/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2024/11/19/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed extra-cmake-modules from i386-whitelist in plucky00:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd-app (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.7.12-0ubuntu2~22.04.1 => 1.7.19-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset)01:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd-app (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.12-0ubuntu2~20.04.1 => 1.7.19-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset)01:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-version-ranges [arm64] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)05:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-version-ranges [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)05:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-version-ranges [armhf] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)05:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-version-ranges [s390x] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)05:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glosstex [arm64] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1] (no packageset)05:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glosstex [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1] (no packageset)05:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glosstex [armhf] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1] (no packageset)05:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glosstex [s390x] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1] (no packageset)05:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyvicare [amd64] (plucky-proposed/none) [2.32.0-1] (no packageset)05:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-version-ranges [amd64] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)05:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glosstex [amd64] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1] (no packageset)05:36
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-version-ranges [riscv64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)06:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glosstex [riscv64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1] (no packageset)06:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glosstex [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1]07:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glosstex [armhf] (plucky-proposed) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1]07:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glosstex [riscv64] (plucky-proposed) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1]07:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-8.4 [source] (plucky-proposed) [8.4.3-0ubuntu1]07:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-version-ranges [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [0.1.0-1]07:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-version-ranges [armhf] (plucky-proposed) [0.1.0-1]07:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-version-ranges [riscv64] (plucky-proposed) [0.1.0-1]07:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glosstex [arm64] (plucky-proposed) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1]07:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glosstex [s390x] (plucky-proposed) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1]07:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-version-ranges [arm64] (plucky-proposed) [0.1.0-1]07:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-version-ranges [s390x] (plucky-proposed) [0.1.0-1]07:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glosstex [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1]07:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-version-ranges [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed) [0.1.0-1]07:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyvicare [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [2.32.0-1]07:12
toabctlsru-team: can we move forward with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd-app/+bug/2065423 please? this blocks the public cloud team from releasing EKS Noble images07:14
-ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2065423 in docker.io-app (Ubuntu Noble) "Update AppArmor template to allow confined runc to kill containers" [Undecided, Fix Committed]07:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mysql-8.4 [armhf] (plucky-proposed/none) [8.4.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)07:23
tjaaltontoabctl: lp2040461 is unverified07:26
toabctltjaalton, what needs to be verified? noble is verified and I don't see what other series is affected.07:34
tjaaltonthis bug isn't07:44
tjaaltonand it's more than just containerd-app, the whole container stack07:45
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-firmware-nvidia-tegra [arm64] (noble-proposed) [36.4.0-20240912212859-0ubuntu1~24.04]07:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-firmware-nvidia-tegra [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [36.4.0-20240912212859-0ubuntu1~22.04]07:54
tjaaltonand it's only 6d old07:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mysql-8.4 [s390x] (plucky-proposed/universe) [8.4.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)09:41
juliankubuntu-archive can somebody reject the fwupd-efi builds in plucky? We want to try copying in the fwupd-efi builds from the build PPA instead like we did in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd-efi/1:1.4-1 - as we just signed those09:45
juliankCC mkukri ^09:45
juliankLaunchpad rejects copies while the existing builds are in unpublished state but looking back at that build it works once they are rejected09:46
apwjuliank, rejected09:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd-efi [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [1:1.7-1]09:47
juliankAlso I guess we could tweak tooling now to auto-accept fwupd-efi; there's no need to block them, signing doesn't happen in the archive anymore - then we can binary copy them to the build PPA for signing as an inverse solution :)09:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd-efi [armhf] (plucky-proposed) [1:1.7-1]09:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd-efi [arm64] (plucky-proposed) [1:1.7-1]09:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd-efi [riscv64] (plucky-proposed) [1:1.7-1]09:47
juliankapw: thanks09:47
juliankLet's see what it says for the copy-package now09:49
juliankI guess I gotta wait for the publisher run09:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mysql-8.4 [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [8.4.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)10:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mysql-8.4 [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [8.4.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)10:48
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: mofed-modules-24.10 (plucky-proposed/primary) [24.10.0.7.0.0+ds1-0ubuntu1]10:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-tegra-defaults (oracular-proposed/universe) [1.3 => 1.4~24.10] (no packageset)10:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mysql-8.4 [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [8.4.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)11:14
juliankapw: OK that did not help, I think we need to reject the source too and then that gets copied back in and doesn't conflict13:19
juliankStill easier than redoing the signing :D13:20
apwjuliank, was it copied into the signing pipeline from the archive copy?13:22
juliankapw: yeah, source copy from ubuntu to ubuntu-uefi-team/build13:22
apwjuliank, so i would expect you to be able to copy back over it, if it never built13:23
apwwhat does it say when you did it.13:23
juliankapw:  fwupd-efi 1:1.7-1 in plucky (same version has unpublished binaries in the destination archive for Plucky, please wait for them to be published before copying)13:24
juliank1:1.4-1 we seemingly rejected at the source package level too13:24
juliankLooking at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd-efi/1%3A1.4-1/+publishinghistory13:24
juliankFor 1:1.6-1 we failed to figure out what we did there, but I think this should work now13:25
juliankI don't see a difference otherwise in state between the 1.4 and 1.7 binaries13:25
apwright, but 1:1.7-1 has already been accepted13:26
apwso rejecting it has no meaning.13:26
juliankapw: oh I meant remove it :D13:27
juliankThen it will copy the same artefact back into the archive and it should stop complaining about having unpublished binaries13:27
apwwe routinely copy in sources already published in the destination to trigger builds13:27
juliankIn an optimal world we'd have the auto syncer sync fwupd-efi directly to the build PPA I suppose13:28
apwso i don't think it should care13:28
juliank Removal requested on 2023-03-10.13:28
juliankDeleted on 2023-03-10 by Steve Langasek13:28
juliankRemoved in favor of sync from signing ppa13:28
juliankAll I can say is that this seemed to work13:28
apwok, will do that and we can see if it helps.13:28
juliankI think ultimately there is a bug in Launchpad where it considers rejected binaries as waiting for approval13:28
juliankWhereas to trigger a build is different because there is no build it waits for approval of13:29
apwthat sounds believable.13:31
apwremoved.13:31
juliankapw: thanks, and it accepted my copy now13:32
* apw gives launchpad the side-eyes13:32
apwjuliank, given fwupd-efi comes from debian and contains no ubuntu signing, why can that not just drop into proposed directly13:37
apwthen you could copy that wiht binaries into the signing pipeline and add a coresponding -signed13:37
apwand then only copy in the -signed.13:38
juliankapw: that works too, I think13:42
juliankapw: Kind of needs an auto-accept bot13:42
juliankBecause all signing tarballs still land in unapproved and it builds them13:42
juliankBut we don't actually sign anymore or rather reject the signed binaries with the old archive key automatically13:43
juliankSo having the binaries go through unapproved is just unnecessary work13:43
apwjuliank, we moved to a "generate" model for all of our signed packages13:43
apwto avoid this very issue.  and the signing pipeline understands this model.13:43
juliankapw: how does that work?13:44
apwjuliank, rather than foo producing the signing tarball, we have a third (middle) package which consume foo and produces the custom-binary upload, and signed consumes that in the normal way13:45
apwand signing knows that generate is only needed through the signing pipeline, and not published out the end.13:45
apwfoo -> foo-generate -> foo-signed13:46
juliankhmm13:46
juliankI'd love if the tooling could generate the generate package itself from the Vcs :D13:47
juliank(and the signed package fwiw)13:47
apwjuliank, we have something to do that too; modelled on the signed-template support13:47
juliankSo you upload fwupd-efi, it builds fwupd-efi-generate from git recipe and then fwupd-signed13:48
juliankWe need that :D13:48
apwjuliank, if you look at our -generate packages they are "ancillary" packages built from the signed13:48
juliankapw: I see13:50
juliankapw: But they don't get generated automagically if you upload signed, do they?13:50
juliankI was wondering what launchpad does if you just stuff multiple .dsc into a single changes file13:51
apwjuliank, not magically no, the signed source carries the information to make them, and our bot does the rest.13:51
juliankThis would be super helpful for grub (and fwupd-efi if less regularly :D)13:52
juliankWe really need to align this closer13:52
apwjuliank, lets talk in our coffee meeting, and i can help make that happen13:52
juliankack13:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: klevernotes (plucky-proposed/primary) [1.1.0-1]14:44
=== dviererbe1 is now known as dviererbe
=== fuseteam1 is now known as fuseteam
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted 0ad [amd64] (oracular-proposed) [0.0.26-6ubuntu0.24.10.1]14:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted 0ad [armhf] (oracular-proposed) [0.0.26-6ubuntu0.24.10.1]14:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted 0ad [arm64] (oracular-proposed) [0.0.26-6ubuntu0.24.10.1]14:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cepces (oracular-proposed/universe) [0.3.7-0ubuntu1 => 0.3.7-0ubuntu1.24.10.1] (no packageset)16:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cepces (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.7-0ubuntu1 => 0.3.7-0ubuntu1.24.04.1] (no packageset)16:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: packagekit (oracular-proposed/main) [1.3.0-1 => 1.3.0-1ubuntu1] (core)16:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected packagekit [source] (oracular-proposed) [1.3.0-1ubuntu1]16:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: packagekit (noble-proposed/main) [1.2.8-2build3 => 1.2.8-2ubuntu1] (core)16:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: packagekit (jammy-proposed/main) [1.2.5-2ubuntu2 => 1.2.5-2ubuntu3] (core)16:20
=== fuseteam1 is now known as fuseteam
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjpeg-turbo [i386] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)17:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjpeg-turbo [s390x] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)17:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjpeg-turbo [amd64] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)17:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjpeg-turbo [arm64] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)17:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjpeg-turbo [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)17:32
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjpeg-turbo [armhf] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)17:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjpeg-turbo [riscv64] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)17:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted klevernotes [sync] (plucky-proposed) [1.1.0-1]18:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjpeg-turbo [arm64] (plucky-proposed) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2]18:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjpeg-turbo [i386] (plucky-proposed) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2]18:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjpeg-turbo [riscv64] (plucky-proposed) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2]18:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjpeg-turbo [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2]18:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjpeg-turbo [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2]18:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjpeg-turbo [armhf] (plucky-proposed) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2]18:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjpeg-turbo [s390x] (plucky-proposed) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2]18:16
Eickmeyerubuntu-release: I know somebody is probably working on it with the build failures and all, but did anyone happen to branch ubuntu-imagesfor plucky yet?19:43
vorlonif someone wants to work out a hint for the exiv2 revdeps that are in -proposed and not migrating, this would fix the ubuntustudio build failure...20:24
Eickmeyervorlon: Also affected edubuntu.20:27
* Eickmeyer is juggling a lot today20:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (noble-proposed/main) [1:4.13+dfsg1-4ubuntu3.2 => 1:4.13+dfsg1-4ubuntu3.3] (core, i386-whitelist)20:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [source] (noble-backports) [323-1~bpo24.04.1]21:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (noble-backports) [327-1~bpo24.04.1]21:01
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-podman [source] (noble-backports) [98-1~bpo24.04.1]21:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-libmaas (oracular-proposed/universe) [0.6.8-0ubuntu2 => 0.6.8-0ubuntu2.24.10.1] (no packageset)21:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-libmaas (noble-proposed/universe) [0.6.8-0ubuntu2 => 0.6.8-0ubuntu2.24.04.1] (no packageset)21:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-libmaas (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.6.8-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 0.6.8-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] (no packageset)21:13
* sudip can try a hint for exiv2 revdeps tomorrow if no-one else has done by then. 21:44
dokovorlon: entangled with boost1.83 and openmpi, so may take a while21:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added liblist-moreutils-xs-perl to i386-whitelist in plucky23:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dxvk [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-1] (no packageset)23:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dxvk [armhf] (plucky-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-1] (no packageset)23:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dxvk [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-1] (no packageset)23:33

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!