[14:30] o/ [14:30] hey o/ [14:32] good morning [14:33] if no-one is around, let me host this one too [14:33] #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status [14:33] Meeting started at 14:33:44 UTC. The chair is didrocks. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology [14:33] Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick [14:33] Ping for MIR meeting - didrocks joalif slyon sarnold cpaelzer jamespage ( eslerm dviererbe ) [14:33] #topic current component mismatches [14:33] Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams [14:33] #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg [14:33] #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg [14:34] o/ [14:34] so… it seems we have gtk4 -> with the i386 deps [14:34] jbicha kindly pre-warned me about it [14:34] and will reach to get the i386 binary being built [14:35] the cpdb stuff was in main for mantic but dropped for noble in part because it wasn't needed but we do need it going forward [14:35] jbicha: do you mind opening a MIR bug with that single statement? That would help tracking the re-promotion [14:35] ok [14:35] and will be linked into that diagram [14:35] thanks! [14:35] mutter -> libdisplay-info [14:36] jbicha: not the first time we have that IIRC, but I don’t remember the reasoning? ^ [14:36] could someone else take a look at libdisplay-info since I think slyon is still out. I'd like to get it cleared up to smooth landing mutter/gnome-shell 46 [14:36] I think the MIR was approved but needs someone to double check and set the status correctly (and/or promotion to main) [14:36] bug 2071396 [14:36] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Bug 2071396 in libdisplay-info (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libdisplay-info" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2071396 [14:37] I’ll have a double check then [14:37] for cpdb, the .svg is already linked to approved MIRs. Do you want a replacement minimal MIR instead? [14:38] jbicha: oh nice, you are right, just add a comment to it? [14:38] (an additional comment) [14:38] (previous correction: land gnome-shell 47) [14:38] the only one which is not tracked is autopkgtest -> retry [14:39] I think slyon will be back soon, and it sounds foundation-related [14:39] let’s park it there for now [14:39] #topic New MIRs [14:39] Mission: ensure to assign all incoming reviews for fast processing [14:39] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [14:40] the page was soooooo empty that it took a while to load here :) [14:40] "this can't be right..." [14:40] #topic Incomplete bugs / questions [14:40] Mission: Identify required actions and spread the load among the teams [14:40] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [14:40] sarnold: my first reaction :) [14:41] didrocks: mine too :) [14:41] especially with FF coming… [14:41] ok, it seems nothing in incomplete is pending on us [14:42] #topic Process/Documentation improvements [14:42] Mission: Review pending process/documentation pull-requests or issues [14:42] #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pulls [14:42] #link https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/issues [14:42] so, one PR pending [14:42] (well, one new) [14:42] based on the discussion we had last week (or was it the week before?) [14:42] who even knows any more.. [14:42] "history" :p [14:43] if you can review/give your 2 cents, I was the only one to ack it [14:43] apart from that, it seems we are in a good position :) [14:43] #topic MIR related Security Review Queue [14:43] Mission: Check on progress, do deadlines seem doable? [14:43] Some clients can only work with one, some with the other escaping - the URLs point to the same place. [14:43] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=%5BMIR%5D&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [14:43] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security/+bugs?field.searchtext=[MIR]&assignee_option=choose&field.assignee=ubuntu-security&field.bug_reporter=&field.bug_commenter=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [14:43] Internal link [14:43] - ensure your teams items are prioritized among each other as you'd expect [14:43] - ensure community requests do not get stomped by teams calling for favors too much [14:43] #link https://warthogs.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/SEC/boards/594 [14:43] stage is yours sarnold :) [14:44] arr, I'm here [14:44] sorry, meeting overload [14:44] there's good news here, but not great news [14:44] reading backlog and chiming in then [14:44] a familiar lament ;( [14:44] good is still better than no or bad news :) [14:44] some of the MIRs have been started but nothing pushed through to completion yet [14:45] so i'm feeling less dispondent than usual [14:45] despondent? yeah probably that [14:45] * didrocks learnt a new word [14:45] unsure I want to it often :) [14:46] read - ack to all above [14:46] I also found a spare three uninterrupted hours last week to work on bringing up a new machine for improvement of our mir process. that felt good. it's not amazing or anything but it felt good to actually knock off an item. [14:46] ack, well, anyway, that’s progress and luckily, we don’t have that many new MIRs [14:46] yeah, surprisingly quiet cycle [14:46] let us clouse out and merge https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pull/62 in AOB if sarnold is ok [14:46] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Pull 62 in canonical/ubuntu-mir "Clarify exotic hardware requirements" [Open] [14:46] sarnold: \o/ [14:46] sarnold: it is not that quiet [14:46] oh [14:46] if you look at the component mismatch [14:47] there are so many stubs filed to be processed [14:47] I expect these to land in a while [14:47] and then we have reivews to do [14:47] and then subsequently should expect security reivews too [14:47] the "new 386 builds" has me a bit worried.. [14:47] six more to come according to https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/component-mismatches-proposed.svg [14:47] cpaelzer_: yeah, the empty "New" one is a little bit of a falacy… and maybe rather than teams doing more requests in advance, they are late… [14:48] didrocks: I think it is both - the conscious ones early. And now the piled up sync late [14:48] cpaelzer_: hum, 2 of them are already in progress or almost done? [14:48] but yeah, let’s see once the list is cleared up [14:48] ack [14:48] and now, merging time apparently! [14:48] #topic Any other business? [14:49] none here [14:49] could we have a look at https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-mir/pull/62 and I merge it if you are ok [14:49] -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Pull 62 in canonical/ubuntu-mir "Clarify exotic hardware requirements" [Open] [14:49] didrocks: said ok [14:49] sarnold: I'll look at your style thing [14:49] ph [14:49] oh [14:49] this isn't a new policy, just clarification, i think two acks separate from the proposer is probably fine [14:50] sarnold: the sentence is meant to continue [14:50] ahhh, I was expecting perhaps several of them to remain [14:50] as people leave just the one that applies [14:50] one or more, not exactly one [14:50] it could be >=1 [14:50] or 0 and we will reject :-) [14:50] :D [14:50] yeah, we should need to develop an app to file it :p [14:50] NO! [14:50] with multi-choices and nested widgets [14:51] :) [14:51] NO² [14:51] we try to help [14:51] it just felt like a bug when I got to the end of the line and the line type changes but the sentence hadn't ended, heh [14:51] but not that :-P [14:51] sarnold: I have the same feeling on the " maintained the package" [14:51] in the existing template [14:51] I'll add colon and make it work [14:51] and then merge [14:51] and then, you get used to it, but I agree, some parts can be puzzling at first like the multi-lines ones [14:52] to both [14:52] no other AOB topic for me [14:52] "…" <- feel free to pick it :) [14:52] nothing else either [14:52] #endmeeting [14:52] Meeting ended at 14:52:42 UTC. Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2024/ubuntu-meeting.2024-08-06-14.33.moin.txt [14:52] thanks everyone! [14:52] didrocks: heh yeah, I can see that, I guess i'm in the "used to it phase" there :) [14:52] thanks didrocks, all :) [14:52] thanks for driving as I was unplanned-late :-/ [14:53] bonus ++ to didrocks [14:53] no worry! === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer