| guruprasad | cjwatson, is there a reason (based on what you know) to not deploy multiple Launchpad DB patches in one go, provided that they are for empty, unused tables? I am planning to deploy them back to back but was wondering about doing it all in one go. | 16:37 |
|---|---|---|
| guruprasad | The total application time is significantly under the limit of 15 seconds. | 16:38 |
| cjwatson | guruprasad: It can be done, but it's often wiser not to since it complicates working out what to do if anything goes wrong. | 16:54 |
| guruprasad | Yeah, that is what I thought too even if others suggested that this is a trivial case with evidence (from staging) confirming it | 16:55 |
| guruprasad | Our documentation says that this should not be done without an explicit from our architect and we don't have one any more :( | 16:55 |
| guruprasad | *explict approval | 16:55 |
| guruprasad | And I don't want to find out what might go wrong by doing this late on a Friday evening. | 16:56 |
| guruprasad | I will still do back-to-back deployments. | 16:56 |
| cjwatson | I remember asking wgrant a similar question once. I don't have the text of the answer any more since it would have been on MM, but IIRC it was just about reducing risk | 16:59 |
| guruprasad | I agree with that opinion. | 17:03 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!