/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/04/30/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-default-settings (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.26 => 24.04.26.1] (ubuntustudio)00:08
=== dviererbe1 is now known as dviererbe
=== chris14_ is now known as chris14
tsimonq2wxl, Eickmeyer: We don't even have base-files or distro-info-data yet, I think lxd-installer just made it to the queue first ;)02:15
Eickmeyertsimonq2: noble -> oracular file copy is in progress. I have `ubuntustudio-installer` in oracular already with matching versions.02:16
EickmeyerYou don't have to be on the same release to upload to it.02:17
tsimonq2Eickmeyer: I know that all too well, just a matter of "the queue isn't even ready yet"02:49
Eickmeyertsimonq2: "DON'T TELL ME WHAT I KNOW, TRAVIS!" --Some animal in Zootopia02:50
tsimonq2hah02:50
tsimonq2I'll check back in the morning, but my Oracular list is as follows (probably in this order): lintian, vim, devscripts, debootstrap. At the very least, devscripts and debootstrap need distro-info built and published in -proposed before accepting, the former two can be done any time.02:56
tsimonq2I'd also like to start a Qt 6 transition ASAP, although I'm willing to wait for official archive opening on that one.02:56
tsimonq2(Re: Qt 6, the choices are either "bootstrap in Bileto" or "bootstrap in the archive" - more details can be found here: https://qt-kde-team.pages.debian.net/qt6-build-deps.html - specifically "packages must be built without arch:all until qttools is available")02:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nbd (noble-proposed/main) [1:3.26.1-1build1 => 1:3.26.1-1ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server)04:11
danilogondolfoubuntu-sru: may I ask you to reject netplan.io from jammy and mantic sru queues, please? I need to fix a little thing in the changelog...09:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware-xilinx-ap1302 [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:2.0-0ubuntu1~23.10.1]10:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware-xilinx-ap1302 [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:2.0-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]10:03
=== pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (noble-proposed/main) [0.60 => 0.60ubuntu0.1] (core)10:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (mantic-proposed/main) [0.58ubuntu0.2 => 0.58ubuntu0.3] (core)12:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (jammy-proposed/main) [0.52ubuntu0.6 => 0.52ubuntu0.7] (core, i386-whitelist)12:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (focal-proposed/main) [0.43ubuntu1.15 => 0.43ubuntu1.16] (core, i386-whitelist)12:25
Trevinhobdmurray: could please check https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=gnome-shell-extension-appindicator ? Bugs should all have the SRU template now12:37
TrevinhoI guess I've to upload the same to Oracular though, or will be that copied over automatically (being in queue for a while?)12:39
Skiab_dmurray is afk this week, fyi Trevinho :-)12:55
TrevinhoSkia: Oh, I see I just checked he was on SRU duties on wiki... Well, someone else from the SRU team then when have time :)12:56
=== fuseteam1 is now known as fuseteam
LocutusOfBorghello, I would like to make abseil build before opening if possible :)14:11
LocutusOfBorgit was a transition nacked on noble due to freeze, better do it for okular14:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: abseil (oracular-proposed/main) [20220623.1-3.1ubuntu3 => 20230802.1-4] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)14:11
ricotzLocutusOfBorg, hey :), let me know when you are planning a libreoffice rebuild, I can upload a new release candidate instead14:18
LocutusOfBorgricotz, ^^ if they approve abseil, it would be a good timing :)14:21
LocutusOfBorgI remember there were some reasons to do it with opening, and probably LO was the reason14:21
ricotzLocutusOfBorg, I will be afk for a few hours, so let me know :)14:22
LocutusOfBorghonestly I don't know if oracular is open or not14:24
LocutusOfBorgand if toolchain updates are planned on opening14:25
ricotzI was just mentioning it to avoid a no-change rebuild, don't worry14:26
LocutusOfBorgyeah, and for sure I will ask you when the package is published, I don't like to fetch/upload LO, takes a lot of bandwith14:28
LocutusOfBorgalso poco was rejected https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poco/1.13.0-614:30
LocutusOfBorgmaybe it can be re-accepted during opening14:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (mantic-proposed/main) [0.107-5ubuntu0.2 => 0.107.1-3ubuntu0.23.10.1] (core)15:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (jammy-proposed/main) [0.106.1-7ubuntu0.22.04.2 => 0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1] (core)15:07
slyon^ the old uploads from 2024-03-21 should be dropped (CC danilogondolfo, sil2100)15:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected netplan.io [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1]16:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected netplan.io [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.23.10.1]16:00
apwslyon, ^16:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lintian (oracular-proposed/main) [2.117.0ubuntu1 => 2.117.0ubuntu2] (core)16:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ucf (jammy-proposed/main) [3.0043 => 3.0043ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)16:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (oracular-proposed/main) [0.60 => 0.62] (core) (sync)16:48
tsimonq2kajiya_, bdrung: ^16:48
tsimonq2I caught it just as Launchpad picked it up :)16:48
kajiya_woop woop, awesome! Thank you tsimonq2 :)16:49
tsimonq2of course :)16:49
bdrungthen only the SRUs need to be accepted16:51
tsimonq2bdrung: Do you happen to know if there's a plan for base-files?16:52
tsimonq2Ah looks like I was wrong about debootstrap needing an upload, thanks LocutusOfBorg ;)16:52
bdrungtsimonq2, sorry, no. I don't know who takes care of base-files usually16:53
tsimonq2I found this: https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-161216:55
tsimonq2Just took care of https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1683 and https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1684 - bdrung it looks like you took care of https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1649 (which should probably be specific to distro-info-data)16:56
bdrunghttps://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1649 is about at least distro-info-data and base-files16:57
tsimonq2Ah, cool. Also looks like it's unassigned.16:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devscripts (oracular-proposed/main) [2.23.7 => 2.23.7build1] (core, i386-whitelist)17:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (oracular-proposed/main) [13ubuntu10 => 13ubuntu11] (core, i386-whitelist)17:06
tsimonq2I was pretty careful with that one (cross-ref'ed with Noble's first base-files upload), but I'd encourage another thorough look ^^^^17:07
tsimonq2ubuntu-release: Please only accept devscripts once distro-info-data and base-files have built in oracular-proposed. :)17:13
tsimonq2Vim looks happy in my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/+archive/ubuntu/oracular-test/+packages17:33
tsimonq2uploaded17:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vim (oracular-proposed/main) [2:9.1.0016-1ubuntu7 => 2:9.1.0377-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)17:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (oracular-proposed/main) [1.22.6ubuntu6 => 1.22.6ubuntu8] (core, i386-whitelist)19:04
tsimonq2Transition tracker switched to Oracular: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-transition-trackers/ubuntu-transition-tracker/configs/revision/110819:09
tsimonq2bdrung, mapreri: Upload of devscripts to Unstable with this, maybe? https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/-/commit/827bc068609f1b55866265ca2f9433248f062aa619:10
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit 827bc06 in debian/devscripts "scripts/reproducible-check: reformat with black 24.2"19:10
tsimonq2My NCR just failed in the PPA, that commit fixes it, I don't like introducing devscripts deltas.19:10
tsimonq2(But I probably will, in this case. :P)19:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pytest-flake8 (oracular-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-4 => 1.1.1-5] (no packageset) (sync)19:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devscripts (oracular-proposed/main) [2.23.7 => 2.23.7ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)19:43
vorlonTrevinho: can you please add an SRU template to bug #2059819?20:23
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2059819 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "Regression: Jammy to Noble, right clicking on some icons shows dropdown on left side of screen" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/205981920:23
vorlonTrevinho: er sorry hold on20:24
vorlonTrevinho: apparently it's there and I needed to refresh!20:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-appindicator [source] (noble-proposed) [58-1]20:28
Trevinhovorlon: yeah, it should be there :)20:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calamares-settings-ubuntu (oracular-proposed/universe) [1:24.04.39 => 1:24.10.1] (lubuntu, ubuntustudio)20:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-artwork (oracular-proposed/universe) [24.04.6 => 24.10.1] (lubuntu)20:32
tsimonq2^^^ s/noble/oracular/ and s/24.04 LTS/24.10/20:32
liushuyushould someone change the topic of this channel now that OO is open?20:42
vorlonit's not actually open, we're in archive-opening freeze20:43
tsimonq2^^^ I'm just doing what I can to help out with that :)20:44
dbungertliushuyu: did you find while working on LP: #2059856 that you had a hang in package build due to a wayward gdbserver process?  This also happens for me in the current jammy version, so I don't think it's related to your change.20:45
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2059856 in gdb (Ubuntu) "gdb 10.0 fails to examine any global variables in D programs" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/205985620:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (noble-proposed) [2024a-3ubuntu1]20:45
vorlonbdrung: how does your ziguard.awk change in mantic (for which there is no linked bug) relate to the noble SRU?20:47
bdrungvorlon, the ziguard.awk change was done to address all cases of bug #205571821:08
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2055718 in tzdata (Ubuntu Mantic) "timezone changed unexpectedly from EST to America/Adak or America/Indiana/Indianapolis" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/205571821:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-software [source] (noble-proposed) [46.0-4]21:11
liushuyudbungert: which package was that? I don't recall there was a hang, since I do have a PPA build for the patched version https://launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/+archive/ubuntu/gdb-testing/+packages21:12
vorlonbdrung: yet, this exact patch (ziguard.awk-Move-link-to-link-feature-from-vanguard-to-ma.patch) shows up in the delta of the *noble* SRU as having been removed as part of fixing the C++ crashes?21:12
liushuyuIf the target platform is arm64/armhf, then you might be interested in https://bugs.launchpad.net/gdb/+bug/204139621:14
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2041396 in gdb (Ubuntu Jammy) "gdb 12.1 generates SIGILL on armhf" [Undecided, Incomplete]21:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-apt [sync] (noble-proposed) [2.8.0]21:14
bdrungvorlon, now I get your question. ziguard.awk-Move-link-to-link-feature-from-vanguard-to-ma.patch was my first approach to fix the wrong symlinks, but that causes links pointing to links. Correct-timezone-symlinks-when-using-BACKWARD-backward-PA.patch is the second and less invasive approach.21:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (noble-proposed) [2.28.1-0ubuntu3]21:17
vorlonbdrung: ok but ziguard.awk-Move-link-to-link-feature-from-vanguard-to-ma.patch is in the mantic debdiff, does this mean it should be rejected?21:17
bdrungvorlon, yes please. I thought the SRU uploads for 2055718 were rejected (mantic was probably missed).21:18
vorlonbdrung: ack21:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (mantic-proposed) [2024a-0ubuntu0.23.10.1]21:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvswitch [source] (noble-proposed) [3.3.0-1ubuntu2]21:19
bdrunglet me prepare the v2 patches for bug #205571821:19
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2055718 in tzdata (Ubuntu Mantic) "timezone changed unexpectedly from EST to America/Adak or America/Indiana/Indianapolis" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/205571821:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (noble-proposed) [46.0-1ubuntu4.1]21:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (mantic-proposed/main) [2024a-0ubuntu0.23.10 => 2024a-0ubuntu0.23.10.1] (core, i386-whitelist)21:34
bdrungvorlon, here you go ^21:35
vorlonbdrung: cheers (I'm not on SRU duty today though, I'm only doing cleanup of pre-release noble uploads in unapproved and it told me about there being a version in mantic also which is why I looked)21:50
liushuyudbungert: were you building on your local ARM device or Launchpad?21:52
dbungertamd64 gdb jammy21:52
bdrungthe jammy SRU will need to wait for the next working day. the Python test case complains (I need to check what is the difference between mantic/noble and jammy there)21:53
liushuyudbungert: on the physical device or a container/VM? I can try to reproduce the issue21:53
dbungertliushuyu: sbuild on a physical device21:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [sync] (oracular-proposed) [0.62]21:56
liushuyudbungert: Thanks! I am testing the build with sbuild21:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (noble-proposed) [0.60ubuntu0.1]22:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.58ubuntu0.3]22:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.52ubuntu0.7]22:03
vorlonbdrung: ^ as soon as those can get verified, I'll publish them to -updates22:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (focal-proposed) [0.43ubuntu1.16]22:04
bdrungvorlon, how long does it take for the builds to propagate to the mirrors normally?22:12
vorlonbdrung: ~1h in total22:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (oracular-proposed/main) [1.5.3-5ubuntu5 => 1.5.3-7ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)22:33
dbungertvorlon: ^22:33
liushuyudbungert: that runaway gdbserver keeps restarting itself due to unable to initiate a session, I can investigate this22:47
tsimonq2vorlon: Thanks for the distro-info-data acceptance :)23:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!