=== chris14_ is now known as chris14 === sleeperbarbie is now known as bassr477L3 === bassr477L3 is now known as sleeperbarbie === sleeperbarbie is now known as ip_collection === ip_collection is now known as sleeperbarbie [03:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openturns [riscv64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [1.23-4] (no packageset) [05:10] Eickmeyer: um https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/noble/dvd/20240616/ doesn't look right! (it's empty) [05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-delthas-go-localeinfo [amd64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20240607.b2e834f-2] (no packageset) [05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-xmlrunner [amd64] (oracular-proposed/none) [3.2.0-3] (no packageset) [07:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-apfs-rw (jammy-proposed/universe) [0+git20220214+ds-2ubuntu2~22.04.3 => 0.3.2-0ubuntu5~22.04.1] (kernel-dkms) [08:10] jbicha, FYI I'm merging/fixing/cleaning pulseaudio [08:10] the current situation is a little bit messy and not building [08:17] locutusofborg, want to update to 17 at the same time maybe? ;-) [08:21] nah!!!!! I'm already too much scared === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer [08:22] and uploaded [08:22] seb128, there will be a new binary, everywhere except armhf and i386 I would say [08:22] in Debian libpulsedsp was selectively disabled [08:22] so... lets reintroduce it? [08:22] ? [08:22] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/1:16.1+dfsg1-5.1ubuntu1 [08:23] libpulsedsp was removed due armhf build failure, but Debian disabled only on 32bit archs, instead of everywhere [08:24] ah, ok [08:25] we also had a lot of Ubuntu patches not applied in series file, but leftover in the patches tree [08:25] I also removed them [08:25] and also fixed some changelog mismatches [08:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pulseaudio [amd64] (oracular-proposed/main) [1:16.1+dfsg1-5.1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pulseaudio [i386] (oracular-proposed/main) [1:16.1+dfsg1-5.1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pulseaudio [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed/main) [1:16.1+dfsg1-5.1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pulseaudio [s390x] (oracular-proposed/main) [1:16.1+dfsg1-5.1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [08:29] seb128, please when you accept, make sure it goes in universe pocket :) [08:29] ack [08:30] locutusofborg, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/1:16.1+dfsg1-2ubuntu12 fails to build? [08:32] this is why I merged 5.1 from Debian :D [08:32] and added two patches [08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pulseaudio [arm64] (oracular-proposed/main) [1:16.1+dfsg1-5.1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [08:36] locutusofborg, you might need to do the update to 17 because of the new webrtc-audio-processing... [08:37] ah ok [08:40] seb128, two cherry-picks :) [09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pulseaudio [riscv64] (oracular-proposed/main) [1:16.1+dfsg1-5.1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [09:21] finished [09:23] seb128, can you please help me understanding this? [09:23] libwebrtc-audio-processing-dev/arm64 in main cannot depend on libabsl-dev in universe [09:23] libwebrtc-audio-processing-dev/armhf in main cannot depend on libabsl-dev in universe [09:23] libwebrtc-audio-processing-dev/riscv64 in main cannot depend on libabsl-dev in universe [09:23] this is a really nonsense by britney [09:24] of course webrtc was built with older libabsl on armh* not sure why [09:30] I guess some forcing of the version made it sad [09:30] I mean britney forcing of armhf [11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: goss [amd64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [0.4.7-2] (no packageset) [11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: goss [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed/universe) [0.4.7-2] (no packageset) [11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: goss [armhf] (oracular-proposed/universe) [0.4.7-2] (no packageset) [11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: goss [s390x] (oracular-proposed/universe) [0.4.7-2] (no packageset) [11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: goss [arm64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [0.4.7-2] (no packageset) [11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mapnik [amd64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [4.0.0+ds-1] (no packageset) [11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mapnik [s390x] (oracular-proposed/universe) [4.0.0+ds-1] (no packageset) [11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mapnik [arm64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [4.0.0+ds-1] (no packageset) [11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mapnik [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed/universe) [4.0.0+ds-1] (no packageset) [11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: goss [riscv64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [0.4.7-2] (no packageset) === sleeperbarbie is now known as no === no is now known as sleeperbarbie [12:25] locutusofborg, I don't understand what you find nonsense? [12:25] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/735329281/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-amd64.webrtc-audio-processing_1.3-0ubuntu4_BUILDING.txt.gz [12:25] libwebrtc-audio-processing-dev_1.3-0ubuntu4_amd64.deb [12:25] ... [12:25] Depends: libwebrtc-audio-processing-1-3 (= 1.3-0ubuntu4), libabsl-dev [12:25] and [12:25] libwebrtc-audio-processing-dev | 1.3-0ubuntu4 | oracular-proposed | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x [12:25] libabsl-dev | 20230802.1-4 | oracular/universe | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x [12:25] locutusofborg, libwebrtc-audio-processing-dev is in main and depends on libabsl-dev which is in universe? [12:26] that seems a valid component mismatch entry? [12:26] seb128, libwebrtc-audio-processing-dev currently in noble is already depending on it [12:26] so, not a "regression" with the current archive state, this is what I don't get [12:27] libabsl-dev is in main in noble though [12:27] it was demoted in oracular because of http://launchpadlibrarian.net/727245097/abseil_20220623.1-3.1ubuntu3_20230802.1-4.diff.gz [12:28] the new version is recommending libgmock-dev [12:28] that isn't an issue created by the new upload, but it is an issue that needs to be resolved [12:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mapnik [armhf] (oracular-proposed/universe) [4.0.0+ds-1] (no packageset) [12:29] I think the logically easy step would be also demote libwebrtc-audio-processing-dev [12:30] thanks, the question was related to the fact that britney should consider also the current archive state before complaining, but maybe it is just a good way to force people fixing inconsistencies [12:31] if you can demote and fix, even better indeed [12:31] wow mapnik migrated just during the new upload being syncd, yay [12:32] and seb128 can we kick jami out of Ubuntu for now? it needs sourceful fixes, not even yet done upstream [12:32] incompatible with current webrtc [12:35] bandali, ^ as the Debian/Ubuntu maintainer, any opinion on ^? [12:53] locutusofborg: oh I expected we would have needed pulseaudio 17 for the new webrtc, thanks for working on that transision [12:54] seb128, locutusofborg, i haven't look into jami recently but plan to pick it up again soon, but it will probably need some amount of work in terms of at least packaging one or two new dependencies that aren't in Debian yet. i'll be contacting upstream to know more and try to come up with a concrete plan [12:54] bandali, thanks [12:54] jbicha, he backported some upstream changes instead of updating [12:56] cheers [13:30] jbicha, there were two merge requests, one for new webrtc and one for std c++17 as default (used by new absl/rtc) [13:30] not something really difficult to cherry-pick, this is why I just did the merge [13:31] I think the version 17 should come first from Debian :) [13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mapnik [riscv64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [4.0.0+ds-1] (no packageset) [14:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (noble-proposed/main) [32.3~24.04 => 32.3.1~24.04] (core) [14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (mantic-proposed/main) [32.3~23.10 => 32.3.1~23.10] (core) [14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (jammy-proposed/main) [32.3~22.04 => 32.3.1~22.04] (core) [14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (focal-proposed/main) [32.3~20.04 => 32.3.1~20.04] (core) [14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [32.3~18.04 => 32.3.1~18.04] (core) [14:12] hi ubuntu-sru, these ubuntu-advantage-tools are normal SRUs, without invoking any exception. Very specific bug fix. [14:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-advantage-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [32.3~16.04 => 32.3.1~16.04] (no packageset) [14:15] hey ahasenack o/ ok, thanks for the heads-up! [14:55] archive gurus -- a question on procedure: where a package has been kicked out of the archive because it ftbfs, and has been absent for a couple of releases, if the failure is rectified should it be uploaded to the devel release and SRU'd backwards, or to the historic release and copied forward? I'm guessing the former (context: criu, which ftbfs and has been absent since noble) [15:01] mwhudson: Agreed. 👀, though it was successful here: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/ubuntustudio/+build/634887. vorlon: Any ideas? [17:04] waveform: fix in devel release first https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Development_Release_Fixed_First [17:05] jbicha, thanks! [17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgnodemx [amd64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [1.6-2] (no packageset) [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgnodemx [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed/universe) [1.6-2] (no packageset) [17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgnodemx [s390x] (oracular-proposed/universe) [1.6-2] (no packageset) [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgnodemx [armhf] (oracular-proposed/universe) [1.6-2] (no packageset) [17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgnodemx [arm64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [1.6-2] (no packageset) [17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgnodemx [riscv64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [1.6-2] (no packageset) [17:52] who on the SRU team is alive to do an SRU review for a High severity SRU because a piece of Universe software is nonfunctional in 24.04 LTS? [17:54] (torbrowser/0.3.7-1ubuntu1, in unapproved queue, SRU bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/torbrowser-launcher/+bug/2056578, software is unusable with the app armor profile in the package currently, so this being pushed sooner than later is preferred) [17:54] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2056578 in torbrowser-launcher (Ubuntu Noble) "[SRU - Noble] Tor Browser - keyboard not functioning" [High, Confirmed] [17:54] (note I've also independently tested and verified this bug) [17:54] ubuntu-sru: ^ [17:54] (and the fix) [17:54] tsimonq2: where's my coffee bish [17:54] teward: sorry I accidentally piped it to /dev/null [17:55] (note this SRU was fixed in Oracular when it merged/autosynced Debian where I already uploaded that fix) [17:58] ubuntu-sru: Likewise, I'd like to expedite ubuntustudio-installer which is verification-failed but has a new upload. [17:58] We can't keep waiting for weeks for these fixes. [17:58] Eickmeyer: did you make a note on the bug just saying? [17:58] teward: Yes, of course. [17:59] teward, tsimonq2, Eickmeyer: pings noted; thanks! [17:59] mfo: Cheers! [18:00] mfo: be careful, I have Debian and Tor Project people on me about torbrowser-launcher incessantly so I'm in warmode because I want them to be silent :p [18:00] mfo: thanks though [18:00] mfo: Also, displaycal-py3. [18:01] (got people on Twitter bugging me about that of all places) [18:01] Eickmeyer: also, don't harp on them too much. I kind of restrict my nagging to "High" issues [18:01] teward: I mean, same, especially when it's a complete segfault (displaycal) [18:01] just giving you advice with the CC hat nearby but not on ;P [18:01] Actually, not segfault, but failure to run. [18:02] * teward is currently warmode-ing several things at once. [18:03] teward, sorry, I didn't follow the 'be careful / warmode' comment. can you clarify, please? [18:05] mfo: RE: torbrowser-launcher I have very angry Tor PRoject people who want to go to Canonical and scream lots of expletives because it's been in the queue for a week and this has been somehting that has taken over a Month to get patches available to due to Debian and autosync issues [18:05] so "war mode" in the sense that "i'm going to nag the living Hell out of the SRU team until this is handled because otherwise I will have a very bad angermode" [18:06] as for the "be careful" it's because i am known to be an annoying nag when i need things done :P [18:06] you've just accepted the nagging ;) [18:41] teward, this is very uncomfortable. [18:41] teward, to be clear, this doesn't change the response/handling of your pings. [18:41] teward, please note, responding to prioritization requests is unrelated to 'acceptance' of nagging (or even willingness for reading) to the description/wording above -- it's offering time/service as part of a community team [18:41] teward, i'm aware of the delays/issues, but that attitude is not helpful (even though your objective is to help; thanks). [18:41] teward, apologies if this doesn't find you well or doesn't realize all that is going on (apparently a lot). [19:02] mfo: I'm going to teward's defense here. I think that was mostly directed at my history of being overly combative and aggressive at certain teams, which I've dialed-back as of late. I've made efforts to be much more friendly in the past few months, which he hasn't seen. So, that had nothing to do with you and more to do with me. :) [19:04] Although, he does have a tendency to nag. :) [19:05] Eickmeyer, thanks for the clarification; I referred to / there's 'SRU team' above. [19:06] mfo: Ah, yes, I see that. Could've been both of us! 😅 [19:07] Eickmeyer, and congrats on taking the efforts to change behavior. (nothing personal; we haven't interacted much; but I realize/know that it can indeed take effort/time/discipline.) [19:10] mfo: Well, I'm a real nice guy if you ever meet me IRL. I'm just not happy with some status quos and I let it overflow when I shouldn't. It's a continuing process and one that is taking several conversations with several people. [19:16] Eickmeyer, I think I understand. hope you find what you're looking for. :) [19:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-installer [source] (noble-proposed) [1.18.4] [19:50] Hi, is there any AA or CoreDev here to perform the sync https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruff/+bug/2069642? [19:50] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2069642 in ruff (Ubuntu) "Sync ruff 0.0.291+dfsg1-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist, New] [19:51] The package was previously sync blocklisted due to a broken dependency, this was resolved in Debian and that dependency was sync'ed to Ubuntu now [20:34] Eickmeyer: vorlon is away for a bit [20:51] Eickmeyer: ah it's because debian-cd is naming the thing -desktop-amd64.iso not -dvd-amd64.iso [20:51] https://code.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/ubuntu-cdimage/+git/ubuntu-cdimage-1/+merge/467624 <- bdmurray could you take a look? === sleeperb1 is now known as sleeperbarbie [20:58] mwhudson: I think it was a one-off because https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntustudio/daily-live/20240617/ populated. [20:59] Ope, that's oracular. [20:59] Nvm, today's didn't populate for noble either. [21:00] ok good in a sense (because i really wouldn't understand what was going on if today worked :-) ) [21:00] mwhudson: Yeah, sorry for the momentary headache. [21:49] rust-minijinja also requires a removal from the sync blocklist === john-cabaj1 is now known as john-cabaj [22:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted torbrowser-launcher [source] (noble-proposed) [0.3.7-1ubuntu1] [22:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (noble-proposed) [32.3.1~24.04] [22:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (mantic-proposed) [32.3.1~23.10] [22:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (jammy-proposed) [32.3.1~22.04] [22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruff (oracular-proposed/primary) [0.0.291+dfsg1-4] [22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (focal-proposed) [32.3.1~20.04] [22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [32.3.1~18.04] [22:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [32.3.1~16.04] [23:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openimageio [amd64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [2.5.12.0+dfsg-2] (ubuntustudio) [23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openimageio [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed/universe) [2.5.12.0+dfsg-2] (ubuntustudio) [23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openimageio [arm64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [2.5.12.0+dfsg-2] (ubuntustudio) [23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openimageio [s390x] (oracular-proposed/universe) [2.5.12.0+dfsg-2] (ubuntustudio) === sleeperbarbie is now known as nokyles