=== liushuyu1 is now known as liushuyu [06:02] howdy! can anybody think of a POSIX-compliant way of doing the same? https://paste.debian.net/hidden/5f0b0633/ [06:51] bdmurray: did I see you say somewhere that you were in charge of MoM? if so, it seems to be down === pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk === pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk === pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk [08:28] RikMills: it's back [08:28] \o/ === pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk === pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk [16:34] kanashiro: I'm trying to understand why ruby-sdbm is FTBFS only on i386. It looks like some circular dependency on libruby and ruby-sdbm? Although I don't really see any reason why it would be i386 specific. [18:59] cpete src:ruby3.3 which provides libruby3.3 does not build on i386, so this dependency is not satisfiable there [19:00] there are other packages involved in the ruby transition FTBFSing on i386 for the same reason [19:00] I am not sure what to do there, remove those package from i386 (?) [19:11] vorlon any thoughts on the above? ^ [19:40] kanashiro: do you have the correct package name there? $ rmadison libruby3.3 [19:41] libruby3.3 | 3.3.4-2ubuntu3 | oracular-proposed | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x [19:43] also $ rmadison libruby [19:43] libruby | 1:3.3~ubuntu3 | oracular-proposed | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x [19:51] ginggs I thought ruby3.3 was not built on i386, but it seems it did, I need to break a circular dependency on i368 then [21:48] kanashiro: thanks! [22:26] I need to disable the inclusion of package metadata on some binaries built by a package. is unsetting ELF_PACKAGE_METADATA the recommended way to do this? [22:53] isn't there a DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS thingie for that [22:54] that's what I'm trying to find, but in this specific case the package is invoking gcc by hand, and from what I've read ELF_PACKAGE_METADATA is what influences this scenario [22:55] DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=qa=-elfpackagemetadata i think [22:57] yeah, I don't want to mess with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS inside d/rules [22:57] DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS, though… [22:58] well DEB_MAINT_BUILD_OPTIONS then :-) [22:58] although i'm not sure if it works quite the same tbh [22:58] but let see what this option does under the hood [22:59] https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/tree/scripts/Dpkg/Vendor/Ubuntu.pm#n177 [22:59] I think it does exactly what I intended to do manually [23:00] which is good. let me try unsetting the variable, then [23:00] thanks, mwhudson :) [23:52] kanashiro: thanks for the info! [23:58] cpete now ruby-sdbm was built on i386, just need to wait to be published