=== dviererbe1 is now known as dviererbe [10:03] doko: big_packages changes is merged :-) [10:04] I realized that squid-deb-proxy is no longer available in plucky. looks like it got also removed from debian (#1081589) . is there a good replacement for squid-deb-proxy? [10:06] apt-cacher-ng is pretty much it...not that it works well. [10:19] Skia: ta! [10:30] doh! apt-cacher-ng also has issues, and especially with ubuntu you can easily get it stuck [10:30] well, easily: not every day but once a month if you make moderate use of the proxy [10:34] do you have tips on how to unstuck it, while you're here? [10:35] Delete the cache, or aspects of it, restart. Sometimes restart does it. :P [10:35] yeah, okay, nothing more than what I already do :-) [10:54] I don't have better solutions. :/ [10:55] there's a bug report about it on bugs.d.o but the only thing it did was give me bad vibes from apt-cacher-ng maintenance and convince me that rolling your own caching instead of relying on a well-known cacher like squid was probably a bad idea [10:56] I think the way forward would be to get debug symbols for apt-cacher-ng and gdb -p into it when it get stuck but it gets stuck at the worst times by definition [10:56] Mm, OTOH using squid means you have to roll your own rules for cache retention of mutable metadata files, so it's kind of swings and roundabouts [10:58] that's a fair point but IIRC the discussion was about the potential effects of HTTP pipelining which is a non-trivial topic [10:58] especially wrt inter-implementation compliance [11:00] Oh, and I am using an older version because it seemed to suck less? [11:00] 3.7.5+really3.6.4-1vanir1 [11:05] unrelated: I'm preparing a change for python3.12 and update-maintainer says "XSBC-Original is managed by 'rules' file. Doing nothing." which seems fine but then dpkg-source complains that "Version number suggests Ubuntu changes, but Maintainer: does not have Ubuntu address" (dpkg-source is called by sbuild --source); what is the solution there? === gurupras- is now known as guruprasad [17:09] tsimonq2: Do you have a tracking bug for libgit2 1.9 transition somewhere on Launchpad? [17:42] liushuyu: Not at the moment. [17:42] I see [17:43] If you want to create one, go for it :) [17:43] Still haven't heard back from Utkarsh on the bug. [17:43] (Debian-side.) [17:54] tsimonq2: I have created one https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgit2/+bug/2093205 [17:54] -ubottu:#ubuntu-devel- Launchpad bug 2093205 in rustc-1.83 (Ubuntu) "libgit2: libgit2 1.9 update and migration" [Undecided, New] [18:03] liushuyu: Thanks!