[01:43] a complaint received on ubuntu.fridge relating to details missing in release notes (24.04.1).. I don't see a 'report bug' type of link/how to leave feedback on release notes; anyone can send me a link or something ? (please) [08:13] sru-team: Could you accept dotnet6 into jammy? The verification is done, see LP: #2076742 [08:13] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2076742 in dotnet6 (Ubuntu) "[SRU] New upstream microrelease .NET 6.0.33/6.0.133" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2076742 [08:33] dviererbe: jammy is frozen for .5 [08:39] tjaalton: okay, thanks [09:13] rbasak: heyhey - is the minor release update for python-trio something we want for oracular? it needs a merge if so [09:13] (digging around in fastapi dependencies to unblock pydantic migration) [09:13] to be clear - trio is not block its migration - I have a patch elsewhere to resolve that [09:22] jamespage: I don't think there's anything new upstream that would affect archive quality. One new feature (interactive debugging) that would be nice for developers though. Everything else is upstream housekeeping / for other platforms that aren't really relevant for Debian or Ubuntu. [09:23] jamespage: that would require an FFe though, and it's probably not worth it now. So I was going to leave it alone unless it's blocking something specific. [09:24] its not === apw_ is now known as apw [13:01] @pilot in === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Feature Freeze, UI Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: ahasenack, seb128 [14:16] @pilot out === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Feature Freeze, UI Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: ahasenack === gurupras- is now known as guruprasad [16:18] Hey Ubuntu devs, we, the Launchpad team are in the process of migrating all s390x builders from bos01, bos02 to bos03. We now have new s390x builders on bos03 and would like to switch over all builds to it. If you notice any issues due to this switch, please let us know (#launchpad on IRC or answers.launchpad.net/launchpad or for Canonical folks, any other appropriate internal communication channels)