[16:37] <guruprasad> cjwatson, is there a reason (based on what you know) to not deploy multiple Launchpad DB patches in one go, provided that they are for empty, unused tables? I am planning to deploy them back to back but was wondering about doing it all in one go.
[16:38] <guruprasad> The total application time is significantly under the limit of 15 seconds.
[16:54] <cjwatson> guruprasad: It can be done, but it's often wiser not to since it complicates working out what to do if anything goes wrong.
[16:55] <guruprasad> Yeah, that is what I thought too even if others suggested that this is a trivial case with evidence (from staging) confirming it
[16:55] <guruprasad> Our documentation says that this should not be done without an explicit from our architect and we don't have one any more :(
[16:55] <guruprasad> *explict approval
[16:56] <guruprasad> And I don't want to find out what might go wrong by doing this late on a Friday evening.
[16:56] <guruprasad> I will still do back-to-back deployments.
[16:59] <cjwatson> I remember asking wgrant a similar question once.  I don't have the text of the answer any more since it would have been on MM, but IIRC it was just about reducing risk
[17:03] <guruprasad> I agree with that opinion.