/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/05/09/#ubuntu-devel.txt

rbasakEickmeyer: FWIW, you're not supposed to be able to push directly to git-ubuntu repositories. They're read-only.06:11
rbasakThe staging branches are supposed to be the exception but they're not live yet (waiting on a Launchpad feature request).06:11
rbasakEickmeyer: https://canonical-git-ubuntu.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/latest/howto/upload.html for how to "push" rich history with git-ubuntu06:12
=== pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk
=== sem2peie- is now known as sem2peie
Eickmeyerrbasak: Ah. Makes sense. Still came in handy as I did a `pull-lp-source` and `git ubuntu` for the merge and then built the package as normal and uploaded that way. Worked like a charm.14:14
arif-aliathos, thanks for your comments on the sosreport LP, I've got to the point of using debdiff-apply, and get the issue on "don't know how to rebase version-change", is that normal14:32
Eickmeyerarif-ali: debdiff-apply isn't really for you to use, but for the sponsor to use. :)14:40
arif-aliEickmeyer: sure, wanted to make sure it would apply cleanly as per the issues with symbolic links yesterday. So wanted to see if that was something I need to worry about14:41
LocutusOfBorgahasenack, LP: #2063841 has a new comment14:43
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2063841 in virtualbox-hwe (Ubuntu) "[SRU] virtualbox crash on network traffic" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/206384114:43
LocutusOfBorgplease tell me if something is still missing, or you want something changed14:43
ahasenack_k14:43
LocutusOfBorgI'm a little bit afk but will answer eventually :D14:43
athosarif-ali: if that is the only issue you are  facing, it is fine. I will deal with it before uploading :) Thanks for addressing it.14:44
arif-aliack, thanks14:45
john-cabajNot sure anyone is around, but I'm hoping to get sponsorship on some new packages for LTS releases pre-Noble (Jammy, Focal, Bionic) - https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206336215:25
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2063362 in involflt (Ubuntu Jammy) "Backport for 22.04, 20.04, and 18.04" [Undecided, In Progress]15:26
tsimonq2@pilot in15:45
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: tsimonq2
tsimonq2o/15:45
tsimonq2liushuyu needs a bouncer ;P16:00
john-cabajtsimonq2: Are you able to have a look at the LP bug above?16:05
tsimonq2john-cabaj: Sure :)16:06
john-cabajtsimonq2: Thanks!16:09
tsimonq2john-cabaj: I'm a community member, so I don't have as much insight on this package's purpose as you probably do... that being said, if you need this in Bionic, that has passed the standard 5 year support cycle. I'd talk to the ESM team.16:11
tsimonq2john-cabaj: For Focal and Jammy, I'll do a full source NEW review (the works), but from an SRU team perspective my gut tells me they'll want more information.16:11
john-cabajtsimonq2: Noted. Priority is Jammy and Focal16:12
tsimonq2john-cabaj: `lintian -EvIL +pedantic` throws me these two, I would be mindful of them for future uploads but I won't block on them: executable-not-elf-or-script (probably comes from upstream?), wrong-section-according-to-package-name (can be done via an Archive Admin override)16:16
tsimonq2Oh, on the source build itself I'm getting missing-build-dependency-for-dh-addon and missing-build-dependency-for-dh_-command ... should be a fairly simple fix16:19
john-cabajtsimonq2: Interesting. The packages did build fine in my PPA16:19
tsimonq2Yeah, that is somewhat confusing, hm16:21
* tsimonq2 sees if it builds any different with dh-dkms as a build dep16:23
tsimonq2john-cabaj: Is this intended to ship the *built* kernel module or just the source files under /usr/src/involflt-0.1.0/ ?16:27
john-cabajtsimonq2: It's intended to ultimately build the module with the kernel. The kernel build pulls in DKMS, builds it, and packages the module16:30
john-cabajSo the former, I believe16:31
tsimonq2I ask because as-is, it only ships the source under /usr/src/involflt-0.1.0/16:31
tsimonq2I'm also not very familiar with DKMS packages :)16:32
john-cabajtsimonq2: Right, I think if you were to install the DKMS package standalone, it would go there.16:32
john-cabajBut this should be part of the kernel build eventually (similar to zfs-linux, v4l2loopback, etc...)16:33
tsimonq2john-cabaj: Okay, I'm mostly satisfied here - the only thing that caught my eye besides the aforementioned Lintian flags is that src/md5.c is public domain. I'll add the debian/copyright entry and get these in the queue for you; that being said, I'd still suggest making the SRU bug report more detailed :)16:37
tsimonq2( licensecheck --copyright -r . )16:38
john-cabajtsimonq2: Thanks for giving it a look!16:38
tsimonq2No problem :)16:39
tsimonq2@pilot out17:45
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: N/A
arraybolt3tsimonq2: ok so what am I doing wrong here18:11
arraybolt3first I downloaded the build logs of all the failed qcoro builds and stuck them in a directory.18:11
arraybolt3Made sure they were unzipped and named differently, so they're all there.18:11
arraybolt3Then I went into the root of the qcoro source package tree, and did pkgkde-symbolshelper batchpatch -v 0.10.0 ../qcoro-symbols/*18:12
arraybolt3this spits out a ton of output and it does indeed change the symbols, but then when I build qcoro again locally, it has a bunch more added and removed symbols that almost seem to have been "missed".18:12
arraybolt3Any clue what happened there?18:12
arraybolt3(part of me is tempted to just surgically convert each build log into a diff file and then `patch` it manually)18:13
RikMillsarraybolt3: pkgkde-symbolshelper batchpatch -v 0.10.0 -c amd64,arm64,armhf,ppc64el,riscv64,s390x../qcoro-symbols/* is what I would have done at 1st18:43
tsimonq2arraybolt3: try piping it into the command?18:45
tsimonq2I'd have to clone it myself, but if you're stuck I can do that18:46
arraybolt3I'll give it a shot later on, thanks!18:47
tsimonq2yw :)18:48
liushuyutsimonq2: Thanks for looking through all the merge proposals!19:06
liushuyutsimonq2: liushuyu needs a bouncer ;P > I did not use a bouncer because I know where to find the scroll back19:07
RikMillsarraybolt3: do you mean your local qcoro build failed again on symbols, or it succeeded but with messy symbols output?19:37
tsimonq2liushuyu: hahahaha fair enough ;)19:38
tsimonq2liushuyu: Also, I didn't look through *all* of them, I left a few of the complicated ones ;P19:38
arraybolt3RikMills: It succeeded but with messy symbols output.19:39
arraybolt3And I'm unsure if it would have succeeded had I pushed to the archive.19:39
RikMillsarraybolt3: arraybolt3 the current symbols file have a lot of MISSING entries commented out with a #19:39
RikMillsis that perhaps what you are seeing?19:40
arraybolt3maybe, but it wasn't just that, there were symbols that were shown as needing to be added too19:40
arraybolt3so both new symbols and MISSING symbols together in the build log of the "working" build.19:41
RikMillsarraybolt3: so I just did this: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3997/+sourcepub/16128654/+listing-archive-extra19:41
RikMillswhich might be more helpful than a local build19:41
arraybolt3hmm, yours looks substantially nicer than mine19:42
RikMillsyeah, I don't seem to have any added. just missing optional, which is to be expected and allowed19:43
arraybolt3mine was this mess: https://termbin.com/wa1c19:43
arraybolt3and this is *after* pkgkde-symbolshelper19:44
arraybolt3what was the exact command you used to do it?19:44
RikMillsthe one I posted earlier19:44
RikMillsarraybolt3: your above paste seems truncated19:45
liushuyuHi there, can someone with permissions to retry https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gammaray/2.11.3-4ubuntu1/+build/28434638? It should succeed according to my PPA build https://launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/+archive/ubuntu/misc/+build/2842508119:45
liushuyu(This is an universe package, so I suppose any MOTU or CoreDev should be able to do it)19:46
RikMills pkgkde-symbolshelper batchpatch -v 0.10.0 -c amd64,arm64,armhf,ppc64el,riscv64,s390x ../buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-*19:46
tsimonq2liushuyu: .19:47
RikMillsliushuyu: just did it. or collided with tsimonq219:47
RikMills:P19:47
arraybolt3so yeah, the only thing I missed was the "-c" in there. OK, noted.19:48
arraybolt3I vaguely remember needing to do something like that now.19:49
liushuyuRikMills, tsimonq2: Thanks! (Although I am bit nervous because the build job got assigned to the slower ARM worker)19:50
sudipI need to request no-change rebuild of two packages for oracular. Is there any special process to request rebuild or do I just do the usual process of opening new bug, add debdiff and assign to sponsors?20:12
arraybolt3sudip: Easier yet still, say something here and someone who has access can do it.20:17
arraybolt3What two packages, and what are they being rebuilt for so I know what to put in the changelog?20:17
* sudip knows arraybolt3 has access ;-)20:17
sudipdiagnostics and ivtools please. "no-change rebuild for libace-7.1.3"20:18
arraybolt3on it20:19
sudipthanks arraybolt320:19
arraybolt3sudip: done20:24
arraybolt3marked them both as being from you and sponsored them20:25
sudipthanks arraybolt3 :)20:25
sudipnow I know whom to ping next time I upload a new version of libace in Debian  :D20:26
arraybolt3hmm, I have some time to burn, might not do a whole lot but why not...20:29
arraybolt3@pilot in20:29
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: arraybolt3
arraybolt3Currently looking at fstransform.20:34
arraybolt3Patch looks great, building.20:35
RikMillsarraybolt3: do you want me to upload qcoro or leave you another try?20:35
arraybolt3RikMills: If you could, that would be great, it takes a while to build here and if you have the magic words figured out, I'd not introduce another point of potential failure by passing it back to me.20:36
arraybolt3I'm sure I'll get a chance to patch the symbols right again :)20:36
RikMillsack, will do20:36
RikMillsarraybolt3: done20:37
arraybolt3sudip: fstransform patch for Oracular sponsored (bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fstransform/+bug/2060740).20:38
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2060740 in fstransform (Ubuntu Oracular) "fsattr fails to run" [Undecided, Confirmed]20:38
sudiparraybolt3: can you please add release targets for fstransform, Focal, Jammy and Mantic please20:39
arraybolt3sure20:39
sudipthanks :)20:39
arraybolt3done20:40
arraybolt3for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcftools/+bug/2062071, the fix looks like it should be applicable to Oracular too. Do you want to update the patch for that, or would you like me to do it so it can be uploaded and thus become SRU-ready for Noble?20:40
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2062071 in bcftools (Ubuntu) "gff2gff.py crashed with ModuleNotFoundError in Noble" [Medium, Confirmed]20:40
sudiparraybolt3: will be great, if you can do it please. I think I missed it when I was updating all the others to Oracular20:42
arraybolt3kk, doing20:42
sudipthanks a lot20:43
arraybolt3oh, actually, it looks like Debian already has the fix and it's been pulled into Oracular.20:45
arraybolt3So in that instance, the Noble patch is SRU-ready.20:45
sudipI will need to add the SRU information first. removing sponsors for now, will add the info tomorrow and put it to sponsors list again20:47
arraybolt3sounds good20:47
sudiparraybolt3: I can see the no-change upload in diagnostics, but cant see it for ivtools.21:05
sudipdont worry, I can see it now. thanks again :)21:12
arraybolt3Wrote some guidance for the libfilezilla SRU patch here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libfilezilla/+bug/206195421:14
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2061954 in libfilezilla (Ubuntu) "filezilla crashed with SIGABRT in start_thread()" [Undecided, In Progress]21:14
arraybolt3and with that, my patch piloting time is out.21:14
arraybolt3@pilot off21:14
ubottu(pilot <in|out>) -- Set yourself as in or out of patch pilot.21:14
arraybolt3@pilot disable21:14
ubottu(pilot <in|out>) -- Set yourself as in or out of patch pilot.21:14
arraybolt3@pilot out21:14
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Mantic | Patch Pilots: N/A
ahasenack_LocutusOfBorg: I couldn't get to virtualbox, the containerstack sru was huge and was ahead22:05
ahasenack_blackboxsw: ^likewise for cloud-init22:05
blackboxswthanks ahasenack_ for the note. we appreciate the effort22:06
=== dbungert1 is now known as dbungert

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!