[03:22] <fnordahl> cpaelzer: the autoconf/autotest generated script accepts a --debug parameter which keeps logs and artifacts even on success
[05:38] <cpaelzer> fnordahl: they are even kept without --debug
[05:38] <cpaelzer> fnordahl: but they are non-cunclusive. I'll need --debug to force it to also emit the commands it issued. Intending to run them one by one as it is yet unclear what is the root cause and what is stuff happening on cleanup after a fail
[05:56] <LocutusOfBorg> mitchdz, thanks, uploading
[05:57] <mitchdz> np :)
[05:59] <mitchdz> I'll respond to the debian bug to help it get fixed there
[06:27] <mitchdz> ah I see you already have
[08:07] <schopin> @pilot in
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: schopin
[09:11] <cpaelzer> fnordahl: FYI I found the root cause,  do you have 10 minutes to discuss if we fix it in DPDK or OVS and in which order going into the future?
[09:37] <rbasak> schopin: if you haven't seen it yet, https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2024-June/019706.html seems important (reported needrestart-related bug but not through the tracker)
[09:45] <schopin> Just seen it. Not exactly a bug.
[09:56] <adrien> I'm looking at "missing builds" on excuses and I vaguely remember something that amd64 is used to build arch-indep packages, is that right? and is that why there are lines such as "missing build on amd64: onboard, onboard-common, onboard-data" but also "missing build on arm64: onboard" (and same for armhf, ppc64el and s390x as arm64)?
[10:40] <ginggs> adrien: yes, arch:all binaries are built on amd64
[10:41] <ginggs> so onboard-common and onboard-data are missing from the amd64 build
[10:43] <ginggs> but only the arch:any binary, onboard, is missing from the other architecure
[10:43] <ginggs> s
[10:45] <kincody> Does anyone know here i can find the source code of the of the  installer of the for ubuntu
[10:46] <kincody> where*
[10:51] <adrien> ginggs: thanks! :)
[11:07] <seb128> kincody, which Ubuntu serie and flavor?
[11:13] <kincody>  bionic 24.04
[11:32] <kincody> Lubuntu
[11:33] <fnordahl> cpaelzer: that's great news! I'm totally backed up today and happy to discuss tomorrow, I'll propose a slot and/or we could use the weekly Debian/Ubuntu DPDK/OVS/OVN sync slot we have tomorrow?
[11:51] <cpaelzer> fnordahl: sure, I've already submitted upstream and by then we should know what they think about it
[13:50] <schopin> @pilot out
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A
[13:53] <tsimonq2> @pilot in
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: tsimonq2
[13:53] <tsimonq2> Won't be a long shift.
[13:55] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: Want to take https://code.launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+git/dpkg/+merge/466892 and https://code.launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-18/+git/llvm-toolchain-18/+merge/466901 ?
[13:59] <LocutusOfBorg> llvm disapproved now
=== coreycb1 is now known as coreycb
[14:05] <tsimonq2> jamespage: Hi, I'll let you review https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/cinder/+git/cinder/+merge/466890 - it seems sane, given Debian just did the same, I'm just unsure of the implications of replacing OAuth2 support with Google Auth support (don't want to break an existing workflow if not necessary).
[14:36] <LocutusOfBorg> tsimonq2, I have zero knowledge without a bug report or more information
[14:36] <LocutusOfBorg> also, why is all of this not in Debian bugs?
[14:36] <LocutusOfBorg> this discussion should come from Debian
[14:46] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: Agreed, I think further explanation is needed
[15:21] <tsimonq2> @pilot out
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A
[15:21] <tsimonq2> https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/patch-pilot-hand-off-24-10/44839/13
[15:52] <adrien> tsimonq2: AFAIK it's not "oauth2" being replaced: the library was poorly named in the first place
[15:53] <adrien> "Lack of clear purpose and goals: The library is named “oauth2client” but is actually a pretty poor OAuth 2.0 client and does a lot of things that have nothing to do with OAuth and its related RFCs."
[15:53] <adrien> from https://google-auth.readthedocs.io/en/latest/oauth2client-deprecation.html
[17:04] <enr0n> @pilot in
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: enr0n
[17:33] <tsimonq2> adrien: Ah, okay, well that's slightly confusing :)
=== coreycb1 is now known as coreycb
[17:49] <adrien> tsimonq2: definitely!
[19:53] <enr0n> tsimonq2: do you want/need to be left as an uploader for nm-tray? Or should this be cleaned up as part of the merge? See https://code.launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/ubuntu/+source/nm-tray/+git/nm-tray/+merge/465950 for context
[20:09] <tsimonq2> enr0n: I'm not particular, feel free to keep it
[20:47] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: haskell & ocaml disappeared from https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/transitions/
[20:55] <enr0n> tsimonq2: if there's no particular reason to keep it, I think it would be best to just remove it to avoid confusion in the future
[20:55] <enr0n> liushuyu: ^
[20:57] <liushuyu> enr0n: okay
[21:10] <enr0n> @pilot out
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A
[21:27] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, I'm already checking
[21:30] <LocutusOfBorg> fixed I gues
[21:30] <LocutusOfBorg> *guess
[22:32] <mitchdz> vorlon: thanks for doing the multipath-tools merge, I was actually just in the middle of doing that! Did you test the new dep8 test already? that failed by default when I was working on the noble merge
[22:32] <mitchdz> The new initramfs test
[22:33] <mitchdz> Needed to make this change - https://git.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/commit/?id=5fb55f125a521f80fbddd592e6ad5014c7588c94
[22:33] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Commit 5fb55f1 in ~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools "d/t/{control,initramfs}: fix initramfs dep8 test"
[22:34] <vorlon> mitchdz: I had not done so.  fwiw the "touched it last" rule for merges.ubuntu.com said it was my responsibility to merge hence I did so
[22:34] <vorlon> some happy reductions in delta along the way tho
[22:34] <mitchdz> Oh yeah there was quite a bit of delta dropping
[22:35] <mitchdz> I ended up not doing the noble merge because I saw some weird behavior on upgrade where the systemd service can get in a bad state
[22:35] <mitchdz> I'd be glad to handle testing and fixes for it since I was planning on doing the merge anyways
[22:35] <vorlon> ah ick
[22:35] <vorlon> yeah if it doesn't migrate cleanly I'm happy to let you be touched-it-last again :)
[22:36] <mitchdz> Sweet
[22:36] <mitchdz> I'll keep an eye on it and work on any failures then
[22:37] <mitchdz> I have a host of commits I made during noble still hosted here - https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+ref/merge-lp2040360-noble-v2
[22:37] <mitchdz> I think we still need https://git.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/commit/?id=0bcc3afdaa558a2e2243834a7030b9019dfb901d
[22:37] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Commit 0bcc3af in ~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools "Allow older dmsetup"
[22:37] <mitchdz> at least until lvm2 updates
[22:42] <mitchdz> vorlon: Also the reason I was planning to do it is because I assigned myself to this bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2064380
[22:42] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2064380 in multipath-tools (Ubuntu) "Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular" [Undecided, New]
[22:42] <mitchdz> but I see you were last-touched since the no change rebuilt in noble, so no worries :)
[22:44] <vorlon> yeah it had required a sourceful change for time_t
[22:44] <vorlon> so even fixing merges.u.c's algorithm wouldn't have let me off the hook
[22:46] <mitchdz> is MOM where most people look to see what merges they should do?
[22:46] <vorlon> qualified yes
[22:46] <vorlon> not everybody listed there as TIL looks
[22:47] <vorlon> and within Foundations, we also look at foundations-team-owned merges in addition to per-uploader merges
[22:51] <mitchdz> ah I see
[22:51] <mitchdz> That's good to know, I was thinking the launchpad bug was good enough