[00:07] cbreak: Yes. As soon as the computer was stable, backed up the whole HD to an SSD. Panic averted. === antonispgs5 is now known as antonispgs [01:02] hello === kai1 is now known as kai [01:33] sweet, 24.10 fixed my GSP-670 bluetooth headset audio issue [01:46] where's the dell-smbios-wmi module gone in 6.11? It's what I need to ajust fan speed modes on my laptop (using smbios-thermal-ctl --set-thermal-mode= ) === cambam100561 is now known as cambam10056 === alphazone is now known as lb === hackhorn is now known as hackinghorn === Wyly7 is now known as Wyly === Wyly5 is now known as Wyly === Mibixy is now known as Mibix === pascalm1 is now known as pascalm === ancientz7 is now known as ancientz [08:58] hi all see [ 0day (xc) Our ] From Lord Jesus Christ https://youtube.com/shorts/3yWDBXQs7TY ... . How skraito communicate with Secret Governor ... . === assaaa is now known as skraitox [09:02] see how this modern technology steganography :) https://youtube.com/shorts/3yWDBXQs7TY keep on reply left and and right and turn left turn on again ... . CopyRight By Lord Jesus Christ ... . [09:03] !ot | skraitox [09:03] skraitox: #ubuntu is the Ubuntu support channel, for all Ubuntu-related support questions. Please use #ubuntu-offtopic for other topics (though our !guidelines apply there too). Thanks! [09:04] that's for ubuntu too [09:04] for your idea [09:04] lotuspsychje, [09:04] :) [09:04] see it yourself [09:04] it doesnt fit in the support channel skraitox [09:04] to hide your source code [09:06] https://imgur.com/a/zT2Q5y1 [09:06] After the latest kernel update, 24.10 version, the grub screen lost all customization, became generic, no longer saying ubuntu, says GNU/Linux instead, boot sequence shows the terminal stuff instead of the ubuntu logo but everything works normally [09:06] any ideas? [09:13] do you have any other OSes on this computer? [09:13] yea win 11 on different drive that works and boots fine too [09:13] the grub menu appearance only changed after 6.11 revision 9 got installed this morning [09:13] does /boot/grub/grub.cfg contain "menuentry 'Ubuntu'" or does it contain "menuentry 'GNU/Linux'"? [09:14] hm, I'm still on 6.11.0-8.8 here, but I see there's an update [09:16] ok, I've apt installed the -9.9 kernel [09:16] my /boot/grub/grub.cfg still has `menuentry 'Ubuntu'` [09:16] mine has GNU/Linux [09:18] and then in the fallback options it says GNU/Linux with Linux 6.11.0-8-generic etc. [09:18] I wonder if i need some custom grub customization package [09:19] can you pastebin your /etc/default/grub somewhere? [09:19] it should have a line that says [09:19] GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR=`( . /etc/os-release; echo ${NAME:-Ubuntu} ) 2>/dev/null || echo Ubuntu` [09:19] (and /etc/os-release, of course, should have a line that says NAME="Ubuntu") [09:20] I don't have /etc/default/grub is that a file? [09:20] off i go God bless the world ... . may all of Us be Count worthy to escape all thing worthy to stand against Him against that day ... . good bye friend ... . [09:21] and /etc/os-release does have that line === hornhack is now known as hackinghorn [09:23] uname -a [09:23] Linux ubuntu 6.11.0-9-generic #9-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Oct 14 13:19:59 UTC 2024 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [09:24] Hi. How do I change the startup sound in Ubuntu 24.10? [09:24] there is an option in settings to turn it off [09:25] Yes, but I meant to change it to a different sound. [09:26] i don't think that's possible to be honest but maybe someone else knows [09:28] hmmm fopr some reason the dummy grub-efi package is not installed on my system [09:29] oh no why didn't I hear the startup sound? I just rebooted, and the speakers are not muted [09:38] antonispgs: what do you mean you don't have /etc/default/grub? I'm surprised your machine boots at all tbh [09:38] yea [09:38] in etc/default there is only grub.d folder [09:38] not even a /etc/default/grub.ucf-old or something like that? [09:39] ok, to recover a lost configuration file in /etc you have to do some utter nonsense with the apt command line [09:39] ... or download the .deb and open it in an archive manager of some kind (like Midnight Commander) [09:40] https://serverfault.com/a/659211 is the command [09:40] apt -o Dpkg::Options:='--force-confmiss' install --reinstall grub-common [09:41] i fi do sudo update-grub I get this on first line Sourcing file `/etc/default/grub.d/kdump-tools.cfg' [09:42] GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="$GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT crashkernel=2G-4G:320M,4G-32G:512M,32G-64G:1024M,64G-128G:2048M,128G-:4096M" [09:42] these are contents of that kdump-tools.cfg file [09:45] yes? [09:45] same here [09:46] so you also do not have /etc/default/grub? [09:46] no, I get that in addition to Sourcing file '/etc/default/grub': https://bpa.st/PAJAC [09:46] that line Sourcing file `/etc/default/grub' is not on mine at all and of course this file does not exist [09:46] how odd [09:47] but all of your initial complaints are explained by losing /etc/default/grub [09:47] because the "Ubuntu" comes from the GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR setting [09:47] and the boot logo comes from GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash" [09:47] https://pastebin.com/A0A8X7HH [09:47] yea [09:47] you are right [09:47] so basically restore the default /etc/default/grub via apt -o Dpkg::Options:='--force-confmiss' install --reinstall grub-common and all of your problems should be fixed [09:47] should i run that command above? or do you think something else might be up after all [09:47] (you may need a sudo update-grub if the post-inst script doesn't run that for you) [09:48] I am very curious about _why_ you don't have that file [09:48] did you accidentally delete it? was there some filesystem corruption event? [09:49] ah, let me also shill some etckeeper -- amazing thing, if you know how to use git; keeps backups of all the config files in /etc in a git repo automatically whenever you apt install/remove/upgrade stuff, plus nightly commits from cron [09:49] no setup needed, just sudo apt install etckeeper and forget about it [09:49] then later you can cd /etc && sudo git log -- default/grub and see when it disappeared and what it looked like before it disappeared [09:50] or use a friendlier terminal git browser like tig [09:51] No honestly I had no issue at all kernel update happens and this happens then I couldn’t tell you if I ever had that file and whether it got deleted in that update or something [09:52] kernel update runs update-grub [09:53] update-grub takes /etc/default/grub and a few other config files and generates a new /boot/grub/grub.cfg [09:53] if you delete /etc/default/grub, nothing will noticeably change until the next time something runs update-grub and then you reboot [09:54] this is why you noticed issues after the kernel update - but the Mysterious Disappearance of a Config File could've happened at any time prior to that [09:54] I run that command and the file has not come back [09:55] https://pastebin.com/MT0dxPT2 [10:02] grub2 package is not installed [10:02] instead grub-efi is could that be it? [10:03] I have 8 packages named grub* installed here [10:04] grub-efi-amd64-signed is the most important one I guess? [10:04] dpkg -S /etc/default/grub says it doesn't belong to any package??? [10:04] so does the installer create it from whole cloth or something? [10:05] but I have a /etc/default/grub.ucf-old, which means some package does manage it [10:06] weird stuff [10:07] I see /var/lib/dpkg/info/grub-pc.postinst doing something with it [10:08] using /usr/share/grub/default/grub as a base [10:08] so, my recommendation would be: sudo apt install --reinstall grub-pc [10:09] since it's not a conffile to dpkg, then the entire -o Dpkg::Options:=--force-confmiss bit is unnecessary [10:11] ok taht seems to have brought back the missing file [10:12] but it also removed grub-efi-amd64 in the process [10:12] eeeek! [10:12] reinstall [10:12] no [10:12] it's fine? [10:12] there's grub-efi-amd64-bin [10:12] and there's grub-efi-amd64 [10:12] I have grub-pc and grub-efi-amd64-bin installed [10:12] I don't have grub-efi-amd64 installed [10:13] this is very confusing [10:13] are you on an Intel Mac? [10:14] no amd [10:14] apt show grub-efi-amd64 says 'This is a dependency package for a version of GRUB that has been built for use with the EFI-AMD64 architecture, as used by Intel Macs' [10:15] maybe it's an obsolete description, written before legacy boot was replaced by UEFI [10:15] grub-pc is for legacy boot, the -efi packages are for UEFI boot [10:15] you can have more than one installed (as I said, I have grub-pc, grub-efi-amd64-bin, grub-efi-amd64-signed, grub-efi-amd64-unsigned) [10:16] (oh and grub-pc-bin, plus misc grub-common/grub2-common/grub-gfxpayload-lists) [10:18] if i try to install grub-pc it wants to remove grub-efi and vice versa [10:19] but grub-pc did recreate that file [10:22] it's ok: grub-pc and grub-efi-amd64 conflict, but grub-pc-bin and grub-efi-amd64-bin can be installed side-by-side [10:23] it you had grub-efi-amd64 previously, better install it [10:23] possibly it has the same kind of postinst script that grub-pc does and it would've also restored your /etc/default/grub [10:23] I just happened to have grub-pc installed here on my machine [10:23] I wonder why -- older installer? did I install it manually at some point when I was preparing bootable USB drives? [10:23] i seem to remember now [10:24] right after i did that 24.10 fresh install, grub-pc was offered in synaptic as no longer needed or something [10:24] and i removed [10:24] I'm definitely not using legacy boot on this thinkpad [10:24] but since no kernel updates happened until now [10:24] it was not noticeable [10:24] hmm, could removing grub-pc remove /etc/default/grub? plausible [10:25] but you said you had grub-efi-amd64 installed instead? [10:25] all good now [10:25] yes [10:25] probnably an installer thing? what can i say [10:25] should I experiment on my primary machine meant for real work? (yes) [10:25] installing grub-efi-amd64 removes grub-gfxpayload-lists grub-pc [10:25] and i definitely have secure boot uefi enabled [10:26] but /etc/default/grub still exists [10:26] so maybe the description of grub-pc is wrong? [10:27] well, "should be the primary boot loader" etc [10:27] the grub-efi-bin package is installed as well for me [10:27] this is one of those situations where it probably only matters when you run "sudo grub-install /dev/..." [10:27] without specifying a --target=i386-pc or --target=x86_64-efi [10:28] and this never happens [10:28] well, this happens when ubuntu pushes a new grub update maybe? [10:28] it's a rare thing; installer does it once [10:28] and then kernel updates and such only regenerate grub.cfg without reinstalling grub itself [10:38] thanks for all the help mgedmin [10:39] that was a fun weird thing [10:39] I have learned new things today! [10:40] and yeah, /var/lib/dpkg/info/grub-efi-amd64.postinst does the same thing to /etc/default/grub that grub-pc.postinst did === tofran8 is now known as tofran [11:50] Hi all [11:51] Hi there! [12:34] good morning friends [12:35] welcome kut [12:36] hows your computing life [12:37] !chat | kut [12:37] kut: #ubuntu is the Ubuntu support channel, for all Ubuntu-related support questions. Please use #ubuntu-offtopic for other topics (though our !guidelines apply there too). Thanks! [12:38] ? [12:38] thats why i said computing [12:38] shouldve said ubuntu [12:39] now youve been cast to the land of off topic [12:39] this is why i lurk, my mistake [12:39] lol i was jk :D [12:39] they arent [12:40] you can say hi but asking if they need help is offtopic [12:41] logic [12:43] boo-hoo, we have enough pedantic crybabies already ...no need for any more [12:43] yeah, lotuspsychje === LanDi1 is now known as LanDi [13:22] Hello, I have an issue with "gedit", maybe someone here can help. I use it to create markdown files, but many times, when I write a title : "# something", the space in in fact "0xc2 0xa0" instead of "0x20". This is strange because it's not everytime and it' like 50/50 on the same document .. Someone know why it do this ? [13:52] Tyaku: i can't answer your question (do not know), but for what it's worth, 0xc2 0xa0 is a unicode non-breaking space character, indicating that no line break should occur at this location. [13:53] (also known as   as an HTML entity) [14:39] test [14:39] thanks for your business ubuntu [15:19] I WANT GITL [15:19] GIRL [16:13] Anyone got a good setup combo for linux in virtualbox? Been trying different OS`es, but can´t seem to get rid of the lag (and yes, guestaddition ok, vram set to 128 mb and ram cap is not an issue). I know it wont be as good as running linux as host, but still.. [16:14] distros* [17:13] hey whats up, just did a apt update; full upgrade and a dkms module is failing to compile. https://bpa.st/3DPSS [17:14] Ben64: quoting your paste: "Consult /var/lib/dkms/rtl88x2bu/5.2.4.4/build/make.log for more information" [17:16] this looks like you may be using a non ubuntu packaged module, though? [17:19] haven't installed anything outside of ubuntu [17:22] Ben64, sudo dpkg --configure -a [17:30] I have 3 terminal windows. somewhere. I get 3 choices when I Super-` but 2 of them don't show up/come forward/be visible when I select them. [17:31] I'm guessing it is because I have a different 2nd display hooked up, and these 2 windows are at some location that doesn't currently have a display [17:31] is there some way to "bring to main display" or something ? [17:33] Hello I am running a minimal installation of Ubuntu Server 24.04 i am having DNS resolution issues which is then causing issues with timedatectl and apt and after further troubleshooting I found that the DNS issues is caused by the default deny in rule that I set in nftables, what rules do I need to set to allow DNS responses in along with apt to work on the server? [17:35] System_o_Packets: it might help to post your firewall rules - how are you setting them? like I use /etc/nftables.conf [17:37] CarlFK: table inet filter { [17:37] chain input { [17:37] comment "Mac based filtering" [17:37] type filter hook input priority filter; policy drop; [17:37] ether saddr CensoredMacAddress tcp dport 2759 accept [17:37] } [17:38] System_o_Packets: poor form to paste more than 2 lines into irc [17:39] /topic says: " Pastes to https://bpa.st " [17:39] if you pasted more than just one {}, nothing after the first } made it [17:39] sorry my mistake i just saw it here is the current config https://bpa.st/AEWB4 [17:40] is it possible to create a vm that is only dm-integrity. [17:40] sudo dmsetup create integrity --table "0 204800 integrity /dev/loop0 512" [17:40] i get device-mapper: reload ioctl on eqty_rootfs (252:0) failed: Invalid argument [17:41] (rather device-mapper: reload ioctl on integrity (252:0) failed: Invalid argument) [17:42] i think i need to open an inbound rule to allow dns traffic through [17:43] but i don't know if i need to add more to allow apt to function and NTP [17:50] System_o_Packets: it's maybe not wise to start with a default deny policy for outbound traffic, if that's what you did. you will also want to allow to allow related traffic on established connections by default. [17:52] System_o_Packets: you can configure nftables to log dropped packets (only do this while setting it up), to get a better understanding of what legitimate traffic you're blocking. for a resolver example, you can look at "## Permit outbound DNS requests" in this example: https://www.firezone.dev/docs/reference/firewall-templates/nftables#base-firewall-template [17:52] but you'll need more than just that [17:54] tomreyn: ok I think i understand so what rules can i configure to allow in established connections? [17:57] System_o_Packets: i'm afraid i lack the time and energy to explain for you what others have already written in documentation that'll be better than what i could explain. [17:57] have you tried to look up some example configurations, yet? [17:58] the very page i just posted has an example for this as well, but i would assume you can find similar on official nftables documentation as well. [18:01] tomreyn: ok thanks i think i was misguided in trying to configure nftables alone with just the documentation alone i should have looked up some example configs, thankyou === skraitox is now known as skraito-0day [18:04] you're welcome [19:38] my encrypted swap no longer seems to work in 24.10 for some reason. I have in /etc/crypttab this: cswap /dev/nvme0n1p10 /dev/urandom plain,cipher=aes-xts-plain64,size=256,hash=sha256,swap which till 24.10 would add an encrypted swap space to my laptop's memory. I've seen in dmesg I'm getting timeouts with the system looking for it. There's nothing in /dev/mapper for cswap [19:38] any ideas? [19:44] mh then again something weird has happened, the partition has been renamed from p10 to p6 [19:44] going to reboot after changing crypttab === y0sh- is now known as y0sh_ [21:53] vortexx: you can, and i would recommend you do, refer to the partition by its UUID instead [22:04] so the output of this should be the second parameter, if the devname is now /dev/nvme0n1p6 (verify this first): echo UUID=$(sudo blkid -s UUID -o value /dev/nvme0n1p6) [22:05] ls -l /dev/disk/by-label/ may help there === docmax is now known as Guest9196 === docmax_ is now known as docmax [23:02] hello, I upgraded SSH recently as part of a distro upgrade (ubuntu 24.10), and now my SSHd with its custom port doesn't appear to respond to connection requests. I nmap'd localhost and did not find that custom SSH port open [23:03] Roey: Have you looked at your sshd_config to see if it possibly got reverted back? [23:04] Roey: sudo systemctl daemon-reload ; sudo systemctl restart ssh [23:04] WaV: right, so I did grep Port /etc/ssh/sshd_config, and I see the port I had originally changed it to, so there appears to be no modification there. [23:06] leftyfb: I did that. I now see the custom port open in "nmap"'s listing. However, I don't appear to get a response from the SSH server.. the cursor just hangs there, waiting [23:06] oh wiat wrong ip [23:06] one moment [23:06] Roey: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/sshd-now-uses-socket-based-activation-ubuntu-22-10-and-later/30189 [23:06] ok I got it now [23:06] leftyfb: thank you!!!!!! [23:06] just what I was looking for. === docmax_ is now known as docmax === docmax is now known as Guest5089 [23:29] leftyfb: hmm, I can do it on localhost and connect, but when I try ssh'ing from another machine, I get "ssh: connect to host w.x.z.z port NNN: Connection refuse" [23:31] Roey: check /etc/systemd/system/ssh.socket.d/listen.conf [23:31] leftyfb: one moment.. [23:32] leftyfb: yeah so it has a comment line by me saying that this is where SSH sets its port these days, and below that [Socket] and below that, nothing. [23:33] leftyfb: I wonder if it got hosed in the upgrade to ubuntu 24.10 [23:35] Roey: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/sshd-now-uses-socket-based-activation-ubuntu-22-10-and-later/30189#:~:text=behavior%20by%20running%3A-,systemctl%20disable%20%2D%2Dnow%20ssh.socket,-rm%20%2Df%20/etc === five618480339175 is now known as five61848033917 [23:35] you can just go back to the previous config as opposed to socket-based [23:35] then it'll all come from sshd_config [23:36] leftyfb: oh my bad, I do have it set in there, I wasn't looking right [23:36] leftyfb: I do have ListenStream= [23:36] so I don't know why (a) I can ssh to myself on the localhost, but (b) cannot ssh from another machine into this host, on the same port. [23:37] https://mahmoodrm.medium.com/socket-based-activation-ssh-old-linux-dogs-vs-new-systemd-tricks-656207db13c9 [23:42] leftyfb: I understand that, and thank you for this article, I will keep it and study it more. But my issue is that machine X *is* responding to ssh when I attempt to connect to it from localhost. But not when I try to connect to it from machine Y [23:44] Roey: so disable the socket config and go back to the previous ways where we're more familiar with how it all works [23:46] leftyfb: it's not the socket config [23:46] ok/? [23:46] PUT A GIRL ON [23:46] I odn't see how it'st he socket config issue. I've had this configured fine [23:46] it's just when I upgraded from ubuntu 22.04 -> 22.10, now two mahcines exhibit this behavior. [23:46] leftyfb: yes, I know about the ListenStream= and have had it configured accordingly. [23:47] PUT A GIRL ON [23:48] Roey: ( cat /etc/systemd/system/ssh.socket.d/addresses.conf ; sudo systemctl status ssh.socket ) | nc termbin.com 9999 [23:48] PUT A GIRL ON [23:49] PUT  A GIRL ON [23:49] hello Jeckoz [23:58] leftyfb: first there is no ssh.socket.d/addresses.conf; second, https://paste.debian.net/1333264/ [23:59] Roey: disable the socket https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/sshd-now-uses-socket-based-activation-ubuntu-22-10-and-later/30189#:~:text=systemctl%20disable%20%2D%2Dnow%20ssh.socket%0Arm%20%2Df%20/etc/systemd/system/ssh.service.d/00%2Dsocket.conf%0Arm%20%2Df%20/etc/systemd/system/ssh.socket.d/addresses.conf%0Asystemctl%20daemon%2Dreload%0Asystemctl%20enable%20%2D%2Dnow%20ssh.service