/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/06/12/#ubuntu-devel.txt

liushuyumwhudson: diffoscope shows translation files (mo files) are added in the new revision (due to corrected handling of file installation)01:54
liushuyuAnd also a new debug stub section was added in the newer revision01:55
liushuyu(for flagging which file the debug data was stripped to)01:55
mwhudsonsergiodj: i wonder if it was ressurected by accident as part of the xz shenanigans or something01:56
mwhudsonliushuyu: seems reasonable! i presume the binaries changed too, on account of honouring dpkg-buildflags now?01:57
mwhudsonor did they do that already01:57
liushuyumwhudson: binaries changed due to debug flags properly added (mentioned in the last message, some parts had a debug stub added in)01:58
mwhudsonliushuyu: right, but did the text sections change too?01:58
liushuyuIt honored some of the optimization flags, so the .text sections did not change very much01:59
liushuyuthere are some jump targets had a address change01:59
liushuyuHmm, frame pointer flags were honored previously, I can see the previous binary also saved %rbp02:02
mwhudsoncool. i wonder how we decide whether to make a change like this ahead of debian.02:02
liushuyucpio installation size changed from 328 to 1127 (translation files added). A new binary package is produced also (cpio-dbgsym)02:03
mwhudsoni guess you could send the patch to debian too and see what the maintainer there thinks. he uploaded a new version fairly recently02:03
mwhudsonalthough the debian bug tracker looks pretty crufty so who knows02:04
liushuyumwhudson: one of the bug on the bug tracker was actually someone asking for the -dbgsym package02:04
liushuyu(because the user was trying to track down a bug in cpio)02:05
mwhudsonliushuyu: which the maintainer has ignored for 7+ years, nice02:05
liushuyumwhudson: make a change like this ahead of debian > xfsdump and hfsutils need the same treatment to fix the build flags passing issue as well02:06
mwhudsonhfsutils needs yeeting out of main i think but yeah02:07
liushuyuI have made fixes for both, hfsutils can't pass the dh_auto_test now due to the tests are finally able to run; xfsdump looks okay-ish02:08
liushuyu(broke the build because the test runner was fixed)02:08
liushuyu(the irony)02:08
mwhudsonha02:08
mwhudsonreinforces my point i think02:08
mwhudsonliushuyu: commented on the mp02:19
* mwhudson afk for a bit02:19
kchsiehHello, I am seeking for sponsor for my SRU, may I get someone's help here? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/2068546 thanks.06:47
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2068546 in thermald (Ubuntu) "Exclude thermald thermal management for Dell Optiplex XE4" [Undecided, New]06:47
LocutusOfBorgkchsieh, sponsored after changing the patch and changelog a bit07:34
kchsiehLocutusOfBorg, thanks a lot.08:25
=== dviererbe1 is now known as dviererbe
ginggs@pilot in11:02
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: ginggs
ricotzRikMills, hi :), could you take a look at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kf6-kio/6.0.0-2/+build/2845892612:47
=== mateus-morais0 is now known as mateus-morais
=== locutusofborg_ is now known as locutusofborg
ginggs@pilot out15:02
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A
rbasakI need u-d-a@ list moderation please15:06
jbicha@pilot in15:26
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: jbicha
rbasakThank you mystery moderator! :-)16:09
=== john-cabaj1 is now known as john-cabaj
vorlonrbasak: you're welcome16:28
vorlonsergiodj, mwhudson: "moved to oracular"> this is a batch move as part of series opening and means nothing16:29
Odd_BlokeI'm getting 504s running rmadison, I'm not sure where to report that.18:01
Odd_Blokehttps://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/madison.cgi loads fine, it seems to only happen when I actually submit a query.18:02
jbicha@pilot out18:48
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A
sergiodjvorlon: I stumbled upon https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2069041 during my triage today. it came from a discussion that's happening in the discourse post, and I could reproduce the problem locally (i.e., port changes to /etc/ssh/sshd_config are not reflected after a systemct restart ssh.service). are you planning to deal with this bug?18:57
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2069041 in openssh (Ubuntu) "Changing Port in sshd_config and restarting ssh.service without effect" [Undecided, New]18:57
sergiodjah, I see you tagged it rls-*-incoming18:57
sergiodjso I'll assume that Foundations will handle this one18:57
Odd_Bloke(rmadison is back to working.)19:04
sergiodjmwhudson: vorlon: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gitaly/+bug/206920019:22
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2069200 in gitaly (Ubuntu) "RM: gitably from Oracular; mistakenly sync'ed from Debian" [Undecided, New]19:22
vorlonsergiodj: that's the intention there, yes :)20:10
vorlonOdd_Bloke: rmadison> reporting here or in #ubuntu-release is fine; it's the Ubuntu Archive team that are responsible; and argh that this continues to be a problem20:20
Odd_BlokeA(rgh)ck, thanks!20:26

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!