:54] Ah I was pointing that out [13:54] llvm-toolchain-14 <- openvdb <- blender, openimageio; mysql-8.0 [13:54] that was the chain [13:55] These should all be ready enough to be force-skiptest now [13:55] Eickmeyer: openimageio was needed too for ubuntustudio [13:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-boot-test [source] (noble-proposed) [2] [13:56] that was blocked by f3d which is sorted out now [13:57] Oh but llvm-toolchain-14 is stillbuilding [13:57] (on arm64) [13:57] Started 2024-04-07 and still going [13:58] Probably faster to port openvdb to llvm 17 than to wait for the llvm 14 build ;) [14:00] Oh at least llvm-defaults should migrate shortly [14:02] 181 packages or tasks depending on src:llvm-defaults -> this is the biggest block of uninstallability left [14:03] juliank: ack [14:04] juliank, yes, but also skiptest on llvm-defaults was fine [14:04] I just tried migration-reference/0 [14:05] because of new warnings emitted by llvm-18, or other stuff [14:05] allowing stderr is meh [14:05] speaking of eternal builds, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acl2/8.5dfsg-5build3/+build/27996988 [14:06] started 1 april, and still running. previous builds took around 1d [14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: upower (noble-proposed/main) [1.90.2-8build3 => 1.90.3-1] (core) (sync) [14:06] maybe it started as april joke [14:06] OK OK; src:acl2 we can just remove from the archive [14:07] heck we can just drop the proposed build and leave it out on amd64 [14:08] juliank, sil2100 : So, to be clear, you need me to NCR openimagio, blender, and openvdb? [14:08] No no [14:08] I think everything is in -proposed [14:08] It's a matter of getting those migrated, but it seems like a bigger bunch of packages [14:08] Ok, Thank goodness. #BlameSimon for confusion. [14:08] tsimonq2: ^^ [14:09] I'll look into it after a fill in a bug with nvidia drivers installation not working ._. [14:14] ubuntu-archive: please take a look at this removal request: bug 2060735. TIA [14:14] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2060735 in spherepack (Ubuntu) "please remove spherepack and ncl from the archive" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2060735 [14:15] juliank, looks progressing anyway [14:15] so maybe in some hours it will finish, comparing with previous log shows it to be mostly at the end [14:15] confusingly it does [14:20] In other news, for Edubuntu, ISO tracker is pointing at an Edubuntu image that doesn't exist (20240410, latest is 20240409) [14:20] Or maybe it built but disappeared, idk. [14:25] Eickmeyer: looking! Might not have propagated to mirrors yet, I just recently rebuilt it [14:25] (since previously it was built in a bad time when packages were still in flight) [14:25] (...and failed) [14:26] Heh, sounds par for the course lately. [14:31] http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/edubuntu/daily-live/20240410.1/ <- so I see the image here at least [14:32] Yeah, it phases in and out of existence, so hopefully it'll hold. [14:37] Ok, let me try pointing the foundations people on the openvdb thing [14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: webkit2gtk (noble-proposed/main) [2.44.0-2 => 2.44.1-1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) (sync) [14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pure-ftpd [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.49-4ubuntu0.1] [14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pipewire-module-xrdp (noble-proposed/primary) [0.2-2] [14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gem2deb (noble-proposed/universe) [2.2.2 => 2.2.3] (i386-whitelist) (sync) [14:44] autopkgtest for dotnet8/8.0.103-8.0.3-0ubuntu3: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, s390x: Test in progress [14:44] ginggs, ^^ llvm-defaults blocked by it... [14:44] maybe force skip= [14:44] ? [14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibus-typing-booster (noble-proposed/universe) [2.25.3-1 => 2.25.4-1] (no packageset) (sync) [14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gem2deb [sync] (noble-proposed) [2.2.3] [14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibus-typing-booster [sync] (noble-proposed) [2.25.4-1] [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: easyeffects (noble-proposed/universe) [7.1.4-1build2 => 7.1.6-1] (no packageset) (sync) [14:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: byte-buddy (noble-proposed/universe) [1.14.11~us1-0ubuntu2 => 1.14.13-1] (no packageset) (sync) [14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dotnet7 (mantic-proposed/universe) [7.0.117-0ubuntu1~23.10.2 => 7.0.118-0ubuntu1~23.10.1] (no packageset) [14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted byte-buddy [sync] (noble-proposed) [1.14.13-1] [14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted easyeffects [sync] (noble-proposed) [7.1.6-1] [14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clevis (noble-proposed/universe) [19-6build2 => 20-1] (no packageset) (sync) [14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted usbguard [source] (focal-proposed) [0.7.6+ds-1ubuntu1] [14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: peony (noble-proposed/universe) [4.0.0.0-1.1build5 => 4.0.0.1-1~fakesync1] (ubuntukylin) [14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dotnet7 (jammy-proposed/universe) [7.0.117-0ubuntu1~22.04.2 => 7.0.118-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset) [14:55] Hi release team, please accept the peony package, which has fixed the installation error and carries the correct suffix. :) [14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clevis [sync] (noble-proposed) [20-1] [14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gimp-plugin-registry (noble-proposed/universe) [9.20200928build4 => 9.20240404] (ubuntustudio) (sync) [14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jtreg7 (noble-proposed/universe) [7.3.1+1-1ubuntu1 => 7.3.1+1-2] (no packageset) (sync) [15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jose (noble-proposed/universe) [11-3build2 => 13-1] (i386-whitelist) (sync) [15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jose [sync] (noble-proposed) [13-1] [15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jtreg7 [sync] (noble-proposed) [7.3.1+1-2] [15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dublin-traceroute (noble-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-2build4 => 0.4.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibus-client-clutter (noble-proposed/universe) [0.0+git20090728.a936bacf-7build1 => 0.0+git20090728.a936bacf-8] (no packageset) (sync) [15:03] handsome_feng: are you sure a fakesync is what you want for peony? [15:04] Yes [15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dublin-traceroute [source] (noble-proposed) [0.4.2-2ubuntu1] [15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libtimezonemap (noble-proposed/main) [0.4.6-6ubuntu1 => 0.4.6-7] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync) [15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibus-client-clutter [sync] (noble-proposed) [0.0+git20090728.a936bacf-8] [15:06] The new version on Debian still unreachable, and it is urgent for this fix to land in noble release before Beta. [15:06] handsome_feng: my understanding is fakesync is when our upstream tarball does not match debian's [15:06] and this is a new tarball [15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gstreamer1.0 (noble-proposed/main) [1.24.1-1build1 => 1.24.2-1] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) [15:07] fakesync is weird [15:07] You can sync it with syncpackage --no-lp && dput [15:07] You can even hack syncpackage to not resign the .dsc [15:08] (currently it strips the signature which is pointless if you are the one who signed it) [15:09] I never patched that properly [15:11] Emm, what is the difference between 'getting the Debian source code, modifying the changelog, and dput' and 'syncpackage --no-lp && dput'?" [15:12] syncpackage --no-lp is more or less the same as fakesync just without the ~fakesync1 [15:12] it just resigns an existing source package and generates an ubuntu .changes file for it with additional metadata [15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-good1.0 (noble-proposed/main) [1.24.1-2ubuntu1 => 1.24.2-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [15:20] The complete command is "syncpackge --no-lp peony_4.0.0.1-1.dsc （which generate locally by debuild）"? [15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: translate-toolkit (noble-proposed/universe) [3.12.2-1 => 3.12.2-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu) [15:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: astropy-regions (noble-proposed/universe) [0.8-1 => 0.8-1build1] (no packageset) [15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: astroscrappy (noble-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-2build4 => 1.1.0-2build5] (no packageset) [15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: photutils (noble-proposed/universe) [1.11.0-1 => 1.11.0-1build1] (no packageset) [15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: healpy (noble-proposed/universe) [1.16.6-1 => 1.16.6-1build1] (no packageset) [15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: biosig (noble-proposed/universe) [2.6.0-1build2 => 2.6.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pygresql (noble-proposed/universe) [1:6.0-1 => 1:6.0-1build1] (no packageset) [15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyregion (noble-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-3 => 2.2.0-3build1] (no packageset) [15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: py-postgresql (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.1+git20180803.ef7b9a9-4build4 => 1.2.1+git20180803.ef7b9a9-4build5] (no packageset) [15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyraf (noble-proposed/universe) [2.2.1-2 => 2.2.1-2build1] (no packageset) [15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyregion [source] (noble-proposed) [2.2.0-3build1] [15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cpl (noble-proposed/universe) [0.7.4-2build9 => 0.7.4-2build10] (no packageset) [15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-skbio (noble-proposed/universe) [0.5.9-4 => 0.5.9-4build1] (no packageset) [15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pysynphot (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0.0+dfsg-1build4 => 2.0.0+dfsg-1build5] (no packageset) [15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-drizzle (noble-proposed/universe) [1.15.0-1 => 1.15.0-1build1] (no packageset) [15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyraf [source] (noble-proposed) [2.2.1-2build1] [15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted biosig [source] (noble-proposed) [2.6.0-1ubuntu1] [15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pygresql [source] (noble-proposed) [1:6.0-1build1] [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sep (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-6build3 => 1.2.1-6build4] (no packageset) [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted py-postgresql [source] (noble-proposed) [1.2.1+git20180803.ef7b9a9-4build5] [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: slixmpp (noble-proposed/universe) [1.8.5-1 => 1.8.5-1build1] (no packageset) [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: reproject (noble-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-1 => 0.13.0-1build1] (no packageset) [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted astroscrappy [source] (noble-proposed) [1.1.0-2build5] [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted photutils [source] (noble-proposed) [1.11.0-1build1] [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted healpy [source] (noble-proposed) [1.16.6-1build1] [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted astropy-regions [source] (noble-proposed) [0.8-1build1] [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: synphot (noble-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1 => 1.3.0-1build1] (no packageset) [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sncosmo (noble-proposed/universe) [2.10.4-1 => 2.10.4-1build1] (no packageset) [15:33] Not sure if I am picking up in the right spt, but I am looking at loqui now [15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libprelude (noble-proposed/universe) [5.2.0-5.3ubuntu2 => 5.2.0-5.3ubuntu3] (no packageset) [15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libprelude [source] (noble-proposed) [5.2.0-5.3ubuntu3] [15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted synphot [source] (noble-proposed) [1.3.0-1build1] [15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-cpl [source] (noble-proposed) [0.7.4-2build10] [15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-skbio [source] (noble-proposed) [0.5.9-4build1] [15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sep [source] (noble-proposed) [1.2.1-6build4] [15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sncosmo [source] (noble-proposed) [2.10.4-1build1] [15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-drizzle [source] (noble-proposed) [1.15.0-1build1] [15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted slixmpp [source] (noble-proposed) [1.8.5-1build1] [15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted reproject [source] (noble-proposed) [0.13.0-1build1] [15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pysynphot [source] (noble-proposed) [2.0.0+dfsg-1build5] [15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kubuntu-wallpapers (noble-proposed/universe) [21.04.1 => 24.04.0] (kubuntu) [15:40] kubuntu-wallpapers and calamares-settings-ubuntu for Kubuntu are branding updates as a result of the Branding Contest [15:40] https://kubuntu.org/news/celebrating-creativity-announcing-the-winners-of-the-kubuntu-contests/ [15:41] I would consider those to be needed for final, perhaps not uploaded in time for Beta [15:47] release team, sorry to say that please reject the peony again and I will using syncpackge --no-lp to upload the right version. [15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: peony (noble-proposed/universe) [4.0.0.0-1.1build5 => 4.0.0.1-1] (ubuntukylin) [15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected peony [source] (noble-proposed) [4.0.0.1-1~fakesync1] [15:53] Hi team. Could I get review for https://code.launchpad.net/~aciba/simplestreams/+git/simplestreams/+merge/464027, please? [15:54] handsome_feng: ^ [15:56] testing a fix in my ppa for loqui [15:56] looking at lsh-utils [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gst-plugins-bad1.0 (noble-proposed/universe) [1.24.0-1ubuntu4 => 1.24.2-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) [16:09] LocutusOfBorg: -proposed NBS cleanup done [16:14] I see a smattering of packages from https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/YwNFD4DkyJ/ being claimed in scrollback to work on, but from random parts of the list. Were people coordinating work on this somewhere else today? [16:15] ginggs: Thanks, looks like it's EOD over there, handsome_feng's request is for acceptance of peony + a respin. :) [16:15] jbicha: ^^^ [16:15] vorlon: not I [16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: photoqt (noble-proposed/universe) [4.2+ds-3build4 => 4.4+ds-1] (no packageset) (sync) [16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted photoqt [sync] (noble-proposed) [4.4+ds-1] [16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: loqui (noble-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-2build2 => 0.7.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: fonts-topaz-unicode (noble-proposed/primary) [1+git20240201+ds-3] [16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted loqui [source] (noble-proposed) [0.7.0-2ubuntu1] [16:23] vorlon: I saw talk of llvm related items here and on MM, so I picked up on loqui (and currently working lsh-utils) [16:23] ah I'm not sure why "llvm-related items" would need to go together [16:24] I'd like to request ovn_22.03.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 to be rejected from the Jammy Unapproved queue. It turns out there was an architecture specific failure in the added test that I was unable to catch prior to proposing it, which I need to fix before we can proceed. [16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kubuntu-settings (noble-proposed/universe) [1:24.04.4 => 1:24.04.5] (kubuntu) [16:28] alright I'll go back [16:36] Last thing I saw for sure was bdrung working on librep [16:36] librep -> migrated [16:36] libsys-utmp-perl -> waiting on autopkgtest [16:36] libtrue-perl -> waiting on autopkgtest [16:36] linux-firmware -> migrated [16:36] linux-restricted-modules-aws -> migrated [16:36] linux-restricted-modules-azure -> migrated [16:36] linux-restricted-modules-gcp -> migrated [16:36] linux-restricted-modules-lowlatency -> nothing to do atm [16:36] linux-restricted-modules-oracle -> migrated [16:36]