tco | ae | 01:48 |
---|---|---|
=== liushuyu1 is now known as liushuyu | ||
=== liushuyu1 is now known as liushuyu | ||
schopin | Anyone ever encountered "Protected: yes" in a binary package definition in d/control? Specifically, it's in the definition for login in src:shadow. | 09:33 |
schopin | It seems there's a dpkg draft about it, but its status isn't clear. | 09:34 |
mirespace | schopin: https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=Protected+path%3Adebian%2Fcontrol&literal=1 but not sure if that can ggive you a clue | 09:35 |
schopin | juliank: apparently you wrote the first versions of the wiki page, is it something that's in actual use? | 09:35 |
schopin | mirespace: thanks for the link. I guess it sort of confirms my intuition about it? | 09:36 |
mirespace | schopin: It seems so :) | 09:36 |
mirespace | I'm on +1 this week... I'm checking the clusters, and rust-gix seems to be hold on rust-hashbrown, but all is green for it... a matter of time to be migrated? No more info in the update_excuses page | 09:39 |
mirespace | I'm retriggering tests from the top for armhf (ERROR: testbed failure: unexpected eof from the testbed) | 09:46 |
juliank | schopin: yes guillem eventually implemented that after apt had Important: yes for ages | 09:50 |
juliank | Hence why some have both | 09:50 |
schopin | mirespace: have you checked the britney logs for rust-hashbrown? | 09:55 |
schopin | It seems to make a whole lot of rust package uninstallable. | 09:57 |
schopin | (that'd be https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_output.txt ) | 09:57 |
mirespace | schopin: no, good idea ... that is outdated_oupted, right ? :$ | 09:57 |
mirespace | yes, it is :) | 09:57 |
mirespace | schopin: wow | 09:58 |
waveform | @pilot in | 11:01 |
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: waveform | ||
ravikant_ | just an fyi - https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu-sponsorships.cgi is working again. | 11:35 |
rbasak | Thanks! | 11:37 |
mirespace | Working on mako | 11:46 |
jbicha | mirespace: I think the biggest blocker for rust-hashbrown etc is bug 2054491 . Some work was done in rust-reqwest recently to work around similar Ubuntu autopkgtest proxy restrictions | 11:51 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2054491 in rust-ureq (Ubuntu) "rust-ureq autopkgtest fails" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2054491 | 11:51 | |
mirespace | jbicha: thanks! checking... because I was looking into dependencies in update_output, and I was with rust-intrusive-collections because I saw it was depending on itself and blocking rust-memoffset (in amd64), but now is only happening in ppc64el ... | 12:00 |
sudip | a newbie question, why does libplacebo transition has ffmpeg in dependency level 1 ? | 12:34 |
LocutusOfBorg | sudip, check the build log and you will see as runtime dependency | 13:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | e.g. for ffmpeg on libavfilter10 | 13:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | Depends: libass9 (>= 1:0.15.0), libavcodec61 (= 7:7.0.1-4ubuntu1), libavformat61 (>= 7:7.0), libavutil59 (= 7:7.0.1-4ubuntu1), libbs2b0 (>= 3.1.0+dfsg), libc6 (>= 2.38), libflite1 (>= 1.4-release-9~), libfontconfig1 (>= 2.12.6), libfreetype6 (>= 2.2.1), libfribidi0 (>= 0.19.2), libharfbuzz0b (>= 0.9.9), liblilv-0-0 (>= 0.14.2~dfsg0), libmysofa1 (>= 0.7~), libplacebo338 (>= 6.338.1), libpocketsphinx3 (>= | 13:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | 0.8.0+real5prealpha+1), libpostproc58 (>= 7:7.0), librubberband2 (>= 3.3.0+dfsg), libsphinxbase3t64 (>= 0.8+5prealpha), libstdc++6 (>= 13.1), libswresample5 (>= 7:7.0), libswscale8 (>= 7:7.0), libva2 (>= 1.7.3), libvidstab1.1, libvpl2 (>= 2023.3.0), libzimg2 (>= 0.3.1), libzmq5 (>= 3.2.3+dfsg), ocl-icd-libopencl1 | libopencl1, ocl-icd-libopencl1 (>= 1.0) | libopencl-1.2-1, zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4) | 13:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | but also libavfilter-extras, ffmpeg itself | 13:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | but in any case libplacebo is not yet accepted, so no transition can be done | 13:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | and also I'm trying to fix ffmpeg on s390x | 13:01 |
sudip | ok, I was confused seeing ffmpeg in dependency level 1, I thought packages depending on libplacebo will be in dependency level 2. | 13:04 |
LocutusOfBorg | oh... that "level" thing is a "best effort code" | 13:45 |
LocutusOfBorg | don't trust level dependencies | 13:45 |
LocutusOfBorg | this is why I usually do them all at once | 13:45 |
LocutusOfBorg | and then retry failing builds | 13:45 |
LocutusOfBorg | (with some manual check of build logs) | 13:46 |
sudip | ahh.. ok.. :) | 13:46 |
waveform | @pilot out | 15:12 |
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
bdrung | i am currently looking into vowpal-wabbit | 15:47 |
bdrung | looking into devicexlib | 15:58 |
waveform | is there an issue with the git-ubuntu importer? I'm looking at the u-boot merge and while the ubuntu versions have been imported, the debian ones are way behind (https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot -- debian/sid should be 2024.01+dfsg-5) | 17:05 |
ogayot | hello! is there a MOTU/coredev available to trigger a NCR of netgen? It needs to rebuild against mpi-defaults 1.17 (the default changed from openmpi to mpich on 32-bit arches). Thanks! | 18:14 |
ogayot | (I can file a LP and attach a debdiff if that helps) | 18:21 |
Eickmeyer | ogayot: I can handle it. | 18:27 |
vorlon | is that the only package needing a rebuild? | 18:27 |
Eickmeyer | ogayot: Before I dput this, ^ ? | 18:32 |
ogayot | vorlon: Eickmeyer: looking! | 18:32 |
Eickmeyer | :) | 18:32 |
ogayot | do we have a `$ reverse-depends src:mpi-defaults` equivalent that supports specifying a version of src:x? | 18:48 |
ogayot | (it's not the only package that needs a rebuild) | 18:51 |
vorlon | ogayot: I think you would instead do reverse-depends src:$implementation -a i386 | 19:04 |
vorlon | vpa1977: ah, is it deliberate that https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bpfcc/0.30.0+ds-1ubuntu2/+build/28685703 only outputs libbpfcc on ppc64el and none of the other binaries? | 19:06 |
ogayot | vorlon: that's only a couple packages on i386, but dozens (with false positives) on armhf. I will try to filter the list. | 19:13 |
vorlon | ogayot: cheers | 19:14 |
vorlon | ogayot: does 'reverse-depends libopenmpi3t64 -a i386' eliminate the false-positives? | 19:15 |
vorlon | and would a rebuild of all packages depending on libopenmpi3t64:i386 && ! libmpich12:i386 be correct? | 19:15 |
john-cabaj | I have a couple of packages pending publication in -proposed since last Friday (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/involflt). Is there something gating this or should I discuss with the Launchpad team? | 19:16 |
vorlon | john-cabaj: what there indicates pending publication? | 19:17 |
john-cabaj | vorlon: Just cling the drop down on the new version and LP says "Note: Some binary packages for this source are not yet published in the repository. " | 19:17 |
john-cabaj | clicking* | 19:17 |
john-cabaj | rmadison seems to think it's in -propsed, though. | 19:18 |
vorlon | john-cabaj: which version is the "new version" you're referring to? | 19:18 |
john-cabaj | 0.1.0-0ubuntu7~22.04.1 and 0.1.0-0ubuntu7~20.04.1 | 19:19 |
vorlon | jammy appears to be in binary NEW | 19:19 |
vorlon | same for focal | 19:19 |
vorlon | john-cabaj: accepted now | 19:20 |
john-cabaj | vorlon: Thanks, I'll keep an eye out | 19:20 |
ogayot | vorlon: I guess a rebuild of all packages depending on `mpi-default-bin:i386 && libopenmpi3t64:i386 && ! libmpich12:i386` would be more correct. I don't think it makes a difference for i386 but might for armhf | 19:29 |
ogayot | once openmpi 5 lands (it's in experimental currently), support for i386 will be dropped, so all packages will need to switch to libmpich12 on armhf|i386 | 19:31 |
ogayot | s/support for i386/support for 32-bit arches/ | 19:31 |
Eickmeyer | ogayot: Catching up on this backlog, I'll go ahead and do this package, but it looks like you've got quite a bit more that need it, correct? | 19:33 |
ogayot | Eickmeyer: yes, that's correct. The unfiltered list has quite a few packages listed: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/8c7RNdSM4m/ | 19:44 |
ogayot | Eickmeyer: thanks! | 19:44 |
Eickmeyer | ogayot: Wow, yes, that's *quite* a lot. Well, I got netgen done, but we're going to need help with the others. Right now, I'm neck-deep in a news post for Ubuntu Studio that I've been putting off. | 19:46 |
rbasak | waveform: u-boot and git-ubuntu> I think this is bug 2028288. The commit graph will be correct; it's the branch pointer that's wrong. | 19:57 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2028288 in git-ubuntu "debian/sid branch incorrect when multiple versions are published" [Medium, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2028288 | 19:57 | |
rbasak | waveform: so you should be able to get to the correct commit through the import tag | 19:57 |
vpa1977 | vorlon: looks like a bug I have introduced. Let me fix it | 20:11 |
vpa1977 | vorlon: it should also output bpfcc-introspection | 20:14 |
waveform | rbasak, hmm -- some of the later imports are indeed present, up to 2024.01-dfsg+4 from experimental, but 2024.01-dfsg+5 (uploaded to Debian back in April) doesn't seem to be there | 20:20 |
rbasak | waveform: is that not https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u-boot/tag/?h=import/2024.01%2bdfsg-5 ? | 20:33 |
waveform | rbasak, oh dammit ... forgot to fetch --tags on this old clone like a fool | 20:34 |
waveform | rbasak, okay ... that tag is now there but origin/debian/sid is still pointing at the ancient import. I'm guessing that's the bug you mentioned from skimming the description. Unfortunately debian/experimental's also in the past so I'll have to do some manual messing around with my merge script :) | 20:39 |
=== jfsimon1981_b is now known as jfsimon | ||
rbasak | waveform: right | 20:42 |
=== liushuyu1 is now known as liushuyu |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!