/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/08/29/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-default-settings (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.26.4 => 24.04.26.5] (ubuntustudio)05:27
Eickmeyerubuntu-sru: That's an upload to fix the noble failure, removed the adduser wrapper. Needs to be expedited. If someone can notify sil2100 when he comes online, that would be great.05:28
RikMillsEickmeyer: I should be about so will try to remember05:35
EickmeyerRikMills: Thanks!05:43
RikMillssil2100: message earlier from Erich:07:38
RikMills<Eickmeyer> ubuntu-sru: That's an upload to fix the noble failure, removed the adduser wrapper. Needs to be expedited. If someone can notify sil2100 when he comes online, that would be great07:38
RikMillsre:  ubuntustudio-default-settings (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.26.4 => 24.04.26.5]07:38
utkarsh2102hello! \o07:42
utkarsh2102cpaelzer: hey there, do you have some capacity to help with riscv64 testing of the server image? (cf: https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/460/builds/311641/testcases)07:42
utkarsh2102or anyone else^07:42
cpaelzerutkarsh2102: I really should say no, but family is out today and I can do that instead of lunch :-)07:44
sil2100RikMills: thanks!07:44
utkarsh2102oops, if you can, that'd be great, thanks, cpaelzer o/07:45
utkarsh2102oof, why do I keep getting reconnected :|08:05
utkarsh2102lmk if I missed some messages b/w now and then^08:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-default-settings [source] (noble-proposed) [24.04.26.5]08:09
cpaelzerutkarsh2102: you now have two test results (slyon was going for that too) and one bug, but nothing that affects the release09:14
utkarsh2102super09:14
utkarsh2102thank you09:14
RikMillsubuntu-reeas09:15
RikMillswhhops09:15
RikMillsubuntu-release: can we get a hint for the lxqt qt6 transition? https://dpaste.com/7Y66W969909:16
RikMillsthanks09:16
utkarsh2102looking09:16
RikMillsbtw, the autohinter looks broken09:18
utkarsh2102RikMills: hints pushed09:18
RikMills>> Skipping auto hinting due to recursion problem09:18
RikMillsutkarsh2102: thanks!09:19
sil2100Flavors! Start marking your .1 images as ready!09:50
ricotzRikMills, hello :), I guess libreoffice-kf6 should be demoted to universe? https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#libreoffice09:56
RikMillsricotz: yes. is there a plasma package for plasma 6 coming?09:57
RikMillslike there is/was for plasma 509:57
RikMillssil2100: kubuntu marked as ready on the tracker09:58
sil2100\o/09:58
ricotzRikMills, this would still be the unversioned libreoffice-plasma which needs to be switched to kf6 when the time comes10:02
ricotzare plasma 5 and 6 co-installable?10:03
RikMillsricotz: well, plasma as of yesterday is 6 in oracular10:04
RikMillsricotz: no, they are not co-installable. plasma 5 no longer exists in oracular10:04
RikMillsso I guess this is the time?10:05
ricotzok, so we need to switch it over to plasma 610:05
RikMillsyep10:05
ricotzare all packages going to main soon?, otherwise demoting libreoffice-kf6 for now to get the current build out of -proposed?10:06
RikMillsricotz: kf6 and plasma 6 are both in the release pocket10:06
ricotzis there a bug report tracking this process for plasma 6?10:07
ricotzRikMills, ok, but britney is blocking it due to component mismatch10:07
ricotzlibreoffice is blocked, I mean10:07
RikMillsyes, I saw that. that obviously needs fixing by demoting to universe10:08
ricotzhello ubuntu-archive, could we get libreoffice-kf6 demoted to universe?10:09
ricotzRikMills, I am going to have this switched to plasma 6 with libreoffice 24.8.1~rc110:10
zhsjubuntu-archive: please remove badger/ppc64el from oracular, to unblock many go packages to migrate. see bug 207831311:35
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2078313 in badger (Ubuntu) "Remove badger on ppc64el from oracular" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/207831311:35
utkarsh2102cpaelzer^11:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added kde-inotify-survey to kubuntu in oracular11:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added xwaylandvideobridge to kubuntu in oracular11:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added kdsoap-ws-discovery-client to kubuntu in oracular11:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: kdsoap-ws-discovery-client (oracular-proposed/primary) [0.4.0-0ubuntu1]12:14
cpaelzerzhsj: I've had a look, but there are rev deps you need to decide how to deal with, commented on the bug12:31
zhsjcpaelzer: this bug only request removal of binary package, not the whole source package.12:44
zhsjso you don't need to use src:badger in reverse-depends12:45
zhsjonly removal of bin:badger/ppc64el12:45
ahasenacksil2100: how is noble, can we (sru) accept things into noble-0proposed?12:54
ahasenackjust not release into updates yet?12:55
cpaelzerzhsj: ok then I need to look more closely, so it no more FTBFSes but no more builds that binary now?13:03
zhsjcpaelzer: the version in -proposed ftbfs on ppc64el, which is an upstream issue that can't be fixed timely.13:11
zhsjcpaelzer: and we need the version in -proposed to help other packages to migrate, reason in bug comments13:12
cpaelzerzhsj: But I can't just remove one single of its binaries while the PKG is FTBFS. Removal of single binaries is for when the PKG build works but stopped building a binary. In your case AFAICS between meetings I could only remove all of ppc64 (as it no more builds being an FTBFS) and that would imply impacting the dependent packages.13:14
zhsjcpaelzer: the only ppc64el binary is badger, golang-github-dgraph-io-badger-dev is arch:all13:21
ahasenacksil2100: around? Who is coordinating 24.04.1 today?14:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ipu7-drivers (oracular-proposed/primary) [0~git202407090310.f40d5a70-0ubuntu1]14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: vision-drivers (oracular-proposed/primary) [0~git202408091833.02081ea4-0ubuntu1]14:27
mkukriubuntu-sru, can you please look at jammy cdboot images14:54
ahasenackmkukri: bug?14:55
mkukrihttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-arm64/+bug/207692914:56
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2076929 in cd-boot-images-arm64 (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Rebuild cd-boot-images-{amd64,arm64} against new shim and grub" [Undecided, Confirmed]14:56
=== amypenguin0 is now known as amypenguin
nishit_hey release team, we have a security update for dovecot for noble CVE-2024-23184_85, let me know if I can upload those to security pocket. TIA14:57
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- ** RESERVED ** This candidate has been reserved by an organization or individual that will use it when announcing a new security problem. When the candidate has been publicized, the details for this candidate will be provided. <https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2024-23184>14:57
Eickmeyersil2100: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntustudio-installer/+bug/2063899/comments/33 verification done. A respin will show whether or not it was truly successful.15:04
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2063899 in ubuntu-desktop-provision "[SRU] Users are not initially configured properly for audio in Ubuntu Studio" [Undecided, New]15:04
EickmeyerFYI, I could lose IRC connection at any minute. ISP doing maintenance, will take my server off line.15:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usbio-drivers (noble-proposed/universe) [0~git202312141918.78ffb706-0ubuntu2 => 0~git202312141918.78ffb706-0ubuntu2.1] (kernel-dkms)15:36
sil2100Eickmeyer: do you want this still for .1? Or are you fine with -setting from the releasse pocket?15:41
sil2100I will start the process of publishing the Ubuntu images right now. I will then move to slowly releasing any other images.15:45
Eickmeyersil2100: We can remove that from updates, but the problem is that then people will be left with bad wrappers in the release pocket that don't allow upgrades well. It's a regression.15:48
EickmeyerBasically, what has phased?15:49
EickmeyerOh, I see what you're saying. Yeah, the version in release is good, but what's in updates is bad.15:50
sil2100Eickmeyer: So the current studio images, they have been built against this settings package from release. So they have the original bug, but not the add user problems. I have removed the settings package from updates previously just so that if people are upgrading, they will not get this issue instantly. I still published the newest settings package so that existing users that got the update have16:00
sil2100actually been reverted back.16:00
sil2100In other words, I think this means that the Studio .1 images should be good..?16:01
Eickmeyersil2100: Should be.16:03
Eickmeyersil2100: The version in -proposed fixes the regression for anyone who caught the updates version so that other packages can upgrade properly.16:03
EickmeyerYou'll notice slightly more code in the preinst script.16:04
Eickmeyersil2100: I'll likely be completely offline for the next few hours, so if there's something urgent, have someone relay through Matrix.16:06
Eickmeyer(ISP doing maintenance, I'm on my hotspot right now but leaving home for an appointment).16:06
sil2100+116:22
sil2100Okay, releasing other ready flavors16:35
sil2100Flavors! Remember to mark your images as ready!16:38
sil2100I will assume that above statement of Erich was a plus one on marking the studio images as ready.16:47
arraybolt3Marking Lubnutu as ready now.17:00
sil2100woohoo17:00
sil2100\o.17:00
samlaneBudgie is ready, just can't mark it17:00
sil2100Cheering with my one hand right now17:00
arraybolt3how much time do we have left? I'm about to blitz through the Unity tests if we have the time17:00
sil2100samlane: we'll fix that I swear, just this legacy tooling...17:01
arraybolt3(I spend the lst two days attacking Lubuntu's and Kubuntu's tests, didn't have time or energy to get further than that but I knocked out mandatory testing for both of them)17:01
samlaneno worries at all, just didn't know if someone else was able to in the meantime17:01
arraybolt3do I have privs to do so?17:01
arraybolt3pretty sure not17:01
arraybolt3but I think sil2100 does17:02
sil2100Did it!17:03
samlanemuch appreciated!17:03
sil2100Do we know anything from the Cinnamon guys?17:03
arraybolt3"once someone does a full disk install I'll mark as ready" is last thing he said on Matrix17:04
arraybolt3from Joshua Peisach17:04
arraybolt3I take it that means if someone gets a full disk install to work right we can mark it as ready17:05
arraybolt3I'd take it on too but my download bandwidth isn't great and it may be faster for someone else to pull it just by virtue of them having better Internet speed. If no one else gets to it first though, I'll take it17:05
arraybolt3ItzSwirlz: ^ all that look OK to you? (just in case you're around)17:06
* sil2100 continues the publisher dance in rthe meantime17:10
sil2100Also wonder about Mate and Xubuntu...17:17
sil2100I think we need to improve the process to make sure that the decision about go/no-go for flavors comes always from the leads of the given flavor. I think this is the ideal situation and I think we should aim for this.17:26
sil2100However, given the situation that we have right now, with my limited capabilities and availability, I think we need to make an exception and I will basically release images that I see have gotten enough coverage to be released. I would love every flavor to be marked as ready like a day before the release so that we are all good to go. But I can imagine that both the delay and, well, life can17:28
sil2100change our availability.17:28
sil2100I think in the future we all have to be a bit more strict about pointer releases and releases in general.17:28
arraybolt3It might help to have a release candidate spun a *little* bit earlier? Part of the reason I didn't get more testing done than I did was because I simply didn't have time.17:28
sil2100Yeah, I think this is... this would be ideal. This would be ideal, yes.17:29
arraybolt3An extra day would have allowed me to knock out Unity and Cinnamon and maybe some others, but as it was it took one day for Lubuntu and part of Kubuntu, and then another day for the rest of Kubuntu plus personal stuff I had to wrangle, and now today is release day :P17:29
sil2100I think it's also a lesson learned on the Ubuntu side. Lots of things were landing last minute. Then again, this is not the first and last time it will happen because some bugs cannot be avoided.17:30
arraybolt3well, we have some good ideas. Download of Unity is still underway, I'mma go patch a kernel for $dayjob and then get to it.17:32
samlanearraybolt3: i can get Cinnamon if you are doing unity17:38
arraybolt3Cinnamon needs only one test so that woud be great17:38
sil2100bluesabre: heeey17:42
sil2100Ok, please continue the testing - I will release all flavors as is, if I see at least some smoke testing passing17:43
sil2100But in case someone notices an issue, give me a sign and I can always pull the images and restore the GA ones that I have backed up.17:44
sil2100Xubuntu minimal had no testing so I'll wait with Xubuntu for now17:45
sil2100Can someone smoketest Xubuntu Minimal?17:53
sleeperbarbieu&g18:01
* sil2100 AFK for a moment18:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-certbot-dns-gandi [source] (noble-proposed) [1.4.3-2ubuntu0.1]18:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usbio-drivers (noble-proposed/universe) [0~git202312141918.78ffb706-0ubuntu2 => 0~git202312141918.78ffb706-0ubuntu2.1] (kernel-dkms)18:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected usbio-drivers [source] (noble-proposed) [0~git202312141918.78ffb706-0ubuntu2.1]18:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted usbio-drivers [source] (noble-proposed) [0~git202312141918.78ffb706-0ubuntu2.1]18:22
samlanecan move on to testing Xubuntu Minimal18:27
sil2100Thank you!18:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libpcap [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.10.1-4ubuntu1.22.04.1]18:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libpcap [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.1-3ubuntu1.20.04.1]18:34
waveformsil2100, I'll be AFK for a while this evening but I've prepped the meta-release branch for the rpi-imager JSON: https://code.launchpad.net/~waveform/meta-release/+git/meta-release/+merge/47223618:44
sil2100<318:44
sil2100Thank you!18:44
arraybolt3having a hard time getting the Unity live test to work - usually the way I do this is launch EVERYTHING all at once, then smoke test it as I close it. But that's overloading compiz and it keeps crashing and taking out most of the launched apps.19:03
arraybolt3so I guess I'll test each app one at a time19:03
ahasenackmkukri: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-amd64/+bug/2076929 is only for jammy?19:21
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2076929 in cd-boot-images-arm64 (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Rebuild cd-boot-images-{amd64,arm64} against new shim and grub" [Undecided, Confirmed]19:21
bluesabresil2100: Hey, sorry! Work has been demanding. I should be able get some tests done in the next two hours though.19:30
sil2100bluesabre: apologies, I saw tests from samlane passing so I went ahead and released19:30
sil2100But please give me a heads up if something looks wrong19:31
sil2100As said, we can easily pull the images down19:31
arraybolt3I suspect Unity is good to go, finishing up the last two tests there.19:40
arraybolt3sil2100: alright, I declare Unity done.19:45
arraybolt3also the testcases for the Calamares-based flavors aren't entirely accurate so I'll need to help fix those up at some point hopefully19:45
arraybolt3but for the most part they're good and things work.19:45
* arraybolt3 afk19:47
mkukriahesnack: it's suppossed to be only for jammy, noble was already SRUd19:52
Eickmeyersil2100: Tim came to #ubuntustudio-devel:ubuntu.com on Matrix and said that upgrades were failing, which was my motivation for expediting that SRU regression fix.19:52
mkukrialso re grub version, i know there is a new one in proposed, but verifying that is annoying and requires someone ooo, so that might only happen after the .5 release19:55
mkukribut we actually need to rebuild cd-boot-images-{amd64,arm64} for the .5 release because of the previous shim being revoked by microsoft19:55
ahasenackmkukri: since uploads to proposed use proposed for build-deps, will this build even work? I suppose it will still find the old version in updates19:56
mkukrii think if proposed and updates are both enabled and the = depend specifies one in updates it will pull that, at least it does that in my sbuild chroot, but i never tested this on LP i dont think19:59
utkarsh2102Eickmeyer: which one, linky please, if you have it handy?20:03
Eickmeyerutkarsh2102: bug 206389920:05
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2063899 in ubuntu-desktop-provision "[SRU] Users are not initially configured properly for audio in Ubuntu Studio" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/206389920:05
utkarsh2102thanky thanky20:06
Eickmeyeryw yw20:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-gnome [amd64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [4.2.2-1] (no packageset)20:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-gnome [s390x] (oracular-proposed/universe) [4.2.2-1] (no packageset)20:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-gnome [arm64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [4.2.2-1] (no packageset)20:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-gnome [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed/universe) [4.2.2-1] (no packageset)20:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-gnome [armhf] (oracular-proposed/universe) [4.2.2-1] (no packageset)20:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-gnome [amd64] (oracular-proposed) [4.2.2-1]20:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-gnome [armhf] (oracular-proposed) [4.2.2-1]20:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-gnome [s390x] (oracular-proposed) [4.2.2-1]20:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-gnome [arm64] (oracular-proposed) [4.2.2-1]20:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-gnome [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed) [4.2.2-1]20:07
arraybolt3I see Mate still needs help20:10
* arraybolt3 pulls ISO, may take ~an hour20:10
arraybolt3mmm, estimating more like 35 minutes20:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-amd64 [source] (jammy-proposed) [20.4]20:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cd-boot-images-arm64 [source] (jammy-proposed) [16.3]20:11
ahasenacksil2100: noble-updates open again?20:12
enr0nathos: FYI fence-agents autopkgtests are failing (they were blocking my openssh upload), and from a quick look it's because some tests in d/t/control still Depends: fence-agents20:15
enr0nECHAN20:15
athosenr0n: replied in ubutnu-devel :)20:22
utkarsh2102ahasenack: yes, next task is to disable the SRU freeze20:28
utkarsh2102let me look if I can do this20:28
utkarsh2102ahasenack: do you have access?20:29
ahasenackutkarsh2102: maybe, and I can also override it in the tooling, I was first and foremost asking just to see if I could start releasing some packages, I have some anxious uploaders nearby20:29
utkarsh2102ahasenack: yes, I think that should be fine20:29
utkarsh2102ahasenack: can you point me to the repository?20:29
utkarsh2102there's nothing in ubuntu-sru file in hints20:30
utkarsh2102nothing in freeze either20:30
utkarsh2102hmm20:30
ahasenack1sec20:30
ahasenackutkarsh2102: it's in hints-ubuntu20:31
utkarsh2102i don't see it20:32
ahasenack✔ ~/git/projects/hints-ubuntu/hints-ubuntu [noble|✔]20:32
ahasenack17:31 $ cat sru-freeze20:32
ahasenack# Noble SRU releases frozen due to LP: #207533720:32
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2075337 in ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) "[SRU] py3clean fails when using alternate character set" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/207533720:32
ahasenacknoble branch20:32
utkarsh2102ah crap20:32
utkarsh2102sorry :P20:32
utkarsh2102ahasenack: disabled the freeze!20:36
utkarsh2102go crazy! :)20:36
ahasenackcrazy it is, roger20:36
utkarsh2102hehe20:36
arraybolt3Finally managed to pull MATE, testing it now.21:36
utkarsh2102arraybolt3: thanks, just let me know once you're done21:38
utkarsh2102and i can mark it as ready21:38
utkarsh2102unity is remaining, aaaaaaaaaaaaaah21:38
arraybolt3unity is done21:43
arraybolt3flavor lead didn't mark it ready but I tested it and got all mandator ytests to pass21:43
arraybolt3rs2009, fuseteam, et al.: ^ anyone around to help?21:43
arraybolt3also pinged on the Matrix side21:44
arraybolt3ubuntu-release: um ok so Mate has an issue.21:52
arraybolt3tl;dr: remember the AppArmor user namespace thing?21:52
utkarsh2102oof21:53
arraybolt3Well that's apparently still biting us in the face. Evolution won't launch (crashes with a trace/breakpoint trap immediately after AppArmor refuses to allow it to create a user namespace with needed privileges)21:53
arraybolt3and that's a default app in Mate.21:53
utkarsh2102arraybolt3: can I mark Unity as ready?21:53
arraybolt3Yes.21:53
utkarsh2102okay, let me do that21:53
arraybolt3^ re: Unity21:53
utkarsh2102and let's look at Mate then21:54
=== sleeperb1 is now known as sleeperbarbie
arraybolt3I seriously though wonder how this managed to slip through initial release or if it regressed. Did we just forget to do Mate live session tests for the initial release?21:54
arraybolt3but anyway, IMO probably not a release blocker, but a thing to SRU pronto.21:54
utkarsh2102Ubuntu Unity has been marked as ready.21:54
utkarsh2102arraybolt3: okay, I see21:55
utkarsh2102do you think this .1 blocker though?21:55
arraybolt3I mean this is already broken on existing .0 systems so no, as it's not a regression21:56
arraybolt3or if it is a regression from the last ISO, it's not a regression from how current installed systems will behave21:56
utkarsh2102ok, that's good21:56
utkarsh2102arraybolt3: in that case, can you report a bug?21:57
arraybolt3sure thing21:57
utkarsh2102and can I mark this as ready?21:57
arraybolt3I'm not quite done testing it21:57
arraybolt3I'm midway through both remaining tests21:57
utkarsh2102oh right, okay, sorry21:57
utkarsh2102take your time21:57
utkarsh2102please open a bug and let me know21:58
arraybolt3(just did a manual partitioning setup on the desktop next to me and am live-session-blazing through the other test in a VM.)21:58
arraybolt3utkarsh2102: should I file this against apparmor or Evolution?21:59
arraybolt3nt sure where the policy will ultimately end up being shipped in21:59
utkarsh2102hmm22:01
utkarsh2102let me think22:01
utkarsh2102Evolution won't launch (or crashes) because of AppArmor stuff - looks like we should file it against evolution and let's go from there?22:03
arraybolt3+122:03
utkarsh2102arraybolt3: btw, there are 3 run-once tests (https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/460/builds/311612/testcases) for ubuntu unity, did you run them, too?22:04
arraybolt3I did not do them yet, they weren't marked as mandatory.22:05
utkarsh2102do you have capacity to do them?22:05
arraybolt3I should, yes22:06
utkarsh2102Eickmeyer: thank you for Edubuntu discourse, neat!22:06
utkarsh2102arraybolt3: thank you! please let me know how you get along with them22:06
EickmeyerIt was short, sweet, and to the point. XD22:06
arraybolt3Please remind me to never launch the screen reader until the end of a live session test22:06
Eickmeyerarraybolt3: Don't launch the screen reader until you're almost done.22:06
arraybolt3what's the keyboard shortcut to turn this off? If I have to hear "untidocupush button list with two iticon view" one more time I'm going to lose my mind.22:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-settings (noble-proposed/main) [24.04.4 => 24.04.5] (ubuntu-desktop)22:08
sarnold.. does the screen reader need some tweaks to be less annoying for people who use it?22:08
Eickmeyerkillall orca ?22:08
arraybolt3yay that worked22:08
arraybolt3sarnold: the screen reader needs to be crushed in a junkyard and melted down into scrap metal22:08
sarnold"I can't let you do that, arraybolt3"22:08
arraybolt3that thing gave me a headache in less than five minutes of use22:09
EickmeyerI'll let my neighbors in the K and J pods of the Puget Sound Southern Resident Orcas know that killall orcaworked. They'll be horrified.22:10
utkarsh2102arraybolt3: hey, absolutely no rush but can you gimme an ETA for the above 3 things (1 bug + MATE testing + Unity run-once tests)? just asking so that I can align other things accordingly.22:15
utkarsh2102also it's 3:45 AM for me, so there's that, too :)22:15
arraybolt3utkarsh2102: ETA on the bug is now: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/2051962 (private, it's a crash from someone else)22:20
utkarsh2102super trouper22:20
arraybolt3ETA for MATE testing = now as well, I'm filing the completion paperwork for that now22:20
arraybolt3for Unity, might take me ~an hour?22:20
utkarsh2102super22:20
utkarsh2102that looks good22:20
utkarsh2102I'll be around22:20
arraybolt3the screen reader run-once test on MATE is not something I'm interested in doing. I tried that for the initial release of 24.04 and the new system installer just isn't ready for that.22:22
utkarsh2102wow, that bugs from 1st feb22:22
utkarsh2102def not a regression then, heh22:22
utkarsh2102still bad22:22
utkarsh2102but not a regression22:22
jbichait shouldn't say "pushbutton" any more in Orca 47 in Ubuntu 24.10, so there is small progress22:22
utkarsh2102arraybolt3: you have acl to mark your stuff for mate, right?22:23
arraybolt3any hope for it to not sound like a robot that's been buried underneat someone's backyard swimming pool for the last decade?22:23
utkarsh2102heh22:23
arraybolt3utkarsh2102: not sure I have the privs to do that, lemme push buttons and find out22:23
utkarsh2102okay, I can do that for you, too22:24
utkarsh2102just let me know whatever is convenient22:24
* arraybolt3 listens to the web UI shout "You have no power here!"22:24
arraybolt3so yeah, I'll need you to press the buttons22:24
utkarsh2102sure22:24
arraybolt3just tried it and it no-op'd22:24
utkarsh2102happy to22:24
utkarsh2102let me know when it's time :)22:24
arraybolt3for MATE it should be time.22:24
utkarsh2102super22:25
utkarsh21024 manadatory22:25
utkarsh21021 run-once22:25
utkarsh21021 optional22:25
utkarsh2102which ones should I mark?22:25
=== sleeperb1 is now known as sleeperbarbie
arraybolt3pardn? I thought you were going to mark the ISO as ready22:26
arraybolt3all four mandatory are done22:26
arraybolt3the one run-once I know won't pass22:26
arraybolt3the one optional is optional22:26
utkarsh2102gotcha22:26
utkarsh2102will do that and mark the ISO is ready22:26
arraybolt3kk22:26
arraybolt3Unity testing underway now.22:26
utkarsh2102Ubuntu Mate has been marked ready22:28
arraybolt3https://i.imgur.com/aNOguZf.png (for those interested in my testing setup :P)22:31
utkarsh2102haha nice22:34
arraybolt3utkarsh2102: alright all run-once tests for Unity are done22:46
utkarsh2102omg, great!22:46
utkarsh2102arraybolt3: updated the information in the tracker22:47
utkarsh2102https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/460/builds -> can you confirm we are on the same page?22:47
utkarsh2102for unity and mate?22:47
arraybolt3yes, that looks right22:49
arraybolt3both are ready22:49
utkarsh2102perfect, everything is ready22:53
utkarsh2102jbicha: hii! i've approved your ffe for ubuntu-meta but please try to land this earlier - as soon as possible23:33
utkarsh2102me no likey landing seed changes closer to release :)23:33
utkarsh2102so please prod the security team to get the MIR review done at the earliest23:33
sarnold:(23:33
utkarsh2102hehe23:42

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!