/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/04/18/#ubuntu-devel.txt

hosietReposting after a day: I am looking for sponsor for a pkg in universe (e.g., MOTU people can help): fcitx5-chinese-addons/5.1.3-1ubuntu1, which fixes https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fcitx5-chinese-addons/+bug/2061664 . Let me know if you have any concerns. Thanks!00:09
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2061664 in fcitx5-chinese-addons (Ubuntu) "Appdata metainfo XML not in main pkg, breaking Appstream software install" [Undecided, New]00:09
mwhudsonsomething definitely seems to have gone wrong here https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/t/tcpxtract/noble/arm6400:18
=== RAOF_ is now known as RAOF
bdrungtjaalton, since you touched it last, do you want to apply the upstream fix for xorg-xserver for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/2062144 or should I do it?09:16
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2062144 in xserver-xorg-video-nouveau (Ubuntu) "xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-3 FTBFS on armhf" [Undecided, New]09:16
tjaaltonbdrung: added a comment there10:18
bdrungtjaalton, thanks. so how to solve that?10:47
tjaaltondrop armhf from it? :)10:59
tjaaltonand from -video-all11:00
tjaalton(nouveau)11:00
tjaaltonI'll test something11:05
tjaaltonthen again there is a new bugfix release of xorg-server too, to fix a potential double-free in the current one11:05
tjaaltonbdrung: this was fixed in debian via -311:38
tjaaltonso maybe just sync that11:38
tjaaltonnouveau11:38
bdrungtjaalton, no, this did not work, -3 is the failing one11:39
tjaaltonwhy does it fail only on armhf?11:41
bdrungbecause it uses -Werror=implicit-function-declaration11:41
tjaaltonand that can't be changed in the package?11:42
tjaaltonlooks like xserver .12-1u1 already has the double-free fix, so I wouldn't be touching that anymore11:46
jbichatjaalton: two more Xorg packages with build failures in noble-proposed are bug 2062159 and Debian bug 106470212:27
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2062159 in xserver-xorg-video-vesa (Ubuntu) "xserver-xorg-video-vesa 1:2.6.0-1build1 FTBFS on armhf" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/206215912:27
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Debian bug 1064702 in src:libxcb "libxcb: FTBFS: KeyError: 'xcb_report_level_t'" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/106470212:27
tjaaltonfor 1064702 I uploaded a fixk, but now it's complaining about new symbols for some reason12:29
tjaalton-k12:29
xypronI am looking for a sponsor for LP #2062166 which is needed for the release.14:38
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2062166 in cd-boot-images-riscv64 (Ubuntu) "Rebuild against u-boot-sifive 2024.01+dfsg-1ubuntu5" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/206216614:38
bdrungi am looking into it14:40
bdrungxypron, why do you specify exact versions instead of using ">="?14:42
xypronbdrung: this was suggested in a review of a prior release.14:43
xypronbdrung: I am fine if this is changed to >= or the constraint is lifted completely.14:43
bdrungxypron, do you have a pointer to the previous discussion?14:44
xypronno14:44
xypronbdrung: The package is only used to generate live-installer images.14:46
xypronbdrung: cd-boot-images-arm64 also uses an exact version for GRUB: grub-efi-arm64-signed (= 1.201+2.12-1ubuntu1) [arm64]14:49
=== utkarsh71 is now known as utkarsh2102
bdrungsponsored14:58
dokobdrung:16:13
doko<doko> aurel32: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11477016:13
doko<aurel32> doko: that change has been done by Benjamin Drung, so please see with him16:13
doko<aurel32> i guess we can change from symlinks to hardlinks, but then some users will complain16:13
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- gcc.gnu.org bug 114770 in gcc "std::chrono::locate_zone('Asia/Chungking') fails on Debian Sid" [Normal, Unconfirmed]16:13
bdrungdoko, okay, can we have a bug report in Debian/Ubuntu for that?16:18
sudipopenmotor needs to be removed, it depends on python3-scikit-fmm which is not available.19:53
ahasenackif ceph has just dropped 32bits (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/19.2.0~git20240301.4c76c50-0ubuntu5/+build/28114799), should it even run dep8 tests on armhf?20:11
ahasenackI suppose a bug is missing, to remove its armhf packages?20:13
ahasenackah, doko just did something a few hours ago, according to the last comments on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/206181520:14
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2061815 in uwsgi (Ubuntu) "[FFE] Drop support for non-64 bit architectures for ceph" [Medium, Fix Released]20:14
ahasenackstill, migration is blocked on something related20:14
dokoahasenack: ceph-mgr-dashboard/amd64 has unsatisfiable dependency  I didn't investigate, and won't tonight. but I can catch up tomorrow20:23
ahasenackdoko: ok, but just so I understand (part of) the process,20:24
ahasenackdoko: in that bug you removed tgt:20:24
ahasenackRemoving packages from noble:20:24
ahasenack tgt 1:1.0.85-1.1ubuntu6 in noble armhf20:24
ahasenackbut I see the armhf binaries published in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tgt/1:1.0.85-1.1ubuntu620:25
ahasenackbut not in rmadison20:25
dokoahasenack: the lp page doesn't change status. I just checked. the tgt binary is removed20:26
ahasenackdoko: but dep8 tests are still attempting to run for armhf, is that a bug over there?20:27
ahasenackor does tgt (for example) need a no-change-rebuild upload to set things straight again?20:27
sergiodjahasenack: if you go to the actual binary page (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/armhf/tgt/1:1.0.85-1.1ubuntu6) you'll see that it's marked as deleted20:29
dokoplease ask the release team to hint these, there's unfortunately manual action required. point them to the bug report about the removals20:29
dokobdmurray: ^^^ if you have time for some productive work20:30

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!