/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/10/17/#ubuntu-release.txt

=== pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk
bdmurrayI seem to recall xnox having opinions about when EoL dates should be04:51
bdmurrayWell thinking more tumbleweed and I might have discussed it around when validate-csv-data was updated04:58
RikMillshttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/plucky08:52
RikMills\o/08:52
SkiaWe're in a call making good progress. We're now at a step where we wait for Launchpad to copy stuff, so everything is still frozen. We'll communicate here when everything is done.09:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: llvm-toolchain-19 (noble-proposed/primary) [1:19.1.1-1ubuntu1~24.04.1]09:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 7942 entries have been added or removed09:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apt (oracular-proposed/main) [2.9.8 => 2.9.8ubuntu0.1] (core, i386-whitelist)10:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (oracular-proposed/main) [0.62 => 0.62ubuntu0.1] (core)10:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (noble-proposed/main) [0.60ubuntu0.1 => 0.60ubuntu0.2] (core)10:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (jammy-proposed/main) [0.52ubuntu0.7 => 0.52ubuntu0.8] (core, i386-whitelist)10:46
gansobdmurray: hi! could you please re-review https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2069125 when you have a minute?  I have added a comment with the details. Thanks in advance!10:50
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2069125 in Ubuntu Cloud Archive bobcat "[SRU] Manila driver error with ONTAP SVM-scoped user" [Undecided, Incomplete]10:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (focal-proposed/main) [0.43ubuntu1.16 => 0.43ubuntu1.17] (core, i386-whitelist)10:53
juliankubuntu-sru please reject apt/oracular; it fails autopkgtests on ppc64el, valgrind has discovered some uninitialized reads of size 8 on that architecture11:21
apwjuliank, looking11:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apt [source] (oracular-proposed) [2.9.8ubuntu0.1]11:25
seb128juliank, ^11:25
juliankthanks seb12811:25
seb128apw, sorry, I just did it before your post11:25
juliankraces11:25
juliank:D11:25
apw(heh that explains why it isn't there :) )11:25
juliankNow I need to run the tests on ppc64el manually with dbgsym in there11:25
juliankI think gcc is misoptimizing something there11:26
parideandersson123, on https://code.launchpad.net/~andersson123/britney/britney/+merge/474686, do we have a bug that is fixed by calling timeout?12:24
parideandersson123, or any reference for prior discussion?12:24
paride*to12:24
parideandersson123, oh, I see we use timeout in the same way somewhere else in the script12:34
parideI guess that's fine12:34
tsimonq2o/ good morning :)13:14
tsimonq2I'll be keeping a close eye on things, but I'm up to 13 packages ready for Plucky. Let me know when I can release the floodgates.13:14
tsimonq2Mostly Qt 6 porting and codename updates, etc.13:14
tsimonq2I haven't been able to get Lintian tests to pass yet, though, and it's FTBFS in oracular-proposed, so I'll continue work on that.13:15
tsimonq2This is the tail of the Lintian test failures, if anyone has ideas: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/S8Fx8BHytx/ - 2.119.0/oracular fails, 2.119.0ubuntu1/oracular fails, 2.119.0/sid succeeds, so it's likely due to something in either our dpkg delta or our debhelper delta.13:18
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: ^13:18
tsimonq2For Qt 6 porting, I have: 2048-qt, kpmcore, partitionmanager, calamares, calamares-settings-ubuntu, software-properties, and usb-creator. For codename updates, I have: vim, calamares-settings-ubuntu. For misc bugfixes I have lxqt-sudo.13:20
tsimonq2debhelper merge is also done locally, and yeah, when testing lintian against it, I still get the test errors.13:20
ginggstsimonq2: cpete was looking at lintian / debhelper maybe they can share something when they wake up13:21
tsimonq2Thanks!13:22
RikMillstsimonq2: I will also be preparing the Qt 6.7.2 transition. you may want to check if any of your Qt6 porting has picked up Qt6 private-abi deps13:24
RikMillsI doubt it, but......13:24
tsimonq2devscripts is in sync, debootstrap is merged with the latest Debian revision, base-files does need a merge.13:25
tsimonq2RikMills: Sounds good!13:25
tsimonq2software-properties-qt and usb-creator are simply PyQt, so I highly doubt anything will go wrong there. partitionmanager, kpmcore, and calamares are an unlikely maybe, although I didn't see anything related when updating symbols.13:26
tsimonq2In an ideal world, today I'll get to ubuntu-release-upgrader-qt so we can get PyQt5 completely off the ISO.13:27
tsimonq2(Lubuntu ISO, no idea about Kubuntu(Studio)13:27
tsimonq2)13:27
tsimonq2cpete: Turns out, LocutusOfBorg has a working lintian merge here :Phttps://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+packages13:31
tsimonq2* https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+packages13:31
tsimonq2I'll test that to see if it builds etvc13:31
tsimonq2RikMills: By the way, let me know where/when you get to Qt 6.7.2. I'll be happy to lend a hand.13:35
tsimonq2https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/software-properties/+git/software-properties/+merge/475261 - if anyone has thoughts on the software-properties portion, I'm all ears. If I don't hear anything, since I tested it and it works in a fresh environment, I'll go ahead with it.13:36
RikMillstsimonq2: I already did the transition for oracular in a ci-train ppa. It just needs copying to to plucky in the ppa, doing a final build against plucky archive, then copying to the main archive13:37
RikMillsso hopefully should be straight forward13:37
tsimonq2Awesome. ginggs etc do we know of any Compiler Fun happening early this cycle?13:38
ginggstsimonq2: i don't think so13:39
ginggspython's an interpreter, not a compiler, right? :)13:39
tsimonq2:D okay I'll keep an eye out for Python Fun, thanks :)13:41
tsimonq2https://docs.python.org/3.13/whatsnew/3.13.html#porting-to-python-3-1313:47
ahasenackoh gosh, what are they dropping this time13:51
tsimonq2Surprisingly... not a lot.13:53
jamespageahasenack: I was bout about to ask about libreoffice/boost/autopkgtest but I can see you just kicked it again14:20
ahasenackthe amd64 test run seems stale/stuck, I triggered it again, and crossing fingers14:20
ahasenackall of the dep8 tests were in bad shape yesterday :(14:21
ahasenackthousands failed14:21
jamespagehandy14:21
jamespageah - I see that test takes ~5hrs typically...14:21
ahasenackamazing how ceph can become entangled with openoffice14:21
jamespagewell we all love boost :)14:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: exim4 (noble-proposed/main) [4.97-4ubuntu4.1 => 4.97-4ubuntu4.2] (ubuntu-server)14:28
=== pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk
sudipplucky builds are working in ppa \o/15:02
sudipis it ok to upload now?15:02
Skiaautopkgtest is not ready yet, so britney cannot yet be enabled15:03
mitya57Hi! Please reject far2l updates in both noble and oracular queues. Upstream found a bug in one of the patches, it needs to be amended.15:03
tsimonq2cpete: Lintian still FTBFS on tests with LocutusOfBorg's version, do you have any insight?15:06
sudipack, thanks Skia. I will wait then :)15:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (plucky-proposed/main) [24.10.27 => 25.04.1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)15:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: 2048-qt (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.1.6-2build4 => 0.1.6-2ubuntu1] (lubuntu)15:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calamares (plucky-proposed/universe) [3.3.8-0ubuntu1 => 3.3.9-0ubuntu1] (lubuntu, ubuntustudio)15:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debconf-kde (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1build3 => 1.1.0-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)15:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kpmcore (plucky-proposed/universe) [23.08.5-0ubuntu3 => 24.08.2-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)15:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debhelper (plucky-proposed/main) [13.18ubuntu2 => 13.20ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)15:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-artwork (plucky-proposed/universe) [24.10.4 => 25.04.1] (lubuntu)15:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxqt-sudo (plucky-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.0.0-0ubuntu2] (lubuntu)15:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: partitionmanager (plucky-proposed/universe) [23.08.5-0ubuntu4 => 24.08.2-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)15:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (plucky-proposed/main) [0.102 => 0.104] (core)15:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usb-creator (plucky-proposed/main) [0.3.17 => 0.4.0] (ubuntu-desktop)15:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vim (plucky-proposed/main) [2:9.1.0496-1ubuntu6 => 2:9.1.0777-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)16:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (plucky-proposed/main) [1:24.10.13 => 1:25.04.1] (core)16:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nm-tray (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-2ubuntu1 => 0.5.1-0ubuntu1] (lubuntu)16:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ksanecore (plucky-proposed/universe) [23.08.5-0ubuntu3 => 24.08.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)16:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libksane (plucky-proposed/primary) [24.08.2-1]16:55
tsimonq2^^ also in Debian NEW16:55
Eickmeyertsimonq2: Seems sane to me.16:58
tsimonq2hah17:01
tsimonq2skanlite needs it17:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: skanlite (plucky-proposed/universe) [23.08.5-0ubuntu4 => 24.08.2-1ubuntu1] (kubuntu)17:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debconf-kde (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1build3 => 1.1.0-1ubuntu2] (kubuntu)17:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pkg-kde-tools (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.17.1ubuntu4 => 0.18.2ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)17:14
LocutusOfBorgtsimonq2, let me check17:21
tsimonq2Whenever ubuntu-archive has a minute: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deepin-deb-installer/+bug/208482917:22
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2084829 in deepin-deb-installer (Ubuntu) "Please demote to plucky-proposed or RM" [Undecided, New]17:22
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: Thanks :)17:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (noble-proposed/main) [255.4-1ubuntu8.4 => 255.4-1ubuntu8.5] (core, i386-whitelist)17:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (jammy-proposed/main) [249.11-0ubuntu3.12 => 249.11-0ubuntu3.13] (core, i386-whitelist)18:06
ahasenackjamespage: hihi it finished in 3h31min https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libr/libreoffice/noble/amd6418:23
ahasenacklooks like the infra came back with a vengeance18:24
cpetetsimonq2, LocutusOfBorg: I'll give credit to liushuyu for helping me figure it out. tl;dr it debhelper 13.19+ should resovle the issue. I've tested the following fix and I can get lintian building again: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debhelper/-/commit/06b7eefa12a086f7ca26d51897ce1a609a6efe7718:42
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit 06b7eef in debian/debhelper "dh_lintian: Reject architecture specific overrides files for M-A: same [c14]"18:42
cpetetsimonq2: essentially debhelper was/is ignoring .ARCH config files for lintian overrides where it didn't before. From what I can tell I don't think that's an intended path for arch-specific lintian overrides in the first place but that's a separate discussion I guess.18:44
tsimonq2cpete: My rebuild against the latest version of debhelper didn't actually fix it, so I'm curious. Could have been a fluke.18:45
tsimonq2cpete: Anyway, I'd be happy to sponsor if you would like me to :)18:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debconf-kde (plucky-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1build3 => 1.1.0-1ubuntu3] (kubuntu)18:47
cpetetsimonq2: Okay I'm reading the build log you posted earlier and that's a different build failure. I got that locally too but coulnd't reproduce in a PPA so I assumed my local state was messed up in someway.18:51
cpetetsimonq2: and that would be great, thanks! I'll ping you once it's ready :)18:52
tsimonq2cpete: Heh, nice one. Will do, let me know!19:10
jamespageahasenack: epic! thanks for releasing - I'll do the Cloud Archive part as well now19:23
ahasenackjamespage: I did test without universe enabled, and also without proposed, and libboost-url was pulled in from mail as a dep19:23
ahasenackjamespage: but I'll give it another try in a while, after all the publishing is done, to confirm I don't have to release libboost19:23
ahasenacks/from mail/from main/19:24
ahasenackbut I also verified the boost builds, wrt to its own sru bug, and test-plan wise it should be ok if needed19:24
jamespagegreat19:29
jbichaubuntu-release: is it a known issue that the oracular excuses page hasn't updated since Saturday? this affects ubuntu-sru23:34

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!