[01:54] <liushuyu> mwhudson: diffoscope shows translation files (mo files) are added in the new revision (due to corrected handling of file installation)
[01:55] <liushuyu> And also a new debug stub section was added in the newer revision
[01:55] <liushuyu> (for flagging which file the debug data was stripped to)
[01:56] <mwhudson> sergiodj: i wonder if it was ressurected by accident as part of the xz shenanigans or something
[01:57] <mwhudson> liushuyu: seems reasonable! i presume the binaries changed too, on account of honouring dpkg-buildflags now?
[01:57] <mwhudson> or did they do that already
[01:58] <liushuyu> mwhudson: binaries changed due to debug flags properly added (mentioned in the last message, some parts had a debug stub added in)
[01:58] <mwhudson> liushuyu: right, but did the text sections change too?
[01:59] <liushuyu> It honored some of the optimization flags, so the .text sections did not change very much
[01:59] <liushuyu> there are some jump targets had a address change
[02:02] <liushuyu> Hmm, frame pointer flags were honored previously, I can see the previous binary also saved %rbp
[02:02] <mwhudson> cool. i wonder how we decide whether to make a change like this ahead of debian.
[02:03] <liushuyu> cpio installation size changed from 328 to 1127 (translation files added). A new binary package is produced also (cpio-dbgsym)
[02:03] <mwhudson> i guess you could send the patch to debian too and see what the maintainer there thinks. he uploaded a new version fairly recently
[02:04] <mwhudson> although the debian bug tracker looks pretty crufty so who knows
[02:04] <liushuyu> mwhudson: one of the bug on the bug tracker was actually someone asking for the -dbgsym package
[02:05] <liushuyu> (because the user was trying to track down a bug in cpio)
[02:05] <mwhudson> liushuyu: which the maintainer has ignored for 7+ years, nice
[02:06] <liushuyu> mwhudson: make a change like this ahead of debian > xfsdump and hfsutils need the same treatment to fix the build flags passing issue as well
[02:07] <mwhudson> hfsutils needs yeeting out of main i think but yeah
[02:08] <liushuyu> I have made fixes for both, hfsutils can't pass the dh_auto_test now due to the tests are finally able to run; xfsdump looks okay-ish
[02:08] <liushuyu> (broke the build because the test runner was fixed)
[02:08] <liushuyu> (the irony)
[02:08] <mwhudson> ha
[02:08] <mwhudson> reinforces my point i think
[02:19] <mwhudson> liushuyu: commented on the mp
[02:19]  * mwhudson afk for a bit
[06:47] <kchsieh> Hello, I am seeking for sponsor for my SRU, may I get someone's help here? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/2068546 thanks.
[06:47] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2068546 in thermald (Ubuntu) "Exclude thermald thermal management for Dell Optiplex XE4" [Undecided, New]
[07:34] <LocutusOfBorg> kchsieh, sponsored after changing the patch and changelog a bit
[08:25] <kchsieh> LocutusOfBorg, thanks a lot.
=== dviererbe1 is now known as dviererbe
[11:02] <ginggs> @pilot in
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: ginggs
[12:47] <ricotz> RikMills, hi :), could you take a look at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kf6-kio/6.0.0-2/+build/28458926
=== mateus-morais0 is now known as mateus-morais
=== locutusofborg_ is now known as locutusofborg
[15:02] <ginggs> @pilot out
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A
[15:06] <rbasak> I need u-d-a@ list moderation please
[15:26] <jbicha> @pilot in
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: jbicha
[16:09] <rbasak> Thank you mystery moderator! :-)
=== john-cabaj1 is now known as john-cabaj
[16:28] <vorlon> rbasak: you're welcome
[16:29] <vorlon> sergiodj, mwhudson: "moved to oracular"> this is a batch move as part of series opening and means nothing
[18:01] <Odd_Bloke> I'm getting 504s running rmadison, I'm not sure where to report that.
[18:02] <Odd_Bloke> https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/madison.cgi loads fine, it seems to only happen when I actually submit a query.
[18:48] <jbicha> @pilot out
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A
[18:57] <sergiodj> vorlon: I stumbled upon https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2069041 during my triage today. it came from a discussion that's happening in the discourse post, and I could reproduce the problem locally (i.e., port changes to /etc/ssh/sshd_config are not reflected after a systemct restart ssh.service). are you planning to deal with this bug?
[18:57] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2069041 in openssh (Ubuntu) "Changing Port in sshd_config and restarting ssh.service without effect" [Undecided, New]
[18:57] <sergiodj> ah, I see you tagged it rls-*-incoming
[18:57] <sergiodj> so I'll assume that Foundations will handle this one
[19:04] <Odd_Bloke> (rmadison is back to working.)
[19:22] <sergiodj> mwhudson: vorlon: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gitaly/+bug/2069200
[19:22] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2069200 in gitaly (Ubuntu) "RM: gitably from Oracular; mistakenly sync'ed from Debian" [Undecided, New]
[20:10] <vorlon> sergiodj: that's the intention there, yes :)
[20:20] <vorlon> Odd_Bloke: rmadison> reporting here or in #ubuntu-release is fine; it's the Ubuntu Archive team that are responsible; and argh that this continues to be a problem
[20:26] <Odd_Bloke> A(rgh)ck, thanks!