| mitchdz | Anyone seen this error before on arm64? Seeing this on optee-os and thought the newer binutils would fix it, but it's still happening with the newer binutils. aarch64-linux-gnu-ld.bfd: Error: unable to disambiguate: -specs=/usr/share/dpkg/elf-package-metadata.specs (did you mean --specs=/usr/share/dpkg/elf-package-metadata.specs ?) | 00:42 |
|---|---|---|
| sarnold | mitchdz: forgive me for asking, but is the - vs -- difference important? | 00:44 |
| mitchdz | Is the what important? sorry didn't follow | 00:45 |
| sarnold | mitchdz: the first one has a single hyphen and the second one has two hyphens | 00:46 |
| mitchdz | Yeah, not sure why that flag is becoming that | 00:46 |
| mitchdz | ah might need a new gcc too let me check if that's in proposed | 00:46 |
| mitchdz | Okay I'm on the newest gcc | 00:48 |
| mitchdz | that -specs=/usr/share/dpkg/elf-package-metadata.specs is showing up in the LDFLAGS of our build, but in the debian build system I'm seeing LDFLAGS='' | 00:49 |
| mitchdz | just not too sure where that's even coming from | 00:52 |
| sarnold | gcc is a challenge to grok :( heh | 00:55 |
| mitchdz | looking at gcc build failures makes me feel some sort of way | 01:02 |
| sarnold | lol yes | 01:02 |
| mitchdz | but on good news I see multipath-tools just migrated :) | 01:02 |
| sarnold | yay | 01:02 |
| sarnold | yeah i'm out of ideas on this one, sorry :( | 01:03 |
| mitchdz | maybe if I sleep it will come to me in the form of a dream | 01:11 |
| sarnold | or you'll invent benzine! either way | 01:11 |
| mwhudson | mitchdz: got a link to a build? | 01:37 |
| mwhudson | it sounds related to bdrung's recent changes for https://systemd.io/ELF_PACKAGE_METADATA/ | 01:38 |
| mwhudson | possibly in combination with some evil hackes in d/rules, at a guess | 01:38 |
| mwhudson | "Strip -Wl, from LDFLAGS as optee_os calls ld directly." oh. | 01:39 |
| sarnold | or, if you sleep, mwhudson might show up with a pretty good idea :) | 01:42 |
| mwhudson | i guess you _could_ put the --package-metadata=JSON thingy into LDFLAGS directly but i'm sure shell quoting gremlins will eat your brain if you try that | 01:45 |
| sarnold | base64 encode all the things | 01:45 |
| mwhudson | sarnold: did you know base64 is bad actually? https://www.opswat.com/blog/how-base64-encoding-opens-the-door-for-malware | 01:47 |
| mwhudson | (do not read this page) | 01:47 |
| mwhudson | actually maybe that's not the really bad one i was looking for | 01:48 |
| mitchdz | no build link, this is a local build. I could upload to pastebin | 01:54 |
| mwhudson | well i think i can see what is going on by inspection | 01:58 |
| mwhudson | did the words above make any sense? | 01:58 |
| mwhudson | basically the code that munges LDFLAGS should probably strip out -specs= too | 01:59 |
| mwhudson | (i see it already filters out -f*, maybe it should _only_ keep things that start -Wl,? i don't nor do i want to speak GNU make very well) | 02:00 |
| mwhudson | https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/5kdw5szmN9/ maybe? | 02:07 |
| mwhudson | mitchdz: ^^ | 02:07 |
| mwhudson | (completely untested) | 02:07 |
| mwhudson | afk for a bit now | 02:07 |
| mitchdz | I'll try that later tonight after I'm back :) | 02:08 |
| ginggs | @pilot in | 03:57 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: ginggs | ||
| mitchdz | mwhudson: tried that and the substitution failed, might need a bit more of a tweak | 04:30 |
| mitchdz | hmm got it to build locally with this ugly line https://git.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/optee-os/commit/?id=d71fa06f0f5e7ce3279f221e56eabfd7f091a844 | 04:46 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Commit d71fa06 in ~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/optee-os "d/rules: also remove elf-package-metadata.specs from LDFLAGS" | 04:46 | |
| mitchdz | Honestly not familiar with this /usr/share/dpkg/elf-package-metadata.specs file and if it's safe to just not link against | 04:47 |
| mitchdz | Cool it built. If someone more knowledgeable could give their $0.02 on if dropping the elf-package-metadata.specs is fine that'd be great | 05:08 |
| mitchdz | from what I'm reading it seems that it's _fine_ but could shoot ourselves in the foot when trying to debug a coredump | 05:09 |
| mwhudson | mitchdz: eh i guess that works but seems a bit specific | 05:13 |
| mwhudson | otoh GNU make is not a good programming language so | 05:13 |
| mwhudson | it's not create to skip the metadata but not the end of the world (aiui anyway) | 05:15 |
| mwhudson | uh | 05:15 |
| mwhudson | it's not *great to ... | 05:15 |
| mitchdz | That's my understanding too. It's nice to have a ready solution though :) | 05:17 |
| mitchdz | (even if it's not the best) | 05:17 |
| ginggs | @pilot out | 09:26 |
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
| ginggs | Thank you for flying Ubuntu Air! | 09:26 |
| === schopin_ is now known as schopin | ||
| sudip | LocutusOfBorg: is it ok if I do the gnuradio and synfig transitions later today.. just wanted to sync with you before you start with them.. | 10:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sudip, ask also jbicha :) | 10:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I did slurm and miniupnpc | 10:47 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and fixing optee | 10:47 |
| sudip | I looked at miniupnpc, but that had one dependency in main so did not ask | 10:48 |
| * sudip will wait for an ack from jbicha before doing gnuradio and synfig today evening (after they are ready) | 10:49 | |
| ginggs | sudip: i think j.bicha is on vac | 10:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sudip, just do them :D | 10:57 |
| sudip | ack, will do. thanks ginggs LocutusOfBorg | 10:58 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sudip, nobody forbids you to do transition and then ask just to rebuild main packages to some core-dev :) | 11:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | at least I won't | 11:07 |
| sudip | LocutusOfBorg: its not about forbid. its about wasting time and effort if 2 person is doing the same. imho, just sending a line to you and j.bicha when I want to look at some transition will save that wasted effort :) | 11:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sudip, I watch transitions based on the html page, so if you do something, I just see in red what is missing | 12:19 |
| LocutusOfBorg | there is not huge risk of duplicating work | 12:20 |
| sudip | ok :) | 13:28 |
| === kerbero is now known as Kerbero | ||
| === Kerbero is now known as kerbero | ||
| flag | LocutusOfBorg: the last upload of bpfcc is completly missing on ppc64 | 14:12 |
| mkukri_ | flag LocutusOfBorg, bpftrace runtime_tests still failing on your latest upload (and blocking linux-meta) | 14:12 |
| mkukri_ | and likely the same for llvm-toolchain-18 | 14:14 |
| flag | mkukri_: ??? - bpftrace 0.21.0-1ubuntu6 passed all tests, but is blocked on bpfcc, not on testing | 14:28 |
| mkukri_ | bpftrace/0.21.0-1ubuntu6 x linux-meta 6.10.0-15.15 is marked as a regression for me | 14:29 |
| mkukri_ | https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest-oracular/oracular/amd64/b/bpftrace/20240724_093853_fe7f9@/log.gz | 14:29 |
| mkukri_ | there is a test that is only broken by the new kernel i believe | 14:29 |
| flag | mkukri_: flaky test, running runtime-tests manually against 6.10 everything passed | 14:30 |
| mkukri_ | then please retry it until it passes | 14:38 |
| flag | mkukri_: already restarted | 14:42 |
| === rkratky__ is now known as rkratky | ||
| mitchdz | LocutusOfBorg: You mentioned earlier that you are working on optee, I may have a fix for optee-os FTBFS | 15:05 |
| mitchdz | Hmmm | 15:11 |
| mitchdz | I was bothered about the new flags that we see in the optee-os build (-specs=/usr/share/dpkg/elf-package-metadata.specs), I'm not sure why/where they are from. I decided to build the current version in release (4.2.0) and it FTBFS for the same reason as the proposed package | 15:12 |
| mitchdz | so it looks like something on our end changed to cause this | 15:12 |
| mitchdz | any idea on what package change would include that flag? | 15:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mitchdz, I already changed and fixed? | 15:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | dpkg is injecting them by default now | 15:36 |
| mitchdz | ah | 15:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and I removed the feature for it | 15:36 |
| LocutusOfBorg | check proposed :) | 15:36 |
| mitchdz | which package in proposed? dpkg | 15:36 |
| mitchdz | oh optee-os | 15:37 |
| mitchdz | ah darn I had this bug up for it :( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/optee-os/+bug/2074012 | 15:37 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2074012 in optee-os (Ubuntu) "arm64 build failure" [Undecided, New] | 15:37 | |
| === pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk | ||
| mitchdz | LocutusOfBorg: did you see my bug linked in excuses page before you started optee? | 15:46 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mitchdz, no... | 16:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | let me open | 16:04 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm uploading your change | 16:05 |
| mitchdz | Just curious what I can do to help make sure we don't do parallel work :) | 16:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mitchdz, I usually check excuses, but since this package was in an already open chrome tab, I didn't check again | 16:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | my fault | 16:05 |
| mitchdz | no worries | 16:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I have like 30 tabs already open of packages | 16:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but I'm uploading your fix | 16:05 |
| mitchdz | hehe I feel that | 16:05 |
| mitchdz | Is that a good way to document I'm working on it though? | 16:06 |
| mitchdz | I realize we don't really have great documentation on how to handle that (at least IMO) | 16:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes it should be indeed | 16:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but that update-excuses sometimes shows really old bugs, so people might not notice it | 16:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | including me | 16:06 |
| mitchdz | Yeah, it definitely is a double edge sword | 16:07 |
| mitchdz | No hard feelings, glad to see we came to the same conclusion :) | 16:07 |
| LocutusOfBorg | maybe you can forward to Debian | 16:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | basically this link script adds some metadata in the binary itself | 16:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/doxygen/+bug/2071468 | 16:09 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2071468 in texinfo (Ubuntu) "ELF package metadata failure: environment variable ‘DEB_HOST_ARCH’ not defined" [High, Triaged] | 16:09 | |
| mitchdz | Yeah I'll make a debian report once I get back | 16:10 |
| mitchdz | Even though they don't suffer from it right now | 16:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | DEB_BUILD_OS_RELEASE_ID, DEB_HOST_ARCH, | 16:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | DEB_SOURCE, and DEB_VERSION | 16:11 |
| mitchdz | https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/wmqNAQac/ | 17:41 |
| mitchdz | whoops weird pasting | 17:41 |
| mitchdz | I'll just paste raw | 17:42 |
| mitchdz | before I go down this rabbit hole I'll ask quickly here, were there recent changes to case Cmake to do this? | 17:42 |
| mitchdz | -- Detecting C compiler ABI info - failed | 17:42 |
| mitchdz | (seeing this in pico-sdk) | 17:45 |
| jbicha | sudip: I'm returning from GUADEC today with very limited connectivity so I won't be duplicating any of your work :) | 18:20 |
| tarzeau | jbicha: hope you enjoyed, looking forward for things :) | 18:21 |
| sudip | those are still in pending publication stage, so please consider that an advance ping for tomorrow :) | 18:24 |
| sudip | if the builds of the dependencies fails in a transition then whats the usual process followed? do we wait for Debian to complete the transition or is it ok to add a delta now and sync/merge from Debian later ? | 18:49 |
| sarnold | mwhudson: ahh, img src=data:image/png;base64, my old friend! I once did a very hasty "copy image link" from firefox and pasted it into irssi over ssh (or mosh?) and then watched the next hour as a line of infinite length was sent to the remote server with no way to kill it except *killing* it | 19:07 |
| === arif-ali_ is now known as arif-ali | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!