| zhsj | could someone retry this https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-1.22/1.22.10-1/+build/29365721 it's flaky test, build succesfully in debian | 08:14 |
|---|---|---|
| adrien | if a package is deleted on an arch and its tests expectedly starts failing, do I need to trigger a migration-reference/0 test or is the removal enough? | 08:43 |
| adrien | hmm, no, forget that question, I misread something | 08:43 |
| sudip | zhsj: retried | 09:14 |
| zhsj | sudip: thanks | 09:14 |
| === voonij is now known as cokpolbb | ||
| sudip | vtk9 build took 1 day, 3 hours, 58 minutes, 32.5 seconds and then failed without a log :( | 14:07 |
| sudip | looking at the gpaw autopkgtest failures, it needs a machine with 4 core. how do I trigger a test to use the large machine? | 18:32 |
| adrien | sudip: I'm preparing a patch instead | 20:18 |
| adrien | 4 cores could be obtained through big_packages | 20:18 |
| adrien | see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration#Openstack_Flavor_Details_for_Architectures | 20:19 |
| sudip | adrien: yes, seen that, but then how did the migration-reference job triggered by tsimonq2_ landed in that type of machine? | 20:19 |
| sudip | so I assumed there will be some undocumented option :) | 20:20 |
| sudip | big_packages list does not have gpaw | 20:21 |
| adrien | that's an interesting question, and I don't have the answer; one possibility is that the behavior is different with the new openmpi and I think I may have seen something like that in some log | 20:22 |
| adrien | basically, does one slot require one CPU, or can you put several slots on the same CPU? (maybe I just wrote something heretical to anyone versed in MPI :) ) | 20:23 |
| adrien | I have an MR almost ready | 20:23 |
| adrien | sudip: https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien/ubuntu/+source/gpaw/+git/gpaw/+merge/477858 | 20:28 |
| === tsimonq2_ is now known as tsimonq2 | ||
| tsimonq2 | sudip: I think there's a hardcoded list in addition to big_packages. I *think*. That's probably a vorlon (or similar) question. | 20:30 |
| sudip | tsimonq2: I think https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs/tree/big_packages?h=main | 20:30 |
| sudip | another list ? | 20:31 |
| tsimonq2 | sudip: My guess is that we're talking hardcoding. | 20:31 |
| tsimonq2 | Oh, and if it's autopkgtests and not Launchpad, paride might know | 20:31 |
| adrien | imho it's debatable that it's a big package; there are quotas for big_packages sadly, that's why I decided to lower the core count rather than try adding it to big_packages | 20:33 |
| sudip | I triggered another migration-reference, if it again goes to large then there is something | 20:33 |
| sudip | ok, so the previous migration_reference did not go to a large machine. if you see the testinfo.json in artifacts, it says "nproc": "2", so something else has changed in openmpi | 21:07 |
| sudip | adrien: parmetis autopkgtest also has the same failure | 21:34 |
| adrien | sudip: good catch, and there's indeed a very suspicious 4 in the tests; I've started testing a patch but I'll go to bed before the results are in | 21:44 |
| adrien | and this time I used nproc actually; I thought it was in a package that may not be installed but it's actually in coreutils (nowadays?) | 21:44 |
| paride | adrien, sudip, tsimonq2: that is strange. If I look at https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-plucky/plucky/amd64/g/gpaw/20241123_192254_230c6@/log.gz I see it ran using the 'autopkgtest' flavor on the lcy02 cloud (you can see this info in the runner/autopkgtest command line, at the very beginning of the log) | 22:28 |
| paride | I tried `autopkgtest flavor show autopkgtest` on that cloud, and: | 22:28 |
| paride | | vcpus | 2 | 22:28 |
| paride | I also tried `nproc` in a VM created using that flavor, and it's 2 again | 22:28 |
| paride | in this PASS run triggered by sudip: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-plucky/plucky/amd64/g/gpaw/20241205_205031_28042@/log.gz | 22:30 |
| paride | openstack failed and made some extra logs visible, including the fact that the flavor has 2 vcpus | 22:31 |
| paride | (the test run was auto-retried after the failure, which is why it eventually passed) | 22:32 |
| paride | so: I don't know, but looks like "gpaw now requires >= 4 cores" is not the whole story | 22:32 |
| === JanC is now known as Guest3359 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!