| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
| === JanC is now known as Guest4647 | ||
| philroche | ahasenack_: As part of SRU duty would you be able to look livecd-rootfs 24.04.72 in noble queue https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=livecd-rootfs ? | 10:29 |
|---|---|---|
| bdrung | @pilot in | 11:00 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: bdrung | ||
| bdrung | @adrien, do you mind me sponsoring https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/2067672 to oracular (wearing my sponsoring hat)? | 11:26 |
| bdrung | ahasenack_, Fix build failure on armhf with rdma-core 52.0-2 upload | 12:09 |
| ahasenack_ | philroche: noted | 12:12 |
| ahasenack_ | bdrung: you just uploaded to debian? | 12:12 |
| bdrung | ahasenack_, yes | 12:15 |
| ahasenack | philroche: ah, you meant unapproved | 12:51 |
| philroche | yes unapproved | 12:52 |
| ahasenack | 5 bugs | 12:53 |
| ahasenack | it's racing ubuntu-advantage-tools in number of fixes per upload :) | 12:53 |
| ahasenack | there are 3 livecd-rootfs jammy uploads to unapproved | 13:01 |
| ahasenack | also one for mantic | 13:01 |
| ahasenack | and mantic also has one in proposed | 13:01 |
| ahasenack | philroche: should all but the most recent one be rejected? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=livecd-rootfs | 13:02 |
| ahasenack | and the most recent one doesn't include the other two in the changes file | 13:03 |
| philroche | yeah I just noticed that. They all need to be rejected. I can re-upload and ensure all versions and changes are included | 13:03 |
| ahasenack | ok, all jammy ones | 13:03 |
| ahasenack | done | 13:04 |
| ahasenack | locutusofborg: hi, regarding gambas3 ftbfs in armhf, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gambas3/+bug/2012420 | 13:05 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2012420 in gambas3 (Ubuntu) "armhf patch no longer necessary, causes FTBFS with new poppler" [Undecided, In Progress] | 13:05 | |
| ahasenack | I added some notes, fixed one build problem, but it's still failing elsewhere now. Some components weren't build for some reason, no clear error that I could see | 13:06 |
| ahasenack | maybe that's what the original patch intended to fix, which I removed because it makes the build fail on armhf with new poppler and its c++20 standardization | 13:06 |
| ahasenack | locutusofborg: current ftbfs in armhf in oracular-proposed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gambas3/3.19.1-1ubuntu2/+build/28603875 | 13:07 |
| ahasenack | same symptom as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dia/+bug/2070284 | 13:08 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2070284 in dia (Ubuntu) "FTBFS: ‘starts_with’ has not been declared in ‘std::string’" [Undecided, Fix Released] | 13:08 | |
| philroche | ahasenack: livecd-rootfs for Jammy now re-uploaded including all changes to unapproved queue https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=livecd-rootfs | 13:16 |
| ahasenack | ok | 13:16 |
| ahasenack | livecd-rootfs is my current task | 13:16 |
| teward | ddstreet: mapreri: I made a backport request in #2071361 for a package I maintain in Debian, but because its my package and my bug I need at least one of you to approve it before I push the two backport packages to the repositories. | 13:40 |
| teward | i say 'my package' because I'm also the Debian driver for it (it's a Universe package) | 13:41 |
| ahasenack | philroche: could you please update the bug tasks of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2062929? | 13:48 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2062929 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) "AppArmor profile policy `unconfined_restrictions` missing for jammy and mantic 6.5 kernel" [Undecided, New] | 13:48 | |
| ahasenack | it only has the devel task, and it's "new" | 13:48 |
| teward | ahasenack: does it need jammy and mantic targeted? | 13:49 |
| teward | if so I can JFDI | 13:49 |
| ahasenack | teward: probably, but I ask algo because I was just reviewing a livecd-rootfs upload to mantic unapproved that mentions this bug | 13:49 |
| ahasenack | and I think there is a jammy unapproved one too, will check next | 13:49 |
| ahasenack | but the latest upload in oracular doesn't mention the bug, so I want to see the status in oracular as well | 13:50 |
| ahasenack | which matters for SRU purposes | 13:50 |
| teward | that skips Noble in the thing so that's why i ask which series / tasks it needs targeted to | 13:50 |
| teward | looks like philroche got it | 13:52 |
| philroche | yes jammy and mantic added | 13:53 |
| teward | and just because you mentioned it i put Oracular on it too (though that's what the "bug task" is, it always defaults to CurrentDevel) | 13:53 |
| teward | *sips coffee* | 13:54 |
| ahasenack | I actually prefer to be specific in the case of devel releases | 13:54 |
| ahasenack | so many bugs are "fix released" in the main task, and to understand when that actually happened to which release, I have to look at the date | 13:55 |
| ahasenack | so me, personally, I tend to also add a task for the devel release in the bugs I work on, if I remember | 13:55 |
| philroche | teward: Thanks. I have marked oracular invalid on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2062929 and added reasoning why | 13:55 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2062929 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Mantic) "AppArmor profile policy `unconfined_restrictions` missing for jammy and mantic 6.5 kernel" [Undecided, In Progress] | 13:55 | |
| teward | no i get it i'm just saying ahasenack | 13:55 |
| teward | philroche: ack no worries :) | 13:55 |
| teward | just doing Due Diligence with my bugcontrol buttons :p | 13:56 |
| mirespace | Hi, I would need a package review for sponsorship walinuxagent at | 14:03 |
| mirespace | lp:~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent:release-upgrade-oracular-devel (I have one approval already, but not from a packager)... thankyou | 14:03 |
| mirespace | bug is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+bug/2068019 | 14:04 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2068019 in walinuxagent (Ubuntu) "Upgrade to v2.11.1.4 on Oracular (24.10)" [Undecided, In Progress] | 14:04 | |
| locutusofborg | ahasenack, what bothers me is that local pbuilder oracular env on armhf works :/ | 14:08 |
| ahasenack | locutusofborg: I actually reproduced the failure, what I pasted in the bug is from my local build on a raspberry pi | 14:08 |
| ahasenack | host arm64, but armhd lxd container | 14:08 |
| ahasenack | I got a lot of "|| Unable to compile '<foo>' component | 14:09 |
| ahasenack | which then translates do the dh_install missing files error | 14:10 |
| ahasenack | my poor pi4 took 49min to reach that error | 14:10 |
| teward | ddstreet: mapreri: fyi i uploaded to backports queue for my XCA bug requesting backport. I can just handwave it but i want to get the normal process anyways done | 14:14 |
| ahasenack | philroche: do you want 23.10.60 from mantic unapproved to go over what is in mantic-proposed (23.10.59)? The changes file implies so | 14:15 |
| ahasenack | that was also a question from rbasak in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2062929/comments/4 | 14:16 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2062929 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Mantic) "AppArmor profile policy `unconfined_restrictions` missing for jammy and mantic 6.5 kernel" [Undecided, In Progress] | 14:16 | |
| lool | Philroche, ahasenack: thanks for the livecd-rootfs re-upload :) I had also forgotten to tag the new 2.765.44 release in git, I’ve done so with Phil’s latest changes, and pushed | 14:26 |
| ahasenack | lool: do you happen to know the answer to my question just above? | 14:26 |
| ddstreet | teward ack, reviewed and approved | 14:26 |
| teward | ddstreet: thank you kindly! | 14:26 |
| lool | ahasenack: I don’t know about the mantic changes I’m afraid | 14:26 |
| ahasenack | philroche: around? ^ | 14:27 |
| lool | Ankush: ^ as well :) | 14:30 |
| * ahasenack is drowning in the list of 10 bugs livecd-rootfs is tackling between jammy, mantic, noble, and oracular | 14:35 | |
| ahasenack | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2061121 is also still open for oracular | 14:37 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2061121 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Oracular) "Mantic preseeding of LXD using incorrect track/channel" [Undecided, New] | 14:37 | |
| locutusofborg | ahasenack, RpcClient.class:112:13: error: Unknown identifier: XmlReader | 14:52 |
| locutusofborg | RpcServer.class:157:13: error: Unknown identifier: XmlWriter | 14:52 |
| locutusofborg | this is the best clue I have | 14:52 |
| ahasenack | yeah, and I thought it was because the xml component failed to build | 14:52 |
| ahasenack | but couldn't find an error there | 14:52 |
| ahasenack | er, rpc I mean | 14:52 |
| ahasenack | I don't know | 14:52 |
| ahasenack | check if libxml is a dep, and somehow it's missing/wrong in armhf? | 14:53 |
| ahasenack | locutusofborg: well, just above that, it says | 14:53 |
| ahasenack | gbi3: warning: component not found: gb.xml.rpc | 14:54 |
| ahasenack | and before that it builds gb.xml | 14:54 |
| locutusofborg | why gcc-11 works? | 14:55 |
| locutusofborg | this is what I can't understand | 14:55 |
| ahasenack | does it? | 14:55 |
| ahasenack | the build with gcc-11 fails with that starts_with error from C++20 | 14:56 |
| ahasenack | can gcc-11 use -std=c++20? | 14:56 |
| ahasenack | maybe that's what we need: stick to gcc-11, and make sure if gets that flag | 14:56 |
| ahasenack | if you check the build log which was still trying to use gcc-11, you see | 14:57 |
| ahasenack | gbi3: warning: component not found: gb.xml.rpc | 14:57 |
| ahasenack | er | 14:57 |
| ahasenack | checking CXXFLAGS for gcc -std=c++11... no, obsolete | 14:57 |
| ahasenack | checking CXXFLAGS for gcc -std=c++17... no, obsolete | 14:57 |
| ahasenack | checking CXXFLAGS for gcc -std=c++20... no, obsolete | 14:57 |
| ahasenack | and then later, of course, | 14:59 |
| ahasenack | GooString.h:241:24: error: ‘starts_with’ has not been declared in ‘std::string’ | 14:59 |
| philroche | ahasenack: RE https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2061121 and oracular. I have marked it as invalid as this is specific to the releases prior to Noble where preseeding of LXD was still supported so this unblockes mantic. | 14:59 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2061121 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Mantic) "Mantic preseeding of LXD using incorrect track/channel" [Undecided, Fix Committed] | 14:59 | |
| philroche | Yes I am drowning in the bugs too :( | 14:59 |
| * ahasenack entering barrage of meetings now, and then lunch | 14:59 | |
| bdrung | @pilot out | 15:00 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
| Ankush | ahasenack, lool RE: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2062929 As far as I understand the only reason the jammy approval should block on mantic approval is that the approvals must happen in the order of releases with later release being before an older release. | 15:30 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2062929 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Mantic) "AppArmor profile policy `unconfined_restrictions` missing for jammy and mantic 6.5 kernel" [Undecided, In Progress] | 15:30 | |
| philroche | ahasenack: RE "do you want 23.10.60 from mantic unapproved to go over what is in mantic-proposed (23.10.59)? The changes file implies so that was also a question from rbasak in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2062929/comments/4" Yes unless 23.10.59 can migrate now? Both bugs in 23.10.58 and 23.10.59 have been verified https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/2007419 and | 16:04 |
| philroche | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2061121 | 16:04 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2062929 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Mantic) "AppArmor profile policy `unconfined_restrictions` missing for jammy and mantic 6.5 kernel" [Undecided, In Progress] | 16:04 | |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2007419 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Mantic) "buildd daily kinetic, lunar, and mantic image missing systemd-resolved" [Undecided, Fix Committed] | 16:04 | |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2061121 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Mantic) "Mantic preseeding of LXD using incorrect track/channel" [Undecided, Fix Committed] | 16:04 | |
| kanashiro | @pilot in | 17:39 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: kanashiro | ||
| philroche | ahasenack: Thank you | 17:52 |
| ahasenack | o/ | 17:52 |
| ahasenack | I'll look at unapproved again in a bit, just need to wait a bit for the lp machinery to run | 17:53 |
| jbicha | doko: do you have an estimate for when you'd try to switch Debian to gcc 14? | 18:29 |
| ahasenack | jbicha: thanks for sending those ftbfs fixes to debian, I had forgotten about that and mostly sent them to upstream when they weren't fixed there yet | 18:29 |
| jbicha | ahasenack: thanks for the Ubuntu fixes, the Debian bugs allow me to put a bit more pressure later on if the fixes aren't applied | 18:30 |
| ahasenack | yep | 18:30 |
| jbicha | Salsa (& gitlab) is also annoying because it's not possible to tell if someone is subscribed to merge requests. I guess that's true for Debian bugs too for anyone not in the Maintainer field | 18:32 |
| ahasenack | right, salsa is hit or miss, whereas bugs are always the right choice | 18:32 |
| === dbungert1 is now known as dbungert | ||
| teward | does anyone know if https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/2067523 is a debootstrap issue or a mk-sbuild (ubuntu-dev-tools) issue? It's fairly important for those of us still building stuff against Debian (though I'm building an environment to address this that is Debian Unstable completely, it's still something that needs addressed, and is really a breakage in the tooling) | 18:50 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2067523 in ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) "`mk-sbuild` on older Ubuntu versions like 22.04 are unable to build new Debian chroots" [Undecided, New] | 18:50 | |
| teward | would there be any harm by me *backporting* debootstrap locally to see if that fixes the problem? | 18:57 |
| teward | (found if I backported debootstrap from Oracular to Jammy / Noble in my environment, it worked with Debian images. Weird that sbuild exploded that way, but i guess it was the usrmerge stuff) | 19:20 |
| ChmEarl | teward my approach (using bookworm as builder) was to point pbuilder to mmdebstrap | 19:23 |
| teward | ChmEarl: i use sbuild not pbuilder | 19:23 |
| ChmEarl | in .pbuilderrc | 19:23 |
| teward | but you're right, i can use mmdebstrap in Debian for it | 19:24 |
| teward | (which is what my Unstable VM has) | 19:24 |
| teward | but i do a lot of crossbuilding | 19:24 |
| teward | and ended up finding it was a debootstrap problem that I was able to fix | 19:24 |
| teward | (this isn't the first time i've had to backport debootstrap as a poweruser) | 19:24 |
| ahasenack | philroche: Ankush: could any of you re-upload mantic's livecd-rootfs 23.10.60, as the one in unapproved currently also includes .59 and .58 which I released today? Otherwise, once I accept .60, it will add a comment to those already-fixed bugs again, and perhaps even flip them back to committed | 19:51 |
| ahasenack | if not, that's also fine, I can change the bugs manually after I think | 19:51 |
| ahasenack | n/m, I can fix that myself (the changes file) | 19:57 |
| kanashiro | @pilot out | 21:26 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!