[11:45] @pilot in === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Oracular | Patch Pilots: slyon [14:18] ahasenack: Steve commented on bug 2084251, and says that we should go ahead and release the SRU as-is. [14:18] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2084251 in systemd (Ubuntu Oracular) "LUKS not detected or prompted for on boot" [High, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2084251 [14:18] enr0n: great [14:25] enr0n: released [14:25] Launchpad encountered an internal error during the following operation: copying package systemd. It was logged with id OOPS-14add1139384f21c2341e9106f72ec29. Sorry for the inconvenience. [14:25] * ahasenack retries [14:45] slyon, hi pilot o/ :) if you have a chance, could you please review/sponsor bug 2077382 comment 13 to plucky? i can sponsor to stable releases later. [14:45] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2077382 in python-libmaas (Ubuntu Plucky) "[SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2077382 === dviererbe1 is now known as dviererbe [14:48] ahasenack: thanks! [14:51] mfo: looking.. [14:51] slyon, thanks! [15:00] mfo: done. [15:01] I'll leave SRU uploads to you, but already unsubscribed ~ubuntu-sponsors [15:01] slyon, awesome! yes, i can handle those. thank you o/ [15:31] @pilot out === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Oracular | Patch Pilots: N/A [16:01] @pilot in === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Oracular | Patch Pilots: lvoytek [19:39] enr0n, juliank: got bug 2088363. Earlier reports appeared to be pointing at the metapackages for Ubuntu Studio, but those amounted to conflicting PPA installations. This one was completely clean, but it looks to me like the resolver was having trouble with time_t64 transitional libraries. [19:39] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Bug 2088363 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu Studio upgrade to 24.04 fails with Could not calculate the upgrade" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2088363 [19:40] I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, just trying to triage here. :) [19:41] waveform: Uh.. i can haz merge request? 😺 [20:01] @pilot out === ChanServ changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Archive: Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support) | Build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of Focal-Oracular | Patch Pilots: N/A [21:24] Eickmeyer: IIRC Julian did have some ideas about this situation already. I cannot remember the details right now, and my brain cannot parse what the solver is doing [21:25] enr0n: Indeed, that's why I pinged you guys. :) [22:41] any idea why python-openstep-plist does not have a i386 build but Debian has ? [22:42] the first package was in Kinetic and that also did not have i386 [22:47] sudip: is it on our i386 whitelist? [22:48] sorry, no idea. where do I check that ? [22:50] sudip: https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/packagesets/plucky/i386-whitelist [22:50] Hi, can someone take a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/ubuntu/+source/python-argcomplete/+git/python-argcomplete/+merge/476715 [22:50] a list of source LP will build i386 for [22:51] don't see it on there, so I guess that is why [22:54] RikMills: yes, its not there, I guess the process to get it added is to open a bug and add archive-admins to it.. [22:57] sudip: yes [22:58] cool, thanks RikMills. I will first test it tomorrow before raising the bug :)