[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed extra-cmake-modules from i386-whitelist in plucky
[01:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd-app (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.7.12-0ubuntu2~22.04.1 => 1.7.19-0ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset)
[01:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd-app (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7.12-0ubuntu2~20.04.1 => 1.7.19-0ubuntu1~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-version-ranges [arm64] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-version-ranges [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-version-ranges [armhf] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-version-ranges [s390x] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glosstex [arm64] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1] (no packageset)
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glosstex [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1] (no packageset)
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glosstex [armhf] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1] (no packageset)
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glosstex [s390x] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1] (no packageset)
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyvicare [amd64] (plucky-proposed/none) [2.32.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-version-ranges [amd64] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glosstex [amd64] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1] (no packageset)
[06:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-version-ranges [riscv64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[06:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: glosstex [riscv64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1] (no packageset)
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glosstex [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glosstex [armhf] (plucky-proposed) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glosstex [riscv64] (plucky-proposed) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mysql-8.4 [source] (plucky-proposed) [8.4.3-0ubuntu1]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-version-ranges [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-version-ranges [armhf] (plucky-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-version-ranges [riscv64] (plucky-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glosstex [arm64] (plucky-proposed) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glosstex [s390x] (plucky-proposed) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-version-ranges [arm64] (plucky-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-version-ranges [s390x] (plucky-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted glosstex [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed) [0.4.dfsg.1-4.1]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-version-ranges [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed) [0.1.0-1]
[07:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pyvicare [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [2.32.0-1]
[07:14] <toabctl> sru-team: can we move forward with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd-app/+bug/2065423 please? this blocks the public cloud team from releasing EKS Noble images
[07:14] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2065423 in docker.io-app (Ubuntu Noble) "Update AppArmor template to allow confined runc to kill containers" [Undecided, Fix Committed]
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mysql-8.4 [armhf] (plucky-proposed/none) [8.4.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[07:26] <tjaalton> toabctl: lp2040461 is unverified
[07:34] <toabctl> tjaalton, what needs to be verified? noble is verified and I don't see what other series is affected.
[07:44] <tjaalton> this bug isn't
[07:45] <tjaalton> and it's more than just containerd-app, the whole container stack
[07:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-firmware-nvidia-tegra [arm64] (noble-proposed) [36.4.0-20240912212859-0ubuntu1~24.04]
[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-firmware-nvidia-tegra [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [36.4.0-20240912212859-0ubuntu1~22.04]
[07:59] <tjaalton> and it's only 6d old
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mysql-8.4 [s390x] (plucky-proposed/universe) [8.4.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:45] <juliank> ubuntu-archive can somebody reject the fwupd-efi builds in plucky? We want to try copying in the fwupd-efi builds from the build PPA instead like we did in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd-efi/1:1.4-1 - as we just signed those
[09:45] <juliank> CC mkukri ^
[09:46] <juliank> Launchpad rejects copies while the existing builds are in unpublished state but looking back at that build it works once they are rejected
[09:47] <apw> juliank, rejected
[09:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd-efi [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [1:1.7-1]
[09:47] <juliank> Also I guess we could tweak tooling now to auto-accept fwupd-efi; there's no need to block them, signing doesn't happen in the archive anymore - then we can binary copy them to the build PPA for signing as an inverse solution :)
[09:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd-efi [armhf] (plucky-proposed) [1:1.7-1]
[09:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd-efi [arm64] (plucky-proposed) [1:1.7-1]
[09:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupd-efi [riscv64] (plucky-proposed) [1:1.7-1]
[09:47] <juliank> apw: thanks
[09:49] <juliank> Let's see what it says for the copy-package now
[09:50] <juliank> I guess I gotta wait for the publisher run
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mysql-8.4 [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [8.4.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mysql-8.4 [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [8.4.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: mofed-modules-24.10 (plucky-proposed/primary) [24.10.0.7.0.0+ds1-0ubuntu1]
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-tegra-defaults (oracular-proposed/universe) [1.3 => 1.4~24.10] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mysql-8.4 [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [8.4.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:19] <juliank> apw: OK that did not help, I think we need to reject the source too and then that gets copied back in and doesn't conflict
[13:20] <juliank> Still easier than redoing the signing :D
[13:22] <apw> juliank, was it copied into the signing pipeline from the archive copy?
[13:22] <juliank> apw: yeah, source copy from ubuntu to ubuntu-uefi-team/build
[13:23] <apw> juliank, so i would expect you to be able to copy back over it, if it never built
[13:23] <apw> what does it say when you did it.
[13:24] <juliank> apw:  fwupd-efi 1:1.7-1 in plucky (same version has unpublished binaries in the destination archive for Plucky, please wait for them to be published before copying)
[13:24] <juliank> 1:1.4-1 we seemingly rejected at the source package level too
[13:24] <juliank> Looking at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd-efi/1%3A1.4-1/+publishinghistory
[13:25] <juliank> For 1:1.6-1 we failed to figure out what we did there, but I think this should work now
[13:25] <juliank> I don't see a difference otherwise in state between the 1.4 and 1.7 binaries
[13:26] <apw> right, but 1:1.7-1 has already been accepted
[13:26] <apw> so rejecting it has no meaning.
[13:27] <juliank> apw: oh I meant remove it :D
[13:27] <juliank> Then it will copy the same artefact back into the archive and it should stop complaining about having unpublished binaries
[13:27] <apw> we routinely copy in sources already published in the destination to trigger builds
[13:28] <juliank> In an optimal world we'd have the auto syncer sync fwupd-efi directly to the build PPA I suppose
[13:28] <apw> so i don't think it should care
[13:28] <juliank>  Removal requested on 2023-03-10.
[13:28] <juliank> Deleted on 2023-03-10 by Steve Langasek
[13:28] <juliank> Removed in favor of sync from signing ppa
[13:28] <juliank> All I can say is that this seemed to work
[13:28] <apw> ok, will do that and we can see if it helps.
[13:28] <juliank> I think ultimately there is a bug in Launchpad where it considers rejected binaries as waiting for approval
[13:29] <juliank> Whereas to trigger a build is different because there is no build it waits for approval of
[13:31] <apw> that sounds believable.
[13:31] <apw> removed.
[13:32] <juliank> apw: thanks, and it accepted my copy now
[13:32]  * apw gives launchpad the side-eyes
[13:37] <apw> juliank, given fwupd-efi comes from debian and contains no ubuntu signing, why can that not just drop into proposed directly
[13:37] <apw> then you could copy that wiht binaries into the signing pipeline and add a coresponding -signed
[13:38] <apw> and then only copy in the -signed.
[13:42] <juliank> apw: that works too, I think
[13:42] <juliank> apw: Kind of needs an auto-accept bot
[13:42] <juliank> Because all signing tarballs still land in unapproved and it builds them
[13:43] <juliank> But we don't actually sign anymore or rather reject the signed binaries with the old archive key automatically
[13:43] <juliank> So having the binaries go through unapproved is just unnecessary work
[13:43] <apw> juliank, we moved to a "generate" model for all of our signed packages
[13:43] <apw> to avoid this very issue.  and the signing pipeline understands this model.
[13:44] <juliank> apw: how does that work?
[13:45] <apw> juliank, rather than foo producing the signing tarball, we have a third (middle) package which consume foo and produces the custom-binary upload, and signed consumes that in the normal way
[13:45] <apw> and signing knows that generate is only needed through the signing pipeline, and not published out the end.
[13:46] <apw> foo -> foo-generate -> foo-signed
[13:46] <juliank> hmm
[13:47] <juliank> I'd love if the tooling could generate the generate package itself from the Vcs :D
[13:47] <juliank> (and the signed package fwiw)
[13:47] <apw> juliank, we have something to do that too; modelled on the signed-template support
[13:48] <juliank> So you upload fwupd-efi, it builds fwupd-efi-generate from git recipe and then fwupd-signed
[13:48] <juliank> We need that :D
[13:48] <apw> juliank, if you look at our -generate packages they are "ancillary" packages built from the signed
[13:50] <juliank> apw: I see
[13:50] <juliank> apw: But they don't get generated automagically if you upload signed, do they?
[13:51] <juliank> I was wondering what launchpad does if you just stuff multiple .dsc into a single changes file
[13:51] <apw> juliank, not magically no, the signed source carries the information to make them, and our bot does the rest.
[13:52] <juliank> This would be super helpful for grub (and fwupd-efi if less regularly :D)
[13:52] <juliank> We really need to align this closer
[13:52] <apw> juliank, lets talk in our coffee meeting, and i can help make that happen
[13:53] <juliank> ack
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: klevernotes (plucky-proposed/primary) [1.1.0-1]
=== dviererbe1 is now known as dviererbe
=== fuseteam1 is now known as fuseteam
[14:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted 0ad [amd64] (oracular-proposed) [0.0.26-6ubuntu0.24.10.1]
[14:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted 0ad [armhf] (oracular-proposed) [0.0.26-6ubuntu0.24.10.1]
[14:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted 0ad [arm64] (oracular-proposed) [0.0.26-6ubuntu0.24.10.1]
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cepces (oracular-proposed/universe) [0.3.7-0ubuntu1 => 0.3.7-0ubuntu1.24.10.1] (no packageset)
[16:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cepces (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.7-0ubuntu1 => 0.3.7-0ubuntu1.24.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: packagekit (oracular-proposed/main) [1.3.0-1 => 1.3.0-1ubuntu1] (core)
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected packagekit [source] (oracular-proposed) [1.3.0-1ubuntu1]
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: packagekit (noble-proposed/main) [1.2.8-2build3 => 1.2.8-2ubuntu1] (core)
[16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: packagekit (jammy-proposed/main) [1.2.5-2ubuntu2 => 1.2.5-2ubuntu3] (core)
=== fuseteam1 is now known as fuseteam
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjpeg-turbo [i386] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjpeg-turbo [s390x] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjpeg-turbo [amd64] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjpeg-turbo [arm64] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjpeg-turbo [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjpeg-turbo [armhf] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjpeg-turbo [riscv64] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted klevernotes [sync] (plucky-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjpeg-turbo [arm64] (plucky-proposed) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjpeg-turbo [i386] (plucky-proposed) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjpeg-turbo [riscv64] (plucky-proposed) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjpeg-turbo [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjpeg-turbo [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjpeg-turbo [armhf] (plucky-proposed) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjpeg-turbo [s390x] (plucky-proposed) [2.1.5-3ubuntu2]
[19:43] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-release: I know somebody is probably working on it with the build failures and all, but did anyone happen to branch ubuntu-imagesfor plucky yet?
[20:24] <vorlon> if someone wants to work out a hint for the exiv2 revdeps that are in -proposed and not migrating, this would fix the ubuntustudio build failure...
[20:27] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Also affected edubuntu.
[20:27]  * Eickmeyer is juggling a lot today
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (noble-proposed/main) [1:4.13+dfsg1-4ubuntu3.2 => 1:4.13+dfsg1-4ubuntu3.3] (core, i386-whitelist)
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [source] (noble-backports) [323-1~bpo24.04.1]
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (noble-backports) [327-1~bpo24.04.1]
[21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-podman [source] (noble-backports) [98-1~bpo24.04.1]
[21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-libmaas (oracular-proposed/universe) [0.6.8-0ubuntu2 => 0.6.8-0ubuntu2.24.10.1] (no packageset)
[21:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-libmaas (noble-proposed/universe) [0.6.8-0ubuntu2 => 0.6.8-0ubuntu2.24.04.1] (no packageset)
[21:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-libmaas (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.6.8-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 0.6.8-0ubuntu0.22.04.2] (no packageset)
[21:44]  * sudip can try a hint for exiv2 revdeps tomorrow if no-one else has done by then. 
[21:55] <doko> vorlon: entangled with boost1.83 and openmpi, so may take a while
[23:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added liblist-moreutils-xs-perl to i386-whitelist in plucky
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dxvk [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dxvk [armhf] (plucky-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dxvk [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [2.5.1-1] (no packageset)