mirespace | Working in fftw | 10:17 |
---|---|---|
mirespace | I've got a MP for fftw: https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/fftw/+git/fftw/+merge/470482 | 11:06 |
mirespace | btw, no clue for rust-hashbrown (except that the first time I installed it from poropsed the container closed suddenly (web socket unexpectedEOF), but it was installed OK | 11:29 |
mirespace | with chdist is also OK | 11:30 |
mirespace | Eickmeyer: I saw form failing on armhf.. I made a patch.. build is running (crossing fingers) | 11:51 |
mirespace | Eickmeyer: I mean, in a PPA | 11:52 |
bdrung | working on bdebstrap | 12:28 |
bdrung | mirespace, you say "Forwarded: yes" in your fftw patch. Do you have a link to it? | 12:29 |
bdrung | i.e. forwarded to https://github.com/FFTW/fftw3? | 12:30 |
LocutusOfBorg | bdrung, maybe they intend here https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074955 | 12:51 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Debian bug 1074955 in src:fftw "fftw: ftbfs with GCC-14" [Serious, Open] | 12:51 | |
mirespace | bdrung: It's the debian bug | 13:38 |
mirespace | bdrung: Maybe I can add the link to my response https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1074955#14 | 13:38 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Debian bug 1074955 in src:fftw "fftw: ftbfs with GCC-14" [Serious, Open] | 13:38 | |
mirespace | bdrung: I check salsa has no activity for 2 years, and fftw3 github is code generated, and the patch doesn't apply | 13:39 |
mirespace | LocutusOfBorg: yes, that is | 13:39 |
mirespace | s/response/answer/ | 13:48 |
bdrung | mirespace, the forwarded field should refer to the upstream project, not Debian. | 13:58 |
bdrung | see also https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep3/ | 13:59 |
mirespace | bdrung: thanks! I'm modifying the header omitting that field | 14:00 |
Eickmeyer | mirespace: Excellent! We can get that fixed, that's just one down. I've got a ton of NCRs that are just completely FTBFS due to GCC-14, and some that are just failing on armhf. | 14:01 |
mirespace | Eickmeyer: Cool! I'm fstill fixing form, as it shows me a new fail after fixing the previous one :) | 14:02 |
Eickmeyer | oof. Disappointing. Well, I'm sure you'll come up with something. I've got even more of those NCRs to do today. I just woke up, 7am my time. | 14:06 |
mirespace | Eickmeyer: Good morning then! I can help with them if you like. | 14:07 |
mirespace | bdrung: MP updated, new build in PPA running | 14:08 |
=== rkratky__ is now known as rkratky | ||
=== javaJake_ is now known as javaJake | ||
ahasenack | mfo: nova in focal unapproved is missing the security updates (2.9 vs 2.11) | 17:43 |
mfo | ahasenack, apologies; I missed that for Focal; will rebase and let you know. | 17:44 |
mfo | ahasenack, uploaded nova (2.12) to focal. build-time test suite passes (bug 1999814 comment 19), if you still have some time. thanks! | 19:36 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1999814 in nova (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] Allow for specifying common baseline CPU model with disabled feature" [Medium, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1999814 | 19:36 | |
ahasenack | sgmoore: hi, around? I have a question on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neochat/+bug/2061116 | 19:40 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2061116 in neochat (Ubuntu Noble) "[SRU] neochat not opening in 24.04" [Undecided, In Progress] | 19:40 | |
Eickmeyer | Noticing some weird packaging quirks with debhelper. It's freaking out on python packages and throwing "No such file or directory" on files in dpkg-dev, but these should be "duh, I should have these files" moments. Happened on h5py and petsc4py rebuilds. | 20:16 |
jbicha | doko: ^ is the dpkg upload broken? | 21:02 |
Eickmeyer | jbicha, doko: it does appear to be. I have quite a few packages failing because they can't find files. | 21:14 |
Eickmeyer | Adding phymland murasakito that list. | 21:15 |
Eickmeyer | List getting bigger. I'd rather not add noise with every package here, but body count approaching 10. | 21:16 |
bdmurray | Eickmeyer: I'm a bit sleep deprived can you point me at something specific? | 21:23 |
Eickmeyer | bdmurray: One example among many: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/741903151/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-amd64.relion_3.1.3-3build4_BUILDING.txt.gz | 21:24 |
jbicha | bdmurray: also https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vte2.91/0.76.3-6 | 21:25 |
Eickmeyer | And https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phyml/3:3.3.20220408-3build3/+build/28706776 | 21:26 |
mwhudson | is anything that used debhelper building correctly? | 21:35 |
mwhudson | *uses | 21:35 |
Eickmeyer | I mean, some... | 21:36 |
mwhudson | ok | 21:36 |
mwhudson | i assume this is due to the dpkg merge ... | 21:36 |
Eickmeyer | I got https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ray/2.3.1-8build3 to build correctly, but it's been rare. | 21:36 |
bdmurray | Looking at update_excuses I see boost slightly above dpkg and it is missing binaries | 21:46 |
freyes | hi all, I've been trying to build a package (rpds-py_0.12.0-3build1.dsc) with sbuild, running "sbuild -A -d oracular *.dsc" works fine, although I would like to build it now using only "main", is there a way to do this?, I would like to confirm if that package has any other dependencies that are not in main (context: http://pad.lv/2072621 ) | 21:54 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2072621 in rpds-py (Ubuntu) "[MIR] rpds-py" [Undecided, Incomplete] | 21:54 | |
mwhudson | oh ffs who invented makefiles | 21:55 |
Eickmeyer | 🤣 | 21:56 |
bdmurray | freyes: rebuild your chroot w/ main only? | 21:57 |
Eickmeyer | bdmurray: Yes, one version of boost (the lower version) needed a NCR for new mpi-defaults, and it FTBFS on armhf. Newer boost didn't require NCR. | 21:57 |
freyes | bdmurray, I tried that, and sbuild didn't like it, the build fails with this issue: "sbuild-build-depends-dose3-dummy : Depends: dose-distcheck but it is not installable" | 22:00 |
sarnold | freyes: you can also check the build logs for "/universe" in the apt install phases https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724186480/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-amd64.rpds-py_0.12.0-3build1_BUILDING.txt.gz -- see that giant pile of librust-* packages and decide it'd be a good day to go back to bed rather than work | 22:00 |
freyes | I wonder if this is a "thing" anyone does as part of your devel workflow, maybe I'm just taking a route that make little sense | 22:00 |
mwhudson | fortunately it looks like dpkg is still buildable so hopefully i can just upload a fix | 22:02 |
freyes | sarnold, 😅 ... yeah, this will be a long journey, rpds-py is used by python3-jsonschema, a widely used library by OpenStack | 22:03 |
sarnold | freyes: oh nooooo | 22:04 |
Eickmeyer | mwhudson: dpkg still buildable> I'd sure hope so! 😂 | 22:04 |
mwhudson | Eickmeyer: well otherwise we'd have to get the version in proposed removed before we could upload the fix. not the end of the world but slower | 22:05 |
Eickmeyer | bdmurray: I sit corrected. NCR on boost 1.74 was successful. | 22:06 |
freyes | sarnold, thanks for the tip on looking at build-deps, I will check with jamespage tomorrow | 22:06 |
mwhudson | ok i have a fix built, testing it on vte2.91 now | 22:07 |
mirespace | My ppa is failing to get a slot to build on arm... leaves me with the intrigue until tomorrow o/ | 22:08 |
mwhudson | ok seems to work | 22:09 |
mwhudson | bdmurray, Eickmeyer: ok https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/1.22.10ubuntu2 should fix the builds. i'm going afk for a bit, will attempt to retry all recent failures when i get back | 22:13 |
Eickmeyer | mwhudson: Thanks! I'll be keeping an eye on my uploads as well. | 22:13 |
Eickmeyer | mirespace: Thanks! I filed a tracking bug for the armhf failures at bug 2075550 | 22:13 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2075550 in r-cran-metamix (Ubuntu) "FTBFS on armhf with GCC-14 (rebuild against mpi-defaults 1.17)" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2075550 | 22:13 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!