| lotuspsychje | good morning | 01:50 |
|---|---|---|
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| === JanC is now known as Guest6104 | ||
| === JanC is now known as Guest9364 | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| === JanC is now known as Guest781 | ||
| === nckx is now known as nckhexen | ||
| === hotaruN_ is now known as hotaruN | ||
| pragmaticenigma | JanC: Are you that lonely that you can do nothing better with your time than offer contrarian and offtopic conversation? seriously, get a life. you don't have to have the last word in anything. just admit you misspoke and move on with your life. it aint that hard. | 20:18 |
| JanC | the only one being contrarian is you | 20:19 |
| JanC | and that begs the question: how can one know there are going to be no recommends pulled in at any level when without knowing exactly what is already installed? | 20:20 |
| pragmaticenigma | JanC: Because I ran the command on my own machine to verify. that's why I said what I said. You're the one that choose not to read the entire statement and note the comment that the plugin's might contain something that brings in the unwanted packages | 20:20 |
| JanC | that only tests whether it would pull anything in on your install... | 20:21 |
| JanC | if only dependency resolution was that easy | 20:22 |
| pragmaticenigma | JanC: and you make too many assumptions. As I have a system right here that does not have Gnome installed, nor the gdm packages. Effectively I have the same scenario as they do, a system without any gnome packages on it. | 20:22 |
| pragmaticenigma | So you keep on making those wrong assumptions... you just make yourself out to be a fool in doing so | 20:23 |
| JanC | again: it was a general recommendation | 20:26 |
| JanC | and it might depend on 1 library or application being installed or not | 20:26 |
| pragmaticenigma | You still don't get it... and still making yourself out to be a fool. | 20:27 |
| JanC | sure | 20:27 |
| leftyfb | that poor horse | 20:28 |
| pragmaticenigma | eh, that horse ran off a long time ago | 20:32 |
| oerheks | toxic pragmaticenigma again .. | 20:39 |
| oerheks | reverse your question to yourself? | 20:40 |
| pragmaticenigma | oerheks: just so you know... comments like that are against the community guidelines... it'd serve you better to not say anything at all | 20:40 |
| oerheks | huh ..? | 20:41 |
| daftykins | don't fan the flames, in other words | 20:42 |
| oerheks | no, just a repeat, your attacks are toxic, and surely against the guidelines. | 20:43 |
| pragmaticenigma | daftykins is wise oerheks | 20:44 |
| * daftykins goes back to singing the Oktoberfest chants from his weekend away in Munich | 20:49 | |
| JanC | Prost! | 20:50 |
| JanC | (hope the beer is good though, Oktoberfest doesn't have the best reputation for that) | 20:51 |
| daftykins | certainly was, seems we're all slowly succumbing to human malware since our return though D: | 20:52 |
| JanC | hmm, that's not something I've ever had trouble with fortunately | 20:53 |
| daftykins | let me share a snap from the brilliant balcony table we had on day 2 in tent #2 | 20:54 |
| daftykins | https://i.imgur.com/hD6bYfC.jpeg | 20:54 |
| JanC | somehow some people get sick whenever they leave their home :) | 20:54 |
| daftykins | must be just like the types mosquitos go for | 20:55 |
| JanC | then again, some people get sick whenever they eat something different from whatever they usually eat | 20:56 |
| pragmaticenigma | daftykins: do tell us that you scored one of those rainbow unicorn balloons, maybe the helicopter? | 20:58 |
| daftykins | i totally had my eye on the helicopter | 20:59 |
| pragmaticenigma | nice! | 21:00 |
| === pragmatic_enigma is now known as pragmaticenigma | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
