/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/08/06/#ubuntu-meeting.txt

jbichao/14:30
didrockshey o/14:30
sarnoldgood morning14:32
didrocksif no-one is around, let me host this one too14:33
didrocks#startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status14:33
meetingologyMeeting started at 14:33:44 UTC.  The chair is didrocks.  Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology14:33
meetingologyAvailable commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick14:33
didrocksPing for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage ( eslerm dviererbe )14:33
didrocks#topic current component mismatches14:33
didrocksMission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams14:33
didrocks#link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg14:33
didrocks#link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg14:33
dviererbeo/14:34
didrocksso… it seems we have gtk4 -> with the i386 deps14:34
didrocksjbicha kindly pre-warned me about it14:34
didrocksand will reach to get the i386 binary being built14:34
jbichathe cpdb stuff was in main for mantic but dropped for noble in part because it wasn't needed but we do need it going forward14:35
didrocksjbicha: do you mind opening a MIR bug with that single statement? That would help tracking the re-promotion14:35
jbichaok14:35
didrocksand will be linked into that diagram14:35
didrocksthanks!14:35
didrocksmutter -> libdisplay-info14:35
didrocksjbicha: not the first time we have that IIRC, but I don’t remember the reasoning? ^14:36
jbichacould someone else take a look at libdisplay-info since I think slyon is still out. I'd like to get it cleared up to smooth landing mutter/gnome-shell 4614:36
jbichaI think the MIR was approved but needs someone to double check and set the status correctly (and/or promotion to main)14:36
jbichabug 207139614:36
-ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2071396 in libdisplay-info (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libdisplay-info" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/207139614:36
didrocksI’ll have a double check then14:37
jbichafor cpdb, the .svg is already linked to approved MIRs. Do you want a replacement minimal MIR instead?14:37
didrocksjbicha: oh nice, you are right, just add a comment to it?14:38
didrocks(an additional comment)14:38
jbicha(previous correction: land gnome-shell 47)14:38
didrocksthe only one which is not tracked is autopkgtest -> retry14:38
didrocksI think slyon will be back soon, and it sounds foundation-related14:39
didrockslet’s park it there for now14:39
didrocks#topic New MIRs14:39
didrocksMission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing14:39
didrocks#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir14:39
didrocksthe page was soooooo empty that it took a while to load here :)14:40
sarnold"this can't be right..."14:40
didrocks#topic Incomplete bugs / questions14:40
didrocksMission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams14:40
didrocks#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir14:40
didrockssarnold: my first reaction :)14:40
sarnolddidrocks: mine too :)14:41
didrocksespecially with FF coming…14:41
didrocksok, it seems nothing in incomplete is pending on us14:41
didrocks#topic Process/Documentation improvements14:42
didrocksMission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues14:42
didrocks#link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls14:42
didrocks#link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues14:42
didrocksso, one PR pending14:42
didrocks(well, one new)14:42
didrocksbased on the discussion we had last week (or was it the week before?)14:42
sarnoldwho even knows any more..14:42
didrocks"history" :p14:42
didrocksif you can review/give your 2 cents, I was the only one to ack it14:43
didrocksapart from that, it seems we are in a good position :)14:43
didrocks#topic MIR related Security Review Queue14:43
didrocksMission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable?14:43
didrocksSome clients can only work with one, some with the other escaping - the URLs point to the same place.14:43
didrocks#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir14:43
didrocks#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=[MIR]&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir14:43
didrocksInternal link14:43
didrocks- ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect14:43
didrocks- ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much14:43
didrocks#link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/59414:43
didrocksstage is yours sarnold :)14:43
cpaelzer_arr, I'm here14:44
cpaelzer_sorry, meeting overload14:44
sarnoldthere's good news here, but not great news14:44
cpaelzer_reading backlog and chiming in then14:44
sarnolda familiar lament ;(14:44
didrocksgood is still better than no or bad news :)14:44
sarnoldsome of the MIRs have been started but nothing pushed through to completion yet14:44
sarnoldso i'm feeling less dispondent than usual14:45
sarnolddespondent? yeah probably that14:45
* didrocks learnt a new word14:45
didrocksunsure I want to it often :)14:45
cpaelzer_read - ack to all above14:46
sarnoldI also found a spare three uninterrupted hours last week to work on bringing up a new machine for improvement of our mir process. that felt good. it's not amazing or anything but it felt good to actually knock off an item.14:46
didrocksack, well, anyway, that’s progress and luckily, we don’t have that many new MIRs14:46
sarnoldyeah, surprisingly quiet cycle14:46
cpaelzer_let us clouse out and merge https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pull/62 in AOB if sarnold is ok14:46
-ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Pull 62 in canonical/ubuntu-mir "Clarify exotic hardware requirements" [Open]14:46
didrockssarnold: \o/14:46
cpaelzer_sarnold:  it is not that quiet14:46
sarnoldoh14:46
cpaelzer_if you look at the component mismatch14:46
cpaelzer_there are so many stubs filed to be processed14:47
cpaelzer_I expect these to land in a while14:47
cpaelzer_and then we have reivews to do14:47
cpaelzer_and then subsequently should expect security reivews too14:47
sarnoldthe "new 386 builds" has me a bit worried..14:47
cpaelzer_six more to come according to https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/component-mismatches-proposed.svg14:47
didrockscpaelzer_: yeah, the empty "New" one is a little bit of a falacy… and maybe rather than teams doing more requests in advance, they are late…14:47
cpaelzer_didrocks: I think it is both - the conscious ones early. And now the piled up sync late14:48
didrockscpaelzer_: hum, 2 of them are already in progress or almost done?14:48
didrocksbut yeah, let’s see once the list is cleared up14:48
cpaelzer_ack14:48
didrocksand now, merging time apparently!14:48
didrocks#topic Any other business?14:48
sarnoldnone here14:49
cpaelzer_could we have a look at https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pull/62 and I merge it if you are ok14:49
-ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Pull 62 in canonical/ubuntu-mir "Clarify exotic hardware requirements" [Open]14:49
cpaelzer_didrocks:  said ok14:49
cpaelzer_sarnold: I'll look at your style thing14:49
cpaelzer_ph14:49
cpaelzer_oh14:49
sarnoldthis isn't a new policy, just clarification, i think two acks separate from the proposer is probably fine14:49
cpaelzer_sarnold:  the sentence is meant to continue14:50
sarnoldahhh, I was expecting perhaps several of them to remain14:50
cpaelzer_as people leave just the one that applies14:50
sarnoldone or more, not exactly one14:50
cpaelzer_it could be >=114:50
cpaelzer_or 0 and we will reject :-)14:50
sarnold:D14:50
didrocksyeah, we should need to develop an app to file it :p14:50
cpaelzer_NO!14:50
didrockswith multi-choices and nested widgets14:50
didrocks:)14:51
cpaelzer_NO²14:51
cpaelzer_we try to help14:51
sarnoldit just felt like a bug when I got to the end of the line and the line type changes but the sentence hadn't ended, heh14:51
cpaelzer_but not that :-P14:51
didrockssarnold: I have the same feeling on the "      maintained the package"14:51
didrocksin the existing template14:51
cpaelzer_I'll add colon and make it work14:51
cpaelzer_and then merge14:51
didrocksand then, you get used to it, but I agree, some parts can be puzzling at first like the multi-lines ones14:51
cpaelzer_to both14:52
cpaelzer_no other AOB topic for me14:52
didrocks"…" <- feel free to pick it :)14:52
didrocksnothing else either14:52
didrocks#endmeeting14:52
meetingologyMeeting ended at 14:52:42 UTC.  Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2024/ubuntu-meeting.2024-08-06-14.33.moin.txt14:52
didrocksthanks everyone!14:52
sarnolddidrocks: heh yeah, I can see that, I guess i'm in the "used to it phase" there :)14:52
sarnoldthanks didrocks, all :)14:52
cpaelzer_thanks for driving as I was unplanned-late :-/14:52
cpaelzer_bonus ++ to didrocks14:53
didrocksno worry!14:53
=== cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!