[04:47] <vpa1977> @pilot out
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Beta Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A
[08:11] <luna_work> morning
[09:47] <seb128> cpaelzer, hey. Did you see the reply from Alessandro on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wsdd/+bug/2070025 where he pointed out that the apparmor/firewall rules were already included?
[09:47] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2070025 in wsdd (Ubuntu) "[MIR] wsdd" [Undecided, New]
[09:58] <cpaelzer> seb128: not yet, but perfect
=== gurupras- is now known as guruprasad
[17:59] <ahasenack> bdrung: hi, I know you didn't file this bug, but I just can't understand the description: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/2081020
[17:59] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2081020 in OEM Priority Project "Boot into initramfs after install 24.04 on UFS storage" [Critical, Confirmed]
[17:59] <ahasenack> is this about failing to boot and entering the initramfs shell prompt?
[17:59] <bdrung> Yes, the system fails to boot
[18:00] <bdrung> ahasenack, how about renaming "Boot into initramfs after install 24.04 on UFS storage" to "initrd: Ubuntu 24.04 fails on UFS storage"?
[18:01] <ahasenack> much better
[18:01] <ahasenack> but that's just one of the problems with that description :)
[18:01] <ahasenack> no regression potential
[18:02] <bdrung> dirksu wanted to provide the SRU. but let me quickly fill that out.
[18:02] <ahasenack> bdrung: and what's the oracular state? It says fix committed, but there is nothing in oracular-proposed
[18:02] <ahasenack> just oracular release
[18:02] <bdrung> ahasenack, it's in the unapproved queue
[18:03] <ahasenack> ah
[18:12] <bdrung> ahasenack, Added "Where problems could occur" to the bug
[18:12] <ahasenack> ta
[18:12] <bdrung> ahasenack, and I promise that this SRU will be the last one for bug #2065180
[18:12] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2065180 in miniramfs (Ubuntu Noble) "performance regression in dracut-install 060" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2065180
[18:13] <ahasenack> haha
[18:13] <bdrung> (i will open a new one in case we find something else performance related :D )
[18:13] <ahasenack> thx, that helps :)
[18:15] <ahasenack> bdrung: I'm not familiar with the syntax used in the modules variable, you added ufs with a "=" prefix, but in a different place in oracular vs noble, does that have any significance?
[18:15] <ahasenack> if it's at the end of the list, or somewhere else?
[18:15] <ahasenack> modules="$modules =drivers/ufs dax_pmem nd_pmem"
[18:15] <ahasenack> vs
[18:15] <ahasenack> modules="$modules mptfc mptsas mptscsih mptspi zfcp =drivers/ufs"
[18:16] <bdrung> ahasenack, the order is not relevant. the = syntax means that all modules from the directory should be included.
[18:16] <ahasenack> ok, thx
[18:16] <bdrung> see /usr/lib/dracut/dracut-install -h
[18:16] <ahasenack> this is not dracut, though
[18:17] <bdrung> :) this modules list end up in a dracut-install call
[18:17] <ahasenack> hopefully also in initramfs-tools? :)
[18:18] <bdrung> since initramfs-tools 0.142ubuntu11: Use dracut-install in manual_add_modules to speed up mkinitramfs significantly (LP: #2031185)
[18:18] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2031185 in initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) "manual_add_modules is slow / consumes the most time" [Medium, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2031185
[18:19] <bdrung> mantic was fast. then we had the famous bug #2065180 that made us loose the improvement again
[18:19] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2065180 in miniramfs (Ubuntu Noble) "performance regression in dracut-install 060" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2065180
[18:22] <bdrung> I added another test case for bug #2081020
[18:22] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2081020 in OEM Priority Project "initrd: Ubuntu 24.04 fails to boot on UFS storage" [Critical, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2081020
[18:23] <ahasenack> bdrung: I'm sorry, but I think this latest change to performance improvements would be better in a separate bug. It will be hard to chase down a regression here if we use the same bug again
[18:23] <ahasenack> the change implementing comment #44
[18:24] <ahasenack> it can have the same test plan, and be something like "further performance improvements"
[18:24] <bdrung> ahasenack, okay. i'll create the new bug.
[18:24] <ahasenack> thank you
[18:25] <ahasenack> I'll add a comment saying I asked for that
[18:34] <bdrung> ahasenack, new bug created and re-uploaded
[18:34] <ahasenack> yay
[18:37] <liushuyu> I am once again asking if someone could review https://code.launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/ubuntu-archive-tools/+git/ubuntu-archive-tools/+merge/473475
[18:44] <utkarsh2102> preliminarily commented^
[18:46] <liushuyu> utkarsh2102: Thanks! Although it's very sad that nobody noticed there should be charts on the bottom of many pages (e.g. NBS)
[18:47] <bdrung> liushuyu, you mean the big blank at the bottom below "over time" on https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/nbs.html?
[18:49] <liushuyu> bdrung: Yes
[18:49] <liushuyu> This is because the JavaScript libraries failed to load
[18:50] <liushuyu> Also YUI 3 (the JavaScript UI library we used here) is no longer maintained
[20:14] <UnivrslSuprBox> liushuyu: For the record, I noticed but did not raise anything :P
[20:21] <liushuyu> UnivrslSuprBox: Fair enough
=== utkarsh18 is now known as utkarsh2102