mwhudson | vorlon: looks like ubuntustudio is showing up in the iso tracker now? | 02:32 |
---|---|---|
mwhudson | ah i see sil2100 fixed it | 02:32 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: datalad-next [amd64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 03:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (noble-proposed/main) [2.2.2-0ubuntu9 => 2.2.2-0ubuntu9.1] (core, kernel-dkms) | 06:36 | |
=== Mirv__ is now known as Mirv | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (jammy-proposed/main) [2.765.46 => 2.765.47] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 08:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.765.47] | 08:55 | |
sgmoore | ubuntu-archive please kick libkdcraw from NEW | 09:34 |
=== sleeperbarbie is now known as rebukedu | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 31 entries have been added or removed | 10:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted datalad-next [amd64] (oracular-proposed) [1.4.1-1ubuntu1] | 10:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5kdcraw [amd64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [24.05.2-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 10:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libkdcraw [source] (oracular-proposed) [24.05.2-1ubuntu1] | 10:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libkf5kdcraw [amd64] (oracular-proposed) [24.05.2-1ubuntu1] | 10:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5kdcraw [armhf] (oracular-proposed/universe) [24.05.2-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 10:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5kdcraw [s390x] (oracular-proposed/universe) [24.05.2-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 10:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5kdcraw [arm64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [24.05.2-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 10:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5kdcraw [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed/universe) [24.05.2-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 10:47 | |
doko | sgmoore: done | 10:47 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libkf5kdcraw [armhf] (oracular-proposed) [24.05.2-1ubuntu1] | 10:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libkf5kdcraw [s390x] (oracular-proposed) [24.05.2-1ubuntu1] | 10:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libkf5kdcraw [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed) [24.05.2-1ubuntu1] | 10:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libkf5kdcraw [arm64] (oracular-proposed) [24.05.2-1ubuntu1] | 10:48 | |
sgmoore | doko thank you! | 10:48 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5kdcraw [riscv64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [24.05.2-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu) | 11:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libkf5kdcraw [riscv64] (oracular-proposed) [24.05.2-1ubuntu1] | 11:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (noble-proposed) [1:24.04.23] | 11:28 | |
sil2100 | Eickmeyer: so I checked and in theory the rebuilds of studio via isotracker now work, but there's a catch: there will be issues with this in series older than noble | 13:41 |
sil2100 | Eickmeyer: the dvd -> daily-live switch wasn't done in a backwards compatible way, so some things (like tracker integration) are not working | 13:42 |
sil2100 | Eickmeyer: fixing this seems at least non-trivial, so I can't sadly sit down to that | 13:42 |
sil2100 | But oracular and noble should be good | 13:43 |
=== sleeperbarbie is now known as vo1la | ||
adrien | LocutusOfBorg: hey, I was about to forget: did you get the information you wanted for ocaml? | 14:24 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: aevol (oracular-proposed/primary) [5.0+ds-3ubuntu1] | 15:00 | |
vorlon | liushuyu: * s390x: ruby-bcrypt, ruby-binding-ninja, ruby-eventmachine, ruby-guestfs, ruby-haml, ruby-hivex, ruby-json, ruby-mysql2, ruby-pcaprub, thin | 15:04 |
vorlon | liushuyu: no ruby-gsl, but still not migrating because of the above list of packages | 15:05 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted aevol [source] (oracular-proposed) [5.0+ds-3ubuntu1] | 15:07 | |
liushuyu | vorlon: Yes, kanashiro and I are currently fixing the issues | 15:12 |
liushuyu | ruby-guestfs and ruby-hivex are also blocked by ocaml transition | 15:13 |
vorlon | liushuyu: ok | 15:13 |
vorlon | should those be removed temporarily from the release pocket? | 15:13 |
vorlon | hmm ruby-guestfs is built from libguestfs so no | 15:13 |
vorlon | but if that was the only blocker we could leave it temporarily uninstallable | 15:14 |
liushuyu | vorlon: We can first fix all the others and see if there are any other packages being broken | 15:14 |
kanashiro | +1 | 15:14 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: aevol [amd64] (oracular-proposed/none) [5.0+ds-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: aevol [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed/none) [5.0+ds-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: aevol [arm64] (oracular-proposed/none) [5.0+ds-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: aevol [s390x] (oracular-proposed/none) [5.0+ds-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fenrir [source] (noble-proposed) [1.9.8-1ubuntu0.1] | 15:19 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: aevol [armhf] (oracular-proposed/none) [5.0+ds-3ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted aevol [amd64] (oracular-proposed) [5.0+ds-3ubuntu1] | 15:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted aevol [armhf] (oracular-proposed) [5.0+ds-3ubuntu1] | 15:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted aevol [s390x] (oracular-proposed) [5.0+ds-3ubuntu1] | 15:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted aevol [arm64] (oracular-proposed) [5.0+ds-3ubuntu1] | 15:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted aevol [ppc64el] (oracular-proposed) [5.0+ds-3ubuntu1] | 15:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tellico [source] (noble-proposed) [3.5.3-1ubuntu5.1] | 15:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted condor [source] (noble-proposed) [23.4.0+dfsg-1ubuntu4.1] | 15:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.22 [source] (focal-proposed) [1.22.2-2~20.04.1] | 15:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.22 [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [1.22.2-2~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 16:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.22 [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.22.2-2~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 16:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.22 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [1.22.2-2~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 16:11 | |
doko | coq/armhf and rdeps needs removal ... not going to start this before my weekend | 16:28 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.22 [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.22.2-2~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 16:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.22 [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [1.22.2-2~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 16:35 | |
tjaalton | release team; the kernel feature freeze is next week, and we have almost everything landed already in the kernel which is in proposed now (zfs builds and works at least for me, nvidia builds..). still waiting for the apparmor update.. | 17:21 |
tjaalton | lrm kernels need to be rebased to the next generic kernel update, then these would have a chance to migrate to release, as nvidia updates have been holding them back | 17:22 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted accerciser [source] (noble-proposed) [3.42.0-1ubuntu0.1] | 17:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (noble-proposed) [10.0.0-2ubuntu8.4] | 18:05 | |
vorlon | liushuyu: node-yarnpkg is still failing autopkgtests with an error that appears unrelated to the update-excuses bug; do you have any insights? it's a tls timeout so maybe another bad network test but the stack trace points into minified garbage js | 18:08 |
vorlon | https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest-oracular/oracular/amd64/n/node-yarnpkg/20240820_054535_681d6@/log.gz | 18:08 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (noble-proposed) [3.107ubuntu9~24.04.2] | 18:09 | |
liushuyu | vorlon: Yes, I previously talked to the QA team about this, because it seems like they have some special firewall rules that blocked this access | 18:11 |
vorlon | ok but you already removed one test that requires Internet access | 18:11 |
vorlon | so why aren't we removing this one | 18:11 |
liushuyu | The offending request is a HTTP Get request to registry.yarnpkg.com | 18:11 |
vorlon | tests that require access to the Internet are *bad* | 18:12 |
liushuyu | vorlon: This is the only test it has though | 18:12 |
vorlon | ok | 18:12 |
vorlon | then I'll just badtest it | 18:12 |
vorlon | and thanks, I remember parts of that earlier conversation now | 18:12 |
vorlon | (including me giving the above opinion about network-based tests) | 18:12 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nagios4 [source] (noble-proposed) [4.4.6-4ubuntu0.24.04.1] | 18:13 | |
liushuyu | Yarnpkg does have an offline mode, but then you will need to ship a pool of npm packages as the test corpus in the source package | 18:14 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gtk+3.0 [source] (noble-proposed) [3.24.41-4ubuntu1.2] | 18:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd-hwe [source] (noble-proposed) [255.1.4] | 18:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-1.22 [riscv64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.22.2-2~20.04.1] (no packageset) | 18:33 | |
Eickmeyer | vorlon: I just got sil2100's messages above, and I understand. Where I'm at is that jammy isn't building due to v4l2loopback somehow sneaking in. Germinate says it's a dependency of the video seed (ubuntustudio-video), but I can't figure out how that's happening since it is now completely removed. | 18:36 |
Eickmeyer | It's also not in the meta (update showed no changes). | 18:36 |
Eickmeyer | s/dependency/recommends/ | 18:37 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pyalsa [source] (noble-proposed) [1.2.7-1ubuntu0.1] | 18:37 | |
Eickmeyer | ginggs said it's a known problem. | 18:37 |
=== ahasenack__ is now known as ahasenack | ||
vorlon | Eickmeyer: "now completely removed" - task fields are published in the release pocket and not changed after release | 21:01 |
Eickmeyer | vorlon: yes, but they were mere comments before, not that it matters. | 21:02 |
vorlon | I don't know what you mean by comments | 21:02 |
Eickmeyer | Preceeded with # vs * | 21:03 |
vorlon | well at the time jammy released, it was pulled into Task: ubuntustudio-video | 21:05 |
vorlon | ... why is the edubuntu seed git repo missing a jammy branch | 21:06 |
vorlon | and kinetic | 21:07 |
vorlon | that looks like some repo damage :P | 21:07 |
Eickmeyer | edubuntu didn't exist again until 23.04. | 21:07 |
vorlon | oh I'm looking at edubuntu instead of ubuntustudio, lala | 21:07 |
Eickmeyer | Hehe | 21:07 |
vorlon | Eickmeyer: you need colored hats | 21:07 |
Eickmeyer | I have them, physically. 😆 | 21:08 |
vorlon | dd556f0bc548b17f3126732500a1a3c194c9b3d8 commented out v4l2loopback. In July 2022, after the release pocket was frozen. | 21:08 |
Eickmeyer | I have it commented out long before then. I'm mobile right now, but that should've occurred around impish. | 21:09 |
Eickmeyer | Jammy shouldn't have even built if that was the case. | 21:10 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (jammy-proposed/main) [2.765.47 => 2.765.48] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | 21:11 | |
vorlon | why? | 21:11 |
Eickmeyer | v4l2loopback was known to cause build failures even then. | 21:12 |
vorlon | I understood the issue being reported now is a dkms regression with newer kernels in jammy | 21:12 |
Eickmeyer | I'm grabbing my laptop to look now. The commented bug reports had the reasoning. | 21:13 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.765.48] | 21:16 | |
vorlon | I see fscrypt ppc64el build failure is because of a test that needs to lock more memory than is available on this arch. Anyone recall how that was dealt with before in other packages? | 21:16 |
Eickmeyer | vorlon: Now that I'm on an actual PC, my memory has been jogged. I remember now that once released, there's no way to change the seed even if we change the meta. Therefore, bug 1983136 remained triaged even though it fixed the kinetic failure. However, where we are now is exactly the same situation kinetic is in. | 21:30 |
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 1983136 in ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] v4l2loopback-dkms breaks secure boot installation in seed" [Critical, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1983136 | 21:30 | |
Eickmeyer | s/is/was/ | 21:30 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!