| aciba | Hello team, when is today's meeting supposed to happen? I do not see it in the Ubuntu Fridge calendar. | 07:05 |
|---|---|---|
| bdrung | \o | 16:00 |
| fheimes | o/ | 16:00 |
| rbasak | o/ | 16:00 |
| aciba | o/ | 16:00 |
| utkarsh2102 | o/ | 16:01 |
| bdrung | Where is the other half of the DMB? | 16:11 |
| rbasak | I'm wondering what we need to do. | 16:11 |
| rbasak | teward, tsimonq2, bdmurray: do we need to move the meeting time or something? | 16:12 |
| bdrung | Should we start the meeting anyway to get it rolling (and carry it over to email for the other DMB members to vote)? | 16:13 |
| rbasak | Agreed | 16:13 |
| fheimes | +1 :-) | 16:13 |
| rbasak | Actually I believe there's a rule that if someone's appearing for a second time then those here can make a final decision | 16:14 |
| rbasak | I think that's the case for fheimes, right? | 16:15 |
| fheimes | @rbasak: yes (even here the 3rd time) | 16:15 |
| rbasak | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/KnowledgeBase#Voting_and_Quorum | 16:15 |
| rbasak | So let's use that and get to a decision on your application today | 16:15 |
| aciba | Mine too, it is my second time | 16:15 |
| bdrung | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/KnowledgeBase#Voting_and_Quorum does not say anything about changed rules for appearing the second time. Only inactive members will reduce the quorum requirement. "Any DMB member who fails to attend 6 consecutive scheduled DMB meetings (during a period no shorter than 12 weeks) shall be considered inactive" | 16:20 |
| rbasak | Oh, OK | 16:20 |
| rbasak | "at the next scheduled meeting, the vote will pass with only a majority of present members" | 16:21 |
| rbasak | That's not my reading though? | 16:21 |
| bdrung | But we should hold the meeting anyway. E.g. if we vote +3 in total, we would just need one more member to vote +1 on the ML to get the application approved. | 16:21 |
| rbasak | Yes we should proceed anyway | 16:21 |
| bdrung | Oh, I missed the part. So we need to vote this time and won't reach quorum. Then we can vote next time with just the majority of present members. | 16:22 |
| utkarsh2102 | +1 | 16:23 |
| utkarsh2102 | I think we should really start | 16:23 |
| bdrung | Who wants to chair. The agenda still says @utkarsh2102 | 16:24 |
| rbasak | utkarsh2102: ? | 16:26 |
| utkarsh2102 | can someone do that today? | 16:26 |
| utkarsh2102 | i have so many things going on | 16:26 |
| utkarsh2102 | I can take the next ones | 16:26 |
| rbasak | #startmeeting Developer Membership Board | 16:27 |
| meetingology | Meeting started at 16:27:32 UTC. The chair is rbasak. Information about MeetBot at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | 16:27 |
| meetingology | Available commands: action, commands, idea, info, link, nick | 16:27 |
| rbasak | #topic Package Set/Per Package Uploader Applications | 16:27 |
| rbasak | #subtopic PPU application for s390-tools by Frank Heimes at DMB meeting 2024-09-16 (will also join meeting on 2024-09-02, just in case there is remaining time, if not it's also fine). | 16:27 |
| rbasak | fheimes: o/ | 16:28 |
| fheimes | hi \o | 16:28 |
| fheimes | shall I introduce myself quickly? | 16:28 |
| rbasak | Sure, thanks. | 16:28 |
| fheimes | Ok, I'm Frank (fheimes) and work at Canonical's Partner Engineering department (formerly known as hardware enablement) and the Partner I take care of is IBM, with their Z platform (s390x) and their IBM Power family (ppc64el) | 16:29 |
| fheimes | Prior to my time at Canonical I worked at IBM's R&D lab in Germany in the area of Linux, esp. Linux on s390x. | 16:30 |
| fheimes | So, I take care about s390x hw enablement duties, I do quite some work in the s390x space, hence me applying for PPU for s390-tools (package set, consists of two packages). | 16:30 |
| teward | rbasak: sorry for lateness. (had an IRL emergency problem) | 16:30 |
| rbasak | OK, questions for fheimes then please. | 16:31 |
| rbasak | Where can the release schedule be found, and on what date was the freeze for Oracular? | 16:31 |
| fheimes | that can be found on discourse, there are release schedule pages for all Ubuntu releases, let me quickly find it ... | 16:32 |
| fheimes | https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/oracular-oriole-release-schedule | 16:32 |
| fheimes | FF was on Aug 15th | 16:33 |
| rbasak | fheimes: OK. And if it's after feature freeze, Oracular has 2.34.0-0ubuntu2 and s390x-tools upstream release 2.34.1, what do you need to check to verify that an upload to Oracular will not violate feature freeze? | 16:33 |
| fheimes | today was beta and hwe freeze | 16:33 |
| fheimes | well, there are several things (I guess) | 16:34 |
| fheimes | one thing to check is if the new release is a bug fix release only | 16:34 |
| fheimes | (there is a high chance with a x.y.1) | 16:35 |
| fheimes | if it incl. new features, that are urgently needed and it would violate the FF, then a FFe can be thought of | 16:35 |
| fheimes | if a new version incl. new features AND bug fixes and some fixes are needed, then they need to be cherry-picked -- the package can no longer be simply version bumped after the FF | 16:36 |
| fheimes | I hope I covered what you were looking for? | 16:37 |
| rbasak | Yes thanks. Typing question next question... | 16:37 |
| rbasak | If you upload and it gets "stuck in proposed", who is expected to resolve the situation? | 16:37 |
| fheimes | well, it's primarily me | 16:38 |
| rbasak | OK. And how would you approach that - for example where's the documentation for dealing with this situation? | 16:39 |
| fheimes | I'll should check and shepared the package through the process and should see when it gets stuck, but I will also get a notification in case it's stuck for a certain amount of time | 16:39 |
| fheimes | I would first of all look at launchpad, trying to find out why it's stuck (FTBFS, missing approval) | 16:40 |
| fheimes | britney is another source, actually the update excuses page, like: | 16:41 |
| fheimes | https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/oracular/update_excuses.html#s390-tools | 16:41 |
| rbasak | Do you get dep8 results for s390-tools in practice? | 16:42 |
| fheimes | there are many docs where someone can find more info on what to do, for example in case of an SRU: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html | 16:42 |
| rbasak | I see the packaging doesn't ship tests (I think?) but maybe you get rdep dep8 tests triggered? | 16:42 |
| fheimes | @rbasak: the status on that is what I can see here: https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/oracular/update_excuses.html#s390-tools | 16:43 |
| rbasak | There's nothing there at the moment though because it isn't pending migration right now | 16:44 |
| fheimes | and I can often find directly the reason there (failt to build, missing approval etc) | 16:44 |
| fheimes | yes, that's correct atm there is nothing there (was just an example in case its stuck) | 16:44 |
| utkarsh2102 | question: what if it's not there (update_excuses.html) and the package has still not migrated? | 16:44 |
| utkarsh2102 | where will you look? | 16:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | or what will you do? | 16:45 |
| fheimes | and failed tests of dependent packages can be identified and if needed, retriggered (in different ways) or tests fixed (if needed) | 16:45 |
| fheimes | this is a good doc on this: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration#How_to_re-run_autopkgtests_with_dependencies_on_other_packages_in_the_proposed_pocket that I sometimes refer to | 16:46 |
| rbasak | Thanks. I have no further questions! | 16:47 |
| rbasak | Does anyone else have any further questions for fheimes? | 16:47 |
| utkarsh2102 | my question^ | 16:47 |
| bdrung | fheimes, have you considered adding dep8 tests to s390-tools? | 16:47 |
| fheimes | so far I got cases where things fauiled to migrate (https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/) via LP itself, and update excuses | 16:48 |
| utkarsh2102 | ok, gotcha | 16:48 |
| utkarsh2102 | fine, it's okay | 16:48 |
| rbasak | Sorry I thought he was answering it in his subsequent messages | 16:48 |
| rbasak | OK, are we all ready to vote? | 16:49 |
| fheimes | yes, I have considered that - there is a local version that I havebut it's difficult to trigger that automatically, since special hw access is needed, that is no always possible in KVM | 16:49 |
| utkarsh2102 | yes, ready to vote | 16:49 |
| bdrung | i am ready to vote as well | 16:49 |
| rbasak | #vote Grant fheimes PPU for s390-tools and s390-tools-signed | 16:50 |
| meetingology | Please vote on: Grant fheimes PPU for s390-tools and s390-tools-signed | 16:50 |
| meetingology | Public votes can be registered by saying +1, -1 or +0 in channel (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1|-1|+0 #channelname') | 16:50 |
| rbasak | +1 | 16:50 |
| meetingology | +1 received from rbasak | 16:50 |
| bdrung | +1 | 16:50 |
| meetingology | +1 received from bdrung | 16:50 |
| fheimes | (for example test on s390x hw cryptography can only be run if the hw got passed throught to a KVM instance, and ensuring that in PS is barely possible ...) | 16:50 |
| rbasak | Sorry I was just checking the application page for the exact set of package names, and then started pondering about the -signed PPA business. | 16:50 |
| fheimes | oh ... | 16:50 |
| rbasak | But I think it's probably irrelevant for initial PPU. | 16:50 |
| utkarsh2102 | +1; Frank has a lot of experience with the package and I think I trust him to be an excellent in taking care of the package. | 16:50 |
| meetingology | +1; Frank has a lot of experience with the package and I think I trust him to be an excellent in taking care of the package. received from utkarsh2102 | 16:50 |
| bdmurray | +1 | 16:50 |
| meetingology | +1 received from bdmurray | 16:50 |
| utkarsh2102 | omg, bdmurray, hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii! | 16:51 |
| rbasak | teward: are you available to vote? | 16:51 |
| teward | yes i am 1 minute | 16:51 |
| utkarsh2102 | rbasak: we already have 4 votes | 16:51 |
| teward | +1 | 16:51 |
| meetingology | +1 received from teward | 16:51 |
| utkarsh2102 | ah nice | 16:51 |
| utkarsh2102 | perfect! | 16:51 |
| rbasak | Yeah but people should have the opportunity to register if they dissent :) | 16:51 |
| teward | rbasak: voted. sorry but like 2 minutes ago I get a call from CEO at DAYJOB | 16:51 |
| teward | and that's one of those "Always Answer" cases | 16:52 |
| rbasak | (and it's nice when they also +1) | 16:52 |
| rbasak | #endvote | 16:52 |
| meetingology | Voting ended on: Grant fheimes PPU for s390-tools and s390-tools-signed | 16:52 |
| meetingology | Votes for: 5, Votes against: 0, Abstentions: 0 | 16:52 |
| meetingology | Motion carried | 16:52 |
| utkarsh2102 | fheimes: hey, congratulations! <3 | 16:52 |
| rbasak | Congratulations fheimes! | 16:52 |
| pleia2 | congrats fheimes :) | 16:52 |
| utkarsh2102 | rbasak: can you add his acl and I can take care of the announcement? | 16:52 |
| rbasak | Any volunteers for the action items to enact this? | 16:52 |
| aciba | congrats fheimes | 16:52 |
| rbasak | ack | 16:52 |
| utkarsh2102 | coolio | 16:52 |
| rbasak | #action utkarsh2102 to announce fheimes' successful application | 16:52 |
| meetingology | ACTION: utkarsh2102 to announce fheimes' successful application | 16:52 |
| fheimes | Many thx ! I'm excited and happy ! | 16:52 |
| rbasak | #action rbasak to add fheimes PPU ACL | 16:52 |
| meetingology | ACTION: rbasak to add fheimes PPU ACL | 16:52 |
| bdrung | congratulations | 16:53 |
| utkarsh2102 | I know we are running out of time but can we look at aciba, too? | 16:53 |
| rbasak | I have a hard stop | 16:53 |
| bdrung | fheimes, I missed to ask one very important question since you stated that you live in the Schwäbische Alb: What is a Muggeseggele? | 16:53 |
| utkarsh2102 | teward, bdrung, bdmurray? | 16:53 |
| teward | i have no objection | 16:53 |
| bdrung | ;-) | 16:53 |
| bdrung | no objections | 16:53 |
| utkarsh2102 | rbasak: but are you okay with cloud-init PPU? | 16:53 |
| fheimes | oh, hey pleia2 ! | 16:53 |
| rbasak | I'm OK if you'd like to continue anyway. If you can please ask the usual questions then I'll check back later and vote if needed. | 16:53 |
| rbasak | On the matter of cloud-init PPU, I believe Chad already has PPU for cloud-init? | 16:54 |
| aciba | Chad and James have | 16:54 |
| utkarsh2102 | i think he does | 16:54 |
| utkarsh2102 | yes | 16:54 |
| fheimes | @bdrung I'm living here, but didn't grew up here, but nevertheless it is a very small unit ;-) | 16:54 |
| rbasak | I'd like to see that ML thread concluded with DMB consensus on the topic, but maybe it's best to follow existing precedent for cloud-init in the meantime | 16:55 |
| rbasak | Seeing as aciba has already been let down | 16:55 |
| utkarsh2102 | i don't understand what that means | 16:55 |
| rbasak | And because it'd be a separate matter as to whether cloud-init is considered "core". | 16:55 |
| bdrung | fheimes, I was born in Baden-Württemberg, but grew up in Berlin. | 16:55 |
| utkarsh2102 | are you okay with us continuing? | 16:56 |
| rbasak | I think it is probably "core", but cloud-init has been working well enough with PPU recently, especially as any changes have to effectively pass an SRU reviewer anyway. | 16:56 |
| rbasak | are you okay with us continuing> yes | 16:56 |
| utkarsh2102 | great! | 16:56 |
| rbasak | #chair utkarsh2102 bdrung bdmurray teward | 16:57 |
| meetingology | Current chairs: bdmurray, bdrung, rbasak, teward, utkarsh2102 | 16:57 |
| rbasak | I need to step away imminently so someone else will need to take over chairing | 16:57 |
| utkarsh2102 | bdrung: are you okay to chair? | 16:57 |
| bdrung | okay | 16:58 |
| bdrung | #subtopic PPU application for cloud-init by Alberto Contreras at DMB meeting 2024-09-16 (as 2024-09-02 did not happen). | 16:58 |
| utkarsh2102 | \o/ | 16:58 |
| aciba | o/ | 16:59 |
| bdrung | #link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlbertoContreras/DeveloperPerPackageUploadApplication | 16:59 |
| bdrung | aciba, do you quickly want to introduce yourself? | 16:59 |
| aciba | yes | 16:59 |
| aciba | I am Alberto Contreras, I have been working for Canonical during the last ~2.5 years as part of the Canonical Public Cloud (CPC) team focused on cloud-init on cloud-specific features / fixes. | 16:59 |
| aciba | I would like to apply to get upload permissions for cloud-init. | 17:00 |
| aciba | More about myself and the application: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AlbertoContreras/DeveloperPerPackageUploadApplication | 17:00 |
| bdrung | Thanks. Questions for aciba please. | 17:01 |
| bdrung | aciba, you list LP #2045582 as first entry under areas of work. What went well there and what did you learn there? | 17:04 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Launchpad bug 2045582 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Mantic) "sru cloud-init (23.4 update) Focal, Jammy, and Mantic" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2045582 | 17:04 | |
| utkarsh2102 | aciba: question - after you answer the above, what happens if the verification of the SRU fails? what do we do then? | 17:05 |
| aciba | the sru process, having the package in -proposed allowed other developers to test that new version and detect a couple of bugs prior to releasing it, iirc | 17:06 |
| aciba | so we detected a couple of bugs and proposed a new version of the package with those bugs fixed to be SRUed | 17:07 |
| bdrung | thanks. perfect transition to utkarsh2102's question | 17:09 |
| aciba | if the verification fails in a valid way, we need to hold that version and fix it | 17:10 |
| aciba | proposing a new version including the fix or fixes | 17:10 |
| aciba | as we did in #2045582 | 17:10 |
| aciba | we need to add the tags as verification failed to the lp bug | 17:10 |
| utkarsh2102 | perfect, thanks | 17:11 |
| utkarsh2102 | aciba: what freezes do you need to keep in mind before uploading? | 17:11 |
| aciba | feature freeze, documentation freeze, beta freeze, final freeze, they are doucmented here: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/oracular-oriole-release-schedule/36460 | 17:12 |
| utkarsh2102 | great | 17:12 |
| bdrung | aciba, when you upload a package to the archive, which steps are taken until the package hits the release pocket? | 17:12 |
| aciba | typically: unnapproved queue > -proposed > -updates | 17:13 |
| aciba | those steps are outlined here: https://canonical-sru-docs.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/latest/howto/standard/ | 17:14 |
| bdrung | aciba, and in case of uploads to oracular? | 17:14 |
| aciba | it depends on the time of the release cycle we are at | 17:15 |
| aciba | prior to feature freeze, it goes directly to the release pockets | 17:16 |
| aciba | after feature freeze but prio to the release, it requires a ffe and goes directly to the release pocket after the ffe has cleared | 17:16 |
| aciba | before release it follows the normal SRU process | 17:17 |
| aciba | that is: unnapproved queue > -proposed > -updates | 17:17 |
| bdrung | did you mean s/before release/after release/? | 17:18 |
| aciba | yes, sorry | 17:18 |
| bdrung | aciba, there is a step in between the upload and release pocket on the development series. | 17:19 |
| aciba | it goes to the unpproved queue, but it gets automatically accepted under certain circumstances, | 17:20 |
| bdrung | aciba, and what about autopkgtest? | 17:21 |
| aciba | they are run when the package hits -proposed, every reverse dependency's dep8 test on the package get executed | 17:21 |
| aciba | on can see the results in the update excuses page | 17:22 |
| aciba | and the SRU drive must monitor and take care of them | 17:22 |
| aciba | s/drive/driver/ | 17:22 |
| bdrung | aciba, are autopkgtest only run for SRU uploads and not for development release uploads? | 17:23 |
| aciba | the rdeps ones yes, I belive the ones associated with the package itself do run on every build | 17:24 |
| bdrung | package uploads to the development release and up in -proposed first. | 17:27 |
| bdrung | s/and/end/ | 17:28 |
| aciba | then yes, autopkgtest run for development release uploads | 17:28 |
| bdrung | Do you need a FFe for every upload after the feature freeze (and before the release)? | 17:29 |
| aciba | no, for example, if there is a new upstream version that contains only bug fixes, then a new upload containing that does not require and ffe | 17:30 |
| aciba | before the release, the SRU process holds | 17:30 |
| bdrung | s/before/after/? | 17:30 |
| aciba | s/after/before/ again | 17:30 |
| aciba | sorry I am a bit nervous | 17:31 |
| bdrung | thanks for being honest here (written text does not convey things like that) | 17:31 |
| aciba | exceptions to the FFe process can be found here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeatureFreeze and https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess | 17:32 |
| bdrung | Any questions from my DMB fellows? | 17:33 |
| utkarsh2102 | not from me | 17:35 |
| teward | none here | 17:35 |
| bdrung | aciba, You list https://github.com/canonical/cloud-init/commit/57bb32388 as one example. Anything one should be aware of when (re)moving files in /etc? | 17:35 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-meeting- Commit 57bb323 in canonical/cloud-init "d/cloud-init.postinst: change priority of hotplug rules" | 17:35 | |
| aciba | it should not changer behavior, it should not remove config files created by the user | 17:38 |
| aciba | it should aviod user intervention | 17:39 |
| aciba | s/aviod/avoid | 17:39 |
| aciba | does that satisfy your question? | 17:41 |
| bdrung | aciba, if upstream decides to drop a file in /etc can the package just remove the file in /etc on upgrade? | 17:41 |
| aciba | drop the file how? | 17:43 |
| aciba | at runtime? | 17:43 |
| aciba | bdrung | 17:44 |
| bdrung | drop = delete / not ship it in the file in the release tarball | 17:44 |
| aciba | yes, the package maint scripts can delete a config file when it is not need anymore | 17:44 |
| aciba | but it depends in a case by case basis I think | 17:45 |
| bdrung | aciba, and in case the file was modified by the user? | 17:45 |
| aciba | we should minimize user disruption | 17:45 |
| aciba | and if the user modified the file, the maint scripts shouldn't remove the file | 17:46 |
| bdrung | perfect thanks. i was aiming for the helpers from https://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/noble/en/man1/dpkg-maintscript-helper.1.html to be used to handle that. | 17:46 |
| bdrung | I am done with my questions. | 17:47 |
| bdrung | Everyone ready for voting? | 17:47 |
| utkarsh2102 | yes | 17:47 |
| utkarsh2102 | teward, bdmurray? | 17:47 |
| bdmurray | I have no questions. | 17:47 |
| utkarsh2102 | bdrung: i think we should proceed | 17:48 |
| utkarsh2102 | it's wayyyyy over time | 17:48 |
| utkarsh2102 | teward will follow up | 17:49 |
| teward | no questions | 17:49 |
| utkarsh2102 | there :) | 17:49 |
| bdrung | #vote Grant Alberto Contreras (aciba) PPU for cloud-init | 17:49 |
| meetingology | Please vote on: Grant Alberto Contreras (aciba) PPU for cloud-init | 17:49 |
| meetingology | Public votes can be registered by saying +1, -1 or +0 in channel (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1|-1|+0 #channelname') | 17:49 |
| teward | (you already asked if we had more questions and I didn't) | 17:49 |
| utkarsh2102 | writing a review.. | 17:51 |
| utkarsh2102 | +1; I think Alberto has quite a lot of experience with cloud-init & its internals. I think they'd be a great addition as an uploader of the package. Yes, there were some answers which weren't completely clear but that's okay, I think those are smaller and can be learned on the fly. Alberto, I'd ask you to exercise your upload rights with caution & | 17:53 |
| meetingology | +1; I think Alberto has quite a lot of experience with cloud-init & its internals. I think they'd be a great addition as an uploader of the package. Yes, there were some answers which weren't completely clear but that's okay, I think those are smaller and can be learned on the fly. Alberto, I'd ask you to exercise your upload rights with caution & received from utkarsh2102 | 17:53 |
| utkarsh2102 | please don't hesitate to ask before uploading or whenever in doubt. More reviews, better the upload is. So please keep in mind all those things when you upload. ;) | 17:53 |
| utkarsh2102 | bdrung, bdmurray, teward? | 17:54 |
| bdrung | +1 I concur what utkarsh2102 wrote | 17:55 |
| meetingology | +1 I concur what utkarsh2102 wrote received from bdrung | 17:55 |
| teward | +! | 17:55 |
| teward | oops | 17:55 |
| teward | +1 | 17:55 |
| meetingology | +1 received from teward | 17:55 |
| bdmurray | +1 | 17:55 |
| meetingology | +1 received from bdmurray | 17:55 |
| utkarsh2102 | #endvote | 17:56 |
| meetingology | Voting ended on: Grant Alberto Contreras (aciba) PPU for cloud-init | 17:56 |
| meetingology | Votes for: 4, Votes against: 0, Abstentions: 0 | 17:56 |
| meetingology | Motion carried | 17:56 |
| utkarsh2102 | yay! | 17:56 |
| utkarsh2102 | aciba: congratulations! <3 | 17:56 |
| aciba | wow, many thanks, I will take care and ask when in doubt | 17:56 |
| utkarsh2102 | aciba: super! thank you! | 17:56 |
| bdrung | aciba, congrats. asking when in doubt is the correct mindset. nobody knows everything. | 17:57 |
| utkarsh2102 | #action rbasak to add aciba to the right place & utkarsh2102 to announce the successful application | 17:57 |
| meetingology | ACTION: rbasak to add aciba to the right place & utkarsh2102 to announce the successful application | 17:57 |
| utkarsh2102 | ok, I'm going to call if off. It was a pretty long meeting :) | 17:57 |
| utkarsh2102 | thank you so much for chairing, bdrung. | 17:57 |
| aciba | much appreciated, have a good day o/ | 17:57 |
| bdrung | exactly | 17:57 |
| utkarsh2102 | you were great! o/ | 17:57 |
| utkarsh2102 | #endmeeting | 17:58 |
| meetingology | Meeting ended at 17:58:05 UTC. Minutes at https://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2024/ubuntu-meeting.2024-09-16-16.27.moin.txt | 17:58 |
| bdrung | now I have to recharge after 360 and this meeting. | 17:59 |
| teward | now for late lunch | 18:35 |
| === not_phunyguy is now known as phunyguy | ||
| === arif-ali_ is now known as arif-ali | ||
| === lucyllewy_ is now known as lucyllewy | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!