| RAOF | jbicha: Ah, yeah, you're quite right. | 00:39 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | Oh, no. Why doesn't that have an SRU bug? | 00:48 |
| RAOF | jbichaHave you filed a regression-updates bug about this yet? | 00:49 |
| === pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk | ||
| peat-psuwit | RAOF: Hello. It was me that report python3-apt installability on armhf earlier. I haven't filed a regression-updates bug. Should I? | 08:45 |
| RAOF | peat-psuwit: Nah, I've filled one here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-apt/+bug/2077685 | 09:15 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2077685 in python-apt (Ubuntu Noble) "python3-apt_2.7.7ubuntu2 uninstallable on armhf" [Critical, In Progress] | 09:15 | |
| RAOF | Thanks, though! | 09:16 |
| peat-psuwit | So I guess I should probably have filed it before raising it here. 😅 | 09:21 |
| peat-psuwit | RAOF: So you said in the bug that you've set the phasing of python-apt to 0. But for some reason it doesn't show up as phased 0% on my armhf container? | 09:23 |
| peat-psuwit | Â Version table: | 09:24 |
| peat-psuwit | Â Â Â Â 2.7.7ubuntu2 500 (phased 30%) | 09:24 |
| sil2100 | peat-psuwit: indeed it was 30%, I now overrode it to 0 | 09:53 |
| === yqsduokyrfafhicf is now known as nrwisehewtivceaq | ||
| === nrwisehewtivceaq is now known as georgiag | ||
| === pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk | ||
| basilgello_ | Hi everyone! | 13:11 |
| basilgello_ | vorlon: please check your debian.org email as I need your help with src:kodi and src:tqdm in noble. Both fixes solve severe issues - for kodi there is already an outcry on the forums and tqdm block NeuroDebian archive rebuild for 24.04 | 13:12 |
| === pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk | ||
| === dbungert1 is now known as dbungert | ||
| === yfeffvbgxaohicfk is now known as ckzgirohbaxpieiu | ||
| === ckzgirohbaxpieiu is now known as georgiag | ||
| === nabivdxxmwqqthte is now known as orxqoeatwdntbkof | ||
| === orxqoeatwdntbkof is now known as georgiag | ||
| === pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk | ||
| mitchdz | Is it too late to request a removal of a package in Oracular? I would like amazon-ec2-net-utils considered. Explained here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amazon-ec2-net-utils/+bug/2077773 | 22:07 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2077773 in amazon-ec2-net-utils (Ubuntu) "Remove from Oracular" [Undecided, New] | 22:07 | |
| mitchdz | Open to any comments on the removal request :) | 22:07 |
| === mmikowski3 is now known as mmikowski | ||
| sarnold | mitchdz: I think archive admins tend to do this in the last week or two before release | 23:48 |
| sarnold | mitchdz: I kinda wish they'd hit them immediately, i'm 90% sure I've seen them get missed before, but maybe I just didn't see the full story | 23:48 |
| mitchdz | I see, thanks sarnold | 23:50 |
| mitchdz | I pinged in ubuntu-release too since that seemed to make more sense to ping. | 23:50 |
| sarnold | mitchdz: yeah it probably does | 23:51 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!