/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/06/05/#ubuntu-devel.txt

fnordahlcpaelzer: the autoconf/autotest generated script accepts a --debug parameter which keeps logs and artifacts even on success03:22
cpaelzerfnordahl: they are even kept without --debug05:38
cpaelzerfnordahl: but they are non-cunclusive. I'll need --debug to force it to also emit the commands it issued. Intending to run them one by one as it is yet unclear what is the root cause and what is stuff happening on cleanup after a fail05:38
LocutusOfBorgmitchdz, thanks, uploading05:56
mitchdznp :)05:57
mitchdzI'll respond to the debian bug to help it get fixed there05:59
mitchdzah I see you already have06:27
schopin@pilot in08:07
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: schopin
cpaelzerfnordahl: FYI I found the root cause,  do you have 10 minutes to discuss if we fix it in DPDK or OVS and in which order going into the future?09:11
rbasakschopin: if you haven't seen it yet, https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2024-June/019706.html seems important (reported needrestart-related bug but not through the tracker)09:37
schopinJust seen it. Not exactly a bug.09:45
adrienI'm looking at "missing builds" on excuses and I vaguely remember something that amd64 is used to build arch-indep packages, is that right? and is that why there are lines such as "missing build on amd64: onboard, onboard-common, onboard-data" but also "missing build on arm64: onboard" (and same for armhf, ppc64el and s390x as arm64)?09:56
ginggsadrien: yes, arch:all binaries are built on amd6410:40
ginggsso onboard-common and onboard-data are missing from the amd64 build10:41
ginggsbut only the arch:any binary, onboard, is missing from the other architecure10:43
ginggss10:43
kincodyDoes anyone know here i can find the source code of the of the  installer of the for ubuntu10:45
kincodywhere*10:46
adrienginggs: thanks! :)10:51
seb128kincody, which Ubuntu serie and flavor?11:07
kincody bionic 24.0411:13
kincodyLubuntu11:32
fnordahlcpaelzer: that's great news! I'm totally backed up today and happy to discuss tomorrow, I'll propose a slot and/or we could use the weekly Debian/Ubuntu DPDK/OVS/OVN sync slot we have tomorrow?11:33
cpaelzerfnordahl: sure, I've already submitted upstream and by then we should know what they think about it11:51
schopin@pilot out13:50
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A
tsimonq2@pilot in13:53
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: tsimonq2
tsimonq2Won't be a long shift.13:53
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: Want to take https://code.launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+git/dpkg/+merge/466892 and https://code.launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-18/+git/llvm-toolchain-18/+merge/466901 ?13:55
LocutusOfBorgllvm disapproved now13:59
=== coreycb1 is now known as coreycb
tsimonq2jamespage: Hi, I'll let you review https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/cinder/+git/cinder/+merge/466890 - it seems sane, given Debian just did the same, I'm just unsure of the implications of replacing OAuth2 support with Google Auth support (don't want to break an existing workflow if not necessary).14:05
LocutusOfBorgtsimonq2, I have zero knowledge without a bug report or more information14:36
LocutusOfBorgalso, why is all of this not in Debian bugs?14:36
LocutusOfBorgthis discussion should come from Debian14:36
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: Agreed, I think further explanation is needed14:46
tsimonq2@pilot out15:21
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A
tsimonq2https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/patch-pilot-hand-off-24-10/44839/1315:21
adrientsimonq2: AFAIK it's not "oauth2" being replaced: the library was poorly named in the first place15:52
adrien"Lack of clear purpose and goals: The library is named “oauth2client” but is actually a pretty poor OAuth 2.0 client and does a lot of things that have nothing to do with OAuth and its related RFCs."15:53
adrienfrom https://google-auth.readthedocs.io/en/latest/oauth2client-deprecation.html15:53
enr0n@pilot in17:04
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: enr0n
tsimonq2adrien: Ah, okay, well that's slightly confusing :)17:33
=== coreycb1 is now known as coreycb
adrientsimonq2: definitely!17:49
enr0ntsimonq2: do you want/need to be left as an uploader for nm-tray? Or should this be cleaned up as part of the merge? See https://code.launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/ubuntu/+source/nm-tray/+git/nm-tray/+merge/465950 for context19:53
tsimonq2enr0n: I'm not particular, feel free to keep it20:09
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: haskell & ocaml disappeared from https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/transitions/20:47
enr0ntsimonq2: if there's no particular reason to keep it, I think it would be best to just remove it to avoid confusion in the future20:55
enr0nliushuyu: ^20:55
liushuyuenr0n: okay20:57
enr0n@pilot out21:10
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A
LocutusOfBorgjbicha, I'm already checking21:27
LocutusOfBorgfixed I gues21:30
LocutusOfBorg*guess21:30
mitchdzvorlon: thanks for doing the multipath-tools merge, I was actually just in the middle of doing that! Did you test the new dep8 test already? that failed by default when I was working on the noble merge22:32
mitchdzThe new initramfs test22:32
mitchdzNeeded to make this change - https://git.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/commit/?id=5fb55f125a521f80fbddd592e6ad5014c7588c9422:33
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Commit 5fb55f1 in ~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools "d/t/{control,initramfs}: fix initramfs dep8 test"22:33
vorlonmitchdz: I had not done so.  fwiw the "touched it last" rule for merges.ubuntu.com said it was my responsibility to merge hence I did so22:34
vorlonsome happy reductions in delta along the way tho22:34
mitchdzOh yeah there was quite a bit of delta dropping22:34
mitchdzI ended up not doing the noble merge because I saw some weird behavior on upgrade where the systemd service can get in a bad state22:35
mitchdzI'd be glad to handle testing and fixes for it since I was planning on doing the merge anyways22:35
vorlonah ick22:35
vorlonyeah if it doesn't migrate cleanly I'm happy to let you be touched-it-last again :)22:35
mitchdzSweet22:36
mitchdzI'll keep an eye on it and work on any failures then22:36
mitchdzI have a host of commits I made during noble still hosted here - https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+ref/merge-lp2040360-noble-v222:37
mitchdzI think we still need https://git.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/commit/?id=0bcc3afdaa558a2e2243834a7030b9019dfb901d22:37
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Commit 0bcc3af in ~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools "Allow older dmsetup"22:37
mitchdzat least until lvm2 updates22:37
mitchdzvorlon: Also the reason I was planning to do it is because I assigned myself to this bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/206438022:42
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2064380 in multipath-tools (Ubuntu) "Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular" [Undecided, New]22:42
mitchdzbut I see you were last-touched since the no change rebuilt in noble, so no worries :)22:42
vorlonyeah it had required a sourceful change for time_t22:44
vorlonso even fixing merges.u.c's algorithm wouldn't have let me off the hook22:44
mitchdzis MOM where most people look to see what merges they should do?22:46
vorlonqualified yes22:46
vorlonnot everybody listed there as TIL looks22:46
vorlonand within Foundations, we also look at foundations-team-owned merges in addition to per-uploader merges22:47
mitchdzah I see22:51
mitchdzThat's good to know, I was thinking the launchpad bug was good enough22:51

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!