| bochecha | hi everyone, who maintains the Ubuntu images for Docker? I see there isn't one yet for Ubuntu Plucky (Devel), and I'd like to use it for my CI, to prepare for the next Ubuntu release, like I test my code in Rawhide (but allowing both to fail because neither are stable yet obviously) | 10:47 |
|---|---|---|
| cjwatson | bochecha: https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/blob/master/library/ubuntu seems to have maintainer contacts | 10:52 |
| bochecha | cool, thank you, I didn't know about this URL, I'm a Fedora dev so I know where to find these things there, but Ubuntu is a bit of a mystery to me ^^ | 10:53 |
| cjwatson | That URL is an upstream docker thing | 10:54 |
| cjwatson | And to be fair I don't know for sure, but those names sound plausible :) Cristovao at least should be able to point you in the right direction if it's not him | 10:56 |
| cjwatson | Cristóvão, sorry | 10:57 |
| bochecha | ah, a brazilian person, cool, I'll be able to brush up my Portuguese then :D | 10:59 |
| dviererbe | Random packaging question: Looking at http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/devel/main/i18n/ there are translations for the packages descriptions. How can you provide such translations for a package? | 11:50 |
| nteodosio | Didn't apt policy start reporting when a update was phasing in Ubuntu? Why don't I get that information here? http://termbin.com/cpim | 13:45 |
| nteodosio | dviererbe, https://launchpad.net/ddtp-ubuntu | 13:48 |
| nteodosio | By the way, that page has a link to http://nightmonkey.ubuntu.hu/ but it redirects to fsf.hu now... | 13:52 |
| juliank | nteodosio: Yes, your mirror is not uptodate, so the phasing update (13.7) still shows in proposed | 13:55 |
| nteodosio | You're right, after a new update it is showing now, thank you. | 13:56 |
| jchittum | bochecha : if you have an issue, you can open a bug at launchpad.net/cloud-images . That will reach a wide group that can address issues. Generally, it's maintained by a combination of Cris and the Public Cloud folks at Canonical. syncs happen monthly (that's a Docker thing, not an Ubuntu thing) | 14:27 |
| bochecha | ah, ok, thank you then | 14:28 |
| brlin | Hello all. I would like to ask whether Bug #981285 is still fixable in Ubuntu 24.04 as it seems to be a prerequisite of enabling AAC support for the bluetooth audio devices which is IMHO a highly requested feature. Also refer to https://gitlab.com/brlin/aac-bluetooth-audio-codec-on-ubuntu-2404 for additional information. | 16:32 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 981285 in MariaDB "[clang] Crash 'ha_xtradb.so' (Undefined symbol '_increment_page_get_statistics')" [Undecided, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/981285 | 16:32 | |
| brlin | Oops wrong bug, it should be Bug #1977614 instead. | 16:32 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 1977614 in fdk-aac-free (Ubuntu) "[MIR] fdk-aac-free" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1977614 | 16:33 | |
| teward | seb128: poke. | 18:45 |
| seb128 | teward, hey | 18:59 |
| teward | seb128: do you know who maintains firefox in 20.04 now? | 18:59 |
| teward | you TIL hence the poke | 18:59 |
| teward | also i saw your email I think let me know if you saw mine | 18:59 |
| teward | if not i'll have to war with microsoft again | 18:59 |
| teward | (your email to the CC) | 19:00 |
| seb128 | teward, me I guess? | 19:00 |
| seb128 | until we get a new official maintainer onboard | 19:00 |
| seb128 | teward, did you have a specific question about firefox on focal? | 19:07 |
| teward | seb128: there was one yes give me a sec to grab it from telegram | 19:07 |
| teward | > hey guys, i notice firefox is still 129 on aarch64 on 20.04. is this expected as we near EOL of focal? | 19:08 |
| teward | s/aarch64/arm64/ | 19:08 |
| teward | seb128: noticed it's FTBFS on everything except amd64 for a while so it's 'outdated' in the other archs | 19:08 |
| teward | (the complaint originated from someone in Ubuntu Flavors Support on Telegram, and i went poking) | 19:09 |
| seb128 | teward, that has been reported on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/2086685 and I replied there | 19:09 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2086685 in firefox (Ubuntu) "ftbfs since 129 on architectures other than amd64 on focal" [High, Triaged] | 19:09 | |
| teward | seb128: ack, that's what i assumed, "Not a high priority" but I promised I'd go hunting :) | 19:10 |
| seb128 | fair enough | 19:10 |
| seb128 | patches are welcome if anyone is interested in poking at the issue | 19:11 |
| seb128 | ricotz, any idea why your arm64 firefox/focal builds are working, https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/prereleases/+build/29233862 ? and not the ones we build in the security ppa... | 19:14 |
| teward | seb128: in 22.04+ it's snapped right? I thought during 22.04 cycle we decided to say "no we're not oswitching off of .deb" because FFox wanted us to move to snap *way* late in the dev cycle | 19:14 |
| teward | i know in 24.04 it's snapped | 19:14 |
| seb128 | correct, we switched for 22.04 | 19:15 |
| ricotz | seb128, llvm-18 | 19:15 |
| ricotz | seb128, there is a backport request bug for it | 19:16 |
| seb128 | ricotz, ah, right, thanks | 19:17 |
| ricotz | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-18/+bug/2078858 | 19:17 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2078858 in llvm-toolchain-18 (Ubuntu) "Backport llvm-toolchain-18 to focal for firefox" [Undecided, New] | 19:17 | |
| teward | ricotz: was that filed as an SRU type backport request or a standard backport request? | 19:17 |
| teward | because if it's backports then mapreri ddstreet and me can poke at it | 19:17 |
| teward | and by 'SRU type backport' i mean to -updates vs. -backports | 19:17 |
| ricotz | yeah, it is a SRU type backport | 19:18 |
| teward | yeah so SRU has to look at it | 19:18 |
| seb128 | teward, it neeeds to be standard SRU, we can't build the deb in the security pocket on top of backports | 19:18 |
| teward | seb128: correct, but was making sure ;) | 19:18 |
| teward | but that needs the SRU team, or Security to look at it | 19:18 |
| seb128 | the issue is not the SRU team, is having someone doing the actual work to build a package that works on focal and go through the process | 19:19 |
| teward | *whistles nonchalantly* i'm not doing anything later. do we have a source package we want me to poke/prod/stab? | 19:19 |
| seb128 | I'm guessing that the SRU team would be happy enough to let a new source in for that usecase | 19:19 |
| brlin | Will the Firefox/Chromium deb2snap packages continue to be in the archive of future Ubuntu releases? IMHO as these packages are supposed to be transitional they shouldn't remain to be in the archive after the transition period. | 19:19 |
| seb128 | brlin, they are not transitional only | 19:20 |
| brlin | seb128: Interesting, thanks for the information. | 19:20 |
| seb128 | we need a deb to provide e.g x-www-browser so other debs which require a browser don't get confused | 19:20 |
| ricotz | seb128, liushuyu-011 started to work on llvm-18 but it stalled, I had based my work on that - https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/mozilla/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=focal | 19:21 |
| ricotz | seb128, seems there is progress at https://launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/+archive/ubuntu/misc/+packages?field.name_filter=llvm&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter= | 19:22 |
| seb128 | ack, I've giving him a poke to know the status, but I expect he will not reply before next week at this point | 19:24 |
| seb128 | well, he did reply. he's waiting on sponsoring on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-18/+bug/2075477 | 19:30 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2075477 in llvm-toolchain-18 (Ubuntu) "SRU: Backport LLVM 18.1.8 to Ubuntu LTS" [Undecided, Confirmed] | 19:30 | |
| teward | seb128: actually it was already sponsored | 19:32 |
| teward | he's facing a bpftrace failure case | 19:32 |
| teward | seb128: https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#llvm-toolchain-18 | 19:32 |
| teward | autopkgtest failure for bpftrace - https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest-noble/noble/amd64/b/bpftrace/20241017_161741_8e340@/log.gz | 19:32 |
| teward | at least for Noble but i think there's known bugs on bpftrace | 19:32 |
| teward | but that's for 24.04 so i think it has to be checked earlier | 19:33 |
| teward | right now running autopkgtests blows up on my local system so i can't test those but it seems if this fails in Noble it might fail elsewhere | 19:34 |
| === JanC is now known as Guest3452 | ||
| jbicha | brlin: there isn't really more of a status update for fdk-aac than what is available on that bug. It is unlikely for fdk-aac to get into main for 24.04 LTS, but possible for a future Ubuntu release | 20:13 |
| brlin | jbicha: Thanks for the information. | 20:14 |
| teward | if i want to build autopkgtest items to work with locally with a VM (qemu), is ithere a way for me to tell the system *which* network bridge to connect to? Because I have a few and I have a dedicated one that I want to use on my system. | 22:30 |
| teward | paride: ping, if you're around | 22:54 |
| teward | paride: you're assigned for the tasks in Jammy and Noble for bug @2069957, do you mind if I take that for noble? I don't want to step on your toes if you're actively working on it (but ran into this warning problem on my end today) | 22:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!