| vpa1977 | @pilot out | 04:47 |
|---|---|---|
| === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Beta Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A | ||
| luna_work | morning | 08:11 |
| seb128 | cpaelzer, hey. Did you see the reply from Alessandro on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsdd/+bug/2070025 where he pointed out that the apparmor/firewall rules were already included? | 09:47 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2070025 in wsdd (Ubuntu) "[MIR] wsdd" [Undecided, New] | 09:47 | |
| cpaelzer | seb128: not yet, but perfect | 09:58 |
| === gurupras- is now known as guruprasad | ||
| ahasenack | bdrung: hi, I know you didn't file this bug, but I just can't understand the description: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/2081020 | 17:59 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2081020 in OEM Priority Project "Boot into initramfs after install 24.04 on UFS storage" [Critical, Confirmed] | 17:59 | |
| ahasenack | is this about failing to boot and entering the initramfs shell prompt? | 17:59 |
| bdrung | Yes, the system fails to boot | 17:59 |
| bdrung | ahasenack, how about renaming "Boot into initramfs after install 24.04 on UFS storage" to "initrd: Ubuntu 24.04 fails on UFS storage"? | 18:00 |
| ahasenack | much better | 18:01 |
| ahasenack | but that's just one of the problems with that description :) | 18:01 |
| ahasenack | no regression potential | 18:01 |
| bdrung | dirksu wanted to provide the SRU. but let me quickly fill that out. | 18:02 |
| ahasenack | bdrung: and what's the oracular state? It says fix committed, but there is nothing in oracular-proposed | 18:02 |
| ahasenack | just oracular release | 18:02 |
| bdrung | ahasenack, it's in the unapproved queue | 18:02 |
| ahasenack | ah | 18:03 |
| bdrung | ahasenack, Added "Where problems could occur" to the bug | 18:12 |
| ahasenack | ta | 18:12 |
| bdrung | ahasenack, and I promise that this SRU will be the last one for bug #2065180 | 18:12 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2065180 in miniramfs (Ubuntu Noble) "performance regression in dracut-install 060" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2065180 | 18:12 | |
| ahasenack | haha | 18:13 |
| bdrung | (i will open a new one in case we find something else performance related :D ) | 18:13 |
| ahasenack | thx, that helps :) | 18:13 |
| ahasenack | bdrung: I'm not familiar with the syntax used in the modules variable, you added ufs with a "=" prefix, but in a different place in oracular vs noble, does that have any significance? | 18:15 |
| ahasenack | if it's at the end of the list, or somewhere else? | 18:15 |
| ahasenack | modules="$modules =drivers/ufs dax_pmem nd_pmem" | 18:15 |
| ahasenack | vs | 18:15 |
| ahasenack | modules="$modules mptfc mptsas mptscsih mptspi zfcp =drivers/ufs" | 18:15 |
| bdrung | ahasenack, the order is not relevant. the = syntax means that all modules from the directory should be included. | 18:16 |
| ahasenack | ok, thx | 18:16 |
| bdrung | see /usr/lib/dracut/dracut-install -h | 18:16 |
| ahasenack | this is not dracut, though | 18:16 |
| bdrung | :) this modules list end up in a dracut-install call | 18:17 |
| ahasenack | hopefully also in initramfs-tools? :) | 18:17 |
| bdrung | since initramfs-tools 0.142ubuntu11: Use dracut-install in manual_add_modules to speed up mkinitramfs significantly (LP: #2031185) | 18:18 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2031185 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "manual_add_modules is slow / consumes the most time" [Medium, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2031185 | 18:18 | |
| bdrung | mantic was fast. then we had the famous bug #2065180 that made us loose the improvement again | 18:19 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2065180 in miniramfs (Ubuntu Noble) "performance regression in dracut-install 060" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2065180 | 18:19 | |
| bdrung | I added another test case for bug #2081020 | 18:22 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2081020 in OEM Priority Project "initrd: Ubuntu 24.04 fails to boot on UFS storage" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2081020 | 18:22 | |
| ahasenack | bdrung: I'm sorry, but I think this latest change to performance improvements would be better in a separate bug. It will be hard to chase down a regression here if we use the same bug again | 18:23 |
| ahasenack | the change implementing comment #44 | 18:23 |
| ahasenack | it can have the same test plan, and be something like "further performance improvements" | 18:24 |
| bdrung | ahasenack, okay. i'll create the new bug. | 18:24 |
| ahasenack | thank you | 18:24 |
| ahasenack | I'll add a comment saying I asked for that | 18:25 |
| bdrung | ahasenack, new bug created and re-uploaded | 18:34 |
| ahasenack | yay | 18:34 |
| liushuyu | I am once again asking if someone could review https://code.launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/ubuntu-archive-tools/+git/ubuntu-archive-tools/+merge/473475 | 18:37 |
| utkarsh2102 | preliminarily commented^ | 18:44 |
| liushuyu | utkarsh2102: Thanks! Although it's very sad that nobody noticed there should be charts on the bottom of many pages (e.g. NBS) | 18:46 |
| bdrung | liushuyu, you mean the big blank at the bottom below "over time" on https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/nbs.html? | 18:47 |
| liushuyu | bdrung: Yes | 18:49 |
| liushuyu | This is because the JavaScript libraries failed to load | 18:49 |
| liushuyu | Also YUI 3 (the JavaScript UI library we used here) is no longer maintained | 18:50 |
| UnivrslSuprBox | liushuyu: For the record, I noticed but did not raise anything :P | 20:14 |
| liushuyu | UnivrslSuprBox: Fair enough | 20:21 |
| === utkarsh18 is now known as utkarsh2102 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!