[00:36] Not directly. Generally if you think it is upstream, we use bugs.kde.org. Otherwise launchpad. [12:45] Hi all [16:08] hi everyone [16:09] RikMills: I had a look @ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/extra-cmake-modules/+bug/2065090 [16:09] -ubottu:#kubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2065090 in extra-cmake-modules (Ubuntu) "Backport cmake 3.29 compatibility fix" [Undecided, New] [16:09] Hi santa_, Britney has been broken, hopefully soon we'll have a good picture of what's going on WRT the Qt 6.6.2 transition [16:09] tsimonq2: aha, thanks [16:10] reading the bug I linked above, the problem is fixed in 5.116.0 [16:11] about e-c-m 6.x I think the idea is that it would be a replacement for 5, but I wold like to have a clear confirmation from upstream, so I think I'm going to ask in some mailing list [16:13] fw 5.116.0 is going to be released officially this saturday, the packages are already finished (unless there's some tarball re-spin) [16:14] meaning we could fix this either: [16:16] a) including a patch right now in the 5.115 package (I can prepare that in the _archive branch if you are willing to upload it to the archive) [16:17] b) this saturday someone uploads the fw 5.116 packages and so get the fix in the archive [16:18] I wouldn't consider the e-c-m 6.x option yet, because like I said I would like to have a confirmation that e-c-m 6 is suposed to coimpletely replace e-c-m 5 [16:18] * completely [16:18] so ... [16:19] what do you want to do? [16:23] I can put a couple hours in Saturday to work on 5.116 [16:24] sgmoore: the packages are done, they juts need to be uploaded, but... [16:24] they didn't update the package set I think [16:24] probably I should send them a friendly reminder [16:25] yeah I have quite a few packages I am unable to upload as well. I sent a request to DMB but so far it has gone ignored. [16:27] I think I am ok on frameworks and can upload on Saturday. Any problem ones I will bug tsimonq2 to upload [16:59] ah, nevermind [16:59] all kf5 is in the packageset already