/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/09/15/#lubuntu.txt

phil42upgrading to 5.4.195 broke my drive assignments05:24
phil42root drive was sda1 now it is sdf105:24
phil42is there a way to restore previous behavior?05:24
eyeohmaybe; depends on your skill level08:32
eyeohI don't recognise that number.. kernel?08:32
eyeohthe fix is probably relatively easy if you switch to using uuid08:33
eyeohthere's a slight learning curve to that but I can help if I know more info08:33
eyeohI've been messing around with setting up btrfs on root08:33
eyeohand just about sorted the dual boot / backup install thing which will help me with the rest08:33
phil4218.04 upgrading from 5.4.19310:14
phil42using ubuntu pro10:14
tomreynuse filesystem uuids in fstab10:16
tomreynnot block device names10:16
tomreyncommands blkid and lsblk -o +uuid10:17
tomreynphil42: ^10:17
phil42UUID=ad8dced8-1349-4315-97dd-21b9d058a5ca /               ext4    errors=remount-ro 0       110:17
tomreynthen what broke?10:17
phil42that is from now on 5.4.19310:18
phil42that line was there when i upgraded to 5.4.19510:18
tomreynyou mean it was put there by the upgrade?10:18
phil42i will have to reboot into 5.4.195 know10:19
phil42i think it is using uuid but still assigning it to sdf1 not sda110:20
phil42i have things set up to use sdxy names10:20
phil42do you know how to tell the kernel to assign sda1 to UUID=ad8dced8-1349-4315-97dd-21b9d058a5ca ?10:22
tomreynthat'd be udev rules, i think, but your real issue is "i have things set up to use sdxy names"10:36
tomreynphil42: ^10:36
phil42not really,  when you have been using a setup since 2018 things like that are normal10:37
tomreyni know this used to be common in the past, yes.10:40
tomreyni'm not sure whether the 10 years of support you get for packages in universe with (the full, not "infra-only" "Pro") also apply to all the relevant packages of Lubuntu. I would recommend you clarify this.10:42
tomreynGenerally, I'd expect volunteer support to be limited to non-commercial (whether or not there is a free tier) offerings.10:43
phil42not much to clarify,   using ubuntu pro to keep lubuntu 18.04 alive10:48
phil42got kernel upgrade from 5.4.193 to 5.4.195 and how my partitions are on te wrong letter10:56
phil42the10:56
phil42i am wanting to put them back the way they were10:56
phil42and now10:56
phil42root partition was /dev/sda1 now it is /dev/sdf1,  this breaks things that have been there for years10:58
tomreynhttps://lubuntu.me/bionic-eol/11:07
tomreynbased on this, if you're on Lubuntu, you have no support since 202111:08
phil42i still get kernel and other upgrades from ubuntu pro11:09
phil42i had to stop using chromium because upgrades stopped11:09
tomreyni don't doubt that yuo're still receiving some updates.11:09
phil42what is your doubt?11:11
tomreyni'm just trying to explain why i'm not going to support Lubuntu 18.04.11:11
phil42i understand and i appreciate the help that you have given11:12
tomreynothers might (though i don't strictly expect it, unless it's commercial support, maybe).11:12
phil42maybe the kernel people can help11:13
tomreynyou're welcome (i haven't really helped much) - good luck, and i'll shut up now so you can look for other volunteers who might be willing to help.11:13
phil42irc is not the best communication channel for some things11:13
phil42do you know alot about udev rules?11:14
phil42or udev in general11:15
tomreyni've since noticed you got very similar responses to the same questions in #lubuntu-devel. please don't cross-post.11:51
tomreynand now in #linux, too11:55
phil42and i am finding people who are giving me ideas12:07
tomreyni mostly see people telling you over and over what i told you early on as 'your real issue is "i have things set up to use sdxy names"', and previously arraybolt told you in "The /dev/sdX assignments are unstable by definition in the Linux kernel. [..]" with more details following.12:13
tomreyni'll stop bringing this up now, though, good luck on whatever you're doing.12:14
eyeohit's always the ones who start by being cagey with details16:31
eyeohkind of another level of the xy problem in that it's intentionally hidden detail16:32
tomreynmaybe not always, but it's certainly a repetitive experience. :-/  i bet they could have progressed a lot by now if they had been willing to share how they depend on the block device names, and why they think they have to continue doing so.16:58
tomreynmaybe not here, but possibly in one of the other channels they asked in, which do not care so much about what can (not) be supported.16:59
eyeohnah I'm with you. they should be experienced enough to ask questions the esr way, or at least be more responsive (granted, I didn't ping them in my initial reply given that I sensed some laziness in the question)17:03
eyeohstuff that had been left to fall apart requires an extra demonstration of effort in my view. for example, one of my older siblings is extremely slow to act on advice after asking about it years ago17:05
eyeohso these days I'm more like ("well you've procrastinated and done nothing for all these years despite me giving you the answer - so show me some effort first, and you tell yourself what you're going to do first")17:06
eyeoh(internal thoughts)17:06
eyeohand that's one of the most common issues for those who end up stuck in the past17:07
eyeohit's not so much a tech issue as it is a motivational and organisation issue. too hard to get into the weeds with that stuff17:07
eyeohin some ways it reminds me of those in tech who still refuse to use ublock origin and password managers17:08
tekisuihello21:28

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!