| === guiverc2 is now known as guiverc | ||
| arraybolt3 | ubuntu-release: ^ fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares-settings-ubuntu/+bug/2084001, this can't wait until after release since it's in the instalelr and this potentially messes up users of several non-English languages. It also is a fairly silent failure so it's hard to realize anything even went wrong or what. This will mandate a respin of klünitybuntu, thankfully | 04:46 |
|---|---|---|
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2084001 in calamares-settings-ubuntu (Ubuntu) "fixconkeys-part1 malfunctions if more than one keyboard layout is active at once at installation time" [Undecided, New] | 04:46 | |
| arraybolt3 | Ubuntu Unity isn't that far along in testing and Lubuntu's impact isn't going to be horrible (and what impact thereis I can help with). Kubuntu... is going to be hit pretty hard. I'm willing to take on all the retesting there if necessary since I think this is important. | 04:46 |
| arraybolt3 | erm, I sent that before the line showed up | 04:46 |
| arraybolt3 | and great, someone else did an upload behind my back so the upload I just did failed. Sigh, grumble, moan... | 04:47 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calamares-settings-ubuntu (oracular-proposed/universe) [1:24.10.5 => 1:24.10.6] (lubuntu, ubuntustudio) | 05:19 | |
| arraybolt3 | ubuntu-release: ^ there, finally did the upload I described just above | 05:20 |
| tjaalton | rbasak: hi, could you maybe check ubuntu-drivers-common on jammy queue early on your day? | 07:00 |
| utkarsh30 | arraybolt3: sorry, can you gimme a bit more context? | 07:31 |
| === utkarsh30 is now known as utkarsh2102 | ||
| utkarsh2102 | looking at 2084001 | 07:32 |
| utkarsh2102 | arraybolt3: oh, I have the context in the scrollback | 07:34 |
| utkarsh2102 | ok, will look through this | 07:35 |
| utkarsh2102 | and I note that {k,l,unity}ubuntu will need to be respun | 07:35 |
| utkarsh2102 | arraybolt3: are you around right now? | 07:42 |
| RikMills | utkarsh2102: they are in the USa so may have gone to sleep | 07:44 |
| RikMills | though people in IT keep weird hours ;) | 07:44 |
| sil2100 | RikMills: heey, so we wanted to know more about LP: #2084001 | 07:45 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2084001 in calamares-settings-ubuntu (Ubuntu) "fixconkeys-part1 malfunctions if more than one keyboard layout is active at once at installation time" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2084001 | 07:45 | |
| RikMills | sil2100: no more than you do. just woke up to it | 07:45 |
| utkarsh2102 | heh | 07:45 |
| sil2100 | RikMills: so arraybolt3 uploaded a fix for it into the queue and requested a respin, mentioning it as a release blocker. I just was curious if this is something that regressed in oracular? Did something change in how calamares works? Or something in setxkbmap -query? | 07:45 |
| sil2100 | RikMills: do you know from the Kubuntu POV? | 07:46 |
| RikMills | sil2100: to be honest, I have not had much to do with getting calameres working for kubuntu.last release or this | 07:47 |
| RikMills | and I have not tested a non uk-english install | 07:47 |
| RikMills | myself | 07:47 |
| sil2100 | RikMills: do you by any chance know which strings to pull to maybe know more? ;) Looking to know more since I'd like to make a call about the fix in the queue | 07:48 |
| sil2100 | As it would lead to respinning the 3 calamares flavors | 07:48 |
| utkarsh2102 | sil2100: I pinged the flavor leads in Matrix | 07:48 |
| utkarsh2102 | all the 3 flavors^ | 07:48 |
| utkarsh2102 | sgmoore is probably around | 07:48 |
| sil2100 | Thank you | 07:48 |
| utkarsh2102 | and rs20096 should be, too | 07:49 |
| RikMills | yes | 07:49 |
| RikMills | however, the people who are very familiar with the interals are all USA based, so may not be responding quickly | 07:50 |
| RikMills | I hope to be wrong there | 07:50 |
| utkarsh2102 | RikMills: yes but we're _hoping_ someone just does :) | 07:53 |
| RikMills | indeed | 07:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dotnet9 (oracular-proposed/universe) [9.0.100-9.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu2 => 9.0.100-9.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 08:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dotnet9 [source] (oracular-proposed) [9.0.100-9.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1] | 08:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dotnet8 (oracular-proposed/main) [8.0.108-8.0.8-0ubuntu3 => 8.0.110-8.0.10-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 08:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dotnet8 [source] (oracular-proposed) [8.0.110-8.0.10-0ubuntu1] | 08:41 | |
| bdrung | utkarsh2102, the tzdata upload was meant as 0-day SRU | 08:46 |
| utkarsh2102 | bdrung: oh, right, okay | 08:46 |
| utkarsh2102 | can you please re-upload with a LP bug | 08:46 |
| bdrung | the LP bug is referenced in 2024b-1ubuntu1 (included in the changes) - since that did not migrate yet. Is that enough? | 08:47 |
| rbasak | tjaalton: ack, though not starting my SRU shift for a few hours yet. I've been pre-empted by some other work :-/ | 08:49 |
| tjaalton | okya | 08:49 |
| tjaalton | -ay | 08:49 |
| tjaalton | probably doesn't matter anyway | 08:49 |
| rbasak | I was going to ask if you needed this sooner, but I guess not then? | 08:50 |
| utkarsh2102 | rbasak: whilst we have you here, there's a DMB vote waiting for you | 08:50 |
| utkarsh2102 | bdmurray: sameeeeeeeeeeeee | 08:51 |
| rbasak | That's also on my list :-/ | 08:51 |
| tjaalton | well, the tester is in .tw I think, so it's EOD already | 08:51 |
| utkarsh2102 | bdrung: oh sure, i didn't see any LP reference in the changes file. perhaps missed it. but if it was there, then sure!!! | 08:51 |
| bdrung | utkarsh2102, okay. re-uploaded | 08:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (oracular-proposed/main) [2024b-1ubuntu1 => 2024b-1ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist) | 08:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected yt-dlp [sync] (oracular-proposed) [2024.10.07-1] | 08:54 | |
| utkarsh2102 | bdrung: thanks, can confirm the LP bug in the .changes file now | 08:55 |
| bdrung | the changes file hasn't changed :) | 08:55 |
| utkarsh2102 | yeah, likely me not seeing it properly earlier :) | 08:56 |
| utkarsh2102 | also, there was no communication before or perhaps I missed that, too? | 08:56 |
| utkarsh2102 | anyway, we're all good for now | 08:56 |
| ginggs | bdrung: maybe you want to build with -v2024a-4ubuntu1 so both changelogs entries are in the .changes for SRU | 08:57 |
| bdmurray | If it's a Release day SRU (new name) please update the release tracking status | 08:58 |
| bdmurray | bdrung: Also we were previously seeing autopkgtest failures with tzdata. Are those sorted? | 08:58 |
| bdrung | bdmurray, the new upload should address all those failures. To verify I just uploaded for oracular before doing the same for the older releases | 08:59 |
| RikMills | sil2100: utkarsh2102 lubuntu also has this issue LP: #2084016 | 09:07 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2084016 in plasma-discover (Ubuntu) "lubuntu oracular live - plasma discover fails to run" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2084016 | 09:07 | |
| RikMills | which seems to be an issue in how lubuntu are using the kvantum Qt6 theme | 09:08 |
| utkarsh2102 | RikMills: ...and no fix? :o | 09:09 |
| bdmurray | RikMills: What is plasma discover used for and how is it important? | 09:12 |
| RikMills | utkarsh2102: reporter said they will be back having a look in an hr or 2 (on lubuntu-dev matrix) | 09:13 |
| RikMills | bdmurray: it is the KDE software store. lubuntu uses it as their default as well | 09:13 |
| RikMills | https://apps.kde.org/en-gb/discover/ | 09:14 |
| RikMills | pretty essential | 09:14 |
| RikMills | working fine on Kubuntu FTR | 09:15 |
| Skia | utkarsh2102: sil2100: I've commented with my findings on LP: #2084001 | 09:23 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2084001 in calamares-settings-ubuntu (Ubuntu) "fixconkeys-part1 malfunctions if more than one keyboard layout is active at once at installation time" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2084001 | 09:23 | |
| xnox | hello | 09:34 |
| xnox | sil2100: let me know when there is new respin to retest x13s and i can do that; and if you want me to look into custom seeding snaps for image build purposes also let me know cause i believe there is a way to construct whichever revisions you want. | 09:35 |
| Skia | oh, hello there :-) | 09:37 |
| bdmurray | xnox: I believe the arm64 images were respun overnight | 09:38 |
| xnox | ack | 09:39 |
| bdmurray | yes, there is one from 03:50 | 09:39 |
| xnox | will retest to confirm mate's bug report | 09:39 |
| utkarsh2102 | oh hello, hello xnox o/ | 09:52 |
| guiverc | bdmurray, plasma discover is the kde package manager; to me its not a [lubuntu] blocker & can be fixed post-release in my view; but I'm no dev | 10:02 |
| xnox | added comments at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/2083919 | 10:03 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2083919 in livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu) "Oracular Oriole ARM64 ISO + install has boot console showing on serial port only" [Critical, Fix Committed] | 10:03 | |
| xnox | the console=tty0 seems to be set before '---' meaning that setting is not copied into the installed system | 10:03 |
| xnox | mwhudson: cpete ^^^^ | 10:04 |
| xnox | also juergh ^^^^ | 10:05 |
| bdmurray | Can anybody see bug 2084019 which was reported to the ISO tracker? | 10:10 |
| Skia | bdmurray: I can't | 10:11 |
| bdmurray | Lets see if we can figure out who reported it. | 10:11 |
| xnox | or ask launchpad ops as to what the sharing settings on it are? or ask them to force subscribe ubuntu-release to it? | 10:12 |
| bdmurray | Looks like it was r41k0u | 10:12 |
| bdmurray | https://launchpad.net/~r41k0u | 10:13 |
| bdmurray | I'm respinning Ubuntu Desktop arm64. | 11:06 |
| === schopin_ is now known as schopin | ||
| bdmurray | the arm64 image has been respun | 13:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-12 (noble-proposed/universe) [12.3.0-17ubuntu1 => 12.4.0-2ubuntu1~24.04] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 13:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-12-cross (noble-proposed/universe) [19ubuntu2 => 19ubuntu2.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 13:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-12-cross-ports (noble-proposed/universe) [17ubuntu2 => 17ubuntu2.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 13:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-12-cross-mipsen (noble-proposed/universe) [4+c1build1 => 4+c1build2] (no packageset) (sync) | 13:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11 (noble-proposed/universe) [11.4.0-9ubuntu1 => 11.5.0-1ubuntu1~24.04] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) | 13:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11-cross (noble-proposed/universe) [21ubuntu2 => 21ubuntu3.2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync) | 13:30 | |
| mfo | rbasak, hi Robie o/ if you still have SRU cycles, could you please check manila in noble/jammy-unapproved? Thanks! | 13:30 |
| bdmurray | mfo: I'm around this week | 13:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11-cross-ports (noble-proposed/universe) [18ubuntu2 => 18ubuntu2.1] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 13:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11-cross-mipsen (noble-proposed/universe) [6+c1+nmu1ubuntu1 => 6+c1+nmu1ubuntu1.1] (no packageset) (sync) | 13:33 | |
| mfo | bdmurray, hey Brian o/ Thank you. Just FYI, anything different this week? IIRC your vanguard shift is on Tuesdays :) | 13:34 |
| mfo | s/FYI/FMY/ | 13:34 |
| bdmurray | mfo: I'm at the release sprint this week so I have some more time available. | 13:36 |
| mfo | bdmurray, ah, ok, cool | 13:36 |
| bdmurray | Its a one off thing. | 13:36 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (jammy-proposed/main) [0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 0.107.1-3ubuntu0.22.04.2] (core) | 15:00 | |
| slyon | danilogondolfo: ^ | 15:00 |
| danilogondolfo | slyon, ack, thanks | 15:01 |
| arraybolt3 | ubuntu-release: btw I'm around on IRC now | 15:09 |
| arraybolt3 | The exact details of the bug are it's not a regression. | 15:10 |
| Skia | arraybolt3: could you please review the comment I added on your bug, and assess whether or not it's the same issue that you were experiencing? | 15:10 |
| arraybolt3 | It's something broken in Noble and still broken in Oracular. | 15:10 |
| arraybolt3 | sure | 15:10 |
| arraybolt3 | Skia: That's a related bug, but not one that this upload fixes. | 15:11 |
| arraybolt3 | Fixing that bug requires being aware of which layout in multiple layouts is active. | 15:11 |
| Skia | yes, okay | 15:12 |
| arraybolt3 | And that's not something that can be done without custom C code, which is far too invasive. | 15:12 |
| arraybolt3 | But imagine that the default layout setup was ma,us there | 15:12 |
| arraybolt3 | in that instance you'd install normally without switching keyboard layout, and encryption would not work. | 15:12 |
| arraybolt3 | Because the Cala code I wrote doesn't know how to handle ma,us or us,ma, it just errors out and does nothing. | 15:12 |
| arraybolt3 | So the fix is to just add a "cut" command that grabs the first keyboard layout. | 15:12 |
| arraybolt3 | That prevents that scenario. | 15:13 |
| arraybolt3 | The goal is to make it so that at least if the user uses all of the defaults, it doesn't break badly. If they do things like switching keyboard layouts around, and it breaks, that's unfortunate but not something that can be fixed. But at least using the installer "normally" shouldn't break. | 15:14 |
| arraybolt3 | and yes this is horribly late, I only learned about this bug very recently because it broke a different distro I work on at my dayjob. | 15:14 |
| arraybolt3 | Which is why I'm volunteering to suffer the testing workload because this is going to be really disruptive to people and it's ultiamtely my fault. | 15:15 |
| Skia | and do Unity and Kubuntu agree with this? I guess this is the main concern of the release team, because all of them would need a respin | 15:16 |
| arraybolt3 | I have pinged Kubuntu, have not pinged Unity. | 15:16 |
| bdmurray | arraybolt3: Could you add these additional details to the bug report so they are on the "permanent record" rather than in some IRC logs? | 15:17 |
| arraybolt3 | Sure, as soon as I have breathing roolm | 15:17 |
| arraybolt3 | *room | 15:18 |
| arraybolt3 | (trying to start a kernel build right this second) | 15:18 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: squid (noble-proposed/main) [6.6-1ubuntu5.1 => 6.10-0ubuntu0.24.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 15:24 | |
| bdmurray | rs20096: Have you seen bug 2084001 and would you want to respin for it? | 15:24 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2084001 in calamares-settings-ubuntu (Ubuntu Oracular) "fixconkeys-part1 malfunctions if more than one keyboard layout is active at once at installation time" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2084001 | 15:24 | |
| bdmurray | For the record the release team's advice would be not to respin for this given that it is not a regression and taking into consideration where we are in the release cycle. | 15:26 |
| bdmurray | Additionally, given where are at in the release process (T-1 Day) bugs being fixed should be of SRU quality. Actually, bugs should be of SRU quality a couple of days before today. | 15:28 |
| arraybolt3 | Not challenging that, but I believe there was also an exception for installer code that couldn't be changed after release? I suppose it's because this doesn't qualify as release-critical. | 15:28 |
| arraybolt3 | (it isn't really, it's just potentially severely annoying for some users) | 15:29 |
| bdmurray | If a release note were to be written for this what would the note be? i.e. think about how people could work around it - install with one keyboard layout and then change it? | 15:29 |
| arraybolt3 | yeah, that would work | 15:30 |
| arraybolt3 | To be clear, when I first started fixing this bug I had originally thought it caused an installer crash. It doesn't, but it did in a different distro that used a slightly different setup. | 15:30 |
| arraybolt3 | That's why I was initially "we have to fix this NOW aaa!" But then in testing I saw it didn't cause a crash. | 15:30 |
| arraybolt3 | At that point I thought it was still work respinning, but going through the rationale I'm doubting that at this point. | 15:31 |
| arraybolt3 | s/work/worth/ | 15:31 |
| arraybolt3 | so tl;dr: if the RT believes this isn't worth a respin, then that's fine by me. If flavor leads accept it and it results in a respin, I'll soak as much of the damage from that as possible. | 15:31 |
| arraybolt3 | really the more I think about it the more I feel like this is probably a bad idea. bdmurray I know I uploaded the fix, but if I -1 a respin at this time is that weird? | 15:35 |
| RikMills | If this can be in release notes for people doing non default options install, then I would say do that and do not re-spin | 15:35 |
| RikMills | ^^ sgmoore ? | 15:35 |
| arraybolt3 | since having this conversation is making me *really* think this isn't critical like I thought it was last night. | 15:35 |
| bdmurray | arraybolt3: It is not weird at all to have second thoughts and want to -1 it. Taking a step back and reconsidering things is always important. | 15:36 |
| arraybolt3 | then I think that's best for Lubuntu at least. If both sgmoore and rs20096 veto it, then I'll go along with a respin, but assuming they don't (and I find it very likely they won't), I'm -1 on a respin. | 15:38 |
| rbasak | tjaalton: I reviewed bug 2083657 but note that most of my review isn't really SRU-specific and more general review points. I'm not even that confident with the specifics. Do we need a reviewer more familiar with this area? | 15:39 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2083657 in OEM Priority Project "Remove oem-flavour.cfg for the OEM kernel retirement" [Critical, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2083657 | 15:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-drivers-common [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:0.9.6.2~0.22.04.8] | 15:40 | |
| tjaalton | rbasak: I don't know who that might be, but I'll answer to the points that I can | 15:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted manila [source] (noble-proposed) [1:18.0.1-0ubuntu2.1] | 15:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12 [sync] (noble-proposed) [12.4.0-2ubuntu1~24.04] | 16:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted manila [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:14.1.1-0ubuntu1.1] | 16:06 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12-cross [sync] (noble-proposed) [19ubuntu2.1] | 16:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-12-cross-ports [sync] (noble-proposed) [17ubuntu2.1] | 16:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gcc-12-cross-mipsen [sync] (noble-proposed) [4+c1build2] | 16:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11 [sync] (noble-proposed) [11.5.0-1ubuntu1~24.04] | 16:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross [sync] (noble-proposed) [21ubuntu3.2] | 16:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross-ports [sync] (noble-proposed) [18ubuntu2.1] | 16:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross-mipsen [sync] (noble-proposed) [6+c1+nmu1ubuntu1.1] | 16:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdb (noble-proposed/main) [15.0.50.20240403-0ubuntu1 => 15.1-1ubuntu1~24.04] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync) | 16:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-18 (noble-proposed/main) [1:18.1.3-1ubuntu1 => 1:18.1.8-9ubuntu1~24.04] (i386-whitelist) (sync) | 16:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bpftrace (noble-proposed/main) [0.20.2-1ubuntu4 => 0.20.2-1ubuntu4.2] (no packageset) (sync) | 16:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdb [sync] (noble-proposed) [15.1-1ubuntu1~24.04] | 16:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: malcontent (noble-proposed/universe) [0.11.1-1build4 => 0.12.0-0ubuntu0.24.04] (ubuntu-budgie, xubuntu) | 16:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-18 [sync] (noble-proposed) [1:18.1.8-9ubuntu1~24.04] | 16:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bpftrace [sync] (noble-proposed) [0.20.2-1ubuntu4.2] | 16:46 | |
| === fuseteam1 is now known as fuseteam | ||
| === fuseteam1 is now known as fuseteam | ||
| Eickmeyer | Ubuntu Studio is ready | 17:58 |
| Eickmeyer | And now all of Edubuntu is ready. | 18:24 |
| utkarsh58 | nice | 18:26 |
| utkarsh58 | that's super | 18:26 |
| utkarsh58 | Eickmeyer: marked so? | 18:27 |
| Eickmeyer | Yes. | 18:27 |
| utkarsh58 | lovely!!! | 18:27 |
| === utkarsh58 is now known as utkarsh2102 | ||
| RikMills | as currently we are not respinning kubuntu/lubuntu or unity, I will mark Kubuntu as ready | 18:27 |
| utkarsh2102 | super! | 18:27 |
| Eickmeyer | Now I have an announcement to write for Studio. amypenguin will write for Edubuntu tonight, and I'll update the discord link. | 18:27 |
| utkarsh2102 | \o/ | 18:28 |
| RikMills | done | 18:28 |
| === tomreyn_ is now known as tomreyn | ||
| arraybolt3 | FYI for those who are wondering, rs20096 responded to the situation with the keyboard layout bug in Calamares-based flavors and also -1'd the respin, so we are officially in "no respin territory" for that bug. | 19:40 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: paramiko (noble-proposed/main) [2.12.0-2ubuntu4 => 2.12.0-2ubuntu4.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | 20:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: paramiko (jammy-proposed/main) [2.9.3-0ubuntu1.2 => 2.9.3-0ubuntu1.3] (ubuntu-desktop) | 20:24 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!