=== hkeoauxyzozlvajw is now known as efirnffutkirrdpr
=== efirnffutkirrdpr is now known as georgiag
[08:01] <mkukri> my 389-ds-base upload is ftbfs in the archive, but same package builds fine in sbulild https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/6RkX2MyNj2/
[08:01] <mkukri> i just wish i saw the difference...
[08:09] <adrien_> ccccchhfuugfkfbflggchvvrbjekudticfnukcbbltd
[08:09] <adrien_> bad yubikey (nothing is configured with a short press on that key :) )
=== adrien_ is now known as adrien
[09:24] <mkukri> can someone sponsor cd-boot-images-* for me please? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2078307/comments/58
[09:24] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2078307 in cd-boot-images-riscv64 (Ubuntu) "Grub 2.12 in Oracular is unable to boot Windows using chainloader" [Undecided, New]
[11:02] <ginggs> @pilot in
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Beta Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: ginggs
[15:00] <ginggs> @pilot out
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Beta Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A
[15:02] <jbicha> @pilot in
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Beta Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: jbicha
[15:32] <dbungert> adrien: you might want to `ykman config usb --disable otp` if you don't use the press feature, can always turn it back on later
[19:01] <jbicha> @pilot out
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Beta Freeze | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Noble | Patch Pilots: N/A
[20:34] <vpa1977> Hi, just wanted to check regarding new sru docs https://canonical-sru-docs.readthedocs-hosted.com/en/latest/howto/standard/#howto-perform-standard-sru. Old wiki stated that the package is tested prior to uploading according to the test plan. New one just states that the patch should be formatted correctly. Just wanted to confirm that the testing requirement is dropped.
[22:01] <rbasak> They left, but "Old wiki stated that the package is tested prior to uploading according to the test plan" -> I didn't think that was ever a requirement or was ever documented as such? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates?action=recall&rev=389 is the old wiki.
[22:01] <rbasak> Is there some corner of the documentation where that was implied, that I'm missing?
[22:04] <vladimirp> rbasak: I think it had something along the lines that submitter must ensure that the package/fix is working properly
[22:05] <rbasak> vladimirp: I would expect you to have tested your own upload yourself before uploading, but it's not formally an SRU process requirement, since if there's a problem it should be detected at SRU verification time after the package hits -proposed, and therefore not got released.
[22:05] <vladimirp> rbasak: ack