/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/09/05/#ubuntu-release.txt

sarnolddo we have a bug that we can give to people that they can follow to find out how much work is left before we re-enable the 22.04 -> 24.04 upgrades?00:57
sarnoldapologies if i've missed it but I just can't find anything saying why we yanked it00:57
Eickmeyersarnold: I'm sure it's on the discourse tracking post.01:25
sarnoldEickmeyer: ah! great! do you have a link? i .. struggle .. with discourse01:26
EickmeyerLooking.01:27
Eickmeyersarnold: I appear to be unable to find it. There was something, iirc, unfortunately I might not be rc. 😅01:30
sarnoldEickmeyer: heh I'm glad I'm not the only one who has .. struggles .. with discourse01:30
sarnoldI knew where I stood with usenet and mail lists01:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (noble-proposed/main) [1:46.3-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 => 1:46.3-0ubuntu0.24.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop)02:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (jammy-proposed/main) [1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.8 => 1:41.7-0ubuntu0.22.04.9] (ubuntu-desktop)03:08
zhsjubuntu-sru: if you still have free cycle for focal, could you check golang-1.22 in new queue https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text=08:05
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fastdds [s390x] (oracular-proposed/universe) [3.0.0+ds-3] (no packageset)08:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fastdds [s390x] (oracular-proposed) [3.0.0+ds-3]08:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fastdds [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed/universe) [3.0.0+ds-3] (no packageset)08:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fastdds [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed) [3.0.0+ds-3]08:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: limnoria (jammy-backports/universe) [2023.11.18-1~bpo22.04.1 => 2024.8.26-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)08:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: limnoria (noble-backports/universe) [2023.11.18-1 => 2024.8.26-1~bpo24.04.1] (no packageset)08:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-21-crac [amd64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [21.0.5+0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)09:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fastdds [amd64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [3.0.0+ds-3] (no packageset)09:26
tomreynin case this matters to anyone, from a user perspective, i think that a decision to disable an LTS upgrade path after it had been enabled (and that got media attention) should be communicated, as a fact, and with an explanation, and a goto location for users to check for when it will be re-enabled, on the commonly used communication channels. this should include mailing lists and blog.09:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fastdds [amd64] (oracular-proposed) [3.0.0+ds-3]09:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-21-crac [amd64] (oracular-proposed) [21.0.5+0-0ubuntu2]09:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-intrinsics-kernel [s390x] (oracular-proposed/none) [0.17.1-1] (no packageset)10:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-intrinsics-kernel [amd64] (oracular-proposed/none) [0.17.1-1] (no packageset)10:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-intrinsics-kernel [armhf] (oracular-proposed/none) [0.17.1-1] (no packageset)10:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-intrinsics-kernel [arm64] (oracular-proposed/none) [0.17.1-1] (no packageset)10:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-intrinsics-kernel [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed/none) [0.17.1-1] (no packageset)10:04
LocutusOfBorg+  * d/conf/nginx.conf: Update default options for current security10:04
LocutusOfBorg+    practices and standards. SSL protos, disable prefer server10:04
LocutusOfBorg+    ciphers, hide server tokens/versions in responses.10:04
LocutusOfBorgis it time to drop the Ubuntu branding for nginx?10:04
LocutusOfBorgteward,10:04
LocutusOfBorgwe have the branding test failing now...10:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-intrinsics-kernel [amd64] (oracular-proposed) [0.17.1-1]10:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-intrinsics-kernel [armhf] (oracular-proposed) [0.17.1-1]10:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-intrinsics-kernel [s390x] (oracular-proposed) [0.17.1-1]10:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-intrinsics-kernel [arm64] (oracular-proposed) [0.17.1-1]10:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-intrinsics-kernel [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed) [0.17.1-1]10:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ocaml-intrinsics-kernel [riscv64] (oracular-proposed/none) [0.17.1-1] (no packageset)10:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml-intrinsics-kernel [riscv64] (oracular-proposed) [0.17.1-1]10:20
adrienLocutusOfBorg: hey, do you specific plans regarding ocaml?10:37
adrienand what's the current situation roughly? (I'm asking but I'm also about to go outside to eat)10:37
sil2100Eickmeyer: hey! Just a heads up, I think I finally fixed the studio isotracker rebuilds11:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (noble-proposed/main) [4:24.2.5-0ubuntu0.24.04.2 => 4:24.2.6-0ubuntu0.24.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)12:08
mfoahasenack, hi o/ if you have a chance, could you please review openafs in noble/jammy-unapproved? thanks in advance!12:17
ahasenacksure12:17
ahasenackopenafs, heh, that's a name I don't hear often12:18
mfoahasenack, indeed; first time for me, tbh!12:19
ahasenackmfo: oh, and on arm even? This got weirder12:26
mfoahasenack, _and_ related to a userspace -> kernel loading issue. this one has special on it :)12:27
sgmooreHello folks, is anyone available to review ubuntu/oracular-proposed (New) 2 , they are very important for our Plasma 6 transition for oracular. kdsoap-ws-discovery-client and libkdcraw. Thanks for your time.12:39
ahasenackubuntu-archive ^12:42
mfoahasenack, re: openafs: test plan updated. thanks!13:01
ahasenackmfo: I'm just waiting for my pi4 to build this thing13:01
ahasenacktaking way longer than I expected13:01
ahasenackah, just finished13:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netplan.io [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1]13:13
ahasenacksil2100: did the accept above work fine? I'm getting LP crashes (503) when running sru-review and accepting a package13:14
sil2100Let me check13:14
ahasenacklazr.restfulclient.errors.ServerError: HTTP Error 503: Service Unavailable13:14
ahasenackthe diff shows fine13:15
sil2100No, it worked fine for me, hm13:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [amd64] (jammy-proposed/main) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1] (core)13:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [s390x] (jammy-proposed/main) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1] (core)13:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/main) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1] (core)13:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [arm64] (jammy-proposed/main) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1] (core)13:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [armhf] (jammy-proposed/main) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1] (core)13:19
ahasenackit just oopses for me (or for this package: openafs)13:23
cpaelzersgmoore: I've a meeting that ended short, not sure if I can get through both but I'll have a look at libkdcraw now13:26
cpaelzersil2100: to avoid duplication - you did not already review that only struggle to accept it for the same issues ahasenack has right?13:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openafs [source] (noble-proposed) [1.8.10-2.1ubuntu3.2]13:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: netplan.io [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/main) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1] (core)13:35
slyonsil2100: for some reason those netplan binaries landed in the NEW queue ^ https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=0&queue_text= Why's that?13:41
cpaelzersgmoore: Oh that one is actually easy - or is it? libkdcraw is in Debian and under the name libkf5kdcraw still even in oracular.13:42
cpaelzersgmoore: The changelog could be a bit nicer like it was in 22.12.1-1ubuntu1 but that isn't a blocker.13:42
slyonsil2100: oh, I think I know why: netplan v0.107 transitions to the NEW netplan-generator package, which we didn't have in Jammy before13:42
cpaelzersgmoore: the interesting bit is that src:libkf5kdcraw also builds the same binaries and this seems to be a source rename/extension13:43
cpaelzersgmoore: to fully work I assume you'll have all rebuild against the new and then request to remove libkf5kdcraw - is that or similar the plan you have?13:43
sil2100slyon: yeah13:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1]13:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1]13:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1]13:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1]13:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1]13:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted netplan.io [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1]13:45
slyon\o/ thx! cc danilogondolfo ^13:45
danilogondolfo\o/ thanks!13:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openafs [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.8.10-2ubuntu1~22.04.2]13:48
LocutusOfBorgadrien, doing rebuilds right now13:49
sgmoorecpaelzer: it is the qt6 port (kf6) and actually builds both qt5 and qt6, Debian also uses the source name libkdraw rather than the libkf5kdcraw now.13:53
cpaelzersgmoore: yeah that is what I see, but still wouldn't it need the usual replace/provides/conflicts dance and a dummy old src package to fully move over?13:54
sgmooreYeah I will ask for removal13:55
cpaelzerI wanted to refer to something, didn't find a great official page but kind of this https://www.labcorner.de/renaming-a-debian-package/ is what I would have expected13:56
cpaelzernot seeing that in libkdcraw, which might make sense (but then we'd need to understand why)13:57
cpaelzerwhen you file a removal bug anyway, maybe refer to the bug in the new upload and explain the transition strategy there13:57
cpaelzerthen me or anyone else can follow and ack or discuss that approach13:57
cpaelzerTL;DR: I'm happy if this is different, but would then want to get explained why :-)13:58
cpaelzerand next meeting anyway now ...13:58
sgmooreThanks for your help. I will fix it13:59
LocutusOfBorgadrien, we need for sure a lot of armhf removals14:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: spirv-llvm-translator-19 (oracular-proposed/primary) [19.~~+git20240826-0ubuntu1]14:06
adrienLocutusOfBorg: I didn't look at the issues, what's happening?14:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spirv-llvm-translator-19 [source] (oracular-proposed) [19.~~+git20240826-0ubuntu1]14:10
LocutusOfBorgadrien, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=107398314:13
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1073983 in release.debian.org "transition: ocaml" [Normal, Closed]14:13
schopinUgh.14:15
schopinDo we have a LP bug to track that?14:17
schopin(the 32-bit brokenness of ocaml)14:17
adrienLocutusOfBorg: removals are the ones given in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073983#94 ?14:25
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1073983 in release.debian.org "transition: ocaml" [Normal, Closed]14:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: mofed-modules-24.07 (oracular-proposed/primary) [24.07.0.6.1.0+ds1-0ubuntu1]14:29
LocutusOfBorgadrien, I'm checking right now, we need some more rebuilds and retries I guess14:30
LocutusOfBorgwill have a better picture in 24h or so14:31
adrienok, thanks for looking at it14:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spirv-llvm-translator-19 [amd64] (oracular-proposed/none) [19.~~+git20240826-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)14:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spirv-llvm-translator-19 [s390x] (oracular-proposed/none) [19.~~+git20240826-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)14:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spirv-llvm-translator-19 [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed/none) [19.~~+git20240826-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)14:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spirv-llvm-translator-19 [arm64] (oracular-proposed/none) [19.~~+git20240826-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)14:52
liushuyuubuntu-archive: can someone temporarily remove ruby-gsl from -proposed pocket again? It seems like someone copied the package back at the wrong time14:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spirv-llvm-translator-19 [armhf] (oracular-proposed/universe) [19.~~+git20240826-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)14:53
ginggsliushuyu: I think it was only removed from -release https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-gsl/+publishinghistory14:59
ginggsit shouldn't be blocking in -proposed15:00
liushuyuginggs: It's a special situation, where all ruby-* packages need to migrate with ruby-defaults so that they stay installable (due to dependency requirements)15:01
liushuyuHowever, ruby-gsl overlaps with gsl transition, so it can't be migrated. According to Britney, this also fails ruby-defaults migration due to installability issues15:02
ginggsruby-gsl needs gsl and ruby-defaults to migrate, but since ruby-gsl is not in -release, i don't think either need ruby-gsl to migrate15:03
liushuyuginggs: That's super strange. I can see from the latest migration log https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_output/oracular/2024-09-05/14:20:30.txt.gz that ...15:06
liushuyu... * s390x: ninix-aya, ruby-bcrypt, ruby-binding-ninja, ruby-cairo, ruby-cairo-gobject, ruby-concurrent-ext, ruby-eventmachine, ruby-gnome-dev, ruby-gsl, ruby-gstreamer, ruby-gtk3, ruby-gtk4, ruby-guestfs, ruby-haml, ruby-hivex, ruby-json, ruby-mysql2, ruby-oj, ruby-oj-introspect, ruby-pango, ruby-pcaprub, ruby-websocket-driver, thin15:07
liushuyutrying: ruby-gsl ... skipped: ruby-gsl (0, 363, 153)15:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xdg-desktop-portal (jammy-proposed/main) [1.14.4-1ubuntu2~22.04.1 => 1.14.4-1ubuntu3~22.04.1] (desktop-core)15:12
=== john-cabaj1 is now known as john-cabaj
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: golang-github-florianl-go-nfqueue (oracular-proposed/primary) [2.0.0-2]16:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-wallpapers [amd64] (oracular-proposed/main) [24.10.1] (desktop-core)16:25
liushuyuubuntu-archive: can we hint Britney that ruby-defaults needs to migrate with ruby-sdbm=1.0.0-5build5?16:36
liushuyu(Because it's a hard prerequisite)16:37
mitchdzubuntu-archive: can we possibly squeeze in jammy,focal SRUs before the jammy freeze?17:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-florianl-go-nfqueue [sync] (oracular-proposed) [2.0.0-2]17:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spirv-llvm-translator-19 [arm64] (oracular-proposed) [19.~~+git20240826-0ubuntu2]17:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spirv-llvm-translator-19 [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed) [19.~~+git20240826-0ubuntu2]17:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-wallpapers [amd64] (oracular-proposed) [24.10.1]17:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spirv-llvm-translator-19 [amd64] (oracular-proposed) [19.~~+git20240826-0ubuntu2]17:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spirv-llvm-translator-19 [s390x] (oracular-proposed) [19.~~+git20240826-0ubuntu2]17:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spirv-llvm-translator-19 [armhf] (oracular-proposed) [19.~~+git20240826-0ubuntu2]17:54
=== mfo is now known as Guest9172
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-florianl-go-nfqueue [amd64] (oracular-proposed/none) [2.0.0-2] (no packageset)17:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-florianl-go-nfqueue [amd64] (oracular-proposed) [2.0.0-2]18:00
Eickmeyersil2100: Thanks! I'll have to give it a go eventually. I'm OoO until Tuesday, back in time for 22.04.5 shenanigans.18:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (jammy-proposed/main) [2.4.12 => 2.4.13] (core, i386-whitelist)19:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (noble-proposed/main) [1:24.04.22 => 1:24.04.23] (core)19:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.4.13]21:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mercurial (noble-proposed/universe) [6.7.2-1ubuntu2 => 6.7.2-1ubuntu2.1] (no packageset)22:54

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!