[00:04] 👍 [01:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-initial-setup [source] (noble-proposed) [46.3-1ubuntu3~24.04.1] [01:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceph [source] (noble-proposed) [19.2.0~is.really.19.1.0-0ubuntu0.24.04.1] [01:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (noble-proposed) [19.2.0~rc2-0ubuntu0.24.04.1] [07:01] hey jbicha I am on +1 this week and vorlon suggested I could help on the ffmpeg transition. I saw https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/janus/+bug/2080268 and https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/transitions/html/auto-ffmpeg.html but this is unclear how I could help. Could I open bugs on the packages to ask for removal? [07:01] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2080268 in openshot-qt (Ubuntu) "Remove packages that fail to build with ffmpeg 7, batch 1" [Undecided, New] [08:17] vorlon, hello :), please could you update the i386-whitelist to pick up nvidia-graphics-drivers-560 on focal/jammy/noble [08:19] 560 shouldn't exist there? [08:22] tjaalton, the script will pick up ppa builds [08:23] hello ubuntu-sru :), please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/2079005 [08:23] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2079005 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Noble) "[SRU] libreoffice 24.2.6 for noble" [Medium, In Progress] [09:56] ubuntu-release: please consider LP: #2080354 [09:56] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2080354 in dpdk (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Upgrade dpdk from 23.11.1-2 to 23.11.2" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2080354 === apw_ is now known as apw [10:10] mirespace: . [10:12] thank you ginggs! [10:39] upils: there is also bug 2080271. The others may work better as individual bugs. I think it helps the Archive Admins to recursively trace reverse depends for requested removals & link to the Debian bug. Subscribe ubuntu-archive to the bugs [10:39] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2080271 in zoneminder (Ubuntu) "Remove packages that fail to build with ffmpeg 7, batch 2" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2080271 [11:22] jbicha, what do you mean by "the others"? [11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flash-kernel (noble-proposed/main) [3.107ubuntu9~24.04.2 => 3.107ubuntu9~24.04.3] (core) [11:24] upils: I filed 2 removal bugs for many of the red lines on the ffmpeg tracker. We should fix or file removal bugs for the rest of the items [11:25] The remaining ones probably have reverse dependencies which would also need to be removed so I think separate bugs for each red line package is better now [11:25] ok, thanks. I will look into that [11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flash-kernel (jammy-proposed/main) [3.104ubuntu20 => 3.104ubuntu21] (core) [11:27] the notcurses dev replied to the bug & said there is an upstream fix, so you could try to find the fix and prepare an upload [11:29] I saw that but they mentioned doing it over the weekend so that was not my priority [11:36] I saw someone was complaining about pytorch not being available in noble, looks like it won't be available in oracular either [11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (noble-proposed/main) [1:24.04.6 => 1:24.04.8] (core) [12:16] ubuntu-release: would you rebuild oracular live-server? It built today with livecd-rootfs 24.10.14 and I'd like to see results with 24.10.15 [12:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.13 => 1:18.04.13.1] (core) [12:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.10.22 => 1:20.04.10.23] (core) [12:52] ubuntu-sru: please consider releasing dotnet8 to noble-updates (LP: #2075185) [12:53] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2075185 in dotnet8 (Ubuntu Noble) "[SRU] Enable ppc64el for .NET 8 on Noble" [Undecided, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2075185 [13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mercurial [source] (noble-proposed) [6.7.4-1ubuntu0.1] [13:42] bryceh, fixing up clamav [13:55] and uploaded [14:57] jbicha, do you know if mplayer was set aside on purpose? I do not see any existing bugs on ubuntu/debian about ffmpeg but I see it FTBFS with gcc-14 (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075294). Should we wait a bit more hoping there will be an upload with the fix in debian that we can then sync? Or is that too late and should I fill a removal bug? [14:57] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1075294 in src:mplayer "mplayer: ftbfs with GCC-14" [Serious, Open] [15:27] upils: I think tecnically its build failure wasn't caused by ffmpeg. It may be appropriate to apply something like [15:27] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-gevent/-/commit/330bd9c [15:27] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit 330bd9c in python-team/packages/python-gevent "Add workaround for gcc-14" [15:27] on top of the Salsa commit mentioned on the Debian bug [15:34] I do not understand why we should apply a commit to workaround the gcc-14 issue if there may soon be an upload with a proper fix [15:36] @LocutusOfBorg, thanks [15:38] upils: we want to finish the ffmpeg transition in the next few days. Debian doesn't have the same urgency on this. But you're welcome to work on a proper fix if you want [15:44] oh ok, you meant creating a delta. And I think I can also take the other patch mentioning a FTBFS with ffmpeg7 [15:47] yes [17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-distro-release-notifier (noble-proposed/universe) [20220915-0ubuntu6 => 20220915-0ubuntu6.1] (no packageset) [17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-distro-release-notifier (jammy-proposed/universe) [20220915-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 20220915-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] (no packageset) [17:20] ubuntu-sru: Extremely important SRU bug 2039492 for plasma-distro-release-notifier. After 24.04.1's release, it started getting EOL data from git.launchpad.net and caused a higher-than-anticipated spike in requests, causing an unintentional DDoS of sorts. This fixes that and moves the burden to Github until we can get it to use distro-info-data [17:20] instead, waiting on tsimonq2 to finish his patch. [17:20] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2039492 in plasma-distro-release-notifier (Ubuntu Noble) "[SRU] plasma-distro-release-notifier gets EOL data from git.launchpad.net" [Critical, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2039492 [17:21] vorlon: unrelated, I think aerodent is still sad, might wanna give IS another nudge. Likely the rsync stalled. [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed apiguardian from i386-whitelist in noble [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed junit5 from i386-whitelist in noble [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed opentest4j from i386-whitelist in noble [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed opentest4j-reporting from i386-whitelist in noble [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed picocli from i386-whitelist in noble [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed univocity-parsers from i386-whitelist in noble [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added bsh to i386-whitelist in noble [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added docbook5-xml to i386-whitelist in noble [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added jtreg to i386-whitelist in noble [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added llvm-toolchain-19 to i386-whitelist in noble [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-560 to i386-whitelist in noble [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added openjdk-24 to i386-whitelist in noble [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python3.13 to i386-whitelist in noble [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added spirv-llvm-translator-19 to i386-whitelist in noble [17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added testng to i386-whitelist in noble [17:47] vorlon: I added python3.13 for noble/i386. should I change the script to revert the other changes? [18:29] ubuntu-release - I'm trying to get the sept 11 ISO for 22.04.5 UB testing but instead I'm getting the sept 9th ISO - not the published sha256 - any ideas? http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-budgie/jammy/daily-live/current/jammy-desktop-amd64.iso.zsync [18:30] i.e. using zsync [18:34] fossfreedom: Yeah, the front-end is out of sync. vorlon has been prodding IS about it. [18:34] Everything goes 404 randomly. [18:36] hmm. thx. So I guess we wait before testing? [18:36] wget of the raw ISO should be OK, it'll either 404 on you up front or actually download [18:41] dbungert: Sometimes it'll just fail in the middle of the wget. [18:54] so I've done a wget of the iso - still got the Sept 9th ISO - so is this the release candidate or is the sept 11th date the one we should be looking for? [19:20] fossfreedom: Sept 11th. [19:21] Unfortunately it keeps popping in and out of existence on the front end, so you have to manually edit the URL and try until it starts downloading. [19:21] I've run out of time tonight. I can't sign off today. [19:22] You could script it and have it loop until successful. ;) [19:39] * Eickmeyer throws aerodent into the abyss === sleeperb1 is now known as _sleeperbarbie [23:40] Eickmeyer: on bug 2039492, so we have a problem with having DoS'd our own infrastructure with a suboptimal mechanism, and the quick fix is to pass that hot potato to some other free service to potentially get the same DoS instead? I'm uncomfortable with being involved in making such a change without their permission. [23:40] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2039492 in plasma-distro-release-notifier (Ubuntu Noble) "[SRU] plasma-distro-release-notifier gets EOL data from git.launchpad.net" [Critical, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2039492 [23:42] Eickmeyer: could you perhaps make it just no-op instead to buy time while you fix it properly? So EOL notifications won't happen for a few weeks but that doesn't seem so bad.