| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kubuntu-installer-prompt (oracular-proposed/universe) [24.04.10 => 24.10.1] (no packageset) | 04:11 | |
| arraybolt3 | ubuntu-release: ^ Fixes two bugs and one low-risk nice-to-have in kubuntu-installer-prompt, very similar to what was done with lubuntu-installer-prompt previously. This is an installer component so it can't be SRU'd later on in Oracular. | 04:11 |
|---|---|---|
| arraybolt3 | sleeperbarbie: your connection seems to be abit unstable | 04:14 |
| sleeperbarbie | i didn't even know i was in here again, i removed thr chat from autojoin. sorry! take care, all | 04:14 |
| sleeperbarbie | the* | 04:14 |
| sleeperbarbie | & | 04:15 |
| arraybolt3 | np :) | 04:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 (oracular-proposed/restricted) [535.183.01-0ubuntu2 => 535.183.01-0ubuntu3] (i386-whitelist) | 05:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 (oracular-proposed/restricted) [550.107.02-0ubuntu1 => 550.107.02-0ubuntu2] (i386-whitelist) | 05:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-installer-prompt [source] (oracular-proposed) [24.10.1] | 05:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 [source] (oracular-proposed) [550.107.02-0ubuntu2] | 05:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 [source] (oracular-proposed) [535.183.01-0ubuntu3] | 05:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-construct-classes [sync] (oracular-proposed) [0.1.2-3] | 08:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected debhelper [source] (oracular-proposed) [13.20ubuntu1] | 08:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libmnl [sync] (oracular-proposed) [1.0.5-3] | 08:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected guvcview [sync] (oracular-proposed) [2.1.0-0.2] | 08:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected svt-av1 [sync] (oracular-proposed) [2.2.1+dfsg-2] | 08:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-construct-classes [amd64] (oracular-proposed/none) [0.1.2-3] (no packageset) | 08:20 | |
| Skia | bdmurray: https://code.launchpad.net/~hyask/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+git/base-files/+merge/474563 | 08:33 |
| Skia | bdmurray: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+bug/2083825 | 08:44 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2083825 in base-files (Ubuntu) "Release base-files for Oracular" [Undecided, New] | 08:44 | |
| bdmurray | Skia: sponsored - thanks! | 08:53 |
| Skia | \o/ | 08:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (oracular-proposed/main) [13.3ubuntu5 => 13.3ubuntu6] (core, i386-whitelist) | 08:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-construct-classes [amd64] (oracular-proposed) [0.1.2-3] | 09:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected base-files [source] (oracular-proposed) [13.3ubuntu6] | 09:18 | |
| nteodosio | Can someone tell me why update-manager on Xenial https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/1:16.04.23 is still in proposed? It's not listed in excuses. | 09:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (oracular-proposed/main) [13.3ubuntu5 => 13.3ubuntu6] (core, i386-whitelist) | 09:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (oracular-proposed) [13.3ubuntu6] | 09:36 | |
| bdmurray | nteodosio: I see it as being in -proposed and -updates | 09:37 |
| bdmurray | nteodosio: It shows up in the -proposed cleanup list here so I'll do that https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/pending-sru.html | 09:39 |
| bdmurray | nteodosio: It shows up in the -proposed cleanup list here so I'll do that https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/pending-sru.html | 09:48 |
| nteodosio | Thank you. | 10:03 |
| === fuseteam1 is now known as fuseteam | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distribution-gpg-keys (oracular-proposed/universe) [1.105+ds-1ubuntu1 => 1.105+ds-2] (no packageset) (sync) | 11:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distribution-gpg-keys [sync] (oracular-proposed) [1.105+ds-2] | 11:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-skbio (oracular-proposed/universe) [0.6.2-1 => 0.6.2-3] (no packageset) (sync) | 12:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-skbio [sync] (oracular-proposed) [0.6.2-3] | 12:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: magicgui (oracular-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-4 => 0.9.1-1] (no packageset) (sync) | 13:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted magicgui [sync] (oracular-proposed) [0.9.1-1] | 13:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (jammy-proposed/main) [23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.2 => 23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.3] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg) | 14:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (focal-proposed/main) [2:21.2.4-0ubuntu2.13 => 2:21.2.4-0ubuntu2.14] (openstack, ubuntu-server) | 14:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgsf (oracular-proposed/main) [1.14.52-1 => 1.14.52-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 14:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mesa [source] (jammy-proposed) [23.2.1-1ubuntu3.1~22.04.3] | 14:24 | |
| vorlon | tjaalton: so, I adjusted seeds and now it's nvidia 550 on https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/component-mismatches.html | 14:59 |
| tjaalton | vorlon: and I pushed a change that dropped 470. next there would be dropping desktop 535. we finally have transitionals for 535/550->560 | 15:04 |
| vorlon | tjaalton: is it correct that the 550 packages get dropped to multiverse as opposed to seeded in restricted as transitionals? | 15:04 |
| tjaalton | vorlon: if I look at 525 in noble, it's in multiverse | 15:06 |
| vorlon | ok | 15:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: edk2 (oracular-proposed/main) [2024.05-2 => 2024.05-2ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server) | 15:09 | |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer: edubuntu stated size limit for noble and oracular is 6.1GB; actual image sizes are 6.3GB+ for noble, 6.8GB+ for oracular. I guess we should just bump these? | 15:54 |
| Eickmeyer | vorlon: Absoluttely. | 15:56 |
| Eickmeyer | Spelling nonwithstanding. | 15:56 |
| Eickmeyer | IIRC noble size limits were never addressed; everything was just so hectic that cycle. | 15:58 |
| bdmurray | And that point release? ;-) | 16:02 |
| Eickmeyer | Yup! | 16:05 |
| liushuyu | I guess Edubuntu ISO is quickly approaching DVD DL storage size limit? | 16:06 |
| Eickmeyer | liushuyu: So, just like with Ubuntu Studio, we're encouraging burn-to-USB. Straight out of the gate with 23.04 it was already there. | 16:08 |
| Eickmeyer | Ventoy and hardware-based solutions, such as the iODD line of products, are also solutions. | 16:08 |
| liushuyu | Eickmeyer: I see. Also more environment friendly than non-disposable plastic frisbees | 16:09 |
| Eickmeyer | Ha! Indeed. | 16:09 |
| vorlon | Eickmeyer: less a question of being hectic than of me having despaired of keeping sizes under any kind of control | 16:09 |
| Eickmeyer | And much more reusable. | 16:09 |
| Eickmeyer | vorlon: I think I can speak for all flavors when I say we're trying and being mindful. It's not like we see it as a free-for-all. | 16:10 |
| vorlon | yes but in practice images stay 'oversized' the whole cycle unless I go around nudging folks about targets | 16:11 |
| Eickmeyer | Valid, but the option is always to "bump". I know Lubuntu and Xubuntu are most mindful of this by trying to keep their sizes to a minimum as much as possible. | 16:14 |
| Eickmeyer | Edubuntu only increased to keep the snap parity with Ubuntu Desktop. Studio lost a few packages due to bitrot, but still gained weight which is par for the course. :/ | 16:15 |
| liushuyu | Eickmeyer: I think we/you might want to do CfP (Call for Participations) if you want to minimize the chance of not having packages left in/collecting dust on the side | 16:18 |
| bdmurray | vorlon: Do flavor leads get the oversized emails? | 16:19 |
| vorlon | I'm not sure | 16:19 |
| Eickmeyer | liushuyu: Oh, those died as it seems that upstream no longer exists (invada-studio-plugins-lv2 as an example) or the package hasn't been released in 11 years (jack-tools) and hasn't seen a commit in almost the same amount of time. That's what I mean by bitrot. Those get removed from Debian and, subsequently, Ubuntu. | 16:21 |
| liushuyu | Eickmeyer: Ah I see, I thought you said some packages were left out of the release pocket | 16:23 |
| Eickmeyer | No, nothing like that. If it's ftbfs I'm more keen to figure out what's going on. If it's dead, it's dead. | 16:23 |
| liushuyu | Eickmeyer: If it's dead, it's dead. > right | 16:27 |
| bdmurray | I only see release team members in the too line for "Daily CD health checks" | 16:28 |
| bdmurray | s/too/to/ | 16:29 |
| vorlon | bdmurray: yeah I just didn't know if we sent separate per-flavor mails | 16:43 |
| bdmurray | Or maybe the "CD image size" KPI should a size limit line? https://ubuntu-release.kpi.ubuntu.com/d/XgP-fUlGz/ubuntu-cd-images?orgId=1 | 16:47 |
| Eickmeyer | Curious that ubuntustudio doesn't show up on the "CD image size" graph. Probably an oversight. | 16:49 |
| bdmurray | Weren't they renamed recently? | 16:50 |
| Eickmeyer | Indeed, likely why. Oracular and later is ubuntustudio-daily-live | 16:50 |
| Eickmeyer | er... something like that. | 16:51 |
| Eickmeyer | ubuntustudio-desktop as opposed to ubuntustudio-dvd | 16:51 |
| bdmurray | We might sort it now | 16:53 |
| Eickmeyer | I'm in video editing mode so my answers might not be quite as accurate as I'd like. :) | 16:54 |
| liushuyu | ubuntu-sru: Hi SRU team, I am looking for someone in the SRU team to review https://code.launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+git/dpkg/+merge/473940 | 17:11 |
| liushuyu | ... SRU bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/2082636 | 17:11 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2082636 in dpkg (Ubuntu) "[SRU] dpkg: backport frame-pointer enabling mechanism for Rust" [Undecided, New] | 17:11 | |
| bdmurray | liushuyu: The SRU team generally reviews uploads in the unapproved queue. Has this been sponsored yet? | 17:19 |
| liushuyu | bdmurray: Not yet | 17:20 |
| bdmurray | liushuyu: So I think finding a sponsor needs to happen first | 17:21 |
| liushuyu | I do have one package that got sponsored but requiring someone from the SRU team to take a look: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dh-cargo/+bug/2028153 | 17:27 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2028153 in dh-cargo (Ubuntu) "[SRU] dh-cargo: Backport vendored dependencies support to Jammy" [Medium, Confirmed] | 17:27 | |
| dbungert | ubuntu-release: I believe that pc-kernel on 24.10/stable is in the desired state, would you rebuild Desktop amd64? | 18:17 |
| utkarsh2102 | dbungert: yo, i'll rebuild Desktop amd64 but waiting for libreoffice to get in | 18:29 |
| utkarsh2102 | mdeslaur_: yo, how serious are libgsf vulnerabilities? | 18:39 |
| mdeslaur_ | utkarsh2102: code exec when opening a file in gnome...kind of bad, but it can wait until after release if it's too much for now | 18:44 |
| utkarsh2102 | $ seeded-in-ubuntu libgsf | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | gir1.2-gsf-1 (from libgsf) is seeded in: | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | kubuntu: supported | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | ubuntu-budgie: supported | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | ubuntu: supported | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | libgsf-1-114 (from libgsf) is seeded in: | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | edubuntu: daily-live, daily-preinstalled | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | kubuntu: supported | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | ubuntu-budgie: daily-live | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | ubuntu: daily-live, daily-preinstalled | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | ubuntucinnamon: daily-live | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | libgsf-1-common (from libgsf) is seeded in: | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | edubuntu: daily-live, daily-preinstalled | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | kubuntu: supported | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | ubuntu-budgie: daily-live | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | ubuntu: daily-live, daily-preinstalled | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | ubuntucinnamon: daily-live | 18:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | libgsf-1-dev (from libgsf) is seeded in: | 18:45 |
| mdeslaur_ | yeah, it's going to be everywhere | 18:46 |
| mdeslaur_ | you can delete it from the queue if it's too late, just let me know and I'll prepare it as an update | 18:47 |
| mdeslaur_ | utkarsh2102: in fact, please remove it | 18:48 |
| utkarsh2102 | mdeslaur_: thank you! i'll do that | 18:48 |
| mdeslaur_ | utkarsh2102: thanks | 18:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted edk2 [source] (oracular-proposed) [2024.05-2ubuntu0.1] | 18:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libgsf [source] (oracular-proposed) [1.14.52-1ubuntu1] | 18:50 | |
| vorlon | respins coming for a late libreoffice accept | 19:55 |
| vorlon | desktop flavors respinning, except for Ubuntu amd64, which is still waiting for TPM FDE fix | 19:58 |
| dbungert | vorlon: I believe the TPMFDE part is ready | 19:58 |
| vorlon | not yet | 19:58 |
| vorlon | according to apw the final snap hasn't been spun yet | 19:58 |
| vorlon | "apw: ubuntu-core-initramfs is now published in the build environment so we are respinning linux-signed, which will then get signed, and then we can make snaps from it." | 19:58 |
| dbungert | we did a revert of pc-kernel 24.10/stable to a build using 6.8, which the London crew wanted to try | 19:59 |
| vorlon | this is a proper, correct fix using 6.11 and all packages from oracular | 19:59 |
| dbungert | OK | 19:59 |
| vorlon | the problem was tracked down to the systemd vs systemd-cryptsetup split, the cryptsetup bits were missing from the initramfs | 19:59 |
| vorlon | apw: some new linux-runtime binaries that aren't seeded: demote or seed? https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/component-mismatches.html | 20:30 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected squid [source] (noble-proposed) [6.10-0ubuntu0.24.04.1] | 21:27 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!