flag | LocutusOfBorg: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/740471663/bpftrace_0.21.0-1ubuntu6.debdiff | 10:05 |
---|---|---|
flag | LocutusOfBorg: this patch will remove two broken tests with 6.8 and 6.10 | 10:05 |
flag | with this applied, the package should finally pass autopkgtests | 10:06 |
flag | LocutusOfBorg: can you upload it? | 10:06 |
rbasak | @pilot in | 11:18 |
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: rbasak | ||
LocutusOfBorg | flag, sure, but is export CI needed or not? | 11:51 |
flag | LocutusOfBorg: some tests use it, so keept it | 12:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | yeah, but is it effective? | 12:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | I was wondering if it was wrongly exported | 12:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | also, bpftrace needs a merge from sid now | 12:01 |
flag | LocutusOfBorg: not sure if it works in autopkgtests since i run all tests manually (to see what's going on) | 12:01 |
flag | LocutusOfBorg: before doing the merge from SID, please, do the upload of this one | 12:02 |
LocutusOfBorg | flag, already done? | 12:50 |
flag | LocutusOfBorg: what? | 12:54 |
LocutusOfBorg | I have already uploaded your fixed package | 12:55 |
flag | LocutusOfBorg: :O | 12:55 |
LocutusOfBorg | and of course I wait for it before merging :) | 12:55 |
flag | LocutusOfBorg: oh thanks, didn't notice that | 12:55 |
* flag checks | 12:55 | |
=== blackboxsw_away is now known as blackboxsw | ||
=== pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk | ||
mkukri | flag: i already had a patch on LP that fixes a test that seems to make it pass | 15:45 |
mkukri | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bpftrace/+bug/2073485 | 15:46 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2073485 in bpftrace (Ubuntu) "bpftrace autopkgtest failure" [Undecided, New] | 15:46 | |
rbasak | bdrung: could you review https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu-sponsoring/+git/ubuntu-sponsoring/+merge/469860 please? | 15:56 |
rbasak | Importantly, the sponsorship report is currently broken (last generated yesterday morning) and this (in addition to other things) fixes it. | 15:57 |
bdrung | rbasak, i'll have a look after the dmb meeting | 15:58 |
rbasak | Thanks! | 15:58 |
bdrung | rbasak, nice: i see test cases in the MR | 15:59 |
rbasak | !dmb-ping | 16:06 |
ubottu | bdmurray, bdrung, rbasak, schopin, teward, tsimonq2, utkarsh2102: DMB ping | 16:06 |
teward | rbasak: i'm here, had to reboot my internet though xD | 16:06 |
teward | broken stuff is broke | 16:06 |
rbasak | @pilot out | 16:27 |
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
ahasenack | enr0n: hey, I'm educating myself on ucf usage, and was looking at openssh. What are the 4 md5sums added for each package version in d/openssh-server.ucf-md5sum? One is the current sshd_config as shipped by the package, including all d/patches applied that might affect it, what are the other 3? | 17:03 |
enr0n | ahasenack: the other three are for the possible combinations of changing the defaults of PermitRootLogin and PasswordAuthentication, because it is possible to change these with debconf | 17:16 |
ahasenack | ah, ok, and I see the code to keep debconf and the config in sync | 17:17 |
enr0n | yeah. And so with patches applied, you can basically generate the correct checksums with: | 17:19 |
enr0n | cat sshd_config | md5sum | 17:19 |
enr0n | cat sshd_config | sed 's/^#*PermitRootLogin .*/PermitRootLogin yes/' | md5sum | 17:19 |
enr0n | cat sshd_config | sed 's/^#PasswordAuthentication .*/PasswordAuthentication no/' | md5sum | 17:19 |
enr0n | cat sshd_config | sed 's/^#*PermitRootLogin .*/PermitRootLogin yes/' | sed 's/^#PasswordAuthentication .*/PasswordAuthentication no/' | md5sum | 17:19 |
ahasenack | enr0n: and we don't want those changes (done via debconf) to trigger a ucf-conf prompt | 17:23 |
enr0n | yeah exactly | 17:23 |
mitchdz | Anyone taking a look at pydantic in -proposed? I'm planning on picking that up if no one else is :) | 21:08 |
mitchdz | python3-defaults has a metric ton of autopkgtest armhf failures from the recent outage, do we have a good way to retrigger all the failed tests or should I go down the list retriggering each one? | 22:01 |
jbicha | mitchdz: git clone https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu-archive-tools | 22:13 |
jbicha | ./retry-autopkgtest-regressions --help to see the syntax and suggestions on how to run. You'll want --blocks python3-defaults | 22:14 |
mitchdz | wonderful, thanks :) | 22:15 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!