| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yt-dlp (noble-backports/universe) [2024.09.27-1~bpo24.04.1 => 2024.11.18-1~bpo24.04.1] (no packageset) | 00:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pantalaimon [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [0.10.5-3] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puppet-agent [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [8.10.0-2] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [3.34.13+dfsg-1] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [armhf] (plucky-proposed) [3.34.13+dfsg-1] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted paraview [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [5.13.1+dfsg-9] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [arm64] (plucky-proposed) [3.34.13+dfsg-1] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-mt940 [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [0.6.0-2] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed) [3.34.13+dfsg-1] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [s390x] (plucky-proposed) [3.34.13+dfsg-1] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rocblas [arm64] (plucky-proposed) [5.5.1+dfsg-7] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-broot [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [1.44.2-2] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-broot [armhf] (plucky-proposed) [1.44.2-2] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-broot [riscv64] (plucky-proposed) [1.44.2-2] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vg [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [1.59.0+ds-0.1] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rocblas [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [5.5.1+dfsg-7] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-broot [arm64] (plucky-proposed) [1.44.2-2] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-broot [s390x] (plucky-proposed) [1.44.2-2] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rocblas [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed) [5.5.1+dfsg-7] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted vg [arm64] (plucky-proposed) [1.59.0+ds-0.1] | 01:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-broot [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed) [1.44.2-2] | 01:09 | |
| === hgwbzjezmokhepyv is now known as axpphndmpygoodzy | ||
| === axpphndmpygoodzy is now known as georgiag | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-tools [s390x] (plucky-proposed/universe) [6.7.2-6] (no packageset) | 04:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-tools [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/universe) [6.7.2-6] (no packageset) | 04:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-tools [armhf] (plucky-proposed/universe) [6.7.2-6] (no packageset) | 04:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-tools [arm64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [6.7.2-6] (no packageset) | 04:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-tools [amd64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [6.7.2-6] (no packageset) | 04:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-tools [riscv64] (plucky-proposed/universe) [6.7.2-6] (no packageset) | 07:52 | |
| mkukri | hi ubuntu-sru, i think pillow for noble can be released now | 08:39 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-tools [amd64] (plucky-proposed) [6.7.2-6] | 08:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-tools [armhf] (plucky-proposed) [6.7.2-6] | 08:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-tools [riscv64] (plucky-proposed) [6.7.2-6] | 08:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-tools [arm64] (plucky-proposed) [6.7.2-6] | 08:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-tools [s390x] (plucky-proposed) [6.7.2-6] | 08:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-tools [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed) [6.7.2-6] | 08:57 | |
| === pushkarnk1 is now known as pushkarnk | ||
| zhsj | ubuntu-sru: please remove golang-1.23 from focal new queue, i will follow a toolchain sru rule, to ask someone to do binary copy to focal new queue, from a -security only ppa. | 09:11 |
| zhsj | and the zip sru for noble and oracular is ready to release. | 09:12 |
| mkukri | ubuntu-archive i also have https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-cd/+bug/2086841 | 10:39 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2086841 in cd-boot-images-riscv64 (Ubuntu) "Please remove cd-boot-images-* from plucky" [Undecided, New] | 10:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected golang-1.23 [source] (focal-proposed) [1.23.1-1~20.04] | 11:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dns-root-data (focal-proposed/main) [2023112702~ubuntu0.20.04.1 => 2024071801~ubuntu0.20.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 11:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dns-root-data (jammy-proposed/main) [2023112702~ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 2024071801~ubuntu0.22.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 11:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dns-root-data (noble-proposed/main) [2023112702~willsync1 => 2024071801~ubuntu0.24.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 11:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dns-root-data (oracular-proposed/main) [2024041801 => 2024071801~ubuntu0.24.10.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 11:53 | |
| === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| cpaelzer | mkukri: sorry for my unawareness of this area, but do the changes in https://code.launchpad.net/~mkukri/debian-cd/+git/ubuntu/+merge/476337 need to land somewhere before the old image packages can be removed? | 12:05 |
| cpaelzer | The comments suggest releasing the new grub is enough and https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/2.12-5ubuntu7 is fully in plucky | 12:05 |
| mkukri | it was already deployed on cdimage build machines and apparently the latest plucky images are built without cd-boot-images now | 12:06 |
| cpaelzer | maybe I need to educate myself about these cd-boot-image-* and debian-cd, pointers ewlcome | 12:06 |
| cpaelzer | oh I see mkukri, that is where it needs to land and it did | 12:06 |
| mkukri | and grub needed to land in the archive but both did | 12:06 |
| mkukri | latest images seem to work and mwhudson confirmed that they were built using the new debian-cd | 12:06 |
| cpaelzer | is there any place once can check to see that this landed in the cdimage build machines and a pointer to a log of their last build? | 12:07 |
| mkukri | i dont have info beyond a mattermost thread on the foundations channel, sorry | 12:07 |
| cpaelzer | reading FO203 spec to update myself on this topic ... | 12:08 |
| mkukri | it's a very small spec | 12:08 |
| cpaelzer | I've not found cd-boot-image nor debian-cd in recent foundations channel, I'd appreciate a link to have a look myself | 12:09 |
| mkukri | i dont think he's up at this time, but mwhudson can probably comment on this later | 12:09 |
| cpaelzer | spec is small but still enough to make it TIL for me :-) | 12:10 |
| mkukri | tbf i knew absolutely nothing about any of this before working on this change | 12:11 |
| mkukri | and kind of want to go back to that state :D | 12:12 |
| cpaelzer | understandably | 12:12 |
| cpaelzer | mkukri: that discussion and the spec helped already - I stated on the bug what I'd think we should demonstrate to remove them | 12:17 |
| cpaelzer | mkukri: anyone deeper into the matter can remove them earlier, but otherwise it is still ok as we likely only have to wait until mwhudson is around again | 12:17 |
| mkukri | that sounds good to me. none of this is very urgent just wanted to put it out there | 12:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (jammy-backports/universe) [324-1~bpo22.04.1 => 329-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (oracular-backports/universe) [324-1 => 329-1~bpo24.10.1] (no packageset) | 14:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit (noble-backports/universe) [327-1~bpo24.04.1 => 329-1~bpo24.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-podman (jammy-backports/universe) [94-1~bpo22.04.1 => 99-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-machines (jammy-backports/universe) [319-1~bpo22.04.1 => 324-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-podman (noble-backports/universe) [98-1~bpo24.04.1 => 99-1~bpo24.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-podman (oracular-backports/universe) [94-1 => 99-1~bpo24.10.1] (no packageset) | 14:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-machines (noble-backports/universe) [323-1~bpo24.04.1 => 324-1~bpo24.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cockpit-machines (oracular-backports/universe) [319-1 => 324-1~bpo24.10.1] (no packageset) | 14:34 | |
| mkukri | anyone doing sru shift today, can pillow sru be released? | 15:04 |
| mkukri | (i also have plenty of grub srus to approve) | 15:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: mofed-modules-24.10 (oracular-proposed/primary) [24.10.0.7.0.0+ds1-0ubuntu1~24.10.1] | 15:26 | |
| === dbungert1 is now known as dbungert | ||
| === woky_ is now known as woky__ | ||
| === woky__ is now known as woky_ | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected amazon-ec2-net-utils [source] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-2~ubuntu0.20.04] | 16:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adsys [source] (noble-proposed) [0.14.3~24.04] | 16:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adsys [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.14.3~22.04] | 16:51 | |
| liushuyu | ubuntu-sru: Hi, can any SRU team member take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfsprogs/+bug/2076309 and see if there's something problematic? Because it seems like this SRU bug was not picked up | 17:00 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2076309 in xfsprogs (Ubuntu) "[SRU] xfsprogs missing frame pointer" [Undecided, Confirmed] | 17:00 | |
| ahasenack | liushuyu: for noble? I don't see it in unapproved, nor in proposed | 17:05 |
| ahasenack | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=xfsprogs <-- noble unapproved | 17:06 |
| ahasenack | $ rmadison -asource xfsprogs|grep noble | 17:06 |
| ahasenack | xfsprogs | 6.6.0-1ubuntu2 | noble | source | 17:06 |
| ahasenack | so there is nothing for the sru team to do | 17:06 |
| halves | ubuntu-sru hi! apologies for putting yet another bug on the pile, bug 2081611 seems to have been picked up (and in -proposed) for Noble, but not for Jammy (still in the upload queue). could I request some eyes on this, please? | 17:07 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2081611 in dmidecode (Ubuntu Jammy) "Add processor support from SMBIOS 3.6.0 in Jammy and Noble" [Medium, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2081611 | 17:07 | |
| ahasenack | mfo: are you on shift today? | 17:07 |
| ahasenack | liushuyu: it was rejected on November 14th: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+queue?queue_state=4&queue_text=xfsprogs | 17:09 |
| ahasenack | "Two uploads fixing different bugs (lp #2081163 and #2076309); please coordinate a single upload fixing both." | 17:09 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2081163 in xfsprogs (Ubuntu Noble) "fix fsck.xfs run by different shells when fsck.mode=force is set" [Medium, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2081163 | 17:09 | |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2076309 in xfsprogs (Ubuntu) "[SRU] xfsprogs missing frame pointer" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2076309 | 17:09 | |
| liushuyu | Huh? It was very clear the upload was only fixing LP: #2076309 not #2076309 | 17:11 |
| -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2076309 in xfsprogs (Ubuntu) "[SRU] xfsprogs missing frame pointer" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2076309 | 17:11 | |
| liushuyu | Oh, the complaint was the upload _should_ fixing both | 17:12 |
| ahasenack | I think there was another one in unapproved | 17:13 |
| ahasenack | that was also rejected, for the same reason | 17:13 |
| liushuyu | ahasenack: Okay, I will coordinate with that other upload to merge the two uploads into one | 17:14 |
| liushuyu | * uploader | 17:14 |
| ahasenack | ok | 17:15 |
| liushuyu | ahasenack: I have proposed https://code.launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/ubuntu/+source/xfsprogs/+git/xfsprogs/+merge/477153 for the combined upload. I am unsure if this is the correct way for fixing the upload conflicts | 17:32 |
| ahasenack | liushuyu: if you merged the other fix, sounds ok. I would ask for a review from that other fix's author, though | 17:33 |
| liushuyu | ahasenack: Sounds reasonable, I have now added them as a reviewer on that MP | 17:33 |
| liushuyu | Although they are in the UTC+8 timezone, which means we will need to at least wait for 10 hours | 17:35 |
| mfo | mkukri, ack on pillow | 18:02 |
| mfo | halves, ack on 2081611 | 18:02 |
| mfo | ahasenack, yup, I started later on today's shihft. | 18:03 |
| mfo | liushuyu, I see you also already reached out/started working on the combined SRU for xfsprogs internally. Thanks! | 18:04 |
| falcojr | question about https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-maintainers-handbook/blob/main/VersionStrings.md#version-merging-from-upstream . It says "Represent that there are Ubuntu changes via `ubuntu1`". What exactly does "changes" mean there? If this an upload to devel and there are no Ubuntu changes from upstream (except for packaging), is it correct to | 19:20 |
| falcojr | use `ubuntu1` or `ubuntu0`? | 19:20 |
| jbicha | falcojr: ubuntu1 because the suffix numbering starts from 1 | 19:22 |
| RikMills | falcojr: ubuntu refers to our packaging delta, so yes ubuntu1 | 19:22 |
| falcojr | thanks! | 19:23 |
| holmanb | Followup question about: https://github.com/canonical/ubuntu-maintainers-handbook/blob/main/VersionStrings.md#version-backport-from-upstream . It says "Signal that it was not yet packaged before in this Ubuntu release before via ubuntu0". However, following this advice would cause a stable release version based on a devel upload to be ordered earlier than a devel release version for an SRU of the same upstream release | 19:29 |
| holmanb | version. When (if ever) might it make sense to use ubuntu0? | 19:29 |
| liushuyu | I think if you are packaging something from upstream that Debian does not yet even started packaging that version | 19:31 |
| liushuyu | ... then you can use ubuntu0 to avoid the version number conflicts | 19:31 |
| falcojr | wouldn't the number before 'ubuntu' represent that though? I.e., 0ubuntu1? | 19:33 |
| liushuyu | falcojr: I think they are referring to part of the documentation that deals with backport from upstream to an older LTS release... | 19:36 |
| liushuyu | ... in order to avoid version number sorting higher than a newer Ubuntu release, we use the ubuntu0 trick | 19:36 |
| liushuyu | ... so that when the user is upgrading to a newer Ubuntu release, a newer package from that new Ubuntu release will be installed, instead of keeping the old one | 19:37 |
| falcojr | gotcha, thanks | 19:39 |
| liushuyu | You're welcome! | 19:39 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cloud-init [amd64] (plucky-proposed/main) [24.4-0ubuntu1] (core) | 19:51 | |
| === ebarretto_ is now known as ebarretto | ||
| juliank | falcojr: I think this is awkward, it should say 0ubuntu1 maybe | 20:19 |
| juliank | falcojr: i.e. if we package version 2.0 ahead of debian (2.0-1) ours would e 2.0-0ubuntu1 | 20:19 |
| juliank | 0ubuntu0<something> are SRUs | 20:19 |
| mfo | mkukri, re: pillow, i posted an update/request about the verification, since this seemed to warrant more details, IMHO. | 20:26 |
| mkukri | mfo ill update it tomorrow | 21:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dmidecode [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.3-3ubuntu0.2] | 21:54 | |
| mfo | halves, dmidecode/jammy-proposed done! | 22:00 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [amd64] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.0.2-1] (core) | 23:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [armhf] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.0.2-1] (core) | 23:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [s390x] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.0.2-1] (core) | 23:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pythonmagick [s390x] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.9.19-11] (no packageset) | 23:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [arm64] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.0.2-1] (core) | 23:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-barcode [amd64] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.15.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fwupd [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/main) [2.0.2-1] (core) | 23:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pythonmagick [armhf] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.9.19-11] (no packageset) | 23:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pythonmagick [arm64] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.9.19-11] (no packageset) | 23:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pythonmagick [ppc64el] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.9.19-11] (no packageset) | 23:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pyobjcryst [amd64] (plucky-proposed/none) [2024.2.1-1] (no packageset) | 23:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pythonmagick [amd64] (plucky-proposed/none) [0.9.19-11] (no packageset) | 23:36 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!