| kenyon | in my subiquity autoinstall yaml, I set apt.mirror-selection.primary with a uri for my own mirror of archive.ubuntu.com. on ubuntu 22.04, the resulting installed system has my uri in /etc/apt/sources.list. but on ubuntu 20.04.6, the installed system still has archive.ubuntu.com. is there a bug report for this? | 00:15 |
|---|---|---|
| dbungert | kenyon: if 22.04 is working for you, then 20.04.6 should give you the same result if you allow snap refresh. This sort of discussion should move to #ubuntu-server though. | 00:31 |
| === sespiros_ is now known as sespiros | ||
| cpaelzer | fnordahl: thanks for OVS 3.3.1 | 07:37 |
| cpaelzer | fnordahl: I see you poked the flaky kmod on amd64 | 07:38 |
| cpaelzer | fnordahl: I've already ran the combined DPDK+OVS and they are good as well | 07:38 |
| cpaelzer | fnordahl: I expect that to be picked up at the next full run of proposed migration | 07:39 |
| xypron | I am looking for a sponsor for LP #2068600. It is a simple rebuild to incorporate the newest dependencies and fixes a changed build dependency leading to FTBFS. | 08:15 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2068600 in u-boot-nezha (Ubuntu Oracular) "Rebuild with current OpenSBI" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2068600 | 08:15 | |
| rbasak | ^ Looking | 08:29 |
| rbasak | xypron: looks fine to me. I think I can drop the versioned build-depends though - so no change to the opensbi b-d needed. Since strictly the build doesn't require that version, and extraneous versioned dependencies make backports more difficult. | 08:31 |
| rbasak | xypron: if you're happy with that change I'll sponsor | 08:31 |
| rbasak | Minor changelog comments - doesn't particular matter, but I'd: 1) Use a bullet point for the second entry, since that's the convention; and 2) point out that the second change is necessary to fix the FTBFS (IIUC?) | 08:32 |
| rbasak | xypron: another even more minor thing - I'd avoid using the proposed-to-be-uploaded version in a PPA since then you get two different binaries floating around that have the same version and are different. Instead, use a ~ppa1 suffix for the PPA upload or similar. | 08:33 |
| cpaelzer | It is at the end personal style, but I totally agree to that suggestion and my dput-ng even warns me from ppa uploads without such a suffix :-) | 08:36 |
| rbasak | Where not doing it in a PPA can go wrong: somebody affected by the bug follows along and installs from your PPA as a workaround. When they next report a bug, you cannot tell if they're using the archive version or your PPA version. If they report a bug and there were changes to the archive version before sponsoring, now you have a real ambiguity to resolve. | 08:43 |
| rbasak | So I think it's a little stronger a reason than just style, but it's true that there's no strict rule about it since a PPA is your own personal realm. | 08:44 |
| xypron | rbasak: I added the version dependency so that in case we SRU u-boot-nezha we are forced to SRU OpenSBI too. But it is not strictly necessary. I had been building ~ppa* before the final upload to the PPA. Sponsors seem to differ in taste. For bigger changes some tend just to upload the files from the PPA and are happy if they have the final version number. | 09:26 |
| xypron | rbasak: OpenSBI is not only a build dependency. The OpenSBI is copied into the U-Boot binary. | 09:28 |
| rbasak | xypron: if you're getting pushback from sponsors for using ~ppaX suffixes in your PPA uploads then send them to me please :) | 09:34 |
| rbasak | xypron: are you happy for me to make the changes I suggested above myself, and for me to then sponsor in your name? | 09:34 |
| rbasak | I don't want to misattribute you, nor attribute myself and take away your attribution! The sponsor's dilemna :) | 09:35 |
| xypron | rbasak: Yes, please, go forward. Thanks for sponsoring. | 09:35 |
| rbasak | Done | 09:41 |
| paride | @pilot in | 12:47 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: paride | ||
| ahasenack | juliank: we (or launchpad?) don't have yet a solution for oracular autopkgtests run against ppas that have RSA-1k keys, do we? | 15:02 |
| ahasenack | example: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-oracular-ahasenack-samba-merge/oracular/amd64/s/samba/20240610_234034_ed87c@/log.gz | 15:02 |
| juliank | ahasenack: negative but I think you can create a new PPA for that now, if that helps | 15:22 |
| ahasenack | juliank: isn't the ppa key the same for all my ppas? | 15:54 |
| juliank | ahasenack: shouldn't be anymore, new PPAs should get 4096R keys only, I think I forgot to verify though when I was asked. | 15:57 |
| ahasenack | juliank: ok, I created https://launchpad.net/~ahasenack/+archive/ubuntu/samba-merge-2 and it shows 4k key | 15:58 |
| ahasenack | hm, I wonder if copying the binaries over works | 15:58 |
| ahasenack | no | 15:59 |
| ahasenack | "ppas never forget" | 16:00 |
| dbungert | @pilot in | 16:01 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: paride, dbungert | ||
| juliank | ahasenack: cool | 16:03 |
| Eickmeyer | What the actual... | 16:20 |
| Eickmeyer | Setting up plymouth (24.004.60-1ubuntu7) ... | 16:20 |
| Eickmeyer | dpkg: error processing package plymouth (--configure): | 16:20 |
| Eickmeyer | installed plymouth package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 127 | 16:20 |
| Eickmeyer | (/usr/sbin/update-initramfs: 3: exec: update-initramfs.REAL: not found) | 16:20 |
| Eickmeyer | 🤦 💀 | 16:21 |
| Eickmeyer | bdrung: Is it possible that the latest initramfs-tools upload broke Plymouth? ^ | 16:22 |
| bdrung | Eickmeyer, no. it's not initramfs-tools' fault. see bug #2068875 | 16:24 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2068875 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "Plymouth package processing failing on oracular during image build: /usr/sbin/update-initramfs: 3: exec: update-initramfs.REAL: not found" [High, Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2068875 | 16:24 | |
| paride | @pilot out | 16:25 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: dbungert | ||
| Eickmeyer | bdrung: Looks like initramfs-tools needs to be added to the edubuntu-desktop-minimal seed. Thanks for the breadcrumb trail! | 16:30 |
| mitya57 | dviererbe: Hi! I added tests for https://code.launchpad.net/~mitya57/ubuntu/+source/unzip/+git/unzip/+merge/466860 on Friday. Can you review again please? | 17:00 |
| dviererbe | mitya57: sure :) | 17:01 |
| mitya57 | Thank you! | 17:02 |
| kenyon | dbungert: thanks, I don't have Internet access where I'm doing these autoinstalls, so not sure there's a way to update the subiquity snap. I posted here because #ubuntu-installer redirects here, did consider #ubuntu-server though. | 17:10 |
| dviererbe | mitya57: I approved the MP again | 17:25 |
| mitya57 | dviererbe: Thanks a lot! | 17:26 |
| === coreycb1 is now known as coreycb | ||
| dbungert | @pilot out | 20:33 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
| * mwhudson glares at lib/cdimage/tree.py | 22:15 | |
| liushuyu | vorlon: also see https://code.launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/ubuntu/+source/cpio/+git/cpio/+merge/467308 | 22:21 |
| liushuyu | This may fix a lot of issues with this package | 22:21 |
| sergiodj | hi, I'm trying to understand why gitaly is not being auto-sync'ed from Debian. we currently carry version 16.0.8+ds1-1build1 in Ubuntu, and Debian has 16.8.2+ds3-2 in unstable | 22:37 |
| sergiodj | (not that sync'ing it would solve anything... I'm just thinking out loud here) | 22:40 |
| mwhudson | liushuyu: would it be possible to diffoscope the before / after packages or something? the change looks good but i worry about unintended changes | 22:41 |
| mwhudson | sergiodj: it's on https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/sync-blocklist.txt | 22:42 |
| sergiodj | mwhudson: ah, there you go. thanks! | 22:42 |
| mwhudson | sergiodj: although it looks like the point of the sync blocklist is to keep it out of ubuntu entirely so ... uh? | 22:43 |
| mwhudson | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gitlab/+bug/1758702 | 22:44 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 1758702 in gitlab-shell (Ubuntu) "Please consider adding gitlab to sync blacklist" [Undecided, Fix Released] | 22:44 | |
| sergiodj | indeed | 22:44 |
| sergiodj | it was moved to oracular by vorlon, maybe he has some context | 22:44 |
| liushuyu | mwhudson: will do | 22:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!