/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/11/19/#ubuntu-devel.txt

slyon@pilot in11:45
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Oracular | Patch Pilots: slyon
enr0nahasenack: Steve commented on bug 2084251, and says that we should go ahead and release the SRU as-is.14:18
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2084251 in systemd (Ubuntu Oracular) "LUKS not detected or prompted for on boot" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/208425114:18
ahasenackenr0n: great14:18
ahasenackenr0n: released14:25
ahasenackLaunchpad encountered an internal error during the following operation: copying package systemd.  It was logged with id OOPS-14add1139384f21c2341e9106f72ec29.  Sorry for the inconvenience.14:25
* ahasenack retries14:25
mfoslyon, hi pilot o/ :) if you have a chance, could you please review/sponsor bug 2077382 comment 13 to plucky? i can sponsor to stable releases later.14:45
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2077382 in python-libmaas (Ubuntu Plucky) "[SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/207738214:45
=== dviererbe1 is now known as dviererbe
enr0nahasenack: thanks!14:48
slyonmfo: looking..14:51
mfoslyon, thanks!14:51
slyonmfo: done.15:00
slyonI'll leave SRU uploads to you, but already unsubscribed ~ubuntu-sponsors15:01
mfoslyon, awesome! yes, i can handle those. thank you o/15:01
slyon@pilot out15:31
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Oracular | Patch Pilots: N/A
lvoytek@pilot in16:01
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Oracular | Patch Pilots: lvoytek
Eickmeyerenr0n, juliank: got bug 2088363. Earlier reports appeared to be pointing at the metapackages for Ubuntu Studio, but those amounted to conflicting PPA installations. This one was completely clean, but it looks to me like the resolver was having trouble with time_t64 transitional libraries.19:39
-ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2088363 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu Studio upgrade to 24.04 fails with Could not calculate the upgrade" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/208836319:39
EickmeyerI mean, correct me if I'm wrong, just trying to triage here. :)19:40
Eickmeyerwaveform: Uh.. i can haz merge request? 😺19:41
lvoytek@pilot out20:01
=== ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Oracular | Patch Pilots: N/A
enr0nEickmeyer: IIRC Julian did have some ideas about this situation already. I cannot remember the details right now, and my brain cannot parse what the solver is doing21:24
Eickmeyerenr0n: Indeed, that's why I pinged you guys. :)21:25
sudipany idea why python-openstep-plist  does not have a i386 build but Debian has ?22:41
sudipthe first package was in Kinetic and that also did not have i38622:42
RikMillssudip: is it on our i386 whitelist?22:47
sudipsorry, no idea. where do I check that ?22:48
RikMillssudip: https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/packagesets/plucky/i386-whitelist22:50
liushuyuHi, can someone take a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/ubuntu/+source/python-argcomplete/+git/python-argcomplete/+merge/47671522:50
RikMillsa list of source LP will build i386 for22:50
RikMillsdon't see it on there, so I guess that is why22:51
sudipRikMills: yes, its not there, I guess the process to get it added is to open a bug and add archive-admins to it..22:54
RikMillssudip: yes22:57
sudipcool, thanks RikMills. I will first test it tomorrow before raising the bug :)22:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!