/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/08/01/#ubuntu-devel.txt

mirespaceWorking in fftw10:17
mirespaceI've got a MP for fftw: https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/fftw/+git/fftw/+merge/47048211:06
mirespacebtw, no clue for rust-hashbrown (except that the first time I installed it from poropsed the container closed suddenly (web socket unexpectedEOF), but it was installed OK11:29
mirespacewith chdist is also OK11:30
mirespaceEickmeyer: I saw form failing on armhf.. I made a patch.. build is running (crossing fingers)11:51
mirespaceEickmeyer: I mean, in a PPA11:52
bdrungworking on bdebstrap12:28
bdrungmirespace, you say "Forwarded: yes" in your fftw patch. Do you have a link to it?12:29
bdrungi.e. forwarded to https://github.com/FFTW/fftw3?12:30
LocutusOfBorgbdrung, maybe they intend here https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=107495512:51
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Debian bug 1074955 in src:fftw "fftw: ftbfs with GCC-14" [Serious, Open]12:51
mirespacebdrung: It's the debian bug13:38
mirespacebdrung: Maybe I can add the link to my response https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074955#1413:38
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Debian bug 1074955 in src:fftw "fftw: ftbfs with GCC-14" [Serious, Open]13:38
mirespacebdrung: I check salsa has no activity for 2 years, and fftw3 github is code generated, and the patch doesn't apply13:39
mirespaceLocutusOfBorg: yes, that is13:39
mirespaces/response/answer/13:48
bdrungmirespace, the forwarded field should refer to the upstream project, not Debian.13:58
bdrungsee also https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep3/13:59
mirespacebdrung: thanks! I'm modifying the header omitting that field14:00
Eickmeyermirespace: Excellent! We can get that fixed, that's just one down. I've got a ton of NCRs that are just completely FTBFS due to GCC-14, and some that are just failing on armhf.14:01
mirespaceEickmeyer: Cool! I'm fstill fixing form, as it shows me a new fail after fixing the previous one :)14:02
Eickmeyeroof. Disappointing. Well, I'm sure you'll come up with something. I've got even more of those NCRs to do today. I just woke up, 7am my time.14:06
mirespaceEickmeyer: Good morning then!  I can help with them if you like.14:07
mirespacebdrung: MP updated, new build in PPA running14:08
=== rkratky__ is now known as rkratky
=== javaJake_ is now known as javaJake
ahasenackmfo: nova in focal unapproved is missing the security updates (2.9 vs 2.11)17:43
mfoahasenack, apologies; I missed that for Focal; will rebase and let you know.17:44
mfoahasenack, uploaded nova (2.12) to focal. build-time test suite passes (bug 1999814 comment 19), if you still have some time. thanks!19:36
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1999814 in nova (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] Allow for specifying common baseline CPU model with disabled feature" [Medium, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/199981419:36
ahasenacksgmoore: hi, around? I have a question on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neochat/+bug/206111619:40
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2061116 in neochat (Ubuntu Noble) "[SRU] neochat not opening in 24.04" [Undecided, In Progress]19:40
EickmeyerNoticing some weird packaging quirks with debhelper. It's freaking out on python packages and throwing "No such file or directory" on files in dpkg-dev, but these should be "duh, I should have these files" moments. Happened on h5py and petsc4py rebuilds.20:16
jbichadoko: ^ is the dpkg upload broken?21:02
Eickmeyerjbicha, doko: it does appear to be. I have quite a few packages failing because they can't find files.21:14
EickmeyerAdding phymland murasakito that list.21:15
EickmeyerList getting bigger. I'd rather not add noise with every package here, but body count approaching 10.21:16
bdmurrayEickmeyer: I'm a bit sleep deprived can you point me at something specific?21:23
Eickmeyerbdmurray: One example among many: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/741903151/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-amd64.relion_3.1.3-3build4_BUILDING.txt.gz21:24
jbichabdmurray: also https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vte2.91/0.76.3-621:25
EickmeyerAnd https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phyml/3:3.3.20220408-3build3/+build/2870677621:26
mwhudsonis anything that used debhelper building correctly?21:35
mwhudson*uses21:35
EickmeyerI mean, some...21:36
mwhudsonok21:36
mwhudsoni assume this is due to the dpkg merge ...21:36
EickmeyerI got https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ray/2.3.1-8build3 to build correctly, but it's been rare.21:36
bdmurrayLooking at update_excuses I see boost slightly above dpkg and it is missing binaries21:46
freyeshi all, I've been trying to build a package (rpds-py_0.12.0-3build1.dsc) with sbuild, running "sbuild -A -d oracular *.dsc" works fine, although I would like to build it now using only "main", is there a way to do this?, I would like to confirm if that package has any other dependencies that are not in main (context: http://pad.lv/2072621 )21:54
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2072621 in rpds-py (Ubuntu) "[MIR] rpds-py" [Undecided, Incomplete]21:54
mwhudsonoh ffs who invented makefiles21:55
Eickmeyer🤣21:56
bdmurrayfreyes: rebuild your chroot w/ main only?21:57
Eickmeyerbdmurray: Yes, one version of boost (the lower version) needed a NCR for new mpi-defaults, and it FTBFS on armhf. Newer boost didn't require NCR.21:57
freyesbdmurray, I tried that, and sbuild didn't like it, the build fails with this issue: "sbuild-build-depends-dose3-dummy : Depends: dose-distcheck but it is not installable"22:00
sarnoldfreyes: you can also check the build logs for "/universe" in the apt install phases https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724186480/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-amd64.rpds-py_0.12.0-3build1_BUILDING.txt.gz -- see that giant pile of librust-* packages and decide it'd be a good day to go back to bed rather than work22:00
freyesI wonder if this is a "thing" anyone does as part of your devel workflow, maybe I'm just taking a route that make little sense22:00
mwhudsonfortunately it looks like dpkg is still buildable so hopefully i can just upload a fix22:02
freyessarnold, 😅  ... yeah, this will be a long journey, rpds-py is used by python3-jsonschema, a widely used library by OpenStack22:03
sarnoldfreyes: oh nooooo22:04
Eickmeyermwhudson: dpkg still buildable> I'd sure hope so! 😂22:04
mwhudsonEickmeyer: well otherwise we'd have to get the version in proposed removed before we could upload the fix. not the end of the world but slower22:05
Eickmeyerbdmurray: I sit corrected. NCR on boost 1.74 was successful.22:06
freyessarnold, thanks for the tip on looking at build-deps, I will check with jamespage tomorrow22:06
mwhudsonok i have a fix built, testing it on vte2.91 now22:07
mirespaceMy ppa is failing to get a slot to build on arm... leaves me with the intrigue until tomorrow o/22:08
mwhudsonok seems to work22:09
mwhudsonbdmurray, Eickmeyer: ok https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/1.22.10ubuntu2 should fix the builds. i'm going afk for a bit, will attempt to retry all recent failures when i get back22:13
Eickmeyermwhudson: Thanks! I'll be keeping an eye on my uploads as well.22:13
Eickmeyermirespace: Thanks! I filed a tracking bug for the armhf failures at bug 207555022:13
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2075550 in r-cran-metamix (Ubuntu) "FTBFS on armhf with GCC-14 (rebuild against mpi-defaults 1.17)" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/207555022:13

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!