| === bdrung_ is now known as bdrung | ||
| mkukri | is there any documentation on how to run debian-cd locally? (asking for a friend :D) | 09:13 |
|---|---|---|
| bluca | seb128: gentle reminder on syncing policykit-1 from unstable now that plucky is open - TIA | 09:22 |
| seb128 | bluca, hey, thanks for the reminder, synced now | 09:29 |
| nteodosi | After '. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule' in a preinst, 'echo 1' prints normally but 'snap install x' no longer prints its output except for the very last line, even if I pipe it to "tr '\r' '\n'". Any idea why? | 10:29 |
| bluca | thanks! | 11:15 |
| nteodosi | Answer: Snapd changes behavior when stdin is not a terminal! | 11:21 |
| nteodosi | confmodule does some crazy redirects that surely surface this. | 11:22 |
| nteodosi | I guess that makes sense, it ends up loading the interactive debian frontend. | 11:25 |
| sudip | need some help please, "pgsql-ogr-fdw" is marked as missing build on armhf. it has dropped support for 32-bit architectures, so the build will be missing. what needs to be done for this one? | 12:28 |
| cjwatson | file bug on the package, subscribe ubuntu-archive to the bug, ask to remove the armhf binary from plucky | 12:30 |
| cjwatson | it'll need to have no reverse-dependencies, or else for those rdeps to be dealt with one way or another | 12:30 |
| sudip | thanks cjwatson | 12:33 |
| sudip | will check the rdep first | 12:33 |
| ahasenack_ | enr0n: hi, around yet? | 12:48 |
| enr0n | ahasenack_: o/ | 15:02 |
| sudip | enr0n: I have already added that change and the other delta in the libtraceevent I uploaded to experimental yesterday, | 15:33 |
| enr0n | sudip: oh great, thanks! | 15:34 |
| sudip | enr0n: have you sent that "LIBTRACEEVENT_STATIC" change to upstream? | 15:36 |
| ahasenack_ | enr0n: I added a question to the systemd sru bug | 15:44 |
| enr0n | sudip: no I have not | 15:57 |
| enr0n | ahasenack_: thanks, I will respond on the bug then | 15:57 |
| seb128 | ahasenack_, hey. could you move the malcontent SRU for noble to updates? the sru report indicates a missing build on ppc64el but that got resolved with a retry, the report just didn't update it to reflect the new status | 16:53 |
| ahasenack_ | seb128: wilco | 16:54 |
| ahasenack_ | I've stumbled upon many missing dep8 results in some srus today, and the pending report doesn't flag those | 16:54 |
| seb128 | :-( | 16:56 |
| seb128 | ahasenack_, thanks | 16:56 |
| ahasenack_ | 1800s VirtSubproc.Timeout: 1800 <-- and that too still happens | 17:20 |
| ahasenack_ | dep8 infra being flaky affects not only the devel release, but also SRUs | 17:20 |
| === ubuntu_4321 is now known as ubuntu4321 | ||
| Skia | On a related topic, I've just deployed (1h ago) some workers in a newer PS6 environment, and so far everything seems fine. That should help reduce the amount of failures that you just mentionned | 17:25 |
| Skia | I've also reduced a bit the number of workers in lcy02, the failing environment, so that it had less pressure, and will also proportionally take less jobs. | 17:25 |
| ahasenack_ | seb128: uhh, excuses noble still shows a flatpak test running, but I don't see it in the running page | 17:26 |
| * Skia signing out | 17:26 | |
| ahasenack_ | and I think we need to give excuses some time to run the ppc64el rdeps tests (malcontent itself doesn't have tests) | 17:26 |
| ahasenack_ | thanks Skia | 17:26 |
| ahasenack_ | seb128: the pending sru report is sad indeed, last run yesterday, but I need at least the excuses page to be green. I'll trigger the flatpak amd64 job that seems to be stuck in "running" | 17:27 |
| ahasenack_ | https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#malcontent specifically | 17:28 |
| ahasenack_ | seb128: do you have access to the host where the sru report is generated? | 17:32 |
| enr0n | vorlon: if you have the time, can you please address this question: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/2084251/comments/30? tl;dr, we are looking for an AA to +1/-1 the systemd SRU in oracular-proposed since it contains a Priority change, but we decided to not actually adjust the Priority for oracular | 18:08 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2084251 in systemd (Ubuntu) "LUKS not detected or prompted for on boot" [High, In Progress] | 18:08 | |
| enr0n | (and you are the AA I originally discussed this with :)) | 18:09 |
| RikMills | enr0n: I was told in #ubuntu-release that v0rlon is away, so a response to anything like that soon is unlikely | 18:41 |
| enr0n | RikMills: yes thank you, I am aware | 18:44 |
| mkukri | can someone upload this please? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bpftrace/+bug/2086104 | 19:26 |
| mkukri | athos-ribeiro please update the bug with the SRU template if you can | 19:26 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2086104 in bpftrace (Ubuntu) "bpftrace is broken on Oracular" [Critical, Confirmed] | 19:26 | |
| enr0n | mkukri: do you have a patch for plucky? Or is it not needed there? | 19:42 |
| mkukri | plucky seems to have it linked correctly | 19:43 |
| mkukri | im gonna look at the last archive build log, but local build log showed the correct link command | 19:43 |
| athos | Hey mkukri! Thanks for working on this one :) I filed most of it, and left the "Where problems could occur" section for you (who is providing the fix) or anyone driving the SRU! | 19:44 |
| athos | plucky works fine, enr0n | 19:44 |
| enr0n | athos: ack, thanks | 19:45 |
| athos | Although we may need to investigate why | 19:45 |
| mkukri | athos it's more about than it working, pre-plucky might still be mis-linked (not that we care) | 19:45 |
| mkukri | but plucky seems to look good based on the buildlog | 19:45 |
| mkukri | i also left a comment about this on an upstream bug to let them know | 19:45 |
| mkukri | *its about more | 19:45 |
| mkukri | we need some kind of test for flagging statically linked binaries like these, i suspect there are more | 19:46 |
| enr0n | mkukri: I willl try to sponsor before my EOD | 19:55 |
| mkukri | thanks | 19:58 |
| brlin | Hello all. I would like to request sponsoring the Bug #2076869 patch into Ubuntu 24.04. I've documented the SRU and have attached a debdiff, is there anything else I need to do to progress it? | 22:26 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2076869 in mutter (Ubuntu Noble) "When changing file or folder names using the Nautilus GUI, Japanese input is not possible." [Medium, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2076869 | 22:26 | |
| enr0n | brlin: I see the bug on the sponsoring report (http://sponsoring-reports.ubuntu.com/), so hopefully a patch pilot will get to it soon. If it takes a little while you can try asking a patch pilot directly during their shift (no one is patch pilot at the moment). | 22:32 |
| brlin | enr0n: Thanks for the information, I'll have it in mind. | 22:33 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!