=== bdrung_ is now known as bdrung [09:13] is there any documentation on how to run debian-cd locally? (asking for a friend :D) [09:22] seb128: gentle reminder on syncing policykit-1 from unstable now that plucky is open - TIA [09:29] bluca, hey, thanks for the reminder, synced now [10:29] After '. /usr/share/debconf/confmodule' in a preinst, 'echo 1' prints normally but 'snap install x' no longer prints its output except for the very last line, even if I pipe it to "tr '\r' '\n'". Any idea why? [11:15] thanks! [11:21] Answer: Snapd changes behavior when stdin is not a terminal! [11:22] confmodule does some crazy redirects that surely surface this. [11:25] I guess that makes sense, it ends up loading the interactive debian frontend. [12:28] need some help please, "pgsql-ogr-fdw" is marked as missing build on armhf. it has dropped support for 32-bit architectures, so the build will be missing. what needs to be done for this one? [12:30] file bug on the package, subscribe ubuntu-archive to the bug, ask to remove the armhf binary from plucky [12:30] it'll need to have no reverse-dependencies, or else for those rdeps to be dealt with one way or another [12:33] thanks cjwatson [12:33] will check the rdep first [12:48] enr0n: hi, around yet? [15:02] ahasenack_: o/ [15:33] enr0n: I have already added that change and the other delta in the libtraceevent I uploaded to experimental yesterday, [15:34] sudip: oh great, thanks! [15:36] enr0n: have you sent that "LIBTRACEEVENT_STATIC" change to upstream? [15:44] enr0n: I added a question to the systemd sru bug [15:57] sudip: no I have not [15:57] ahasenack_: thanks, I will respond on the bug then [16:53] ahasenack_, hey. could you move the malcontent SRU for noble to updates? the sru report indicates a missing build on ppc64el but that got resolved with a retry, the report just didn't update it to reflect the new status [16:54] seb128: wilco [16:54] I've stumbled upon many missing dep8 results in some srus today, and the pending report doesn't flag those [16:56] :-( [16:56] ahasenack_, thanks [17:20] 1800s VirtSubproc.Timeout: 1800 <-- and that too still happens [17:20] dep8 infra being flaky affects not only the devel release, but also SRUs === ubuntu_4321 is now known as ubuntu4321 [17:25] On a related topic, I've just deployed (1h ago) some workers in a newer PS6 environment, and so far everything seems fine. That should help reduce the amount of failures that you just mentionned [17:25] I've also reduced a bit the number of workers in lcy02, the failing environment, so that it had less pressure, and will also proportionally take less jobs. [17:26] seb128: uhh, excuses noble still shows a flatpak test running, but I don't see it in the running page [17:26] * Skia signing out [17:26] and I think we need to give excuses some time to run the ppc64el rdeps tests (malcontent itself doesn't have tests) [17:26] thanks Skia [17:27] seb128: the pending sru report is sad indeed, last run yesterday, but I need at least the excuses page to be green. I'll trigger the flatpak amd64 job that seems to be stuck in "running" [17:28] https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#malcontent specifically [17:32] seb128: do you have access to the host where the sru report is generated? [18:08] vorlon: if you have the time, can you please address this question: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/2084251/comments/30? tl;dr, we are looking for an AA to +1/-1 the systemd SRU in oracular-proposed since it contains a Priority change, but we decided to not actually adjust the Priority for oracular [18:08] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2084251 in systemd (Ubuntu) "LUKS not detected or prompted for on boot" [High, In Progress] [18:09] (and you are the AA I originally discussed this with :)) [18:41] enr0n: I was told in #ubuntu-release that v0rlon is away, so a response to anything like that soon is unlikely [18:44] RikMills: yes thank you, I am aware [19:26] can someone upload this please? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bpftrace/+bug/2086104 [19:26] athos-ribeiro please update the bug with the SRU template if you can [19:26] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2086104 in bpftrace (Ubuntu) "bpftrace is broken on Oracular" [Critical, Confirmed] [19:42] mkukri: do you have a patch for plucky? Or is it not needed there? [19:43] plucky seems to have it linked correctly [19:43] im gonna look at the last archive build log, but local build log showed the correct link command [19:44] Hey mkukri! Thanks for working on this one :) I filed most of it, and left the "Where problems could occur" section for you (who is providing the fix) or anyone driving the SRU! [19:44] plucky works fine, enr0n [19:45] athos: ack, thanks [19:45] Although we may need to investigate why [19:45] athos it's more about than it working, pre-plucky might still be mis-linked (not that we care) [19:45] but plucky seems to look good based on the buildlog [19:45] i also left a comment about this on an upstream bug to let them know [19:45] *its about more [19:46] we need some kind of test for flagging statically linked binaries like these, i suspect there are more [19:55] mkukri: I willl try to sponsor before my EOD [19:58] thanks [22:26] Hello all. I would like to request sponsoring the Bug #2076869 patch into Ubuntu 24.04. I've documented the SRU and have attached a debdiff, is there anything else I need to do to progress it? [22:26] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2076869 in mutter (Ubuntu Noble) "When changing file or folder names using the Nautilus GUI, Japanese input is not possible." [Medium, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2076869 [22:32] brlin: I see the bug on the sponsoring report (http://sponsoring-reports.ubuntu.com/), so hopefully a patch pilot will get to it soon. If it takes a little while you can try asking a patch pilot directly during their shift (no one is patch pilot at the moment). [22:33] enr0n: Thanks for the information, I'll have it in mind.