| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
| lotuspsychje | good morning | 03:20 |
|---|---|---|
| lotuspsychje | smoltalk: wich subiquity did you try | 08:49 |
| smoltalk | lotuspsychje I'm using the version installed with the 24.04 desktop release I flashed a couple of days ago | 08:57 |
| smoltalk | I'm following the Curtin documentation to delete all of the path keys (since they're apparently ignored anyway) and instead rely on the device serials, which I've already pulled from `/dev/disk/by-id` | 08:58 |
| smoltalk | I read that there's a way to tweak udev to assign devices in a fixed order, but that seems like overkill for what I'm doing | 08:58 |
| smoltalk | If I get some time, it would be fun to submit some Subiquity PRs to add better support for multiple disks (either a UI update in the default mode, or adding support for LVM/LUKS in the manual partitioning UI). Also the source looks like it's not great with validating the storage config via Curtin. It would be cool to find a way to improve that. | 09:02 |
| smoltalk | a UI update to install across multiple disks in the default mode* | 09:03 |
| smoltalk | But I guess that's not really possible if creating a LUKS-encrypted partition and then putting LVM on top of it, rather than the other way around. | 09:04 |
| smoltalk | lotuspsychje any idea why later Ubuntu versions switched up to LVM over LUKS? IIRC, it used to be the other way around? | 09:05 |
| lordievader | IIRC ubuntu put the pv on a luks encrypted volume for years. Has that changed? | 09:50 |
| smoltalk | lordievader not sure... I thought I remembered the 18.04 installer setting it up for me as LUKS over LVM when I enabled encryption on /home (no secure boot / FDE), but I could be mistaken | 09:58 |
| smoltalk | So after running both the 24.04 and 22.04 graphical installers, I'm confident in saying that I was wrong about my issue being specific to 24.04. It's not straightforward on either version to set up encrypted partitions and secure boot on a multi-disk system. | 12:05 |
| smoltalk | One thing I've learned from this is that it might be worthwhile to submit a Subiquity PR to add a third installation option aside from "Erase disk and install Ubuntu" or "Do something else": "Customize defaults" or something equivalent. It would have an "Advanced options" button like the first option, but take you to the manual partition UI after | 12:05 |
| smoltalk | to customize the partition table that would have been created by default. | 12:05 |
| smoltalk | Any thoughts/feedback/suggestion here before I move this to an issue and verify so I can move towards a PR? | 12:05 |
| jp__ | is openstack user friendly? | 12:38 |
| jp__ | i am noob, me want to make big server. me only know a little python. me succeed? | 12:38 |
| ravage | Openstack is not user friendly at all | 12:59 |
| ravage | Also one big server does not make a stack | 13:00 |
| === madmax__ is now known as madmax | ||
| Bashing-om | UWN: Issue837 now available to our reading public: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-weekly-newsletter-issue-837/44392 :D | 22:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!