=== pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk
=== pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk
[10:15] <rbasak> bdrung: it doesn't look like the sponsorship report is being updated. Please could you take a look?
[10:18] <bdrung> i'll check
=== pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk
[10:26] <bdrung> rbasak, strange: unattended-upgrade did not do an "apt-get update" to see the new package version
[10:28] <bdrung> package updated. the queue should be refreshed in a few minutes.
[10:28] <rbasak> Thanks!
[10:30] <adrien> Can someone sync python-googleapi? It's new enough now and newer than the version I prepared (newer means 1 month newer and a whooping 6 new versions). Thanks.
[10:31] <bdrung> adrien, i'll do it
[10:32] <adrien> bdrung: thanks!
[10:39] <thibf> Under which condition does the ubuntu archive bot automatically copy package from the security pocket to updates pocket ? I didn't find this information
[11:01] <rbasak> thibf: I think it's always done, and that it's generally an error if a package published to security _isn't_ copied to updates.
[11:01] <rbasak> I don't recall the reason though.
=== pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk
=== pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk
[12:25] <thibf> rbasak , thanks, curious if there was any document on the archive bot explaining those systemic operation
[12:30] <rbasak> thibf: I doubt there is, sorry. Theoretically it'd probably be down to some combination of the release, archive admin and Launchpad teams to document, but I don't think that exists. I'm not aware that there's been any need for it, either.
[12:30] <thibf> rbasak: Okay clear
[13:12] <mitchdz> LocutusOfBorg: I'm on +1 this week - let me know if you need any help with the lvm2 migration.
[13:15] <mitchdz> I see there are failures for multipath-tools, I think that might actually be due to the commit for downgrading lvm2, I can build a quick package without the downgrade and re-run autopkgtest against -proposed to check
[13:15] <mitchdz> if so we would need to coordinate releasing both :)
[14:40]  * sudip is confused with the transition tracker. auto-uhd has just disappeared from that page.
[14:48] <adrien> sudip: I can see it at https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/transitions/html/auto-uhd.html#!good,bad,partial,unknown,!notintesting
[14:49] <sudip> adrien: it now appeared at https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/transitions/.. but I can swear it was not there 10 minutes ago..
[14:51] <sudip> also, is there any script to trigger the rebuilds? or just manual process ?
[14:52] <adrien> was it in the "almost finished" state before?
[14:52] <adrien> or was it "ongoing"?
[14:52] <sudip> ongoing
[14:59] <adrien> I could imagine something happening at the transition (no pun intended) between the two states
[15:02] <sudip> maybe its just the timing. I noticed there was a period of time when the new uhd was deleted from proposed but did not appear in the release pocket. I can image the transition tracker updated its page during that period
[15:03] <sudip> s/image/imagine/
[15:35] <LocutusOfBorg> mitchdz, yes please
[15:35] <LocutusOfBorg> I was trying to check multipath you were faster
[15:37] <mitchdz> LocutusOfBorg: lvm2 migration is looking pretty healthy so I say we just go forward with dropping that delta right away if tests are green.
[15:38] <mitchdz> the delta == multipath-tools dmsetup downgrade
[15:38] <mitchdz> my test PPA isn't fully published yet, will run full autopkgtest suite against -proposed as soon as it is
[15:40] <LocutusOfBorg> I wasn't aware of this multipath-tools downgrade
[16:09] <jbicha> RikMills: I had to do uploads for the ongoing jpeg-xl transition. See https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kf6-kimageformats/6.4.0-0ubuntu3 & https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kimageformats/5.116.0-0ubuntu5
[16:10] <RikMills> jbicha: yeah, I saw those in my emails. thanks for the fyi though. not all bother to do that
[16:13] <jbicha> sorry, I probably wouldn't notify for simple rebuilds, but this time I did an actual change
[16:13] <jbicha> default gcc is now 14 so some things are going to ftbfs until they are fixed
[16:16] <dbungert> @pilot in
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: dbungert
[17:43] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: we both did the jpeg-xl 0.10 rebuilds
[18:27] <mitchdz> LoctusuOfBorg: The tests look fine for all of arches except arm64/armhf, simply because the builders are sad today and so can't run them. I'll put an MP up anyways for review.
[18:27] <LocutusOfBorg> jbicha, sad
[18:27] <LocutusOfBorg> mitchdz, please upload :D
[18:28] <mitchdz> LocutusOfBorg, give me a sec to make MP and if you give +1 I can upload :)
[18:36] <mitchdz> LocutusOfBorg: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+merge/469963 let me know if you have any questions
[18:36] <mitchdz> Put a nice description on the MP
[18:37] <mitchdz> Of course the caveat is we need to release lvm2 and multipath-tools at the same time after this merge
[18:49] <LocutusOfBorg> mitchdz, +1!
[19:06] <mitchdz> LocutusOfBorg: Thanks!
[20:35] <mitchdz> LocutusOfBorg: Let me double check the new multipath-tools && the current proposed lvm2 in a multipath-tools-boot environment real quick. If it works fine then I'll upload.
[20:44] <mitchdz> Looks great, uploading now
[20:53] <mitchdz> LocutusOfBorg: whoops, I need a coredev to upload that :(
[21:02] <dbungert> enr0n: on LP: #2072516 you mention an intention to upload, the previous conversation was mostly about Noble, but the upload was Oracular-only, do you have thoughts on the Noble version?
[21:02] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2072516 in puppetdb (Ubuntu Noble) "autopkgtests fail on oracular & noble" [Medium, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2072516
[21:05] <dbungert> mitchdz: might be late for L_ocutusOfBorg, I'm only half following your conversation, what do you need?
[21:06] <mitchdz> dbungert: I need a core-dev to upload https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+merge/469963
[21:06] <mitchdz> this is to unblock lvm2 migration
[21:08] <dbungert> looking
[21:09] <mitchdz> Thanks, I'm here if you have any Q's or feel free to put them on the MP
[21:22] <dbungert> mitchdz: ok, so if I'm following this, we used to patch this udev rule in lvm2 and multipath-tools needed to match and now we're working on backing that out?
[21:24] <mitchdz> Not precisely
[21:25] <mitchdz> Debian dropped that patch once dmsetup upgraded to where it was not needed. I kept that in during the initial merge because at the time lvm2 was not in -proposed. Now that lvm2 is upgraded, we can drop that patch just like Debian.
[21:25] <mitchdz> well, now that lvm2 is upgraded in -proposed
[21:26] <dbungert> k
[21:33] <mitchdz> Thanks Dan :)
[21:34] <dbungert> Welcome!
[21:45] <dbungert> @pilot out
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A