[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-default-settings (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.26 => 24.04.26.1] (ubuntustudio) === dviererbe1 is now known as dviererbe === chris14_ is now known as chris14 [02:15] wxl, Eickmeyer: We don't even have base-files or distro-info-data yet, I think lxd-installer just made it to the queue first ;) [02:16] tsimonq2: noble -> oracular file copy is in progress. I have `ubuntustudio-installer` in oracular already with matching versions. [02:17] You don't have to be on the same release to upload to it. [02:49] Eickmeyer: I know that all too well, just a matter of "the queue isn't even ready yet" [02:50] tsimonq2: "DON'T TELL ME WHAT I KNOW, TRAVIS!" --Some animal in Zootopia [02:50] hah [02:56] I'll check back in the morning, but my Oracular list is as follows (probably in this order): lintian, vim, devscripts, debootstrap. At the very least, devscripts and debootstrap need distro-info built and published in -proposed before accepting, the former two can be done any time. [02:56] I'd also like to start a Qt 6 transition ASAP, although I'm willing to wait for official archive opening on that one. [02:58] (Re: Qt 6, the choices are either "bootstrap in Bileto" or "bootstrap in the archive" - more details can be found here: https://qt-kde-team.pages.debian.net/qt6-build-deps.html - specifically "packages must be built without arch:all until qttools is available") [04:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nbd (noble-proposed/main) [1:3.26.1-1build1 => 1:3.26.1-1ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server) [09:38] ubuntu-sru: may I ask you to reject netplan.io from jammy and mantic sru queues, please? I need to fix a little thing in the changelog... [10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware-xilinx-ap1302 [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:2.0-0ubuntu1~23.10.1] [10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware-xilinx-ap1302 [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:2.0-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] === pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk [10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (noble-proposed/main) [0.60 => 0.60ubuntu0.1] (core) [12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (mantic-proposed/main) [0.58ubuntu0.2 => 0.58ubuntu0.3] (core) [12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (jammy-proposed/main) [0.52ubuntu0.6 => 0.52ubuntu0.7] (core, i386-whitelist) [12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (focal-proposed/main) [0.43ubuntu1.15 => 0.43ubuntu1.16] (core, i386-whitelist) [12:37] bdmurray: could please check https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=gnome-shell-extension-appindicator ? Bugs should all have the SRU template now [12:39] I guess I've to upload the same to Oracular though, or will be that copied over automatically (being in queue for a while?) [12:55] b_dmurray is afk this week, fyi Trevinho :-) [12:56] Skia: Oh, I see I just checked he was on SRU duties on wiki... Well, someone else from the SRU team then when have time :) === fuseteam1 is now known as fuseteam [14:11] hello, I would like to make abseil build before opening if possible :) [14:11] it was a transition nacked on noble due to freeze, better do it for okular [14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: abseil (oracular-proposed/main) [20220623.1-3.1ubuntu3 => 20230802.1-4] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) [14:18] LocutusOfBorg, hey :), let me know when you are planning a libreoffice rebuild, I can upload a new release candidate instead [14:21] ricotz, ^^ if they approve abseil, it would be a good timing :) [14:21] I remember there were some reasons to do it with opening, and probably LO was the reason [14:22] LocutusOfBorg, I will be afk for a few hours, so let me know :) [14:24] honestly I don't know if oracular is open or not [14:25] and if toolchain updates are planned on opening [14:26] I was just mentioning it to avoid a no-change rebuild, don't worry [14:28] yeah, and for sure I will ask you when the package is published, I don't like to fetch/upload LO, takes a lot of bandwith [14:30] also poco was rejected https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poco/1.13.0-6 [14:30] maybe it can be re-accepted during opening [15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (mantic-proposed/main) [0.107-5ubuntu0.2 => 0.107.1-3ubuntu0.23.10.1] (core) [15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (jammy-proposed/main) [0.106.1-7ubuntu0.22.04.2 => 0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1] (core) [15:07] ^ the old uploads from 2024-03-21 should be dropped (CC danilogondolfo, sil2100) [16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected netplan.io [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1] [16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected netplan.io [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.23.10.1] [16:03] slyon, ^ [16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lintian (oracular-proposed/main) [2.117.0ubuntu1 => 2.117.0ubuntu2] (core) [16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ucf (jammy-proposed/main) [3.0043 => 3.0043ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (oracular-proposed/main) [0.60 => 0.62] (core) (sync) [16:48] kajiya_, bdrung: ^ [16:48] I caught it just as Launchpad picked it up :) [16:49] woop woop, awesome! Thank you tsimonq2 :) [16:49] of course :) [16:51] then only the SRUs need to be accepted [16:52] bdrung: Do you happen to know if there's a plan for base-files? [16:52] Ah looks like I was wrong about debootstrap needing an upload, thanks LocutusOfBorg ;) [16:53] tsimonq2, sorry, no. I don't know who takes care of base-files usually [16:55] I found this: https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1612 [16:56] Just took care of https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1683 and https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1684 - bdrung it looks like you took care of https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1649 (which should probably be specific to distro-info-data) [16:57] https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1649 is about at least distro-info-data and base-files [16:58] Ah, cool. Also looks like it's unassigned. [17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devscripts (oracular-proposed/main) [2.23.7 => 2.23.7build1] (core, i386-whitelist) [17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (oracular-proposed/main) [13ubuntu10 => 13ubuntu11] (core, i386-whitelist) [17:07] I was pretty careful with that one (cross-ref'ed with Noble's first base-files upload), but I'd encourage another thorough look ^^^^ [17:13] ubuntu-release: Please only accept devscripts once distro-info-data and base-files have built in oracular-proposed. :) [17:33] Vim looks happy in my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/+archive/ubuntu/oracular-test/+packages [17:33] uploaded [17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vim (oracular-proposed/main) [2:9.1.0016-1ubuntu7 => 2:9.1.0377-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (oracular-proposed/main) [1.22.6ubuntu6 => 1.22.6ubuntu8] (core, i386-whitelist) [19:09] Transition tracker switched to Oracular: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-transition-trackers/ubuntu-transition-tracker/configs/revision/1108 [19:10] bdrung, mapreri: Upload of devscripts to Unstable with this, maybe? https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/-/commit/827bc068609f1b55866265ca2f9433248f062aa6 [19:10] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit 827bc06 in debian/devscripts "scripts/reproducible-check: reformat with black 24.2" [19:10] My NCR just failed in the PPA, that commit fixes it, I don't like introducing devscripts deltas. [19:10] (But I probably will, in this case. :P) [19:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pytest-flake8 (oracular-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-4 => 1.1.1-5] (no packageset) (sync) [19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devscripts (oracular-proposed/main) [2.23.7 => 2.23.7ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [20:23] Trevinho: can you please add an SRU template to bug #2059819? [20:23] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2059819 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "Regression: Jammy to Noble, right clicking on some icons shows dropdown on left side of screen" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2059819 [20:24] Trevinho: er sorry hold on [20:24] Trevinho: apparently it's there and I needed to refresh! [20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-appindicator [source] (noble-proposed) [58-1] [20:28] vorlon: yeah, it should be there :) [20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calamares-settings-ubuntu (oracular-proposed/universe) [1:24.04.39 => 1:24.10.1] (lubuntu, ubuntustudio) [20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-artwork (oracular-proposed/universe) [24.04.6 => 24.10.1] (lubuntu) [20:32] ^^^ s/noble/oracular/ and s/24.04 LTS/24.10/ [20:42] should someone change the topic of this channel now that OO is open? [20:43] it's not actually open, we're in archive-opening freeze [20:44] ^^^ I'm just doing what I can to help out with that :) [20:45] liushuyu: did you find while working on LP: #2059856 that you had a hang in package build due to a wayward gdbserver process? This also happens for me in the current jammy version, so I don't think it's related to your change. [20:45] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2059856 in gdb (Ubuntu) "gdb 10.0 fails to examine any global variables in D programs" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2059856 [20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (noble-proposed) [2024a-3ubuntu1] [20:47] bdrung: how does your ziguard.awk change in mantic (for which there is no linked bug) relate to the noble SRU? [21:08] vorlon, the ziguard.awk change was done to address all cases of bug #2055718 [21:08] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2055718 in tzdata (Ubuntu Mantic) "timezone changed unexpectedly from EST to America/Adak or America/Indiana/Indianapolis" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2055718 [21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-software [source] (noble-proposed) [46.0-4] [21:12] dbungert: which package was that? I don't recall there was a hang, since I do have a PPA build for the patched version https://launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/+archive/ubuntu/gdb-testing/+packages [21:12] bdrung: yet, this exact patch (ziguard.awk-Move-link-to-link-feature-from-vanguard-to-ma.patch) shows up in the delta of the *noble* SRU as having been removed as part of fixing the C++ crashes? [21:14] If the target platform is arm64/armhf, then you might be interested in https://bugs.launchpad.net/gdb/+bug/2041396 [21:14] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2041396 in gdb (Ubuntu Jammy) "gdb 12.1 generates SIGILL on armhf" [Undecided, Incomplete] [21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-apt [sync] (noble-proposed) [2.8.0] [21:16] vorlon, now I get your question. ziguard.awk-Move-link-to-link-feature-from-vanguard-to-ma.patch was my first approach to fix the wrong symlinks, but that causes links pointing to links. Correct-timezone-symlinks-when-using-BACKWARD-backward-PA.patch is the second and less invasive approach. [21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (noble-proposed) [2.28.1-0ubuntu3] [21:17] bdrung: ok but ziguard.awk-Move-link-to-link-feature-from-vanguard-to-ma.patch is in the mantic debdiff, does this mean it should be rejected? [21:18] vorlon, yes please. I thought the SRU uploads for 2055718 were rejected (mantic was probably missed). [21:18] bdrung: ack [21:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (mantic-proposed) [2024a-0ubuntu0.23.10.1] [21:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvswitch [source] (noble-proposed) [3.3.0-1ubuntu2] [21:19] let me prepare the v2 patches for bug #2055718 [21:19] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2055718 in tzdata (Ubuntu Mantic) "timezone changed unexpectedly from EST to America/Adak or America/Indiana/Indianapolis" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2055718 [21:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (noble-proposed) [46.0-1ubuntu4.1] [21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (mantic-proposed/main) [2024a-0ubuntu0.23.10 => 2024a-0ubuntu0.23.10.1] (core, i386-whitelist) [21:35] vorlon, here you go ^ [21:50] bdrung: cheers (I'm not on SRU duty today though, I'm only doing cleanup of pre-release noble uploads in unapproved and it told me about there being a version in mantic also which is why I looked) [21:52] dbungert: were you building on your local ARM device or Launchpad? [21:52] amd64 gdb jammy [21:53] the jammy SRU will need to wait for the next working day. the Python test case complains (I need to check what is the difference between mantic/noble and jammy there) [21:53] dbungert: on the physical device or a container/VM? I can try to reproduce the issue [21:54] liushuyu: sbuild on a physical device [21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [sync] (oracular-proposed) [0.62] [21:58] dbungert: Thanks! I am testing the build with sbuild [22:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (noble-proposed) [0.60ubuntu0.1] [22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.58ubuntu0.3] [22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.52ubuntu0.7] [22:03] bdrung: ^ as soon as those can get verified, I'll publish them to -updates [22:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (focal-proposed) [0.43ubuntu1.16] [22:12] vorlon, how long does it take for the builds to propagate to the mirrors normally? [22:14] bdrung: ~1h in total [22:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (oracular-proposed/main) [1.5.3-5ubuntu5 => 1.5.3-7ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [22:33] vorlon: ^ [22:47] dbungert: that runaway gdbserver keeps restarting itself due to unable to initiate a session, I can investigate this [23:55] vorlon: Thanks for the distro-info-data acceptance :)